Within Loire UFOs
How Loire UFOs Became Balloons and Aircraft
Many Loire reports became less mysterious when aircraft, balloons, lanterns, satellites and the ISS were checked against witness accounts.
On this page
- Aircraft lights and night perception
- Balloons, lanterns and silent movement
- Why explanations often arrive after re checking
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
Loire’s explained UFO cases show a simple pattern: many reports became less mysterious when investigators checked the sighting against ordinary sky traffic, wind, lighting, timing and witness perception. In the public GEIPAN record, the strongest explained examples in the department are not exotic craft but familiar causes: a Mylar balloon at Montbrison, sky lanterns at Rive-de-Gier and Pralong, the International Space Station over Noirétable, a satellite at Chalmazel, a likely light aircraft near Saint-Haon-le-Châtel, and even the star Antares at Saint-Chamond. GEIPAN’s own method matters here because it does not ask whether a witness was sincere; it asks whether the reported oddness survives comparison with known causes, and whether the information is strong enough to analyse.[GEIPAN+4GEIPAN+4GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frGEIPANMONTBRISON (42) 10.04.202212 Apr 2022 — - "forme parallélépipédique": les ballons mylar peuvent avoir des formes très diverses. Le…
That makes this part of Loire’s UFO history less spectacular but more useful. The department is not best understood as a reservoir of hard unexplained cases. It is a compact example of how ordinary lights can look strange when seen briefly, at night, from a single viewpoint, with uncertain distance and little context.
Why “explained” does not mean “the witness invented it”
GEIPAN, the French public group within CNES that collects, analyses and publishes reports of unidentified aerospace phenomena, was created in 1977 and works with partners including the gendarmerie, police, the Air and Space Force, CNRS and Météo-France. Its public role is not only to preserve unusual reports, but also to show how they were assessed.[CNES]cnes.frOpen source on cnes.fr.
The key point for Loire is classification. GEIPAN’s category A means an observation has been explained without ambiguity; category B means the retained explanation is considered very probable; category C means the case cannot be analysed properly because information is missing; and category D is reserved for cases still unexplained despite the available evidence. Since 2008, GEIPAN has also used a more detailed method based on two ideas: the residual strangeness of the report after known explanations are tested, and the consistency of the available information.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frevolution classification des casevolution classification des cas
This distinction protects both sides of the discussion. A Loire witness may accurately report what they saw: an orange object, a silent moving light, a bright point crossing the sky, or coloured lights at night. The explanation can still be ordinary if the object’s movement, colour, duration and direction match a balloon, lantern, satellite, aircraft or star. Conversely, a dramatic description does not become strong evidence if the report lacks angle measurements, independent witnesses, reliable timing or enough location detail.
Aircraft lights and night perception
The Saint-Haon-le-Châtel case of 21 May 2004 is one of the clearest Loire examples of an apparently puzzling night sighting becoming a probable aviation mistake. GEIPAN classified it B, with the phenomenon listed as a tourist aircraft. The investigation noted several key factors: the observation lay near and in the axis of Roanne airport, which was approved for night visual flight rules; the reported movement was towards other airfields beyond the mountain; the witnesses perceived an engine noise similar to an aircraft or helicopter; and the colours reported — red, green and yellow — were compatible with aviation lighting.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
This matters because many night aircraft sightings are not recognised as aircraft by casual observers. A small plane seen head-on or at an angle may seem to hover. Navigation lights can appear separated from the body of the aircraft. Changes in heading can look like sudden changes in speed. If cloud, terrain or buildings hide part of the track, a normal flight path can feel discontinuous.
Loire is also not an empty sky. The department has several aviation sites, including Saint-Étienne-Bouthéon, Roanne-Renaison, Feurs-Chambéon, Saint-Galmier and Saint-Chamond-L’Horme. A local airport profile for Saint-Étienne describes business aviation, charter and aviation services, while an aerodrome directory lists five airports or aerodromes in the department.[Aéroport de Saint-Étienne Loire]saint-etienne.aeroport.frOpen source on aeroport.fr.
That does not mean every Loire light is an aircraft. It means that aircraft must be checked before a report is treated as exceptional. The Saint-Haon-le-Châtel case shows the investigative logic: not “it was probably a plane because planes exist”, but “the reported colour pattern, noise, direction and local aviation context fit a plausible aircraft hypothesis better than an unknown object”.
Balloons, lanterns and silent movement
The most striking recent explained Loire cases involve objects that move quietly with the air. They can look deliberate because they drift smoothly. They can look structured because they have unusual shapes. They can look uncanny because the observer has no reliable way to judge distance or size.
Montbrison on 10 April 2022 is a good example. GEIPAN classified the case A and identified the phenomenon as a Mylar balloon. The reported object had a slow, regular, straight movement, with rotation on itself; the movement broadly matched the dominant wind direction, and the wind was very light, around 5 km/h. GEIPAN also noted that Mylar balloons can have very varied shapes, which matters because the witness described a block-like or parallelepiped form.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frGEIPANMONTBRISON (42) 10.04.202212 Apr 2022 — - "forme parallélépipédique": les ballons mylar peuvent avoir des formes très diverses. Le…
The lesson is that a shape description can mislead. A shiny or shaped balloon is not a simple round dot in the sky. It can flash, tumble, darken, brighten, or briefly resemble a geometric object. If it is close enough to show form but far enough to remove scale, the witness may describe something solid and purposeful even though the motion is just wind-driven.
Sky lanterns create a different but equally common confusion. Rive-de-Gier on 11 May 2013 was classified B by GEIPAN as a probable observation of Thai lanterns after witnesses reported orange luminous points moving through the sky.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr. Pralong on 29 July 2023 was classified A as sky lanterns after two orange trapezoid-shaped objects were observed moving horizontally, then appearing to move away to the south-east while gaining altitude; the file included a short video and witness questionnaires.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frGEIPANPRALONG (42) 29.07.202322 Oct 2024 — Observation du passage de deux PAN de forme trapézoïdale de couleur orangé dans le ciel: obse…
These cases are important because lantern reports often sound more organised than they are. A small group of lanterns can seem to maintain formation. Their orange colour can suggest fire or propulsion. Their silence can feel suspicious, especially if the witness expects an aircraft to make noise. Yet the same features — orange glow, slow drift, no engine sound, gradual climb or fade — are exactly why lanterns have become a recurring modern source of UFO reports. GEIPAN has itself described the rise of ordinary or simple cases, including Thai lanterns and photographic anomalies, as one reason the proportion of hard unexplained cases has fallen.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frbaisse cas dbaisse cas d
Satellites, the ISS and bright stars
Not all Loire mistakes involve objects in the lower atmosphere. Some come from above it.
At Noirétable during the night of 4 to 5 July 2010, a witness saw a very bright light moving in a straight west-east line before it disappeared behind the roof. GEIPAN classified the case B and identified the International Space Station as the likely explanation. The file is especially instructive because the reported time was not exact: the ISS was visible from the location from about 00:23, while the witness gave a time around 00:15, and GEIPAN considered the seven-minute difference acceptable because the witness’s own timing was approximate.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
That is a small detail with a large implication. UFO reports are often treated as if the witness’s timing were exact, but ordinary observation rarely works that way. A person glancing at a clock before or after an event may be several minutes out. For satellites and the ISS, that margin can decide whether a sighting appears impossible or becomes a close match.
Chalmazel on 31 August 2013 was also classed B, with the phenomenon listed as a satellite. The public database summary records one witness and a probable identification rather than a firm unexplained event.[Geipan]geipan.frOpen source on geipan.fr.
Saint-Chamond in 1998 shows an even simpler category of sky mistake: a celestial object. GEIPAN lists the 13 August 1998 case as category A, with Antares as the identified phenomenon.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr. Bright stars and planets can be surprisingly deceptive when seen low on the horizon, through haze, from a moving vehicle, or against drifting cloud. They may appear to flicker, change colour, pulse or move slightly, even when the source is fixed.
For Loire, these cases matter because they widen the idea of “ordinary”. The ordinary explanation is not always a plane or balloon. It may be orbital motion, a bright star, or a timing error that made a satellite pass look stranger than it was.
Why explanations often arrive after re-checking
Most explained Loire cases did not become clear from the witness description alone. They became clearer after re-checking: weather, wind, aircraft context, astronomical possibilities, timing, direction, colour and movement. GEIPAN’s classification method explicitly requires the search for hypotheses that can explain the observation “in all its strangeness” as perceived by the witness, followed by an assessment of how probable those hypotheses are.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frmethodologie classification geipanmethodologie classification geipan
The Loire files show three recurring reasons why the first impression can be misleading.
Distance is hard to judge in the sky. A small nearby balloon may be read as a larger distant craft. A lantern may seem higher or faster than it is. A satellite may seem to be within the atmosphere because there are no visual cues for altitude.
Silence is not automatically strange. Balloons, lanterns, stars and satellites are silent. Distant aircraft can also be inaudible, especially if wind, terrain or urban noise masks the sound. A silent moving light is therefore not, by itself, strong evidence of anything exotic.
Single-witness timing is often approximate. The Noirétable ISS case shows how a few minutes can matter. The Roanne 1976 case, although not explained, shows the other side of the same problem: a photograph and a vivid account are still weak if there are no other witnesses and not enough contextual information to test the claim fully. GEIPAN classified Roanne C because the file lacked sufficient reliable information, not because it established a robust unexplained object.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
This is why later investigation often weakens the mystery without attacking the witness. A sincere report can be transformed by data the witness did not have at the time: wind direction, known orbital passes, local flight paths, the position of a bright star, or the behaviour of lanterns and reflective balloons.
What the explained cases say about Loire’s UFO record
The explained Loire cases make the department’s UFO history more modest, but also more readable. They show a public record in which the strongest lessons are about misidentification, evidence quality and the gap between experience and analysis.
Several features stand out. First, Loire has a noticeable cluster of category A and B explanations rather than a catalogue of strong unresolved cases. Second, the causes are varied: aircraft, balloons, lanterns, satellites, the ISS and a star. Third, the cases often involve exactly the features that make UFO reports compelling to the public: silence, orange light, apparent formation, geometric shape, bright movement, or an object that seems to stop, climb or vanish.
The practical conclusion is not that “all UFOs are mistakes”. It is narrower and better supported: in Loire’s public record, many of the reports that sound unusual at first become ordinary when checked against the sky that was actually there. Montbrison becomes a wind-driven Mylar balloon. Rive-de-Gier and Pralong become lantern cases. Noirétable becomes an ISS timing match. Chalmazel becomes a probable satellite. Saint-Haon-le-Châtel becomes a likely night aircraft. Saint-Chamond becomes Antares.[GEIPAN+5GEIPAN+5GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frGEIPANMONTBRISON (42) 10.04.202212 Apr 2022 — - "forme parallélépipédique": les ballons mylar peuvent avoir des formes très diverses. Le…
That pattern is the real value of Loire’s explained cases. They do not remove every doubt from every sighting, and they do not make witness testimony worthless. They show how a department-level UFO record can be read without sensationalism: start with what was reported, test ordinary explanations carefully, separate weak files from strong ones, and reserve mystery for the cases where the evidence genuinely survives that process.
Amazon book picks
Further Reading
Books and field guides related to How Loire UFOs Became Balloons and Aircraft. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.
The Demon-haunted World
Perfect fit for a page about balloons, aircraft and mistaken interpretations.
eBay marketplace picks
Marketplace Samples
Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.
Endnotes
1.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=c&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=74%2C0&sort=asc
2.
Source: cnes.fr
Link:https://cnes.fr/en/projects/geipan
3.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: evolution classification des cas
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/actualites/evolution-classification-des-cas
4.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: missions methodes et resultats
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/missions-methodes-et-resultats
5.
Source: aerodromes.fr
Link:https://www.aerodromes.fr/loire-42-d42.html
6.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/en/node/60188
7.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%255B11%255D=11&field_date_d_observation_value%255Bmax%255D=&field_date_d_observation_value%255Bmin%255D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%255Bmax%255D=&field_latitude_value%255Bmin%255D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%255Bmax%255D=&field_longitude_value%255Bmin%255D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=86&sort=asc
8.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: baisse cas d
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/actualites/baisse-cas-d
9.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=title&page=139&sort=desc
10.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: methodologie classification geipan
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/actualites/methodologie-classification-geipan
11.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=78&sort=desc
12.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?customGetLattitude=46.124763699209396&customGetLongitude=2.3840332031249996&customGetZoom=6&field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B12%5D=12&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=50.52739681329302&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=41.72213058512578&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=9.42626953125&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=-4.658203125000001&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=28&sort=desc
13.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=2020-11-18&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=1&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=title&page=12&sort=desc
14.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?customGetLattitude=45.52221935752051&customGetLongitude=5.278930664062501&customGetZoom=8&field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=46.638122462379656&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=44.40631625266138&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=7.146606445312501&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=3.4112548828125004&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=6&sort=desc
15.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation&page=82&sort=desc
16.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_classification_des_cas&page=59%2C22&sort=desc
17.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B0%5D=12&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation&page=45%2C7&sort=desc
18.
Source: archives.loire.fr
Link:https://archives.loire.fr/expositions/salle-la-loire-blessee-mais-la-loire-liberee-151/n%3A260
19.
Source: loire.fr
Title: Département de la Loire
Link:https://www.loire.fr/
20.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2022-04-51331
21.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/cas/2023-07-51459
22.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/en/node/54666
23.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2004-05-01626
24.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/temoignage/6400
25.
Source: saint-etienne.aeroport.fr
Link:https://saint-etienne.aeroport.fr/en/
26.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2013-05-08451
27.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/en/node/60803
28.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=2022-03-29&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=1&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=6%2C0&sort=desc
29.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2022-07-51451?page=%2C27&undefined=
30.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=Ain&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=34&sort=asc
31.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/1980-09-09348
32.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=80&sort=desc&undefined=
33.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B12%5D=12&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=29%2C37&sort=desc
34.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=2023-02-16&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=1&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=title&page=7%2C33&sort=desc
35.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B11%5D=11&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=1&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=116&order=title&page=38%2C37&select-category-export=nothing&sort=asc&video=on
36.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?customGetLattitude=45.735486641128446&customGetLongitude=-0.615234375&customGetZoom=5&field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=54.52108149544362&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=36.94989178681327&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=14.326171875000002&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=-15.556640625000002&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation_textuel&page=89&sort=desc
37.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=116&order=field_departement_textuel&page=77&select-category-export=nothing&sort=desc
38.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=title&page=34&s=09&sort=asc
39.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?customGetLattitude=43.9503570933062&customGetLongitude=-3.31787109375&customGetZoom=5&field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B11%5D=11&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=53.014783245859235&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=34.88593094075317&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=8.920898437500002&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=-15.556640625000002&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation_textuel&page=3&sort=desc
40.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?customGetLattitude=46.94358292648825&customGetLongitude=4.4989013671875&customGetZoom=7&field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id=All&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=49.11702904077932&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=44.77013681219717&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=7.668457031250001&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=1.329345703125&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date&page=34%2C10&sort=desc
41.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=c&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation_textuel&page=1&sort=desc
42.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/node/412
43.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/node/58788
44.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=c&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_classification_des_cas&page=49&sort=desc
45.
Source: saint-etienne.aeroport.fr
Link:https://saint-etienne.aeroport.fr/en/aviation-en/
46.
Source: academia.edu
Link:https://www.academia.edu/99067452/GEIPAN_classification_with_text_mining_and_machine_learning
47.
Source: Wikipedia
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GEIPAN
Additional References
48.
Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZbpEeZNWVSM
49.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Neil de Grasse Tyson on UFOs, Government Files, and the Physics of Alien Claims
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yjriq7BcQwQ
50.
Source: trialsearch.who.int
Link:https://trialsearch.who.int/Trial2.aspx?TrialID=EUCTR2021-000713-17-FR
51.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Meeting France’s UFO detectives • FRANCE 24 English
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zczcBLukQ6s
52.
Source: jpl.nasa.gov
Link:https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/asteroidwatch/newsfeatures.cfm?release=2010-358
53.
Source: researchgate.net
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/369507030_GEIPAN_classification_with_text_mining_and_machine_learning
54.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/FRANCE24/videos/-depuis-des-d%C3%A9cennies-les-ovnis-alimentent-tous-les-fantasmes-et-les-th%C3%A9ories-le/3009001669249813/
55.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/42television/videos/et-si-le-temps-dun-instant-le-ciel-devenait-accessible-%C3%A0-tous-le-25-avril-2026-%C3%A0/1748411636568371/
56.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/groups/1019088781499937/posts/34488281057487279/
57.
Source: meprises-du-ciel.fr
Link:https://meprises-du-ciel.fr/sources-artificielles/lanternes-thailandaises/
Topic Tree