What Really Happened in Haut Rhin's UFO Files?
Haut-Rhin’s UFO history is not a story of one famous “smoking gun” case. It is better understood as a layered local record: a few genuinely unresolved reports, many explained or probably explained sightings, and a long background of Alsatian press stories, gendarmerie statements, airport traffic, military activity, stars, lanterns, lasers and modern drones.
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
The department still matters in French UFO history because it sits in a busy border sky. Basel-Mulhouse airport, the former Colmar-Meyenheim air base, the Rhine plain, the Vosges, the Black Forest horizon and cross-border traffic all create conditions in which ordinary phenomena can look extraordinary. A small number of cases remain unresolved, but the pattern is mainly one of careful downgrading: reports that began as “UFOs” often become aircraft, Venus, lanterns, lasers, reflections or drones after investigation.
Why Haut-Rhin produces convincing-looking UFO reports
Haut-Rhin is a particularly good place to misunderstand the sky. That does not mean witnesses are careless. It means they are often looking across a complicated visual environment. The department is bordered by Switzerland and Germany, includes the Basel-Mulhouse-Freiburg airport zone, sits under civilian and military routes, and has hills and valleys that can make lights appear to hover, climb, descend or vanish.
GEIPAN’s own national framing is useful here. The agency describes itself not as an extraterrestrial research body, but as a CNES expertise unit that collects, analyses and archives reports of unidentified aerospace phenomena. It explicitly says it does not research extraterrestrial life and uses recognised scientific knowledge rather than speculative hypotheses. Its classifications separate identified cases, probably identified cases, insufficient-information cases and cases that remain unidentified after investigation.[CNES]cnes.frGEIPAN | CNESGEIPAN | CNES
That matters for Haut-Rhin because many local reports sit exactly at the border between a persuasive witness description and a mundane explanation. A silent triangular shape may be a military aircraft seen from a car. A glowing object over the Vosges may be Venus. A pale oval moving on clouds may be a ground-based light show. A cluster of floating lights may be lanterns. A hovering red-and-green light before a public event may be a drone.
The other reason the department matters is historical. Alsace appears repeatedly in catalogues of the 1954 French UFO wave, when newspapers across France reported “flying saucers”, “cigars” and strange luminous bodies. Some Haut-Rhin entries, such as Hésingue, Colmar and Rixheim, are preserved mainly through later catalogues and press references rather than modern investigative files. They are historically interesting, but generally weaker than modern GEIPAN dossiers because they often lack named adult witnesses, precise timing, photographs, radar data or formal follow-up.[ufologie.patrickgross.org+2ufologie.patrickgross.org]ufologie.patrickgross.orgOpen source on patrickgross.org.
The two strongest unresolved Haut-Rhin cases
The most important Haut-Rhin cases are not the most spectacular-sounding ones. They are the ones where official records still leave a residue after ordinary explanations have been considered. On the current public record, Huningue in 1980 and Rixheim in 2009 stand out.
Huningue, 26 May 1980: a dome, a trained witness and an unusable radar echo
The Huningue case is one of the department’s clearest unresolved files. According to GEIPAN, two walkers saw an unusual object at about 7 pm in a clear sky. One witness was an officer and flight mechanic, which gives the account more interest than an anonymous casual report. The object was described as metallic, round-based, dome-shaped, silver on top, darker underneath, apparently stationary at an estimated 200 to 300 metres above the ground, and showing intermittent reddish luminescence. It was seen for about six minutes, made no sound, left no condensation, and disappeared into cloud in a stepped movement.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
The radar detail is the tempting part of the story, but also the part that should be handled most carefully. GEIPAN notes that Basel-Mulhouse airport recorded a radar echo, but says it was mixed into private and general aviation traffic and was therefore not very usable. No other witness was found in France or across the nearby German border. GEIPAN classifies the event as D: unexplained after investigation, with medium to strong consistency and high strangeness.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
This is a good example of a case that deserves attention without exaggeration. The trained aviation witness, six-minute duration and radar mention make it stronger than many local anecdotes. Yet the lack of corroborating witnesses, the weak radar value and the absence of physical evidence prevent it from becoming proof of anything beyond an unexplained observation.
Rixheim, 26 July 2009: a satellite-like point that did not behave like a satellite
The Rixheim case is less cinematic but more methodically documented. A witness on a terrace saw a white point of light moving south to north in a starry sky at an elevation of about 25 to 35 degrees. At first, the witness thought it resembled a satellite. After briefly losing sight of it, he saw a luminous point appear to turn west for two or three seconds, then move rapidly on a straight path overhead. No sound was heard.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
GEIPAN’s file is important because it records attempted eliminations. The agency says aircraft were not supported by radar data in the Rixheim sector during the relevant interval, Jupiter was too low on the horizon, and a candidate satellite, Cosmos 1151 Rocket, did not fit because its elevation was about 57 degrees. GEIPAN classified the case as D, with strangeness rated 0.62, and the public case page was updated in June 2026.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
Rixheim is still not a dramatic close encounter. It is a single-witness luminous-point case lasting seconds. Its value is different: it shows what an unresolved GEIPAN case can look like when the event is modest but the known explanations do not fit cleanly. The best reading is cautious. It remains unexplained, but not necessarily extraordinary.
The cases that look strange until the setting is known
Many Haut-Rhin reports become much less puzzling once the location, date and local activity are checked. These cases are useful because they show the kinds of mistakes that recur in the department.
In Flaxlanden on 5 August 1980, witnesses reported several elongated luminous objects changing direction in the evening sky, with a similar observation the next night. GEIPAN notes that Basel-Mulhouse airport reported numerous aircraft flights that evening and classifies the case as a probable aircraft observation.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
In Fréland on 24 April 1983, two witnesses saw a luminous object above a mountain, apparently descending in stages and changing colour. The case had once seemed more puzzling, partly because an astronomical explanation had reportedly been rejected at the gendarmerie stage. A later GEIPAN re-examination found the object was exactly where Venus was located and classified the case as A: an identified astronomical observation.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
In Moosch on 19 September 1990, a family saw a milky white oval moving and rotating over forest under cloud cover. Neighbourhood enquiries found other witnesses over several nights. GEIPAN later re-examined the file, previously treated as more mysterious, and concluded that the description closely matched a ground-based laser or skytracer projected onto cloud: oval shape, rotating and back-and-forth motion, white diffuse appearance, cloud cover and no illumination of the surroundings.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
In Haut-Rhin on 22 February 2015, witnesses in Habsheim and Eschentzwiller saw multiple lights moving in the sky. GEIPAN judged the report very probably to be flying lanterns, noting the local carnival period around Mulhouse and Basel, the timing near Chinese New Year, slow movement, weak wind and progressive disappearance of lights.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
These cases matter because they weaken a common assumption: that a report becomes stronger simply because more people saw it. Multiple witnesses can still share the same misinterpretation, especially when the phenomenon is visible across a wide area, moves slowly, or appears against cloud, hills or festival lighting.
The aviation thread: airport, air base and military traffic
Aviation is one of the strongest recurring explanations in Haut-Rhin. The department has a long and obvious connection to flight: Basel-Mulhouse sits nearby, and the former Colmar-Meyenheim air base operated in the department before becoming an army site in 2010. The air base was built in the 1950s, hosted fighter units during the Cold War and later housed Mirage F1 aircraft before its air-force role ended.[Forgotten Airfields]forgottenairfields.comairfield colmar meyenheim 1088airfield colmar meyenheim 1088
That background helps explain several GEIPAN files. On 9 November 2021, a witness driving between Sierentz and Habsheim saw three fixed white-blue lights forming a triangle, apparently low, silent and overhead. GEIPAN classified the case as A after concluding it was very probably an A400M military aircraft in very-low-altitude exercise south of the former Colmar air base. The case is a textbook example of how a real aircraft can produce a classic “black triangle” impression when seen at night from a moving car.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
A similar pattern appears in a 15 August 2024 A35 motorway case between Bartenheim and Mulhouse. A driver saw red and white lights forming a near-equilateral triangle, with video taken by a passenger. GEIPAN concluded there were two overlapping phenomena: a probable military aircraft for the visual sighting and reflections from inside the vehicle for what appeared in the video. The case was classified B for the visual report and A for the reflection element.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
Another 2024 case at Burnhaupt-le-Bas shows the modern investigative value of video and flight-tracking data. A witness recorded bright lights near the eastern horizon. GEIPAN compared the video with Flightradar24 data and found that the main recorded light matched an airliner approaching Basel-Mulhouse; other moving lights were also linked to aircraft, while earlier aligned lights were plausibly linked to grooming vehicles on ski slopes in the Black Forest. The final classification was A: identified airliner.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
The lesson is not that every UFO report is an aircraft. Huningue and Rixheim show that some cases survive routine elimination. But in Haut-Rhin, aviation is not background noise. It is central to the local UFO record.
What the 1954 wave adds — and what it cannot prove
The 1954 French UFO wave gives Haut-Rhin a place in a much older national story. Reports from that year include Hésingue, where two school pupils reportedly saw a silent luminous spindle-shaped object at high altitude on 9 January; Colmar, where several people and a group of children reportedly saw a “flying cigar” around 6.45 pm on 31 October; and Rixheim, where a late September sighting appears in later Alsatian UFO literature and press-based catalogues.[ufologie.patrickgross.org+2ufologie.patrickgross.org]ufologie.patrickgross.orgOpen source on patrickgross.org.
These stories are historically valuable because they show how UFO language entered local reporting. The objects were often described as cigars, spindles, discs or luminous bodies, reflecting the vocabulary of the time. But their evidential value is uneven. Some accounts are preserved through later summaries, lack full witness data, or rely on newspaper phrasing designed for curiosity. Even specialist catalogues often flag weaknesses such as vague descriptions, child witnesses, missing times, delayed reporting or possible meteor explanations.[ufologie.patrickgross.org+2ufologie.patrickgross.org]ufologie.patrickgross.orgALSACA T, UFOs in Alsace, FranceALSACA T, UFOs in Alsace, France
The best use of the 1954 material is not to treat it as proof of a hidden event over Haut-Rhin. It is to see it as part of the department’s folklore and press history: a period when unusual lights, meteors, aircraft and social expectation could all be folded into a “flying saucer” frame. Compared with modern GEIPAN files, the older reports are less testable and more dependent on how local newspapers and later ufologists preserved them.
How to read Haut-Rhin’s UFO record fairly
A fair reading of Haut-Rhin’s UFO history needs three categories, not two.
First are the identified or probably identified cases. These include Venus at Fréland, aircraft at Flaxlanden and Burnhaupt-le-Bas, an A400M near Sierentz-Habsheim, lanterns near Habsheim and Eschentzwiller, a laser or skytracer at Moosch, and a probable drone in Mulhouse in August 2024. These cases are still useful because they show how convincing misperceptions form.[Geipan+6Geipan+6Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
Second are the weakly documented cases. Mulhouse on 14 April 1986 is a good example: a witness reported a silent delta-wing shape for 30 to 40 seconds from a bedroom, but GEIPAN classified it as C because there was not enough information for a serious analysis. A C classification is not a stronger mystery than an explained case; it often means the file is too thin to resolve.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
Third are the unresolved cases after investigation. Huningue and Rixheim belong here. They should not be dismissed, because official files record why simple explanations were not enough. But they should not be inflated either. Huningue lacks corroboration beyond a poor radar echo, and Rixheim is a short, single-witness point-of-light event. The responsible conclusion is that they remain unexplained in the available record, not that they establish an exotic origin.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
The department’s overall pattern is therefore balanced but not sensational. Haut-Rhin has a handful of unresolved reports worth preserving, a larger body of explained cases worth learning from, and a historical layer from the 1954 wave that belongs more to press and cultural history than to hard evidence.
The real takeaway from Haut-Rhin
Haut-Rhin’s UFO history is valuable precisely because it resists a simple story. It is not an empty file: there are official records, named locations, gendarmerie material, technical checks and at least two unresolved GEIPAN cases. But it is also not a department full of strong evidence for extraordinary craft. The best-documented pattern is the gradual conversion of “unknown lights” into aircraft, planets, lanterns, lasers, reflections and drones once investigators have enough information.
That makes Haut-Rhin a useful department-level case study in how UFO history should be read. The most interesting question is often not “Was it alien?” but “What made this look impossible at the time?” In Haut-Rhin, the answers are usually local: borderland aviation, mountain horizons, low cloud, festival nights, military exercises, busy airport approaches, vehicle reflections and witnesses trying honestly to describe something unfamiliar. The unresolved cases remain part of the record, but they sit inside that broader pattern rather than above it.<section class="further-reading-section" data-page-toc-exclude aria-labelledby="further-reading-title"><div class="fr-section-shell"><div class="fr-section-header"><div class="fr-section-heading"><p class="fr-section-kicker">Amazon book picks</p><h3 class="fr-heading" id="further-reading-title">Further Reading</h3></div><p class="fr-intro">Books and field guides related to What Really Happened in Haut Rhin's UFO Files?. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.</p></div><div class="fr-books-grid"><article class="fr-book-card">Book<div class="fr-book-info"><h4 class="fr-book-title">The UFO Experience</h4><p class="fr-book-author">By Joseph Allen Hynek</p><p class="fr-book-desc">Explains investigation and classification of sightings.</p><div class="fr-book-actions">
See on Amazon</div></div></article><article class="fr-book-card">Book
<div class="fr-book-info"><h4 class="fr-book-title">UFOs</h4><p class="fr-book-author">By Leslie Kean</p><p class="fr-book-desc">Fits a department-wide overview of significant UFO reports.</p><div class="fr-book-actions">
See on Amazon</div></div></article><article class="fr-book-card">Book
<div class="fr-book-info"><h4 class="fr-book-title">Passport to Magonia</h4><p class="fr-book-author">By Jacques Vallee</p><p class="fr-book-desc">Provides historical and European context for unusual reports.</p><div class="fr-book-actions">
See on Amazon</div></div></article><article class="fr-book-card">Book<div class="fr-book-info"><h4 class="fr-book-title">The Demon-haunted World</h4><p class="fr-book-author">By Carl Sagan</p><p class="fr-book-desc">Useful for assessing extraordinary claims critically.</p><div class="fr-book-actions">
See on Amazon</div></div></article></div><div class="fr-section-footer"><div class="fr-browse-links" aria-label="Browse more on Amazon">Browse more on Amazon:The UFO ExperienceUFOsPassport to Magonia</div><p class="fr-disclosure">As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.</p></div></div></section><section class="further-reading-section" data-page-toc-exclude data-ebay-localized-links data-ebay-visual-market="EBAY_GB" aria-labelledby="merchant-block-title"><div class="fr-section-shell"><div class="fr-section-header"><div class="fr-section-heading"><p class="fr-section-kicker">eBay marketplace picks</p><h3 class="fr-heading" id="merchant-block-title">Marketplace Samples</h3></div><p class="fr-intro">Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.</p><div class="fr-ebay-market-toolbar"><div class="fr-ebay-market-picker">UsingUSA<div class="fr-ebay-market-menu" data-ebay-market-menu role="listbox" hidden></div></div></div></div><div class="fr-ebay-market-panel" data-ebay-market-panel="EBAY_GB" data-ebay-market-default="1"><div class="fr-books-grid"><article class="fr-book-card">
<div class="fr-book-info"><p class="fr-book-kicker">Example eBay listing</p><h4 class="fr-book-title">UFO TV Series Rare 9 Card Memorabilia 2003 Promo Preview Set</h4>SearcheBay.co.uk: UFO memorabilia<div class="fr-book-actions">
Browse similar oneBay.co.uk</div></div></article><article class="fr-book-card">
<div class="fr-book-info"><p class="fr-book-kicker">Example eBay listing</p><h4 class="fr-book-title">ED WALTERS UFO GULF BREEZE POSTCARD UFOLOGY MEMORABILIA</h4>SearcheBay.co.uk: UFO memorabilia<div class="fr-book-actions">
Browse similar oneBay.co.uk</div></div></article><article class="fr-book-card">
<div class="fr-book-info"><p class="fr-book-kicker">Example eBay listing</p><h4 class="fr-book-title">UFO Trail information board This information board in the main c2013</h4>SearcheBay.co.uk: UFO memorabilia<div class="fr-book-actions">
Browse similar oneBay.co.uk</div></div></article><article class="fr-book-card">
<div class="fr-book-info"><p class="fr-book-kicker">Example eBay listing</p><h4 class="fr-book-title">UFO gerry anderson genuine tv prop harness buckle used in sky one UACC RD COA</h4>SearcheBay.co.uk: UFO memorabilia<div class="fr-book-actions">
Browse similar oneBay.co.uk</div></div></article></div><div class="fr-section-footer">
Browse more oneBay.co.uk<p class="fr-disclosure">Example items shown for inspiration; availability and pricing can change. Branchoria may earn a commission if you purchase through outbound eBay links.</p></div></div></div></section>
Endnotes
1.
Source: cnes.fr
Title: GEIPAN | CNES
Link:https://cnes.fr/en/projects/geipan
2.
Source: ufologie.patrickgross.org
Link:https://www.ufologie.patrickgross.org/1954/9jan1954hesingue.htm
3.
Source: ufologie.patrickgross.org
Link:https://www.ufologie.patrickgross.org/1954/31oct1954colmar.htm
4.
Source: ufologie.patrickgross.org
Link:https://ufologie.patrickgross.org/1954/28sep1954rixheimf.htm
5.
Source: ufologie.patrickgross.org
Title: ALSACA T, UFOs in Alsace, France
Link:https://ufologie.patrickgross.org/alsacat/1954-10-30-colmar.htm
6.
Source: ufologie.patrickgross.org
Link:https://www.ufologie.patrickgross.org/1954/31oct1954meyreuil.htm
7.
Source: ufologie.patrickgross.org
Link:https://ufologie.patrickgross.org/1954/1954.htm
8.
Source: ufologie.patrickgross.org
Link:https://ufologie.patrickgross.org/1954/23oct1954mundolsheim.htm
9.
Source: ufologie.patrickgross.org
Link:https://www.ufologie.patrickgross.org/alsacat/1987-07-09-landser.htm
10.
Source: ufologie.patrickgross.org
Link:https://www.ufologie.patrickgross.org/alsacat/1954-10-16-haguenau.htm
11.
Source: ufologie.patrickgross.org
Link:https://www.ufologie.patrickgross.org/alsacat/1974-02-00-colmar.htm
12.
Source: ufologie.patrickgross.org
Link:https://ufologie.patrickgross.org/1954/20oct1954guebwillerf.htm
13.
Source: ufologie.patrickgross.org
Link:https://www.ufologie.patrickgross.org/alsacat/0000-00-00-taennchel.htm
14.
Source: ufologie.patrickgross.org
Link:https://ufologie.patrickgross.org/alsacat/0000-00-00-taennchelf.htm
15.
Source: ufologie.patrickgross.org
Link:https://ufologie.patrickgross.org/1954/31oct1954arry.htm
16.
Source: ufologie.patrickgross.org
Link:https://ufologie.patrickgross.org/1954/18oct1954luconf.htm
17.
Source: ufologie.patrickgross.org
Link:https://ufologie.patrickgross.org/1954/1954f.htm
18.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/sites/default/files/PV%20n%C2%B0491%20%281980308505%29.pdf
19.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?field_date_value=2007-03-01&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=56&sort=asc
20.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_=&field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_classification_des_cas&page=%2C490&sort=desc
21.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=2007-03-01&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_classification_des_cas&page=1&sort=desc
22.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_date_value=2004-04-23&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=55&sort=asc
23.
Source: rixheim.fr
Link:https://rixheim.fr/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/BM_n163.pdf
24.
Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hn2xTieploU
25.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Geipan: France is also interested in UFOs
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OLXDikL331Y
26.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: Geipan Methodology | GEIPAN
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/node/58788
27.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/1980-05-00775
28.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2009-07-02361
29.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/1980-08-00785
30.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/1983-04-00973?field_agregation_index_value=c&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation&page=19%2C0&sort=asc
31.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/1990-09-01215
32.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2015-02-09131?field_agregation_index_value=Ain&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=title&page=45&sort=desc
33.
Source: forgottenairfields.com
Title: airfield colmar meyenheim 1088
Link:https://www.forgottenairfields.com/airfield-colmar-meyenheim-1088.html
34.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2021-11-51291
35.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2024-08-51554
36.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2024-11-51604
37.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2024-08-51560
38.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/1986-04-01092
39.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/missions-methodes-et-resultats
40.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2009-03-02249
41.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2017-11-09787
42.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2013-10-08589
43.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: export cas pub 20251127093552.csv
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/save_json_import_files/export_cas_pub_20251127093552.csv
44.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/en/node/54069
45.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B11%5D=11&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=1&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation_textuel&page=24&select-category-export=nothing&sort=desc&video=on
46.
Source: scramble.nl
Link:https://www.scramble.nl/planning/airfield-guide/france/colmar-meyenheim
47.
Source: Wikipedia
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GEIPAN
48.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/gendarmeriedurhone/photos/%F0%9D%97%A2%F0%9D%97%A9%F0%9D%97%A1%F0%9D%97%9Caujourdhui-le-2-juillet-cest-la-journ%C3%A9e-des-ovnisi-vous-avez-vu-ou-cru-voir-/1117132010440508/
49.
Source: cidehom.com
Link:https://www.cidehom.com/question.php?_q_id=5765
50.
Source: airhistory.net
Link:https://www.airhistory.net/location/3604/Colmar-Meyenheim-LFSC
Additional References
51.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/groups/160336030815548/
52.
Source: miltechsimulations.com
Link:https://www.miltechsimulations.com/products/skydesigners-french-airbase-132-colmar-meyenheim-lfsc-msfs
53.
Source: alamy.com
Link:https://www.alamy.com/stock-photo-france-haut-rhin-68-meyenheim-old-disused-nato-and-french-air-force-88118214.html
54.
Source: airportmap.de
Link:https://airportmap.de/airport/LFSC/info
55.
Source: instagram.com
Link:https://www.instagram.com/reel/DNdXj_BO9Rj/
56.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/NatGeoFR/posts/un-objet-volant-non-identifi%C3%A9-terrifie-la-petite-ville-sans-histoire-dalfena-au-/3404841566216442/
57.
Source: stm.cairn.info
Link:https://stm.cairn.info/le-coup-de-marteau-sur-la-tete-du-chat-la-science-des-faits-divers–9782021348668-page-203
58.
Source: youtube.com
Title: UFO Office: Is the truth out there? • FRANCE 24
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yDqQGyAwWCg
59.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Meeting France’s UFO detectives • FRANCE 24 English
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zczcBLukQ6s
60.
Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/shorts/qiCdqB6kXkA
Topic Tree
Follow this branch
Related pages 95
- Manche UFOs
- Ariege UFOs
- Correze UFOs
- Dordogne UFOs
- Hautes Pyrenees UFOs
- +90 more in sidebar