What Really Happened in Pas de Calais Skies?
Pas-de-Calais has a modest but revealing place in French UFO history. It is not best understood as a department full of spectacular, well-proven mysteries.
Page outline Jump by section
What the official record says about Pas-de-Calais
The strongest starting point for Pas-de-Calais is the GEIPAN case archive. GEIPAN classifies reports into four broad categories: A for explained without ambiguity, B for a very probable explanation, C for cases that cannot be analysed properly because information is missing, and D for cases left unexplained after investigation. Category D is split into D1 and D2, depending on how strange and how well supported the case is. GEIPAN also says its classifications rest on two measures: the “strangeness” left after known explanations are tested, and the “consistency” of the observation, meaning the amount and reliability of the information gathered.[geipan.fr]geipan.frFA Q | GEIPANFA Q | GEIPAN
Within Pas-de-Calais, the public archive shows an uneven pattern. Some cases are classic old files with missing photographs or brief police records. Others are modern reports with more structured questionnaires, photographs, videos or online checks. GEIPAN’s search results list 1954 Pas-de-Calais cases at Wimereux, Andres-to-Guines and Oye-Plage; later cases at Neuville-Saint-Vaast, Saint-Pol-sur-Ternoise, Arras, Vieille-Eglise, Calais and Longuenesse; and more recent explained or probably explained reports such as Liévin, Outreau, Souchez, Béthune, Avion, Billy-Montigny, Sallaumines and Warlus-to-Dainville.[geipan.fr]geipan.frRecherche de cas | GEIPANRecherche de cas | GEIPAN
This matters because it pushes against two common simplifications. Believers sometimes treat every old sighting as equally mysterious; sceptics sometimes treat every report as too silly to study. The Pas-de-Calais archive supports neither shortcut. It contains one officially unexplained case, several reports where lack of data is the main problem, and many examples where the same broad family of misidentifications recurs: lights in the sky, aircraft seen under unusual lighting, lanterns, balloons, birds, meteors and atmospheric or optical effects.
Why 1954 still matters locally
The autumn 1954 French UFO wave is the historical backdrop for several Pas-de-Calais entries. Nationally, 1954 became famous because local newspapers, police reports and later UFO writers recorded a rush of flying-saucer and “flying cigar” claims across France. The best-known northern case, Marius Dewilde at Quarouble, was in the neighbouring Nord department rather than Pas-de-Calais, but it helps explain the regional media climate: a dramatic railway-side encounter story in September 1954 helped feed public attention to aerial mysteries across northern France.[Complete France]completefrance.comComplete France Flying saucers in France: A history of UFO sightingsComplete France Flying saucers in France: A history of UFO sightings
Pas-de-Calais appears in the official record during this same wave. The department’s most interesting 1954 files are not all equally strong. GEIPAN’s current handling shows three different outcomes: one case at Wimereux is too poorly supported to analyse, one Andres-to-Guines report is probably a meteor, and Oye-Plage is listed as another insufficient-information case in the public case table.[cnes-geipan.fr+2cnes-geipan.fr]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
That spread is important. It suggests the 1954 material should not be treated as one single “wave” of equally persuasive events. Some reports may have involved ordinary astronomical or atmospheric events interpreted through the flying-saucer language of the time. Others are simply too incomplete to resolve. A few remain interesting as historical documents, not because they prove anything exotic, but because they show how quickly witness testimony, press attention and police paperwork could combine into a durable UFO case.
The Wimereux photograph case: intriguing, then weakened by missing evidence
The 2 October 1954 Wimereux case has the kind of detail that catches a reader’s attention: a witness was reportedly preparing to photograph a dolmen at about 4 pm in sunny weather when he saw a very clear elliptical object moving from south-west to north-east. He took two photographs and sent the negatives to the magazine “Radar”. The gendarmerie learned of the story through the press and met the witness only on 15 October. GEIPAN records the case as category C: insufficient reliable information.[cnes-geipan.fr]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
The key weakness is not that photographs were claimed; it is that the photographs are not available in the GEIPAN file now used for analysis. GEIPAN notes that prints were apparently attached only to the first sending of the report, not to the copies available in its archive. A brief GEPAN review in the late 1970s reportedly found that the photographs had not been published in “Radar” and that attempts to find the witness, who would then have been about 58, were unsuccessful. The sighting itself lasted only a few seconds, and the description was too short to test.[cnes-geipan.fr]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
For Pas-de-Calais UFO history, Wimereux is a cautionary case. On the surface it looks stronger than many 1954 reports because it involves claimed photographs. In practice, the missing images make the case weaker, not stronger. Without the negatives, prints, camera details, witness interview depth or a secure chain of custody, the story remains a historical report about a reported photograph, rather than photographic evidence of an unknown object.
Andres to Guines, 21 October 1954: a likely meteor seen by gendarmes
The Andres-to-Guines case is one of the clearer examples of GEIPAN reducing a dramatic report to a probable conventional explanation. On 21 October 1954 at 7.30 pm, two gendarmes saw a very bright luminous trail cross the clear night sky silently and rapidly from north to south. GEIPAN describes it as cone-shaped, with the point forward and the base extended by many sparks. The witnesses reportedly rejected a meteor explanation because of the apparent size and horizontal path, but GEIPAN now classifies the case as B: probably a bolide, meaning a bright meteor or natural meteoroid fragmenting in the atmosphere.[cnes-geipan.fr]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
This is a useful example because it involves trained public officials, not anonymous rumour. Yet trained witnesses can still misjudge unfamiliar sky events. A bright meteor can look enormous, low and horizontal, especially when seen unexpectedly against a dark sky. The Pas-de-Calais lesson is not that official witnesses are unreliable; it is that witness status alone cannot decide a UFO case. Geometry, duration, speed, direction, light behaviour and known natural phenomena all matter.
The case also shows why the word “unidentified” needs care. To the witnesses in 1954, the object was unidentified. To GEIPAN after review, it was probably identified. Both statements can be true at different stages of the evidence trail.
Calais, 1981: a former mystery downgraded after reanalysis
The 9 January 1981 Calais case is one of the most instructive Pas-de-Calais files because it changed status. Three witnesses working in a retirement home saw, around 9 am, an elongated yellow-red or fire-coloured object moving east to west. It seemed very fast, made no noise, was partly hidden by clouds, and the observation lasted three to four minutes. GEIPAN notes that two of the witnesses had seen the same phenomenon the previous day.[cnes-geipan.fr]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
The case had previously been treated as category D, meaning unexplained, but GEIPAN later revisited it and reclassified it as B: probably an aircraft. The explanation is specific rather than dismissive: the observed phenomenon had the characteristics of a high-altitude aircraft contrail lit by the rising sun. GEIPAN also notes a practical investigation problem: the buildings where the witnesses stood were demolished from 2013 onwards, making exact reconstruction of their viewing position impossible.[cnes-geipan.fr]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
This case matters because it shows how later tools and experience can weaken an older UFO claim. GEIPAN explicitly says some old A, B, C or D cases are re-examined to improve conclusions, and that new technical means and investigative experience can produce new remarks or even a change of classification. For readers, Calais is a reminder that “unexplained” is not a permanent verdict when better contextual analysis becomes possible.[cnes-geipan.fr]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
Longuenesse, 1990: the department’s strongest unresolved official case
The most important unresolved Pas-de-Calais case in the GEIPAN archive is Longuenesse, dated 8 September 1990. GEIPAN classifies it as D, with the type described as a strange to very strange phenomenon of medium to strong consistency. The summary refers to an ovoid shape with red and green lights, moving slowly or remaining stationary.[cnes-geipan.fr]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
The description is more substantial than many local reports. GEIPAN says the observation took place over several days and for several hours from around 9.30 pm. The forms were ovoid, with red and green lights, and were seen moving slowly or staying still. Several witnesses were involved, and a National Police patrol also observed the phenomenon. GEIPAN says it could not identify the phenomenon, although it might suggest lasers from a Lille discotheque. The file also notes a possible link to a 17 July observation if the aircraft hypothesis for that earlier case is not correct.[cnes-geipan.fr]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
Longuenesse is therefore the case most likely to interest readers looking for a genuinely unresolved Pas-de-Calais file. Its strengths are multiple witnesses, repeated observation and police involvement. Its weaknesses are also clear: the public summary is brief, the suggested laser possibility remains open, and the file does not provide the kind of decisive instrumental data that would transform a puzzling sighting into a strong physical case.
The fairest assessment is that Longuenesse is unresolved in the official sense, not confirmed in any extraordinary sense. It is a good candidate for a deeper local case page because it contains the ingredients of a serious UFO report — duration, repetition, multiple observers and official attention — while still leaving room for mundane explanations.
Berck, 2010: a striking triangle weakened by late reporting
The 7 October 2010 Berck case sounds, at first, like a classic modern UFO sighting. At 10.45 pm, a witness on the beach with a friend saw a huge triangle outlined by white lights at each corner in a cloudy sky. It appeared over the sea to the west, moved towards the witnesses, passed overhead silently and continued inland. The witnesses were surprised and did not photograph or film it.[geipan.fr]geipan.frOpen source on geipan.fr.
GEIPAN classifies the case as C, not because the story is dull, but because the evidence is too weak. The report was submitted years later, on 17 March 2019, for an observation said to have occurred in 2010. Only one testimony was collected, even though two people were present. GEIPAN judged the strangeness high but the consistency rather low, because the testimony was both single and late.[geipan.fr]geipan.frOpen source on geipan.fr.
The case also shows how memory and later internet research can complicate UFO reporting. GEIPAN notes that the date was eventually recovered with a large degree of confidence from details supplied by the witness. But it also says the delay made verification impossible, including checks of aircraft traffic at Berck-sur-Mer airfield. Some elements suggested possible confusion with a light aircraft on approach. GEIPAN further noted that, during the long gap before reporting, the witness had discussed the subject with the second witness and had searched online, comparing the event with famous cases such as Phoenix in Arizona and Golfech in south-west France.[geipan.fr]geipan.frOpen source on geipan.fr.
Berck is a strong example of the difference between a memorable experience and a strong case file. A witness may sincerely remember a life-changing event; investigators still need prompt reporting, independent testimony, time, direction, weather, aircraft records and original photographs or video.
Recurring explanations in the department
Pas-de-Calais cases repeatedly show the same pattern found in wider UFO archives: unusual sky events are often ordinary things seen under poor viewing conditions, emotional surprise or misleading lighting. GEIPAN’s Pas-de-Calais listings include likely or confirmed lanterns at Souchez, Béthune, Liévin and Calais; aircraft or airliner explanations at Calais, Marck, Outreau and the wider departmental 17 July 1990 case; a bolide for Andres-to-Guines; a laser at Hulluch and Le Portel; a bird at Tatinghem and Sallaumines; a star at Sainte-Catherine; debris at Bruay-la-Buissière; lightning at Avion; and a Mylar balloon between Warlus and Dainville.[geipan.fr+2geipan.fr]geipan.frRecherche de cas | GEIPANRecherche de cas | GEIPAN
The 2021 Warlus-to-Dainville case is especially useful because it explains how a mundane object can look manoeuvrable. The witness saw a light in clouds, then two superposed grey spheres whose path seemed to change abruptly and accelerate. GEIPAN judged it an A case: a novelty Mylar balloon carried by the wind. The apparent turns were probably caused by the balloon rotating and changing brightness, creating the impression of moving away and then coming closer.[geipan.fr]geipan.frOpen source on geipan.fr.
That explanation is valuable beyond one case. Many UFO reports hinge on perceived motion: a light seems to stop, turn, accelerate, approach or vanish. But perceived motion can be produced by changes in brightness, cloud cover, loss of contrast, observer movement, wind drift, aircraft angle, or a lantern or balloon rotating. The Pas-de-Calais archive gives concrete local examples of that mechanism rather than asking readers simply to accept a generic sceptical claim.
Aviation, coast and border geography
Pas-de-Calais is well placed for ambiguous sky reports. It has a Channel coastline, ferry and port traffic, local airfields, cross-Channel routes, aircraft approaches, inland towns, open rural areas and weather that often includes cloud layers, haze and changing visibility. That does not explain every report, but it helps explain why aircraft, contrails, lights over the sea and objects seen near the horizon recur in the archive.
The Calais 1981 case is the cleanest example of aviation and lighting combining into a UFO-like report: an elongated “fire”-coloured silent object at dawn was later judged probably to be a high-altitude aircraft contrail lit by the rising sun. The Berck case also shows how proximity to an airfield matters, because GEIPAN specifically noted that the late report made it impossible to verify traffic around Berck-sur-Mer airfield, even though some details evoked a possible light aircraft on approach.[cnes-geipan.fr]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
This does not mean “it was always a plane”. It means the local environment supplies several recurring candidate explanations that investigators must test before treating a report as anomalous. In Pas-de-Calais, the most persuasive cases are those that survive that testing; the weakest are those where the data needed for testing were never collected.
How to read Pas-de-Calais UFO cases fairly
A balanced reading of Pas-de-Calais requires three distinctions.
First, a category C case is not a hidden category D case. It means the report cannot be properly analysed because information is missing. Wimereux and Berck are both interesting stories, but each is limited by missing or late evidence. GEIPAN’s C classification is not a debunking verdict; it is a warning that the case file cannot carry much evidential weight.[cnes-geipan.fr]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
Second, category B does not mean “nothing happened”. It means something probably happened, but the retained explanation is likely. The Andres-to-Guines gendarmes probably saw a bright bolide; the Calais witnesses probably saw a sunlit aircraft contrail. Those are still real observations, but not strong evidence for an unknown craft.[cnes-geipan.fr]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
Third, category D deserves attention but not exaggeration. Longuenesse is officially unresolved and has stronger features than many local cases. But unresolved does not mean extraterrestrial, military, paranormal or proven exotic. It means that, with the evidence available, GEIPAN did not identify the phenomenon after considering ordinary possibilities.[cnes-geipan.fr]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
The department’s place in French UFO history
Pas-de-Calais is not one of France’s headline UFO departments in the way that some famous national cases dominate public memory. Its importance is quieter. It offers a compact cross-section of French UFO investigation: 1954 wave material, a photograph claim undermined by missing images, official witnesses whose report became a meteor case, an old Calais mystery reclassified as aircraft-related, a modern triangle weakened by delayed testimony, and one notable unresolved Longuenesse file.
For a public-facing department history, the best evidence-led framing is therefore not “Pas-de-Calais: land of unexplained craft”. It is “Pas-de-Calais: a department where UFO stories become test cases for evidence”. The archive rewards careful reading. It shows how witness sincerity, press memory, official paperwork, astronomy, aviation, weather, delay and data quality all shape the final judgement.
The most defensible takeaway is simple: Pas-de-Calais has a real UFO history, but it is a history of reports and investigations rather than confirmed extraordinary events. Longuenesse remains the standout unresolved case; Wimereux and Berck remain memorable but weakly supported; Andres-to-Guines and Calais show how later analysis can point to ordinary sky phenomena; and recent GEIPAN cases show that many strange-looking local sightings become understandable once balloons, lanterns, aircraft, birds, debris and lighting effects are checked.<section class="further-reading-section" data-page-toc-exclude aria-labelledby="further-reading-title"><div class="fr-section-shell"><div class="fr-section-header"><div class="fr-section-heading"><p class="fr-section-kicker">Amazon book picks</p><h3 class="fr-heading" id="further-reading-title">Further Reading</h3></div><p class="fr-intro">Books and field guides related to What Really Happened in Pas de Calais Skies?. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.</p></div><div class="fr-books-grid"><article class="fr-book-card">Book<div class="fr-book-info"><h4 class="fr-book-title">UFOs</h4><p class="fr-book-author">By Leslie Kean</p><p class="fr-book-desc">Matches the page's focus on weighing evidence and official investigations.</p><div class="fr-book-actions">
See on Amazon</div></div></article><article class="fr-book-card">Book
<div class="fr-book-info"><h4 class="fr-book-title">Passport to Magonia</h4><p class="fr-book-author">By Jacques Vallee</p><p class="fr-book-desc">Places French and European UFO reports into a broader historical context.</p><div class="fr-book-actions">
See on Amazon</div></div></article><article class="fr-book-card">Book
<div class="fr-book-info"><h4 class="fr-book-title">The UFO Experience</h4><p class="fr-book-author">By Joseph Allen Hynek</p><p class="fr-book-desc">Explains case evaluation and classification approaches similar to official archives.</p><div class="fr-book-actions">
See on Amazon</div></div></article><article class="fr-book-card">Book
<div class="fr-book-info"><h4 class="fr-book-title">The Report on Unidentified Flying Objects</h4><p class="fr-book-author">By Edward J. Ruppelt</p><p class="fr-book-desc">Useful for understanding how official case files are assessed.</p><div class="fr-book-actions">
See on Amazon</div></div></article></div><div class="fr-section-footer"><div class="fr-browse-links" aria-label="Browse more on Amazon">Browse more on Amazon:UFOsPassport to MagoniaThe UFO Experience</div><p class="fr-disclosure">As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.</p></div></div></section><section class="further-reading-section" data-page-toc-exclude data-ebay-localized-links data-ebay-visual-market="EBAY_GB" aria-labelledby="merchant-block-title"><div class="fr-section-shell"><div class="fr-section-header"><div class="fr-section-heading"><p class="fr-section-kicker">eBay marketplace picks</p><h3 class="fr-heading" id="merchant-block-title">Marketplace Samples</h3></div><p class="fr-intro">Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.</p><div class="fr-ebay-market-toolbar"><div class="fr-ebay-market-picker">UsingUSA<div class="fr-ebay-market-menu" data-ebay-market-menu role="listbox" hidden></div></div></div></div><div class="fr-ebay-market-panel" data-ebay-market-panel="EBAY_GB" data-ebay-market-default="1"><div class="fr-books-grid"><article class="fr-book-card">
<div class="fr-book-info"><p class="fr-book-kicker">Example eBay listing</p><h4 class="fr-book-title">Green Alien Figurine 24cm Tall + Ornate Skull Stand– Sci-Fi Collectible UkSeller</h4>SearcheBay.co.uk: alien collectible<div class="fr-book-actions">
Browse similar oneBay.co.uk</div></div></article><article class="fr-book-card">
<div class="fr-book-info"><p class="fr-book-kicker">Example eBay listing</p><h4 class="fr-book-title">Area 51 Alien Collectible 13cm 3D Printed Statue Model Action Figure Toy Horror</h4>SearcheBay.co.uk: alien collectible<div class="fr-book-actions">
Browse similar oneBay.co.uk</div></div></article></div><div class="fr-section-footer">
Browse more oneBay.co.uk<p class="fr-disclosure">Example items shown for inspiration; availability and pricing can change. Branchoria may earn a commission if you purchase through outbound eBay links.</p></div></div></div></section>
Endnotes
1.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: Mission & Geipan | GEIPAN
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/missions-methodes-et-resultats
2.
Source: geipan.fr
Title: FA Q | GEIPAN
Link:https://geipan.fr/fr/faq-page
3.
Source: geipan.fr
Title: Recherche de cas | GEIPAN
Link:https://geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?amp=&field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=43%2C0&sort=desc
4.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=116&order=field_departement_textuel&page=121&select-category-export=nothing&sort=asc
5.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/1954-10-09216
6.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/1954-10-00024
7.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/1981-01-00850
8.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/1990-09-01214
9.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/fr/cas/2010-10-50728
10.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B12%5D=12&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=48&sort=asc
11.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/en/node/60326?field_date_value=2020-11-18&field_is_new_value=1&order=field_classification_des_cas&page=8&sort=desc
12.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/fr/cas/1979-09-00661
13.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/fr/cas/1963-11-01791
14.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/fr/temoignage/10148
15.
Source: geipan.fr
Title: Questionnaire terre R315
Link:https://geipan.fr/sites/default/files/Questionnaire%20terre-R315.pdf
16.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/en/node/57968
17.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/sites/default/files/note_poher_1977.pdf
18.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/fr/temoignage/9213
19.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/fr/cas/1954-10-09216
20.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas?field_agregation_index_value=Berck
21.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/fr/cas/1981-01-00850?field_date_value=2007-03-01&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=title&page=23&sort=asc
22.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field=&order=field_departement_textuel&page=43&sort=desc
23.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/fr/cas/2022-01-51297
24.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/en/node/54828
25.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?customGetLattitude=49.98977423589942&customGetLongitude=3.5211181640625004&customGetZoom=8&field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id=All&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=51.01375465718821&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=48.96579381461063&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=5.388793945312501&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=1.6534423828125002&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=12&sort=asc
26.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/fr/cas/1980-12-00842
27.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?order=field_departement_textuel&page=123&sort=asc&undefined=
28.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/fr/cas/1976-01-00283
29.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?customGetLattitude=49.98977423589942&customGetLongitude=3.5211181640625004&customGetZoom=8&field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id=All&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=51.01375465718821&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=48.96579381461063&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=5.388793945312501&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=1.6534423828125002&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=5&sort=desc
30.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/fr/cas/2007-09-01795?amp=&field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation&page=64&sort=asc
31.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/fr/cas/2022-03-51336
32.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/fr/cas/2004-08-01627?field_date_value=2004-04-23&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=title&page=21&sort=desc
33.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/en/search/cas?page=%2C100&undefined=
34.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation&page=1&select-category-export=nothing&sort=asc
35.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B12%5D=12&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B13%5D=13&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B14%5D=14&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B15%5D=15&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B16%5D=16&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=1&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_classification_des_cas&page=64&select-category-export=nothing&sort=asc&video=on
36.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/fr/temoignage/68
37.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B0%5D=12&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation&page=64&sort=desc
38.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas?field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B0%5D=13&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B1%5D=14&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=%2C178&select-category-export=nothing&sort=desc
39.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B14%5D=14&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date&page=%2C4&sort=asc
40.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/
41.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/en/what-did-i-see/step-1
42.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/fr/cas/1993-11-01335
43.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/fr/cas/1980-03-00751
44.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/sites/default/files/Compte%20rendu%20enquete22.pdf
45.
Source: geipan.fr
Title: Compte rendu enquete46
Link:https://geipan.fr/sites/default/files/Compte%20rendu%20enquete46.pdf
46.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/index.php/fr/plan-du-site
47.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/sites/default/files/Compte%20rendu%20enquete386.pdf
48.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/fr/cas/1979-07-00644
49.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/fr/cas/1997-09-01479?field_is_revisited_value=1&page=2%2C17
50.
Source: geipan.fr
Title: Compte rendu enquete805
Link:https://geipan.fr/sites/default/files/Compte%20rendu%20enquete805.pdf
51.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/
52.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: export cas pub 20251127093552.csv
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/save_json_import_files/export_cas_pub_20251127093552.csv
53.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/en/search/cas?field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=116&order=field_departement_textuel&page=%2C409&select-category-export=nothing&sort=asc
54.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?customGetLattitude=49.42700809484137&customGetLongitude=-0.9608752280473711&customGetZoom=7&field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=51.49757451349519&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=47.35644167618756&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=2.2526257485151295&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=-4.174376204609872&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation&page=%2C33&sort=asc
55.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=116&order=title&page=93&select-category-export=nothing&sort=desc
56.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas?field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B11%5D=11&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B12%5D=12&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B13%5D=13&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B14%5D=14&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=1&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation_textuel&page=%2C532&select-category-export=nothing&sort=asc&video=on
57.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/node/58791
58.
Source: cnes.fr
Title: serie ovnis 5 choses savoir geipan
Link:https://cnes.fr/actualites/serie-ovnis-5-choses-savoir-geipan
59.
Source: cnes.fr
Link:https://cnes.fr/en/projects/geipan
60.
Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hn2xTieploU
61.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Geipan: France is also interested in UFOs
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OLXDikL331Y
62.
Source: completefrance.com
Title: Complete France Flying saucers in France: A history of UFO sightings
Link:https://www.completefrance.com/travel/flying-saucers-in-france-a-history-of-ufo-sightings/
63.
Source: zfilesuap.com
Link:https://zfilesuap.com/en/sightings
64.
Source: Wikipedia
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GEIPAN
65.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Marius Dewilde
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marius_Dewilde
66.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Marius Dewilde
Link:https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marius_Dewilde
67.
Source: uapedia.ai
Link:https://uapedia.ai/wiki/geipan-frances-official-uap-unit/
68.
Source: newspaceeconomy.ca
Title: GEIPA N: Frances UAP Investigation Unit
Link:https://newspaceeconomy.ca/2025/07/29/geipan-frances-uap-investigation-unit/
69.
Source: uap-knowledge-graph.onrender.com
Link:https://uap-knowledge-graph.onrender.com/uap_deploy/events?_facet=obs_anti_gravity&_facet=obs_sudden_accel&_sort=canonical_id&obs_sudden_accel=0
Additional References
70.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Meeting France’s UFO detectives • FRANCE 24 English
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zczcBLukQ6s
71.
Source: youtube.com
Title: UFO hoax fools several French media • FRANCE 24 English
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t1KQQB2GDLU
72.
Source: 20minutes.fr
Link:https://www.20minutes.fr/high-tech/sciences/4215259-20260329-demarche-scientifique-comment-enqueteurs-geipan-tentent-expliquer-cas-ovnis-france
73.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/France3Occitanie/posts/comment-fonctionne-le-geipan-le-groupe-d%C3%A9tudes-et-dinformations-sur-les-ph%C3%A9nom%C3%A8n/971177045625594/
74.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/FRANCE24.English/posts/-franceinfocus-is-there-anybody-out-there-in-france-an-organisation-exists-whose/860539629578748/
75.
Source: thegoodlifefrance.com
Link:https://thegoodlifefrance.com/france-bans-ufos/
76.
Source: reddit.com
Link:https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1cc1tve/the_debrief_the_new_director_of_geipan_frances/
77.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/groups/spacehipsters/posts/1608218192556391/
78.
Source: facebook.com
Title: en 1954 dans le nord à quarouble marius dewilde en est persuadé il a vu des ovni
Link:https://www.facebook.com/francetvslash/posts/en-1954-dans-le-nord-%C3%A0-quarouble-marius-dewilde-en-est-persuad%C3%A9-il-a-vu-des-ovni/1363324055234228/
79.
Source: facebook.com
Title: septembre 1954 marius dewilde prétend avoir croisé une soucoupe volante dans son
Link:https://www.facebook.com/RFfrancebleunord/posts/septembre-1954-marius-dewilde-pr%C3%A9tend-avoir-crois%C3%A9-une-soucoupe-volante-dans-son/1137021715090915/
Topic Tree
Follow this branch
Related pages 95
- Manche UFOs
- Ariege UFOs
- Correze UFOs
- Dordogne UFOs
- Hautes Pyrenees UFOs
- +90 more in sidebar