What Really Happened Over Haute Saone?
Haute-Saône’s UFO history is not a story of a famous mass sighting or a dramatic local legend. It is a small, document-led record centred on five public GEIPAN/CNES cases, two of which remain officially unidentified after investigation.
Page outline Jump by section
What makes Haute-Saône’s record worth reading?
The public record for Haute-Saône is modest but unusually neat. The independent CarteOvni index, built from GEIPAN/CNES data, lists five cases in the department: two class A cases, one class B case, no class C cases, and two class D cases. In GEIPAN language, class A means identified, class B means probably identified, class C means insufficient information, and class D means unidentified after investigation.[CarteOvni.fr]carteovni.frCarte Ovni.fr OVN I dans le Haute-Saône (70) — Carte Ovni.frCarte Ovni.fr OVN I dans le Haute-Saône (70) — Carte Ovni.fr
That split matters. It prevents the department from being presented as a simple “UFO hotspot”, while still leaving two files that are interesting enough to discuss. Most of the department’s known reports are not mysteries once investigated: Navenne in 2021 was attributed to birds flying in a V formation; Marnay in 2016 to a meteor; and La Vergenne in 2010 to a probable meteor or atmospheric entry. The two unresolved cases, La Neuvelle-lès-Lure in 1989 and Villers-lès-Luxeuil in 2019, stand out because GEIPAN considered them strange or sufficiently consistent after review.[Geipan+4Geipan+4Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
GEIPAN itself is important context here. It is the French space agency’s public unit for collecting, analysing, archiving and publishing reports of unidentified aerospace phenomena. It is not an alien-hunting body, and its own English-language mission page explicitly says it is not a research organisation for extraterrestrial life or futuristic technologies. Its work is closer to structured case triage: identify what can be identified, document what cannot, and publish anonymised files where possible.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frGeipan Mission & Geipan | GEIPANGeipan Mission & Geipan | GEIPAN
The Villers-lès-Luxeuil case: the department’s strongest modern file
The 26 November 2019 Villers-lès-Luxeuil case is the clearest reason Haute-Saône appears in modern French UFO discussion. GEIPAN records it as a Haute-Saône case, observed at about 17:20, with two witness statements, an investigation report and a final classification of D: an unidentified phenomenon of medium-to-strong consistency. The public case page describes a dark, triangular or delta-wing-like form, non-point lights, silence, and no reported environmental effects.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
The basic account is striking but also complicated. A couple were travelling in separate vehicles from Vesoul towards their home at Villers-lès-Luxeuil. The husband first reported a white light near Saulx-de-Vesoul, apparently below cloud level, which rose vertically and disappeared into cloud. Later, near Villers-lès-Luxeuil, both witnesses reported seeing a large, almost stationary black triangular structure above the village, with a strong white light at the front and a fixed red light. The husband stopped, turned off the radio and opened the window to listen, but reported no sound. GEIPAN’s conclusion says the observation lasted around 20 seconds and that the perceived strangeness came from the size, dark triangular form and total silence.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frCompte rendu enquete725Compte rendu enquete725
The case is not strong because it has photographs, radar confirmation of an unknown object or multiple independent strangers. It has none of those. GEIPAN noted two cooperative witnesses but also cautioned that their testimony could not be treated as fully independent, and that there was no material proof such as images or video. That is an important limit on the case.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frCompte rendu enquete725Compte rendu enquete725
What gives the case weight is the depth of the conventional checking. GEIPAN examined three main hypotheses: a Robin DR400 light aircraft, a Mirage 2000-5F fighter, and a military drone. The drone idea was rejected because the relevant temporary airspace zone concerned much higher flight levels, while the weather ceiling was below 3,000 metres. The Mirage idea had some appeal because a military exercise involving Mirage 2000-5F aircraft from BA116 was confirmed, and the aircraft shape could fit a triangular impression. But GEIPAN found several problems: the timing appeared about ten minutes off, the angular height was too low, the apparent size did not match the witness statements, no loud jet noise was heard, and the witnesses lived locally and were familiar with Mirage activity.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frCompte rendu enquete725Compte rendu enquete725
The Robin DR400 hypothesis came closest. The aircraft was present at low altitude in the relevant time window, was approaching BA116, and its landing light and left position light could explain the white and red lights. Yet GEIPAN still did not accept it as a full explanation, mainly because the apparent size and dark triangular shape described by the witnesses did not sit comfortably with a small light aircraft unless an optical illusion or strong misperception was involved. The final classification was therefore D1: unidentified, but not a proof of an extraordinary object.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frCompte rendu enquete725Compte rendu enquete725
Why the Luxeuil air base matters, but does not solve everything
Haute-Saône’s aviation context is unusually relevant because Luxeuil-Saint-Sauveur air base sits in the department. CNES records the national GEIPAN partnership network as including the Air and Space Force, and the Villers-lès-Luxeuil report specifically used air-traffic and military-context checks, including BA116-related aircraft hypotheses.[CNES]cnes.frGEIPAN | CNESGEIPAN | CNES
The base matters for two reasons. First, it increases the chances that unusual lights, noise patterns, low-level movements, silhouettes or manoeuvres in the local sky may have conventional aviation causes. Secondly, it creates a witness-culture problem: people living near the base may be more used to aircraft than outsiders, so when they say something did not look or sound like familiar local aircraft, that observation deserves to be recorded, but it still cannot override physical checks on timing, trajectory and visibility.
The earlier unresolved case: La Neuvelle-lès-Lure, 1989
The 30 May 1989 La Neuvelle-lès-Lure case is the department’s older unresolved GEIPAN file. GEIPAN lists it as a Haute-Saône case, classified D, with three testimonies and a police or gendarmerie record in the file. The observation took place at about 23:15 in clear night conditions, in a forest or semi-natural environment. The public summary describes a fast, silent object, conical in overall form, yellow-amber and white in colour, with a trail or tail. The witness data also mention “one triangle formed by three projectors emitting flashes”, which gives the report a partly triangular character.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
This is an intriguing but harder case to read today than Villers-lès-Luxeuil. The file is older, the available public page gives less narrative explanation, and there is less immediately visible reconstruction in the online case page. It remains important because it shows that Haute-Saône’s unresolved record is not only a recent “black triangle” story. It also sits in the late 1980s, a period when reports of triangular or structured lights appeared in several countries and were later grouped by UFO writers into broader “black triangle” discussions. That grouping is interpretive, not an official object category, and should be treated cautiously.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
The La Neuvelle-lès-Lure file therefore deserves attention, but not overstatement. Its value is that GEIPAN preserved a multi-witness, late-night, silent-object report as unresolved. Its weakness is that the public-facing evidence is not as rich as the 2019 Villers report, at least in the accessible case-page summary. For a reader comparing the two Haute-Saône class D cases, Villers is the better documented modern investigation; La Neuvelle-lès-Lure is the older historical marker.
The explained cases show the usual traps in the sky
The identified and probably identified Haute-Saône cases are not filler. They show the kinds of ordinary phenomena that can look strange enough to be reported.
At Navenne on 14 August 2021, a witness saw several faint white lights moving quickly in a V formation shortly after midnight. GEIPAN classified the case A, concluding that the most likely explanation was birds, probably wild ducks, moving in formation. The factors supporting that explanation included the V shape, faint luminosity, urban lighting, lack of noise, apparent proximity and speed.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
At Marnay on 14 November 2016, a motorist saw a white light cross the sky for about ten seconds. GEIPAN classified it A as a meteor. The report notes that the Taurid meteor shower was active, that Taurids can be slow, and that a modest meteor may not show a conspicuous tail. This is a useful reminder that a witness may reject “shooting star” because the event lasts longer than expected, while astronomical context can make that duration plausible.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
At La Vergenne on 2 June 2010, the witness saw a very brief, fast, pale green fluorescent oval object moving silently. GEIPAN classified the case B: a probable atmospheric entry of a meteor. The short duration, high speed, comet-like form and greenish colour all supported that explanation, though the classification stopped short of absolute certainty.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
Together, these three cases make the two unresolved cases easier to interpret fairly. They show that GEIPAN does not leave Haute-Saône reports mysterious by default. When birds, meteors or likely atmospheric entries fit the details, the department’s cases are closed accordingly.
What the evidence supports — and what it does not
The strongest evidence-supported statement is simple: Haute-Saône has a small public GEIPAN record, and two of its five listed cases remain officially unidentified. That does not mean two alien craft were observed. In GEIPAN terms, “unidentified” means that after available checks, no known explanation was sufficiently convincing.[CarteOvni.fr]carteovni.frCarte Ovni.fr OVN I dans le Haute-Saône (70) — Carte Ovni.frCarte Ovni.fr OVN I dans le Haute-Saône (70) — Carte Ovni.fr
For Villers-lès-Luxeuil, the best evidence consists of two cooperative witnesses, a detailed GEIPAN reconstruction, timing analysis using phone-call records and street-light switching, checks against aircraft activity, and a structured comparison of Robin DR400, Mirage 2000-5F and drone hypotheses. The main doubts are equally clear: no video, no photo, no independent unrelated witnesses, no confirmed radar return for an unknown object, and possible memory or perception problems around timing, size and lighting.[Geipan+2Geipan]cnes-geipan.frCompte rendu enquete725Compte rendu enquete725
For La Neuvelle-lès-Lure, the best evidence is its official GEIPAN D classification and the presence of three testimonies in the public file. The main doubt is the relative thinness of the readily accessible narrative and the age of the report. It is historically relevant but less practically testable for a modern reader than the 2019 file.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
For the department as a whole, the most sensible reading is balanced. Haute-Saône is not a major French UFO theatre in the way that famous national cases are. It is a compact local record where the interesting point is the contrast between ordinary explanations and the residual cases that survive them. The two unresolved reports are worth preserving and comparing, especially because they involve triangular or structured impressions near an aviation-rich part of the department, but neither provides enough evidence to justify a confident extraordinary conclusion.
How to read Haute-Saône’s UFO history without being misled
A good local UFO history should separate three things that are often blurred together.
First, a sighting can be sincere and still misidentified. Navenne, Marnay and La Vergenne all show how a report can begin as puzzling and end with a mundane explanation. That does not make the witnesses foolish; it shows that the sky is difficult to judge, especially at night, in motion, or without distance cues.[Geipan+2Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
Second, “unresolved” is not the same as “strong proof”. Villers-lès-Luxeuil is unresolved because the investigated hypotheses left stubborn mismatches, not because GEIPAN confirmed a craft of unknown origin. The report’s own caution about non-independent testimony and lack of material evidence is part of the case, not an afterthought.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frCompte rendu enquete725Compte rendu enquete725
Third, local context matters. A department with an active air base, low cloud, rural roads, small villages, aircraft approaches, astronomical events and night-time wildlife creates many opportunities for sincere but difficult observations. The value of the Haute-Saône record is that it gives readers a department-level example of how UFO history should be handled: case by case, with the strongest ordinary explanations tested first, and with the remaining uncertainty stated plainly rather than inflated into certainty.
Amazon book picks
Further Reading
Books and field guides related to What Really Happened Over Haute Saone?. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.
The UFO Experience
Explains case evaluation, witness reports and classification approaches.
UFOs and Government
Useful for readers interested in official investigations such as GEIPAN.
eBay marketplace picks
Marketplace Samples
Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.
Endnotes
1.
Source: carteovni.fr
Title: Carte Ovni.fr OVN I dans le Haute-Saône (70) — Carte Ovni.fr
Link:https://carteovni.fr/departement/haute-sa-one
2.
Source: cnes.fr
Title: GEIPAN | CNES
Link:https://cnes.fr/en/projects/geipan
3.
Source: carteovni.fr
Link:https://carteovni.fr/commune/villers-les-luxeuil-70
4.
Source: carteovni.fr
Link:https://carteovni.fr/commune/la-neuvelle-les-lure-70
5.
Source: carteovni.fr
Title: la neuvelle les lure 1989 0501176
Link:https://carteovni.fr/cas/la-neuvelle-les-lure-1989-0501176
6.
Source: carteovni.fr
Title: villers les luxeuil 2019 1150872
Link:https://carteovni.fr/cas/villers-les-luxeuil-2019-1150872
7.
Source: carteovni.fr
Title: Cas OVNI non identifiés (classe D) en France
Link:https://carteovni.fr/classification/d
8.
Source: carteovni.fr
Title: navenne 2021 0851222
Link:https://carteovni.fr/cas/navenne-2021-0851222
9.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas?field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B0%5D=11&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation&page=%2C30&select-category-export=nothing&sort=desc
10.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?customGetLattitude=50.18191716948982&customGetLongitude=-2.197265625&customGetZoom=4&field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B14%5D=14&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B15%5D=15&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=65.69447579373418&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=34.66935854524545&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=24.433593750000004&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=-28.828125000000004&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation&page=3%2C4&select-category-export=nothing&sort=desc
11.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas?field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B11%5D=11&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=1&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=116&order=field_date_d_observation&page=%2C26&select-category-export=nothing&sort=asc&video=on
12.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas?field_date_value=2007-03-01&field_is_new_value=1&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&page=%2C49
13.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_classification_des_cas&page=3&sort=desc
14.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas?field_agregation_index_value=lune&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation&page=%2C11&sort=desc
15.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=1&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_classification_des_cas&page=%2C422&select-category-export=nothing&sort=desc&video=on
16.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/fr/temoignage/9753
17.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Meeting France’s UFO detectives
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zczcBLukQ6s
18.
Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hn2xTieploU
19.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Geipan: France is also interested in UFOs
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OLXDikL331Y
20.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/cas/2021-08-51222
21.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/cas/2016-11-09585
22.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/cas/2010-06-02600
23.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/temoignage/4694
24.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/temoignage/9754
25.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: Geipan Mission & Geipan | GEIPAN
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/missions-methodes-et-resultats
26.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: Compte rendu enquete725
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/Compte%20rendu%20enquete725.pdf
27.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: Recherche de CASNo information is available for this page
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas
28.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas?field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id%5B0%5D%5Btarget_id%5D=217&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&page=%2C5&select-category-export=nothing
29.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/temoignage/9119
30.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B13%5D=13&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=title&page=50&sort=desc
31.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/temoignage/10027
32.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?order=field_classification_des_cas&page=13&sort=desc&undefined=
33.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_date_value=2007-03-01&field_is_new_value=1&order=field_date_d_observation_textuel&page=4&sort=asc
34.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=Gard&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation&page=1&sort=asc
35.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas?field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B11%5D=11&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=50.708634400828224&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=31.765537409484374&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=20.22890244005691&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=-5.127542872443095&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_classification_des_cas&page=%2C40&select-category-export=nothing&sort=desc
36.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B12%5D=12&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B13%5D=13&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B14%5D=14&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B15%5D=15&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B16%5D=16&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=1&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=88%2C7&select-category-export=nothing&sort=desc&video=on
37.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?customGetLattitude=41.2370859051563&customGetLongitude=7.550679783806908&customGetZoom=5&field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B13%5D=13&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=50.708634400828224&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=31.765537409484374&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=20.22890244005691&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=-5.127542872443095&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date&page=44&sort=asc
38.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/en/search/cas?field_date_value=2007-03-01&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date&page=%2C97&sort=desc
39.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/recherche/cas?field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B11%5D=11&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&page=%2C31
40.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=Gard&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_classification_des_cas&page=0&sort=desc
41.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/search/cas?field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B14%5D=14&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B15%5D=15&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B16%5D=16&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&page=%2C1&select-category-export=all_temoignages
42.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas?field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B0%5D=14&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B1%5D=15&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B2%5D=16&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=title&page=3%2C10&select-category-export=nothing&sort=asc
43.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/recherche/cas?field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B11%5D=11&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&page=%2C58
44.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?customGetLattitude=46.124763699209396&customGetLongitude=2.4169921874999996&customGetZoom=6&field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id=All&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=50.52739681329302&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=41.72213058512578&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=9.8876953125&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=-5.053710937500001&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_classification_des_cas&page=%2C7&sort=desc
45.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas?field_agregation_index_value=lune&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=%2C11&sort=asc
46.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas?field_agregation_index_value=Photo&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=title&page=%2C35&sort=asc
47.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_classification_des_cas&page=1&sort=desc
48.
Source: Wikipedia
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GEIPAN
49.
Source: mapcarta.com
Link:https://mapcarta.com/24944630
Additional References
50.
Source: lemonde.fr
Link:https://www.lemonde.fr/en/france/article/2025/03/19/macron-announces-establishment-fourth-nuclear-air-base-in-france_6739324_7.html
51.
Source: globalmilitary.net
Link:https://www.globalmilitary.net/airbases/base-aerienne-116-luxeuil-saint-sauveur/
52.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/BA116LUXEUIL/
53.
Source: lafederationdefense.fr
Link:https://www.lafederationdefense.fr/club/380-04-a/
54.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/futura.sciences.fr/posts/ce-mardi-ce-nest-pas-une-soucoupe-volante-qui-a-%C3%A9t%C3%A9-observ%C3%A9e-mais-un-autre-ph%C3%A9no/1163306512501320/
55.
Source: nationalgeographic.fr
Link:https://www.nationalgeographic.fr/espace/france-qui-se-cache-derriere-le-geipan-le-bureau-des-ovnis-en-france-etrange-enquetes
56.
Source: reddit.com
Link:https://www.reddit.com/r/todayilearned/comments/1qa0lyb/til_that_france_has_a_dedicated_unit_to_finding/
57.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/reelmediaofficiel/videos/le-jour-o%C3%B9-ce-pilote-croise-un-ovni/1014600110780711/
58.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/meteofranccomtoise/posts/-les-gaz-dune-fus%C3%A9e-en-pleine-man%C5%93uvre-viennent-dappara%C3%AEtre-dans-le-ciel-de-fran/1354049306730395/
59.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/LEstRepublicainVesoulHauteSaone/posts/une-affaire-tr%C3%A8s-%C3%A9trange-selon-les-enqu%C3%AAteurs/1762074271720955/
Topic Tree
Follow this branch
Related pages 95
- Manche UFOs
- Ariege UFOs
- Correze UFOs
- Dordogne UFOs
- Hautes Pyrenees UFOs
- +90 more in sidebar