Within Oise UFOs

When Oise UFOs Became Ordinary Lights

Many Oise reports became more ordinary after investigation, showing why counting sightings can mislead readers.

On this page

  • The 1979 1980 cluster
  • Moon, Venus, kites and hoaxes
  • Why category C is not strong evidence
Preview for When Oise UFOs Became Ordinary Lights

Introduction

Oise is a useful place to see how UFO reports can become less mysterious once they are checked. Its public record includes cases later attributed to Venus, the Moon, a likely kite, a confirmed hoax, a meteorite re-entry, a probable bolide and several files that remain weak not because they prove anything extraordinary, but because there is too little reliable information to analyse. That matters because a raw sighting count can make the department look more mysterious than the evidence supports: an explained Venus case, a hoax and a category C file should not be weighed in the same way as a genuinely unresolved case. GEIPAN’s own classification system makes this distinction central: category A is explained without ambiguity, B is very probably explained, C is not analysable for lack of information, and D remains unexplained after investigation.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frevolution classification des casevolution classification des casOverview image for Explained Cases

The 1979–1980 cluster shows why “many witnesses” is not enough

The clearest lesson from the late 1970s and early 1980s is that multiple reports can still point to a familiar object. On 5 January 1980, several witnesses in Oise, including people at Ons-en-Bray and Crépy-en-Valois, reported an intense luminous sphere from about 18:30. Witnesses described variation in colour and size, apparent slow motion, silence and, for some, a possible rotating effect. Taken at face value, that sounds like a classic local UFO episode. GEIPAN classed the case A, however, because the directions of observation placed the light in the south-west, the reported disappearance time matched Venus setting at about 19:30, and the planet was especially bright at magnitude -3.8.[Geipan]geipan.frOpen source on geipan.fr.

That case is important for Oise because it undercuts a common misunderstanding: a report does not become strong simply because several people noticed it. Venus is bright enough to draw attention, especially near the horizon where haze, expectation, changing viewing angles and the lack of obvious distance cues can make it seem larger, mobile or strange. The 1980 Oise file is therefore not a mass mystery that later lost its paperwork; it is an official example of a striking-looking observation being brought back to a precise astronomical source.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.

The same period also includes the Beauvais-area case of 14 July 1979, recorded by GEIPAN under Beauvais but tied in the testimony to Le Mesnil-Théribus. Two witnesses saw a rounded, cauldron-like metallic or aluminium-coloured object at an estimated 100–150 metres, moving horizontally from north-east to south-west, oscillating regularly and making no sound. GEIPAN classified the case B and suggested that, given the description and the date, the witnesses had probably seen a kite, noting that many unusual low-altitude objects can be present on 14 July.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.

The contrast between the January 1980 Venus case and the July 1979 kite case is revealing. One looks astronomical; the other looks local, low and human-made. Both began as unusual objects in the sky, but neither requires an exotic explanation once date, direction, motion and context are checked.Explained Cases illustration 1

Moon, Venus, kites and hoaxes

Oise’s explained cases are not all the same kind of mistake. Some are honest astronomical misidentifications, some are likely ordinary objects seen under awkward conditions, and one is a straightforward hoax. Treating them together as “UFO sightings” without their later classification would erase the most useful part of the record.

The Moon case at Le Coudray-Saint-Germer is especially instructive. On 3 September 1984, two and then three young witnesses in a car saw a very bright red-orange low-altitude phenomenon during a night drive between Saint-Aubin-en-Bray, Le Coudray-Saint-Germer and the Sérifontaine area. It seemed to be present at several points along the route, silent, low on the horizon and frightening enough for the witnesses to turn back. GEIPAN’s later re-examination found that the description matched the setting Moon: large, orange-red, low in the south-west, apparently “following” the car during a long observation window, and in the correct direction for the witnesses’ road-based bearings.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.

This is a good reminder that an ordinary source can still produce a powerful experience. The witnesses’ fear does not make the Moon explanation false; rather, it shows how a familiar object can become unfamiliar when seen low on the horizon, from a moving vehicle, after a tiring day, and without the witnesses recognising or mentioning the Moon at the time. GEIPAN’s investigation notes even stress that the apparent “following” effect is typical of distant astronomical objects seen while travelling.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frNotes d'enquete22Notes d'enquete22

The Pont-Sainte-Maxence case of 5 April 1976 is different. The initial story involved a person reporting an object near a sports ground, with smoke, burnt grass and a charred tree stump at the site. The gendarmerie inquiry found that the traces had been caused by firecrackers lit by several people. GEIPAN’s summary adds that the witness later acknowledged not having seen a craft and that object dimensions had apparently been suggested through press involvement. The case is therefore classed A as a hoax.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.

This case matters because it shows why physical traces are not automatically stronger than lights in the sky. Burnt grass and smoke can look more concrete than a distant light, but they still need a chain of evidence. In Pont-Sainte-Maxence, the trace evidence led not to a craft, but to ordinary prank activity and a contaminated story.

Why category C is not strong evidence

Category C is one of the most easily misunderstood parts of the Oise record. It does not mean “mysterious in a strong way”. It means the case cannot be properly analysed because the information is missing, late, imprecise or insufficient. GEIPAN’s classification guidance makes this distinction explicit: category C is for observations that are not analysable for lack of information, while category D is reserved for cases that remain unexplained despite the available evidence.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frevolution classification des casevolution classification des cas

Oise has several examples where the category C label should make readers more cautious, not more excited. Lacroix-Saint-Ouen produced two 1954 files: on 7 October, two people reportedly saw a very bright aluminium-coloured oval object move near the church tower for about a minute; on 8 October, four witnesses saw a luminous circular object moving east-west for only a few seconds. In both cases, GEIPAN notes that the records are brief gendarmerie information sheets and that possible ordinary sources include sunlight on an aircraft, a balloon or a meteor-like event. Both are classed C for lack of information.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.

What these explained and weak cases change about Oise

The department’s record looks different when the cases are sorted by evidential weight. CarteOvni, an independent map built from GEIPAN public data, lists 53 Oise cases, with 14 class A, 18 class B, 19 class C and only 2 class D. The exact interpretation should still rest on the underlying GEIPAN files rather than the map alone, but the distribution captures the broad point: most of the Oise material is either explained, probably explained or too thin to analyse.[CarteOvni.fr]carteovni.frOpen source on carteovni.fr.

That does not make Oise uninteresting. It makes it useful. The department shows how different ordinary pathways can produce “UFO” reports: Venus at the horizon, the setting Moon, a kite-like object on a public-holiday evening, firecrackers and press-amplified traces, atmospheric entries, probable bolides, and old or incomplete testimonies. These cases help readers read the stronger unresolved files more carefully, because they show the filters that any serious claim must pass before it deserves much weight.

The practical takeaway is simple: count classifications, not just sightings. A category A Venus case is evidence for misidentification; a category B kite or bolide case is evidence for a probable ordinary explanation; a category C case is evidence of an evidential gap; and only category D carries the narrower meaning of “unexplained after investigation”. In Oise, that distinction is the difference between a dramatic local UFO catalogue and a more sober history of unusual reports being tested, reduced and, in many cases, made ordinary.

Amazon book picks

Further Reading

Books and field guides related to When Oise UFOs Became Ordinary Lights. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.

eBay marketplace picks

Marketplace Samples

Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.

UsingUSA

Endnotes

1. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: evolution classification des cas
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/actualites/evolution-classification-des-cas

2. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: methodologie classification geipan
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/actualites/methodologie-classification-geipan

3. Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/en/node/48336?field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation&page=145&sort=desc

4. Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/en/node/46700

5. Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/en/node/46701?field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_valu_valu=04-23&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_classification_des_cas&page=%2C547&sort=desc

6. Source: carteovni.fr
Link:https://carteovni.fr/departement/oise

7. Source: carteovni.fr
Title: beauvais 60
Link:https://carteovni.fr/commune/beauvais-60

8. Source: carteovni.fr
Title: Observations OVNI à Oise
Link:https://carteovni.fr/commune/oise-60

9. Source: carteovni.fr
Title: Observations OVNI à Troissereux
Link:https://carteovni.fr/commune/troissereux-60

10. Source: carteovni.fr
Title: morlincourt 1960 0809109
Link:https://carteovni.fr/cas/morlincourt-1960-0809109

11. Source: carteovni.fr
Link:https://carteovni.fr/commune/morlincourt-60

12. Source: carteovni.fr
Title: beauvais 1965 0802422
Link:https://carteovni.fr/cas/beauvais-1965-0802422

13. Source: geipan.fr
Title: Questionnaire technique R219
Link:https://geipan.fr/sites/default/files/Questionnaire%20technique-R219.pdf

14. Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/fr/temoignage/1262

15. Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_date_value=2007-03-01&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=title&page=13&sort=asc

16. Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=2004-04-23&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=title&page=151%2C4&sort=desc

17. Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=Ain&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation&page=1&sort=asc

18. Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=title&page=13&sort=asc

19. Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/en/node/54417?field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=1&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&page=%2C25

20. Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=116&order=field_date_d_observation_textuel&page=160&select-category-export=nothing&sort=desc

21. Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_date_value=2004-04-23&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation&page=2&sort=asc

22. Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation&page=162%2C25&sort=desc

23. Source: youtube.com
Title: Jupiter and Venus’could be mistaken for UFOs’
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P-ymwG9mDhE

<summary>Source snippet</summary><p>GEIPAN: Everything You Need to Know About UFOs and Aerial Phenomena…</p>

24. Source: youtube.com
Title: GEIPAN: Everything You Need to Know About UFOs and Aerial Phenomena
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K-dgmfIOYBE

<summary>Source snippet</summary><p>Jupiter and Venus are being mistaken as UFO…</p>

25. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/en/node/48336

26. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/1979-07-00640

27. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/1984-09-01031

28. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: Notes d’enquete22
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/Notes%20d%27enquete22.pdf

29. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/1976-04-00297

30. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2009-08-02409?order=field_date&page=118&sort=desc&undefined=

31. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2012-05-08274

32. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/1954-10-00015

33. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/1954-10-00016?field_agregation_index_value=Ain&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=title&page=20%2C35&sort=asc

34. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/1998-01-01496?field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B13%5D=13&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation&page=24%2C21&sort=asc

35. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B11%5D=11&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=5%2C37&sort=desc

36. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation&page=146&sort=desc

37. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/save_json_import_files/export_cas_pub_20251127093552.csv

38. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B11%5D=11&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=5%2C18&sort=desc

39. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?customGetLattitude=43.9503570933062&customGetLongitude=-3.31787109375&customGetZoom=5&field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B0%5D=11&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=53.014783245859235&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=34.88593094075317&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=8.920898437500002&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=-15.556640625000002&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=5&sort=desc

40. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?customGetLattitude=43.9503570933062&customGetLongitude=-3.31787109375&customGetZoom=5&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B0%5D=11&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=53.014783245859235&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=34.88593094075317&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=8.920898437500002&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=-15.556640625000002&order=field_departement_textuel&page=38&sort=asc

41. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?customGetLattitude=46.94358292648825&customGetLongitude=4.4989013671875&customGetZoom=7&field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id=All&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=49.11702904077932&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=44.77013681219717&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=7.668457031250001&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=1.329345703125&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&page=51

42. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2005-06-01732

43. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2013-10-08586?order=field_departement_textuel&page=150&sort=asc

44. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/1979-07-00647?order=field_date_d_observation&page=146&sort=desc

45. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: Classification No information is available for this page
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/node/58787

46. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: 21 Questionnaire technique 2025.0001275
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/2025-08/21-Questionnaire%20technique%202025.0001275.pdf

47. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/

48. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: Questionnaire technique R279
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/Questionnaire%20technique-R279.pdf

49. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: Questionnaire technique R275
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/Questionnaire%20technique-R275.pdf

50. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2013-07-50065?field_agregation_index_value=Gard&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_classification_des_cas&page=9%2C23&sort=asc

51. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2005-01-01769?field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=1&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date&page=125&select-category-export=nothing&sort=desc&video=on

52. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%255Bmax%255D=&field_date_d_observation_value%255Bmin%255D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%255Bmax%255D=&field_latitude_value%255Bmin%255D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%255Bmax%255D=&field_longitude_value%255Bmin%255D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_classification_des_cas&page=%2C310&sort=asc

53. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?page=163

54. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=c&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_classification_des_cas&page=3&sort=asc

55. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: Recherche de CASNo information is available for this page
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas

56. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2014-04-50829

57. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2020-11-51136

58. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2005-01-01769?field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=116&order=field_date_d_observation_textuel&page=%2C387&select-category-export=nothing&sort=asc

59. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?customGetLattitude=50.04976591053777&customGetLongitude=1.8017578125000002&customGetZoom=8&field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=51.07246834624619&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=49.027063474829355&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=3.6694335937500004&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=-0.06591796875000001&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=7%2C33&sort=desc

60. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?customGetLattitude=49.98977423589942&customGetLongitude=3.5211181640625004&customGetZoom=8&field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id=All&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=51.01375465718821&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=48.96579381461063&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=5.388793945312501&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=1.6534423828125002&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation&page=%2C45&sort=asc

61. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=116&sort=asc

62. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/Temoignage%20direct-R1.pdf

63. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B12%5D=12&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_classification_des_cas&page=%2C163&sort=asc

64. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas?field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B0%5D=13&order=field_classification_des_cas&page=%2C163&sort=asc

65. Source: cnes.fr
Title: serie ovnis 5 choses savoir geipan
Link:https://cnes.fr/actualites/serie-ovnis-5-choses-savoir-geipan

66. Source: cnes.fr
Link:https://cnes.fr/projets/geipan

Additional References

67. Source: youtube.com
Title: Through Conversations Podcast
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=08Of8uTAZBo&t=3174s

<summary>Source snippet</summary><p>Ex-Pentagon Insider on How UFO's Work and Why the Government is Disclosing Information JRE Clips…</p>

68. Source: youtube.com
Title: Satellites Mistaken for UFOs
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vxk7WQus6ws

<summary>Source snippet</summary><p>UFO mistaken for planet Venus Jupiter and Venus 'could be mistaken for UFOs' The Telegraph…</p>

69. Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/lefigaro/posts/ladministration-trump-a-publi%C3%A9-vendredi-une-premi%C3%A8re-s%C3%A9rie-de-documents-gouverne/1454114836755651/

70. Source: 20minutes.fr
Link:https://www.20minutes.fr/high-tech/sciences/4215259-20260329-demarche-scientifique-comment-enqueteurs-geipan-tentent-expliquer-cas-ovnis-france

71. Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/78actu/posts/dominique-andr%C3%A9-habite-%C3%A0-ecquevilly-yvelines-il-raconte-avoir-vu-un-objet-volant/1431919655443660/

72. Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/ScienceetVieMag/posts/fr%C3%A9d%C3%A9ric-courtade-est-le-directeur-du-geipan-ce-groupe-rattach%C3%A9-au-cnes-enqu%C3%AAte-/872407098372462/

73. Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/Montagne.cantal/posts/dans-le-cantal-lun-des-plus-c%C3%A9l%C3%A8bres-ph%C3%A9nom%C3%A8nes-a%C3%A9rospatiaux-non-identifi%C3%A9s-date/1208265474060539/

74. Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/curieuxlive/posts/les-apparitions-dovnis-un-sujet-trait%C3%A9-plus-s%C3%A9rieusement-quil-ny-para%C3%AEt-et-un-ce/1445804037106827/

75. Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/CNESFrance/posts/ne-dites-plus-ovni-mais-plut%C3%B4t-pan-cest-le-terme-utilis%C3%A9-par-le-geipan-notre-gro/10163463849650301/

76. Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/ancientaliens/posts/will-dr-vallees-incredible-work-soon-lead-to-answers-about-what-has-been-happeni/1165722252247173/

Topic Tree

Follow this branch

Parent topic

Oise UFOs

Related pages 1