Why Loire's UFO Files Became Ordinary
Loire’s UFO record is not a story of one famous, department-defining mystery. It is a smaller, more practical case file: a handful of sightings spread from Roanne and Saint-Chamond to Montbrison, Pralong, Rive-de-Gier and the Forez hills, most of which have been explained or judged too thin to analyse confidently.
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
The most instructive Loire cases are not necessarily the strangest. Roanne in 1976 remains unresolved in the weak sense: a photographed orange circular object was recorded, but GEIPAN classed it C because there was too little reliable information. By contrast, later cases at Saint-Haon-le-Châtel, Saint-Just-Saint-Rambert, Rive-de-Gier, Chalmazel, Montbrison and Pralong show how official re-examination often weakens an original UFO claim by matching it to aircraft, balloons, lanterns, satellites or the International Space Station.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
What the official Loire record actually shows
The French public body most relevant to Loire UFO history is GEIPAN, the group within CNES that collects, analyses and archives reports of unidentified aerospace phenomena. CNES describes GEIPAN as having been created in 1977, with partners including the gendarmerie, police, the Air and Space Force, CNRS and Météo-France; its role is to collect witness accounts, investigate them and publish documented cases for public information.[CNES]cnes.frGEIPAN | CNESGEIPAN | CNES
That framework is important for Loire because many local cases are not folklore items or anonymous internet stories; they are archived reports with dates, locations, classifications and sometimes gendarmerie statements, questionnaires, photographs or investigation notes. GEIPAN’s own national figures also put the Loire pattern in perspective: CNES says 24.6% of phenomena in its database are clearly identified, 39.7% probably identified, 32.4% unidentified for lack of data and only 3.3% unidentified after investigation. Loire’s public pattern is even less mysterious than the national average because the department-level list contains no class D case.[CNES]cnes.frGEIPAN | CNESGEIPAN | CNES[CarteOvni.fr]carteovni.frCarte Ovni.fr OVN I dans le Loire (42) — Carte Ovni.frOVNI dans le Loire (42) — CarteOvni.fr…
GEIPAN’s classification language is easy to misunderstand. A class C case is not a confirmed mystery; it means the observation cannot be analysed properly because the information is insufficient. Class A means the observation has been explained without ambiguity, while class B means GEIPAN regards its explanation as very probable. Class D is reserved for cases still unexplained despite the information available, with D1 and D2 separating medium-consistency strange cases from stronger, more unusual cases.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frbaisse cas dbaisse cas d
This distinction is the key to reading Loire’s UFO history fairly. A report can sound dramatic at first glance, especially if a witness describes silence, acceleration, a dark triangular shape or orange lights. But the official question is narrower: does the report contain enough reliable detail, and does the remaining strangeness survive comparison with known causes such as aircraft, balloons, satellites, lanterns, meteors, optical effects or witness-perception errors? GEIPAN says its method weighs “strangeness” against “consistency”, meaning the unusualness of the observation after testing explanations and the reliability and quantity of the available information.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frmethodologie classification geipanmethodologie classification geipan
The Roanne 1976 case: Loire’s most memorable weak mystery
The Roanne case of 29 March 1976 is the closest Loire has to a classic archival UFO story. GEIPAN records that at 17:10 a witness observed and photographed an orange circular object in the sky. The object was said to move slowly, stop briefly, then depart rapidly on a north-south trajectory, without any sound being heard.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
On the surface, that is exactly the sort of description that enters local UFO memory: a shape, a colour, a photograph, a change of speed and silence. But GEIPAN’s classification is C, not D. The reason is explicit: no other testimony was collected, and the file lacks enough reliable information to reach a firm explanation. In other words, Roanne remains unresolved because the evidence is too incomplete, not because the investigation established a robust unknown craft.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
That makes Roanne useful as a cautionary case. A photograph does not automatically make a UFO report strong if the image cannot be tied to enough contextual data: angle, distance, exposure conditions, independent witnesses, weather, possible aircraft or balloons, and a precise chain of evidence. Later summaries of the Roanne file repeat the same basic lesson: the object was photographed, but the lack of corroborating data prevents a firm conclusion.[OVNI Archive]ovniarchive.comOpen source on ovniarchive.com.
For a department-level history, Roanne matters less as proof of something extraordinary and more as an example of how a local case can sit in the public record for decades without becoming a strong mystery. It is neither convincingly debunked nor convincingly unexplained in the strong GEIPAN sense. It is a thin, intriguing file.
The Roannais aircraft case: when a “triangle” becomes aviation
The Saint-Haon-le-Châtel case of 21 May 2004 is one of the most valuable Loire examples because it shows how an apparently dramatic description can be pulled back towards a conventional explanation. Two witnesses reported points of coloured light outlining a dark triangular mass, with a dull engine noise, as the phenomenon passed low overhead and moved away towards the mountains. GEIPAN classed the case B and identified the likely cause as a light aircraft.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
The details matter. GEIPAN noted the proximity and alignment of Roanne airport, which is approved for night visual flight, the direction of movement towards other airports beyond the mountains, the witnesses’ description of a motor sound, and the presence of red, green and yellow lights consistent with aviation lighting. The case had gaps and contradictions, including missing angle measurements and uncertainty about the exact positions of lights on the object, but those weaknesses did not strengthen the UFO claim; they limited certainty while leaving an aircraft explanation probable.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
This is a recurring issue in UFO interpretation. At night, separate lights can be mentally joined into a larger shape, especially when the body of an aircraft is hard to see. GEIPAN also mentioned micro-movements of the eye as a possible contributor to perceived irregular motion when someone fixes on a point light in darkness. The point is not that the witnesses were dishonest. It is that sincere observation, darkness, movement and expectation can combine into a much stranger mental picture than the source object warrants.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
Saint-Haon-le-Châtel also shows why aviation links matter in Loire. The department is not dominated by a major military UFO narrative, but local airfields, flight paths and night flying can still turn into UFO reports when witnesses see navigation lights without enough context.
Balloons, lanterns and the problem of silent lights
Several Loire cases become much easier to understand once balloons and lanterns are treated as serious explanations rather than afterthoughts. The 25 July 2009 Saint-Just-Saint-Rambert report involved several witnesses seeing a white object travelling silently through a valley, initially with regular speed and height before rising and disappearing. GEIPAN classed it B, judging it a probable balloon, with the witness’s own description allowing for a weather-balloon type object.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
The Montbrison case of 10 April 2022 is even clearer. A witness in a garden saw an object moving slowly, rotating erratically, reflecting sunlight and following a straight south-east to north-west path for more than five minutes, and took phone photographs. GEIPAN classed the case A, identifying it as a very probable Mylar balloon. Its reasoning was practical: metallic colour, intermittent reflection, slow rectilinear movement, rotation, varied possible balloon shapes and drift broadly in the direction of a weak dominant wind.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
The lantern cases are similar. At Rive-de-Gier on 11 May 2013, a witness saw five yellow-orange points moving slowly in the north-east before fading and disappearing. GEIPAN classed the case B, saying the observation was compatible with Thai lanterns released during a Saturday evening celebration and drifting in very light, variable wind.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
At Pralong on 29 July 2023, the report was stronger in one sense because there were two witnesses and a short video. They saw two orange, trapézoid-to-round objects moving away and gaining altitude without sound. GEIPAN classed it A as sky lanterns: the colour, flame-like comparison, lack of noise, movement with the wind and even described “feet” or small circular movements all supported the lantern explanation, even though nearby communes did not know of a lantern release that evening.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
These cases explain a major Loire pattern: silent lights are not automatically strange. Balloons and lanterns can move without engine noise, change apparent shape, rise or drift with wind, reflect sunlight or glow orange, and disappear when they climb, extinguish or become too faint to track.
Satellites over the Forez: strange flashes without strange craft
Loire’s more rural and upland areas add another ingredient: dark skies and skywatchers. The Chalmazel case of 31 August 2013 involved an amateur astronomer observing with two friends when he noticed flashes of white light in the constellation Pegasus between 22:40 and 23:00. GEIPAN classed the case B as a probable misidentification of a very high-altitude satellite rotating rapidly.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
This is an instructive case because the main witness was not simply a casual passer-by. An amateur astronomer may know the sky better than most witnesses, but expertise does not remove ambiguity when a rare-looking light appears briefly. GEIPAN noted that at least seven very high-altitude satellites were present in the observation sector during the time window, and that the issue was not the witness’s eyesight but the interpretation of a short, surprising set of flashes.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
The Noiretable case of 5 July 2010 is another orbital example. Around 00:15, a witness saw a very bright light moving in a straight west-east line from a bedroom window before it disappeared behind the roof. GEIPAN classed the case B as a very probable sighting of the International Space Station, accepting a seven-minute difference between the reported approximate time and the ISS visibility window.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
These two cases are useful because they separate “unfamiliar” from “unidentified”. Satellites can flare, blink, move silently and appear brighter than expected. The International Space Station can be strikingly bright and steady. A witness who sees only part of a pass, without checking orbital data, may reasonably find the sight puzzling.
The class C cases: when “not identified” mostly means “not enough”
Loire’s class C files deserve careful treatment because they are easy to overstate. CarteOvni’s department-level summary lists four class C Loire cases, including Roanne in 1976, Villemontais in 1979, Saint-Chamond in 1983 and La Talaudière in 2023. Class C is not GEIPAN’s strongest mystery category; it is the category for observations that cannot be analysed because the evidence is lacking.[CarteOvni.fr]carteovni.frCarte Ovni.fr OVN I dans le Loire (42) — Carte Ovni.frOVNI dans le Loire (42) — CarteOvni.fr…[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frbaisse cas dbaisse cas d
The La Talaudière case of 1 April 2023 shows the point well. A witness walking back from a supermarket saw a dark, silent, delta-wing-like object with squared front and rear parts moving slowly from south-west to north-east for three or four minutes. GEIPAN considered an object carried by the wind and a drone, but the photo supplied by the witness was unusable, there were no other reports and no additional trace was found despite the urban setting. The case was therefore classed C.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
That is a very different conclusion from “unknown craft over La Talaudière”. GEIPAN explicitly recorded possible ordinary explanations but said the evidence did not allow one to be preferred. Even the drone explanation was complicated rather than impossible: the witness noted no noise and no visible propellers, but road noise could have masked sound and propellers are often not visible in flight.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
For readers, the class C group is best understood as the department’s evidence gap, not its strongest unexplained residue. These cases remain open only in the limited sense that the available material is not good enough to close them.
Is Loire a UFO hotspot?
On the available public evidence, Loire should not be described as a major UFO hotspot. The mapped GEIPAN-derived department page lists 15 cases and no class D cases, with Saint-Chamond the only commune shown with two cases among the listed locations. The cases are scattered across the department rather than concentrated into one sustained, well-documented flap.[CarteOvni.fr]carteovni.frCarte Ovni.fr OVN I dans le Loire (42) — Carte Ovni.frOVNI dans le Loire (42) — CarteOvni.fr…
That does not make the department uninteresting. Loire is a good example of a quieter, more typical UFO landscape: isolated witness reports, many single-witness files, several plausible explanations, a few older weak cases and a modern official record that often resolves sightings after checking weather, aircraft, satellites, balloons and witness details. The interest lies in the investigative pattern, not in a spectacular unresolved incident.
Local media can still shape the folklore. Le Progrès, for example, ran a 2016 local piece asking whether La Talaudière was “UFO land”, noting that residents had reportedly seen UFOs above the commune several times. That type of local press treatment can keep a place-name alive in public memory even when official casework later shows that specific reports are weak, explained or lacking enough information.[Le Progrès]leprogres.frLe Progrès La TalaudièreLe Progrès La Talaudière
The best answer, then, is balanced: Loire has a modest UFO history, but not a strong unresolved UFO tradition. Its public record is most valuable for showing how ordinary aerospace, atmospheric and human-perception factors create reports that feel extraordinary at the time.
How to read a Loire UFO claim responsibly
A Loire UFO report is strongest when it has independent witnesses, precise time and location, photographs or video that actually show the phenomenon, weather and wind data, checks against aircraft and satellite movements, and a clear chain from witness statement to official analysis. It is weaker when there is only one witness, an approximate time, no usable image, no corroboration and no way to reconstruct angles, distance or motion.
The Loire cases show several practical warning signs:<div class="content-enhancement content-enhancement--insight-grid" markdown="1">
- Silence is not decisive. Balloons, lanterns and satellites are silent; distant aircraft can also be hard to hear.
- Orange lights are common in lantern cases. Rive-de-Gier and Pralong both involved orange or yellow-orange lights and were judged likely or certain lantern cases by GEIPAN.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
- Slow, drifting motion often points to windborne objects. Montbrison and Saint-Just-Saint-Rambert both turned on balloon-like motion, reflection, drift or apparent acceleration caused by wind.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
- Night lights can create false structure. Saint-Haon-le-Châtel’s triangular impression was judged probably consistent with a small aircraft, helped by engine noise and aviation-coloured lights.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
- A class C file is not a class D mystery. Roanne and La Talaudière remain insufficiently evidenced, not strongly unexplained.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.</div>
This is why later reporting often weakens the first impression. A witness sees “an object”; the investigation asks whether that object was a balloon, aircraft, lantern, satellite, drone, meteor, optical effect or memory/perception issue. In Loire, the ordinary explanations have usually survived that process better than the extraordinary ones.
Why Loire still matters in French UFO history
Loire matters precisely because it is not dominated by a spectacular national case. It represents the everyday work of French UFO investigation: gendarmerie records, witness questionnaires, technical re-checks, reclassifications and public case files that often end with modest conclusions. CNES says GEIPAN exists to collect and analyse witness accounts and publish documented results; Loire’s file set is a local example of that national system working through routine reports rather than headline-making mysteries.[CNES]cnes.frGEIPAN | CNESGEIPAN | CNES
The department’s record also helps correct two opposite mistakes. The first is credulous: treating every puzzling light as evidence of an extraordinary object. The second is dismissive: assuming witnesses are foolish because their reports are later explained. The Loire cases show something more human. People often report real perceptions of real lights or objects, but the sky contains many unfamiliar-looking ordinary things.
The strongest historical takeaway is therefore not “nothing happened”. Something did happen in each report: someone saw, photographed, filmed or described something they could not identify at the time. The question is what the evidence can still support after investigation. In Loire, the answer is mostly balloons, lanterns, satellites, aircraft, and a small remainder of cases where the evidence simply ran out.
Amazon book picks
Further Reading
Books and field guides related to Why Loire's UFO Files Became Ordinary. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.
The UFO Experience
Closely matches the page's survey of explained and unexplained reports.
eBay marketplace picks
Marketplace Samples
Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.
Endnotes
1.
Source: carteovni.fr
Title: Carte Ovni.fr OVN I dans le Loire (42) — Carte Ovni.fr
Link:https://carteovni.fr/departement/loire
2.
Source: cnes.fr
Title: GEIPAN | CNES
Link:https://cnes.fr/en/projects/geipan
3.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: baisse cas d
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/actualites/baisse-cas-d
4.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: methodologie classification geipan
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/actualites/methodologie-classification-geipan
5.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/sites/default/files/PV%20n%C2%B063%20%281977309108%29.pdf
6.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/sites/default/files/PV%20n%C2%B023%20%281994307750%29.pdf
7.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/en/node/60188
8.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/fr/temoignage/6979
9.
Source: geipan.fr
Title: Compte rendu enquete581
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/sites/default/files/Compte%20rendu%20enquete581.pdf
10.
Source: carteovni.fr
Title: montbrison 2022 0451331
Link:https://carteovni.fr/cas/montbrison-2022-0451331
11.
Source: carteovni.fr
Title: chalmazel 2013 0808552
Link:https://carteovni.fr/cas/chalmazel-2013-0808552
12.
Source: carteovni.fr
Title: pralong 2023 0751459
Link:https://carteovni.fr/cas/pralong-2023-0751459
13.
Source: carteovni.fr
Link:https://carteovni.fr/commune/saint-haon-le-chatel-42
14.
Source: carteovni.fr
Title: saint just saint rambert 42
Link:https://carteovni.fr/commune/saint-just-saint-rambert-42
15.
Source: carteovni.fr
Title: saint just saint rambert 2009 0702490
Link:https://carteovni.fr/cas/saint-just-saint-rambert-2009-0702490
16.
Source: carteovni.fr
Title: roanne 1976 0300294
Link:https://carteovni.fr/cas/roanne-1976-0300294
17.
Source: carteovni.fr
Title: roanne 42
Link:https://carteovni.fr/commune/roanne-42
18.
Source: loire.fr
Link:https://www.loire.fr/upload/docs/application/pdf/lm_58_2007_02_16__10_18_31_596.pdf
19.
Source: loire.fr
Title: mag110 bat
Link:https://www.loire.fr/upload/docs/application/pdf/2015-02/loiremag110_bat.pdf
20.
Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hn2xTieploU
21.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/1976-03-00294
22.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2004-05-01626
23.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/cas/2009-07-02490
24.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/cas/2013-05-08451
25.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/cas/2013-08-08552
26.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2022-04-51331
27.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/cas/2023-07-51459
28.
Source: ovniarchive.com
Link:https://ovniarchive.com/doc/10357?lang=en
29.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/cas/2010-07-02602
30.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/cas/2023-04-51441
31.
Source: leprogres.fr
Title: Le Progrès La Talaudière
Link:https://www.leprogres.fr/loire/2016/08/11/la-talaudiere-terre-d-ovni
32.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/
33.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/en/node/53400?field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date&page=%2C321&sort=desc
34.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: GENDARMERI E NATIONALE
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/PV%20n%C2%B01006%20%282009310238%29.pdf
35.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/Flightradar241.pdf
36.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/1980-08-00791
37.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/Lieu%20observation.pdf
38.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: export cas pub 20251127093552.csv
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/save_json_import_files/export_cas_pub_20251127093552.csv
39.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: methodologie classification geipan
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/actualites/methodologie-classification-geipan
40.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2017-11-50456
41.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: missions methodes et resultat
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/actualites/missions-methodes-et-resultat
42.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/1979-07-00644
43.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/1980-03-00751
44.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/glossaire
45.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/1993-11-01335
46.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2010-10-50728?field_agregation_index_value=c&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation_textuel&page=105&sort=desc
47.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: Compte rendu enquete365
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/Compte%20rendu%20enquete365.pdf
48.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2018-12-50686
49.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/note_tech_11.pdf
50.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/faq-page
51.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: Compte rendu enquete171
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/Compte%20rendu%20enquete171.pdf
52.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/node/58702
53.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/missions-methodes-et-resultats
54.
Source: leprogres.fr
Link:https://www.leprogres.fr/faits-divers-justice/2025/10/13/il-y-a-50-ans-la-traque-d-un-ovni-sur-le-plateau-de-saint-jean-de-nay
55.
Source: leprogres.fr
Link:https://www.leprogres.fr/lyon/2016/02/13/xavier-passot-directeur-du-geipan-face-aux-ovni
56.
Source: leprogres.fr
Title: Archives Le Progrès
Link:https://www.leprogres.fr/archives/2025/04-10
57.
Source: leprogres.fr
Link:https://www.leprogres.fr/loire/2011/01/22/un-ovni-age-de-dix-ans-leo-rispal-ce-soir-sur-tf1-%28la-video%29-video-8
58.
Source: ovniarchive.com
Link:https://ovniarchive.com/pais/francia?lang=en&offset=50
Additional References
59.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Ancient Aliens: 300+”Flying Saucer” Incidents in France
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dcMrAX4zRwo
60.
Source: youtube.com
Title: UFOs: GEIPAN is working on the issue (Toulouse)
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nnOX-NXZFqE
61.
Source: journaldunet.com
Link:https://www.journaldunet.com/magazine/1546833-bp1-ce-site-on-ne-peut-plus-officiel-permet-de-voir-les-signalements-d-ovni-autour-de-chez-vous/
62.
Source: 20minutes.fr
Link:https://www.20minutes.fr/high-tech/sciences/4215259-20260329-demarche-scientifique-comment-enqueteurs-geipan-tentent-expliquer-cas-ovnis-france
63.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/astronophilos/videos/combien-de-civilisations-extraterrestres-dans-notre-galaxie-l%C3%A9quation-de-drake-c/31983628517949901/
64.
Source: instagram.com
Link:https://www.instagram.com/reel/DJWJIYcPk38/
65.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/groups/maybeplanet/posts/958768447790110/
66.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/groups/correze.surprendsnous/posts/2143932562552911/
67.
Source: ubereats.com
Link:https://www.ubereats.com/fr/store/ovni-burger/_BasRsTDQp-11c8dCqW3iA?srsltid=AfmBOoqzwbysmVEL4ReRGPvBkKyvXuAvMZSLtPN2yvWjJJJC37em-62w
68.
Source: nationalgeographic.fr
Link:https://www.nationalgeographic.fr/espace/france-qui-se-cache-derriere-le-geipan-le-bureau-des-ovnis-en-france-etrange-enquetes
Topic Tree
Follow this branch
Related pages 95
- Manche UFOs
- Ariege UFOs
- Correze UFOs
- Dordogne UFOs
- Hautes Pyrenees UFOs
- +90 more in sidebar