What Really Happened in Eure et Loir Skies?
Eure-et-Loir has a modest but unusually useful UFO record: not because it proves extraordinary craft over the Beauce, Perche or Drouais, but because many local reports are preserved in the public files of GEIPAN, the French space agency’s unit for unidentified aerospace phenomena. The department’s pattern is clear.
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
That makes Eure-et-Loir a good department for readers who want to understand the difference between “unexplained” and “unproven”. The strongest local material comes not from folklore alone, but from gendarmerie statements, GEIPAN reappraisals, witness questionnaires, press mentions and aviation context around places such as Chartres, Dreux, Châteaudun, Vernouillet and the A10 corridor.[Geipan+2CNES]cnes-geipan.frGeipan Mission & Geipan | GEIPANGeipan Mission & Geipan | GEIPAN
What the official record shows
GEIPAN is part of CNES, the French space agency. It collects, analyses, investigates, archives and publishes reports of unidentified aerospace phenomena, using the term UAP rather than UFO because the reported thing is not always a solid object and because “UFO” often implies flying saucers or aliens. CNES says GEIPAN was created in the French official lineage that began in 1977 and works with partners including the gendarmerie, police, the French Air and Space Force, CNRS and Météo-France.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frGeipan Mission & Geipan | GEIPANGeipan Mission & Geipan | GEIPAN
For Eure-et-Loir, GEIPAN’s searchable case list gives a compact departmental history. The entries include Romilly-sur-Aigre in 2019, Le Thieulin in 2022, Brézolles in 2023, Fresnay-le-Comte in 1979, Châteaudun in 1980, Authon-du-Perche in 1980, Toury in 2012, Rohaire in 2012, Villiers-le-Morhier in 1997, Dreux in 2002 and 1987, Trancrainville in 1982, Saussay in 1986, Vernouillet in 2011, Chérisy in 2015, Sainville in 2016 and Dreux again in 2018. The list is striking because only one of these is marked as class D in the visible official table: Trancrainville.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frGeipan Recherche de cas | GEIPANGeipan Recherche de cas | GEIPAN
GEIPAN’s categories matter. “A” cases are clearly identified, “B” cases are probably identified, “C” cases lack enough reliable information, and “D” cases remain unexplained after assessment. That does not mean a class D case is evidence of extraterrestrial technology. CNES states more broadly that GEIPAN has found no proof of extraterrestrial life or advanced visiting technology in its investigations; its role is to explain what can be explained and document what cannot.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frGeipan Mission & Geipan | GEIPANGeipan Mission & Geipan | GEIPAN
The A10 case near Trancrainville: the department’s standout mystery
The most important Eure-et-Loir-linked official case is the January 1982 observation recorded by GEIPAN under Trancrainville. In the published summary, gendarmes from a motorway patrol on the A10, travelling in the Paris-to-province direction between about 4.35 am and 4.55 am, saw a pale undefined mass in the sky and a strongly lit area on the ground. Their observation continued over roughly 30 kilometres, sometimes while driving and sometimes while stopped. They reported no particular noise, lost sight of the phenomenon several times, and then saw it again.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
The case matters because it has several features often missing from weaker UFO reports. The witnesses were gendarmes on duty; the observation was not just a brief flash; the reported light affected the landscape, including pylons and buildings; and the file was later re-examined by GEIPAN. The original record also included local checks: the gendarmes contacted Orléans Air Base 123, seven kilometres from the motorway, and were told no aircraft or helicopter was in flight and that the base radar had been off since the previous evening. Cofiroute, the motorway operator, was also contacted and no employee reported the phenomenon.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
GEIPAN considered astronomical confusion but found it inadequate. Planets such as Jupiter, Saturn or Mars were present, and a moving witness can misread bright celestial bodies as “following” them. However, GEIPAN noted that this did not explain a pale mass seen through cloud or focused lighting on the ground. A helicopter with a powerful searchlight was also explored, and at first looks more plausible: it could explain a vague mass, lack of visible navigation lights and a moving patch of illumination. Yet GEIPAN judged that hypothesis too weak, citing cloud height, the implied range and focus of the light, the reported quality of the illumination and the practical question of why a helicopter would operate above cloud while using a searchlight.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
The final classification remains D: unexplained. GEIPAN also added an important caution. Because the case was re-examined long after the event, the kind of modern field reconstruction and cognitive interview that would now be expected was no longer possible. The case is therefore best read as an unresolved, medium-to-strong file with notable witnesses and documented checks, not as a confirmed exotic craft case.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
The older “flying saucer” era in Chartres and Dreux
Before official GEIPAN-style case files became the main public reference point, Eure-et-Loir had a more classic “flying saucer” phase in local press culture. Local historian Alain Denizet, drawing on press accounts, describes a 1952 cluster around Chartres and Ymonville, including a reported white disc over Chartres cathedral on 4 June 1952 and a separate report the same day of a silvery luminous trail near the airfield and gasworks. Another witness at Ymonville reportedly saw a pale yellow disc moving silently at around midnight.[Alain Denizet]alaindenizet.frAlain Denizet Soucoupes volantes en Eure-et-LoirAlain Denizet Soucoupes volantes en Eure-et-Loir
These reports belong to a different evidential world from modern GEIPAN files. They are useful as cultural history: they show how quickly the post-1947 flying-saucer wave reached provincial France, how local newspapers framed ambiguous aerial observations, and how witness language borrowed from the imagery of discs, saucers and mysterious craft. They are less useful as proof of what was physically in the sky. The descriptions are brief, the sources are mediated by press retelling, and there is little sign of technical reconstruction.[Alain Denizet]alaindenizet.frAlain Denizet Soucoupes volantes en Eure-et-LoirAlain Denizet Soucoupes volantes en Eure-et-Loir
When the sky looks strange but the answer is ordinary
Many Eure-et-Loir cases show GEIPAN’s most common pattern: the witness’s experience is sincere and odd, but the explanation is a known object or perception effect. The 1979 Fresnay-le-Comte case is a good example. A driver and two passengers saw a red, non-dazzling, phosphorescent-looking object above a wood near Fresnay-le-Comte, changing shape before disappearing. The case had once been treated as more puzzling, but GEIPAN’s later reappraisal classified it as A: a misidentification of the rising Sun in a cloudy sky. The position, colour, apparent lighting of the wood and changing shape all fitted that explanation.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
The 1980 Châteaudun case is another useful lesson in astronomy. Several people saw a bright whitish ball near something resembling a crescent Moon, with later reports of apparent movement. GEIPAN concluded that the witnesses had seen the Moon with earthshine and Venus above it. The file notes that the Moon was near the horizon, that Venus was nearby, and that apparent movement could have been exaggerated by horizon effects and the autokinetic effect, the illusion that a fixed light moves when stared at in darkness.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
Modern cases repeat the same theme with newer objects. At Le Thieulin in 2022, a witness reported a bright star-like phenomenon moving irregularly, first with the naked eye and then through binoculars. GEIPAN concluded that the first observation was Sirius and the second Arcturus, with twinkling at low elevation and autokinesis explaining the sense of changing form and erratic movement.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
Balloons and lanterns are also recurrent. Romilly-sur-Aigre in 2019 involved two white non-flashing spheres seen for only five seconds; GEIPAN judged them very probably LED balloons. Brézolles in 2023 involved a bright point near the Sun, with an apparent pause and change in movement; GEIPAN classified it as a festive Mylar balloon, using witness angles, weather modelling and compatibility with wind-driven motion.[Geipan]geipan.frOpen source on geipan.fr.
Weak files are not the same as mysteries
Several Eure-et-Loir cases are officially interesting because GEIPAN did not identify the phenomenon, but the reason is lack of information rather than strong anomaly. Toury in 2012 is class C: a single witness reported fast silent orange lights forming triangular shapes, but there were no precise azimuths, heights, object counts, relative positions or angular measurements. GEIPAN therefore could not make a solid judgement.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
Rohaire is similar. A witness reported in 2014 an observation said to have happened in 2012: an intense white and red light at low altitude, moving rapidly and changing direction. GEIPAN noted that the questionnaire was only partly completed, that key details such as duration and speed were missing, that only one position was supplied despite reported movement, and that mentioned photographs were never sent despite follow-up. The result was class C, not because the phenomenon was proven strange, but because the file was too weak to answer.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
Villiers-le-Morhier in 1997 is even thinner. GEIPAN’s public description records a yellow light moving above trees and forming three arcs of a circle, but says no other information is available. Such cases are useful in a departmental catalogue because they preserve local testimony, yet they should not be weighted as heavily as cases with multiple witnesses, timing, direction, weather data, official checks or photographs.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
Aviation makes some reports more serious, but not automatically exotic
Eure-et-Loir’s aviation geography matters. Châteaudun has long been associated with military aviation, and French archive records identify Base aérienne 279 Châteaudun across the period 1939 to 2014. Local heritage sources also describe the old Châteaudun airfield as a major German-held airfield during the Second World War and a continuing centre of aeronautical memory. This aviation background helps explain why local sky reports often raise questions about aircraft, bases, radar and pilot observations.[France Archives]francearchives.gouv.frOpen source on gouv.fr.
The department’s recurring explanations
Across the official Eure-et-Loir record, several explanations recur often enough to form a local pattern.
Astronomical bodies: Châteaudun, Authon-du-Perche and Le Thieulin show how Venus, the Moon, Sirius or Arcturus can become strange when seen low on the horizon, through haze, cloud or binoculars, or when the witness has no fixed reference points. GEIPAN’s own methodology emphasises that autokinesis and other perception effects can turn ordinary lights into apparently moving phenomena.[Geipan+2Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
Balloons: Romilly-sur-Aigre and Brézolles show two modern variants: LED balloons at night and reflective Mylar balloons by day. The Brézolles case is especially useful because GEIPAN checked air traffic and meteorological compatibility rather than merely naming a convenient explanation.[Geipan]geipan.frOpen source on geipan.fr.
Lanterns: Chérisy in 2015 and Sainville in 2016 were both classified as probable Thai lantern cases. Chérisy involved more than ten silent white and red lights moving across the night sky, compatible with weekend lantern releases and wind direction. Sainville involved a short silent white light observation by a group stargazing in a field; GEIPAN noted that absence of wind at ground level did not rule out wind at altitude.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
Insufficient data: Toury, Rohaire and Villiers-le-Morhier show the limits of retrospective testimony. Without precise direction, elevation, timing, photographs, independent witnesses or environmental checks, a case can remain “unidentified” in a bureaucratic sense while still being too weak to support a strong mystery.[Geipan+2Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
How to read Eure-et-Loir’s UFO history fairly
The fairest reading is neither dismissive nor sensational. Eure-et-Loir has real UFO history: local flying-saucer stories from the 1950s and 1960s, an official departmental trail through GEIPAN, gendarmerie records, aviation-linked reports, and at least one unresolved file of genuine interest. But the same record also shows how often a compelling first impression weakens after reconstruction. Sunrise, Venus, the Moon, stars, lanterns and balloons explain much of the department’s official catalogue.[Alain Denizet+2Geipan]alaindenizet.frAlain Denizet Soucoupes volantes en Eure-et-LoirAlain Denizet Soucoupes volantes en Eure-et-Loir
The Trancrainville case is the main exception and should be handled with care. It has official witnesses, a longer duration, environmental effects and investigated alternatives that GEIPAN did not find persuasive. Yet even there, the file is constrained by the age of the case and the impossibility of a modern field reconstruction. Its value lies in being a well-preserved unresolved case, not in proving a preferred extraordinary explanation.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
For readers exploring the department, the best route is to separate three layers. First are explained cases, which are often the most educational because they show how misperception works. Second are weak class C reports, which preserve testimony but do not carry much evidential weight. Third is the small unresolved core, led by Trancrainville, where the known explanations were considered and found wanting. That distinction is what makes the Eure-et-Loir record useful: it turns a loose collection of strange lights into a disciplined local history of claims, checks, explanations and remaining uncertainty.
Amazon book picks
Further Reading
Books and field guides related to What Really Happened in Eure et Loir Skies?. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.
UFOs
Focuses on documented reports, official investigations, and evidential standards similar to GEIPAN case analysis.
The Report on Unidentified Flying Objects
Provides context for how government agencies assess unexplained aerial reports and separate strong from weak cases.
In Plain Sight: an Investigation Into UFOs and Impossible Sci...
Examines modern UAP evidence, witnesses, and investigative methods relevant to readers exploring official case files.
The UFO Experience
Explains how reported sightings are evaluated and classified, matching the page's focus on distinguishing explained from unexplained cases.
eBay marketplace picks
Marketplace Samples
Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.
Endnotes
1.
Source: cnes.fr
Title: GEIPAN | CNES
Link:https://cnes.fr/en/projects/geipan
2.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/fr/cas/2019-04-50749
3.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/sites/default/files/PV%20n%C2%B0341%20%282022351166%29.pdf
4.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/sites/default/files/PV%20n%C2%B0564%20%281979308680%29.pdf
5.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/sites/default/files/PV%20n%C2%B01370%20%282015311626%29.pdf
6.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas?field_agregation_index_value=Gard&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation&page=%2C52&sort=desc
7.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas?field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=1&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=%2C25&sort=asc
8.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B0%5D=14&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B1%5D=15&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B2%5D=16&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=1&select-category-export=nothing&sort=asc
9.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/fr/cas/2022-03-51333?field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B0%5D=11&order=field_departement_textuel&page=11%2C37&sort=asc
10.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=title&page=44&sort=asc
11.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B0%5D=11&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date&page=42&sort=asc
12.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B11%5D=11&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=title&page=35&sort=desc
13.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=Photo&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation_textuel&page=%2C65&sort=desc
14.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?field_date_value=2020-11-18&field_is_new_value=1&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_classification_des_cas&page=9&sort=asc
15.
Source: cnes.fr
Link:https://cnes.fr/projets/geipan
16.
Source: epizodsspace.airbase.ru
Title: Varnoteaux Mouriaux Alexandre Ananoff (1910 1992)
Link:https://epizodsspace.airbase.ru/bibl/inostr-yazyki/iaa/2015/Varnoteaux_Mouriaux_Alexandre_Ananoff_%281910-1992%29.pdf
17.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Ancient Aliens: French Government EXPOSES Evidence of UFOs (Special) | History
Link:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2wBIkZ646gA
18.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: Geipan Recherche de cas | GEIPAN
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=1&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=119&select-category-export=nothing&sort=desc&video=on
19.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: Geipan Recherche de cas | GEIPAN
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=1&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=120&select-category-export=nothing&sort=desc&video=on
20.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/1982-01-00913
21.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: Geipan Mission & Geipan | GEIPAN
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/missions-methodes-et-resultats
22.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2011-03-02724
23.
Source: alaindenizet.fr
Title: Alain Denizet Soucoupes volantes en Eure-et-Loir
Link:https://alaindenizet.fr/soucoupes-volantes-en-eure-et-loir/
24.
Source: air-cosmos.latribune.fr
Title: Air&Cosmos Il y a 25 ans disparaissait Alexandre Ananoff
Link:https://air-cosmos.latribune.fr/article/espace/7109769586407/il-y-a-25-ans-disparaissait-alexandre-ananoff
25.
Source: saf-astronomie.fr
Link:https://saf-astronomie.fr/alexandre-ananoff-lastronaute-meconnu/
26.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/1979-10-00674
27.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/1980-02-00738
28.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2022-03-51333
29.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2023-08-51447
30.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2012-07-08278
31.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2012-11-08711
32.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/1997-08-01466
33.
Source: francearchives.gouv.fr
Link:https://francearchives.gouv.fr/fr/findingaid/09d5809ec14ef892976bc2003b94378b932d2f00
34.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2015-05-09204
35.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2016-08-50289
36.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/
37.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/PV%20n%C2%B0341%20%282022351166%29.pdf
38.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?customGetLattitude=46.124763699209396&customGetLongitude=2.4169921874999996&customGetZoom=6&field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id=All&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=50.52739681329302&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=41.72213058512578&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=9.8876953125&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=-5.053710937500001&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=114&sort=desc
39.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?order=field_departement_textuel&page=122&sort=desc&undefined=
40.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/PV%20n%C2%B0564%20%281979308680%29.pdf
41.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/search/cas?field_agregation_index_value=Gard&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date&page=%2C11&sort=asc
42.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?field_date_valu_valu=04-23&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=43&sort=asc
43.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas?field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=1&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=title&page=%2C25&sort=asc
44.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=c&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_classification_des_cas&page=63&sort=asc
45.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=title&page=44&s=09&sort=asc
46.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B0%5D=14&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B1%5D=15&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B2%5D=16&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=1&select-category-export=nothing&sort=asc
47.
Source: Wikipedia
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GEIPAN
48.
Source: runway28.nl
Link:https://www.runway28.nl/2003_05_11_LFOC_EN.php
49.
Source: servicehistorique.sga.defense.gouv.fr
Link:https://www.servicehistorique.sga.defense.gouv.fr/ark/1473939
Additional References
50.
Source: youtube.com
Title: French Government DECLASSIFIED UFO Report: The COMETA Files Explained
Link:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_m7TEFOFW4Q
51.
Source: youtube.com
Title: France’s Official UFO Investigation Agency (GEIPAN)
Link:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lXi5B0NTwVc
52.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Pierre Bescond: Why France Studied UFOs at the Highest Level
Link:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jWKfvL0666E
53.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Meeting France’s UFO detectives • FRANCE 24 English
Link:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zczcBLukQ6s
54.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/groups/beaute.de.tournai/posts/3109993875877125/
55.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/lechorepublicain.fr/posts/ce-mercredi-2-juillet-marque-la-journ%C3%A9e-mondiale-des-ovni-%C3%A0-cette-occasion-l%C3%A9cho/1510449276602247/
56.
Source: heesters.eu
Link:https://www.heesters.eu/at-the-fence/10s/chateaudun/
57.
Source: zininfrankrijk.nl
Link:https://www.zininfrankrijk.nl/de-10-mooiste-bezienswaardigheden-in-eure-et-loir/
58.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/memoire.histoire/
59.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/France3Occitanie/videos/-julien-debet-est-enqu%C3%AAteur-au-geipan-le-groupe-detudes-et-dinformations-sur-les/987261810372598/
Topic Tree
Follow this branch
Related pages 95
- Manche UFOs
- Ariege UFOs
- Correze UFOs
- Dordogne UFOs
- Hautes Pyrenees UFOs
- +90 more in sidebar