What Really Happened in Cantal's UFO Files?
Cantal’s UFO history is dominated by one famous rural encounter: the reported 1967 close encounter at Cussac, near Saint-Flour. It is one of the best-known French cases involving alleged occupants, but it is also a case where the evidence is contested, the retellings have varied, and later sceptical work has challenged the more extraordinary interpretation.
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
Cantal’s UFO history is dominated by one famous rural encounter: the reported 1967 close encounter at Cussac, near Saint-Flour. It is one of the best-known French cases involving alleged occupants, but it is also a case where the evidence is contested, the retellings have varied, and later sceptical work has challenged the more extraordinary interpretation. Beyond Cussac, the official GEIPAN record for Cantal is much less dramatic: several reports are either explained as ordinary phenomena, such as a weather balloon, a star, or an illuminated sky projector, or remain weak because too little reliable information survived. The result is a department-level history that is not a broad “flap” story, but a useful example of how French UFO cases move from local testimony to press coverage, official files, and later reappraisal.
Why Cantal matters in French UFO history
Cantal is not one of France’s busiest UFO departments in the public record, but it has an outsized place because of Cussac. The case sits in the same national conversation as earlier close-encounter stories such as Valensole and Quarouble, not because it proves an exotic explanation, but because it combines several elements that UFO researchers tend to find memorable: child witnesses, a rural setting, alleged small figures, an object on or near the ground, sensory details, and rapid official attention. A later sceptical review of French official UFO studies described Cussac as a close encounter that became “as famous in France” as Kelly-Hopkinsville in the United States, while arguing that a conventional helicopter hypothesis had not been investigated seriously enough by official researchers.[Skeptical Inquirer]skepticalinquirer.orgSkeptical Inquirer
The department also matters because it shows the range of outcomes in the French system. GEIPAN, the French official body attached to CNES, does not use “UFO” as its working term; it prefers UAP, or the French equivalent, because witnesses may report lights, shapes, sounds, or perceived movements rather than a definite object. GEIPAN says it publishes anonymised sighting reports and conclusions, works with police and gendarmerie, volunteer investigators and scientific experts, and does not claim to be searching for extraterrestrial life.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frGeipan Mission & Geipan | GEIPANGeipan Mission & Geipan | GEIPAN
That distinction is important for Cantal. A case can be locally famous and still unresolved, weakly documented, or later explained. GEIPAN’s own classification scheme separates identified cases, probably identified cases, cases lacking enough usable data, and cases still unidentified after investigation; CNES summarises the categories as A, B, C and D, with category C meaning the file lacks exploitable information rather than being mysteriously strong.[CNES]cnes.frSérie OVNI(s): 5 choses à savoir sur le GEIPAN (qui existe pour de vrai) | CNESSérie OVNI(s): 5 choses à savoir sur le GEIPAN (qui existe pour de vrai) | CNES…
Cussac 1967: what the witnesses said happened
The Cussac report concerns two siblings, a boy aged 13 and his 9-year-old sister, who were tending cattle near the village on 29 August 1967. The core claim is that they saw four small dark figures near a round or spherical craft, and that the figures rose into the air and entered the object before it departed. Later summaries describe the figures as about 1.20 metres tall and the object as a bright sphere or round craft, with a whistling sound and an intense light that reportedly dazzled the boy.[zfilesuap.com]zfilesuap.comZ 檔案 / The Z FilesZ 檔案 / The Z Files
The incident was quickly reported locally. A later critical dossier quotes the early chronology: the case was publicised by radio on 30 August, then covered by the regional newspaper on 1 September 1967, after a journalist spoke with the children. The same dossier places the children by a dry-stone wall, watching the family herd, when the dog barked and the boy looked towards the opposite side of the road.[Observatoire zététique]zetetique.frObservatoire zététique Microsoft WordObservatoire zététique Microsoft Word
Several details helped the case endure. The children were said to have returned home crying and upset. A gendarmerie visit reportedly followed later that day, and later accounts refer to a sulphur-like smell and dried grass near the alleged departure point. Le Parisien’s 2007 report, written when France’s UFO files were attracting fresh attention, repeated the broad outline: two children near Cussac saw four black figures beside a large sphere, the figures rose into the air, the object left with a sharp whistling sound, and investigators noted an odour and dried grass.[leparisien.fr]leparisien.frDeux rencontres du troisième typeDeux rencontres du troisième type
Those details do not make the event proven. They explain why the case became durable. Cussac has enough immediate human drama to be memorable, enough local authority involvement to seem weightier than a campfire story, and enough uncertainty to keep both UFO writers and sceptics returning to it.
What official and semi-official investigation added
Cussac was not handled by GEIPAN in its modern form at the time because GEIPAN did not yet exist. CNES created GEPAN in 1977, and the service later became SEPRA and then GEIPAN in 2005. CNES’s own public summary describes that institutional sequence and notes that the service was created partly to centralise reports that had previously reached gendarmerie or other public bodies.[CNES]cnes.frSérie OVNI(s): 5 choses à savoir sur le GEIPAN (qui existe pour de vrai) | CNESSérie OVNI(s): 5 choses à savoir sur le GEIPAN (qui existe pour de vrai) | CNES…
The 1967 case was first investigated by private UFO groups and later revisited by GEPAN in 1978. A modern case summary notes that GEPAN carried out an on-site reconstruction with the witnesses and prepared an internal report for its scientific council, but did not publish a simple public identification of the phenomenon.[zfilesuap.com]zfilesuap.comZ 檔案 / The Z FilesZ 檔案 / The Z Files
The strongest doubts about Cussac
The main sceptical challenge is not that the children necessarily lied. It is that a sincere, frightening observation may have been misperceived, then reinforced by media attention and repeated questioning. The most prominent conventional hypothesis is that the witnesses saw a helicopter, possibly a light turbine-powered military helicopter, under unusual viewing conditions. The Skeptical Inquirer review argues that descriptive details from Cussac, including apparent shape, noise and take-off behaviour, are consistent with such a possibility, and criticises official handling for not giving that explanation adequate attention.[Skeptical Inquirer]skepticalinquirer.orgSkeptical Inquirer
That hypothesis is not a closed solution. A helicopter would need to fit the timing, location, sound, sightline, witness reactions and lack of confirmed flight record. Supporters of the case point to the children’s distress, the reported odour, and the consistency of the core story. Critics counter that several striking elements appear to have become more elaborate through later versions, and that child witnesses interviewed repeatedly over years are especially vulnerable to contamination of memory.
The most balanced reading is therefore neither “confirmed alien landing” nor “obviously nothing”. Cussac is a historically important unresolved or disputed case. It is strong as folklore, testimony and investigative history; it is weaker as physical evidence. Its value today is as a case study in how extraordinary claims are built from a mixture of immediate testimony, local authority response, press treatment, later expert interpretation and sceptical reanalysis.
Other Cantal cases in the GEIPAN record
Cantal’s official record outside Cussac is quieter, and that matters. It prevents the department’s UFO history from being reduced to one famous story while also showing that most reports do not stay mysterious after investigation.
In Pierrefort, GEIPAN records an old sighting said to have taken place around April 1960. Two schoolchildren reportedly saw a luminous phenomenon from a road at about 7.30 am, watched it for a few minutes, and saw it disappear towards the horizon. But the testimony was given much later, in 2008, and GEIPAN classed the case as C because the old date, lack of precision and absence of further information made a real investigation difficult or impossible.[Geipan]geipan.frOpen source on geipan.fr.
Pierrefort appears again in a 3 December 1978 file, involving three people who saw a strong light between 5 and 6 am, with red and blue flashing lights also reported. The gendarmerie found no traces or objects, and GEIPAN again classed the case as C for lack of reliable information.[Geipan]geipan.frOpen source on geipan.fr.
Mauriac provides a useful contrast because it initially sounds dramatic but was later identified. On 4 January 1990, about ten children in a school playground reported a silent black oval or cylindrical object, with details described as legs and windows, passing roughly 150 metres above the school. GEIPAN classed it as A after a weather balloon launched from Bordeaux was found in a nearby commune on 16 January; reconstruction from the debris identified the “legs” as the lower part of the radar reflector.[Geipan]geipan.frOpen source on geipan.fr.
Two recent Cantal files show how modern reports can be resolved with contemporary tools. In Pierrefort on 21 August 2022, a witness described multiple fast, silent, oval or translucent white forms near cloud level. GEIPAN classed the report as A and identified the phenomenon as an illuminated sky projector, with a low strangeness score and relatively good consistency because there was video and a technical questionnaire.[Geipan]geipan.frOpen source on geipan.fr.
At Saint-Urcize on 20 September 2024, a witness filmed and photographed a scintillating point that seemed to change colour from yellow-white to red. GEIPAN found the position close to Arcturus, noted that cold and windy conditions were compatible with strong atmospheric scintillation, and explained the apparent motion in the zoomed smartphone video as movement of the hand without visual reference points. The case was classed A: Arcturus.[Geipan]geipan.frOpen source on geipan.fr.
Does Cantal show a local UFO pattern?
The strongest pattern is not a wave of exotic craft. It is a pattern of rural and small-town sightings filtered through ordinary limits of perception: distance, darkness, terrain, weather, brief duration, and lack of reference points. Cantal’s landscape of high plateaux, pasture, scattered villages and dark skies can make lights seem isolated and strange. That does not make witnesses foolish. It means that a sincere observer may have very little context for judging size, distance, speed or altitude.
GEIPAN’s wider public explanation is useful here. The agency says many reports begin with something real in the sky, while the sense of strangeness may be added by perception effects: a moving star, a badly judged angular speed, an aircraft that seems stationary, or a witness trying to infer distance from an unidentified light.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frGeipan Mission & Geipan | GEIPANGeipan Mission & Geipan | GEIPAN
In Cantal, the documented examples fit that pattern. The Mauriac schoolyard object became a weather balloon. Saint-Urcize became a bright star seen low in the sky under scintillating conditions. Pierrefort 2022 became an illuminated sky projector. The 1960 and 1978 Pierrefort reports remain less useful not because they are especially strong mysteries, but because the information is too thin.
Cussac is the exception in fame and complexity, not proof of a department-wide phenomenon. It remains the anchor case because it is vivid, old, officially revisited and disputed. The rest of the record pushes in a more modest direction: Cantal’s UFO history is best read as a small set of reports in which one famous close encounter sits beside several ordinary or under-documented observations.
How to read Cantal’s UFO files without overclaiming
The first rule is to separate “unidentified” from “extraordinary”. A case can be unidentified because the data are poor, because the event was brief, or because the witness reported it long after the fact. GEIPAN’s category C is especially important: it means the file lacks enough usable information, not that investigators found strong evidence of an unknown craft.[CNES]cnes.frSérie OVNI(s): 5 choses à savoir sur le GEIPAN (qui existe pour de vrai) | CNESSérie OVNI(s): 5 choses à savoir sur le GEIPAN (qui existe pour de vrai) | CNES…
The second rule is to treat early testimony and later retellings differently. In Cussac, the earliest reports matter because they are closest to the event. Later interviews may preserve important memories, but they may also import details from newspapers, UFO books, investigators’ questions, and the witnesses’ own attempts to make sense of a frightening childhood experience.
The third rule is to value explanations that account for the whole scene, not just one detail. A weather balloon explanation for Mauriac is persuasive because it connects the timing, shape, debris and radar reflector. The Arcturus explanation at Saint-Urcize is persuasive because it links direction, elevation, scintillation, smartphone zoom and lack of reference points. The helicopter hypothesis for Cussac is more contested because it explains some features but still lacks a confirmed flight record and must account for the witnesses’ reported sensory and emotional details.[Geipan+2Geipan]geipan.frOpen source on geipan.fr.
The fourth rule is to keep witness sincerity separate from factual accuracy. Cantal’s files include reports by children, adults, multiple witnesses and people who were clearly surprised or frightened. Sincerity is relevant, but it does not by itself identify what was seen.
What remains genuinely unresolved
Cussac remains the unresolved centrepiece. Its core story has survived because it is unusually vivid and because it entered both local memory and national UFO literature. Yet its evidential status is mixed: the early involvement of local authorities and the children’s distress support the seriousness of the report, while the absence of decisive physical evidence, later variations in detail and plausible conventional hypotheses weaken any confident extraordinary claim.[zfilesuap.com+2Observatoire zététique]zfilesuap.comZ 檔案 / The Z FilesZ 檔案 / The Z Files
The Pierrefort 1960 and 1978 files also remain unresolved in a narrower sense, but they are not strong landmark mysteries. GEIPAN’s own reason is lack of reliable information, not high strangeness after a full investigation. That distinction is central to a fair department-level account.[Geipan]geipan.frOpen source on geipan.fr.
Cantal’s UFO history is therefore best summarised as a single famous close-encounter case surrounded by a modest official record of explained sightings and weak files. For readers, the department’s real interest lies less in a catalogue of spectacular incidents than in the contrast between Cussac’s enduring power as a story and GEIPAN’s quieter, case-by-case work of sorting reports into the explained, the under-documented and the genuinely disputed.
Amazon book picks
Further Reading
Books and field guides related to What Really Happened in Cantal's UFO Files?. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.
Passport to Magonia: from Folklore to Flying Saucers
Connects French UFO traditions, witness reports, and broader interpretations relevant to Cantal and Cussac.
The UFO Experience
Provides the close-encounter framework often used when discussing cases such as Cussac and other landmark reports.
UFOs
Focuses on official investigations and evidential standards, themes central to French UFO files and GEIPAN discussions.
Dimensions
Examines close-encounter narratives and competing interpretations, mirroring debates surrounding Cussac.
eBay marketplace picks
Marketplace Samples
Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.
Endnotes
1.
Source: skepticalinquirer.org
Title: Skeptical Inquirer
Link:https://skepticalinquirer.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/29/2009/01/p47.pdf?ref=thegalacticmind.com
2.
Source: cnes.fr
Title: Série OVNI(s): 5 choses à savoir sur le GEIPAN (qui existe pour de vrai) | CNES
Link:https://cnes.fr/actualites/serie-ovnis-5-choses-savoir-geipan
3.
Source: zfilesuap.com
Title: Z 檔案 / The Z Files
Link:https://zfilesuap.com/en/cases/cussac-1967
4.
Source: leparisien.fr
Title: Deux rencontres du troisième type
Link:https://www.leparisien.fr/societe/deux-rencontres-du-troisieme-type-23-03-2007-2007876993.php
5.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/Cometa_0.pdf
6.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/fr/cas/1960-04-02014?field_date_value=2004-04-23&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation&page=165&sort=desc
7.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/fr/cas/1978-12-00573
8.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/fr/cas/1990-01-01193?field_date_value=2004-04-23&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date&page=10&sort=asc
9.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/fr/temoignage/10229
10.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/fr/cas/2024-09-51582
11.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/
12.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B11%5D=11&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B12%5D=12&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B13%5D=13&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B14%5D=14&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=1&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=24&select-category-export=nothing&sort=asc&video=on
13.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B13%5D=13&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B14%5D=14&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B15%5D=15&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B16%5D=16&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=1&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=57.70414723434193&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=19.642587534013032&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=49.921875&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=-9.843750000000002&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=8&select-category-export=nothing&sort=asc&video=on
14.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas?field_date_value=2021-06-26&field_is_new_value=1&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=title&page=1%2C33&sort=desc
15.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=c&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=121&sort=desc
16.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=24&s=09&sort=asc
17.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B13%5D=13&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B14%5D=14&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B15%5D=15&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B16%5D=16&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=1&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=57.70414723434193&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=19.642587534013032&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=49.921875&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=-9.843750000000002&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation&page=44&select-category-export=nothing&sort=desc&video=on
18.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_date_value=2020-11-18&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=1&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=20&sort=desc
19.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=2004-04-23&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=1&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation&page=9%2C2&sort=desc
20.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_date_value=2024-08-12&field_is_new_value=1&order=field_date_d_observation_textuel&page=3&sort=desc
21.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=2023-08-04&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=1&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_classification_des_cas&page=4&sort=desc
22.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=2004-04-23&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=1&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation&page=14&sort=asc
23.
Source: zfilesuap.com
Title: quarouble 1954
Link:https://zfilesuap.com/en/cases/quarouble-1954
24.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Meeting France’s UFO detectives • FRANCE 24 English
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zczcBLukQ6s
25.
Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hn2xTieploU
26.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: Geipan Mission & Geipan | GEIPAN
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/missions-methodes-et-resultats
27.
Source: zetetique.fr
Title: Observatoire zététique Microsoft Word
Link:https://www.zetetique.fr/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/OvniDuCnes_chapitre10.pdf
28.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/recherche/cas?field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B11%5D=11&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&page=%2C22
29.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=2024-07-23&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=1&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=1&sort=asc
30.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2024-09-51582
31.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_classification_des_cas&page=162&s=09&sort=desc
32.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas?field_agregation_index_value=Vid%C3%A9o&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=title&page=%2C23&sort=asc
33.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=1&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&page=10&select-category-export=nothing&video=on
34.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?customGetLattitude=43.9503570933062&customGetLongitude=-3.31787109375&customGetZoom=5&field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B0%5D=11&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=53.014783245859235&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=34.88593094075317&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=8.920898437500002&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=-15.556640625000002&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=title&page=27%2C0&sort=asc
35.
Source: skepticalinquirer.org
Link:https://skepticalinquirer.org/2009/01/ufos-an-assessment-of-thirty-years-of-official-studies-in-france/
36.
Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CWt2zkuxRNQ
37.
Source: extraterrestre.org
Link:https://extraterrestre.org/cussac/
Additional References
38.
Source: youtube.com
Title: UFO: Military or Something Else? Cussac, the Unsolved French Mystery
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ySgXQclrJMo
39.
Source: researchgate.net
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330980867_The_chronology_of_human_and_animal_presence_in_the_decorated_and_sepulchral_cave_of_Cussac_France
40.
Source: ohmynews.com
Link:https://www.ohmynews.com/NWS_Web/View/img_pg.aspx?CNTN_CD=IA000605811
41.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/groups/1918635208971536/posts/2114751489359906/
42.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/1Fathomthecosmos/posts/horrified-by-the-images-of-ufo-disks-entering-a-giant-cave-in-the-mountainous-co/147939638190353/
43.
Source: nationalgeographic.fr
Link:https://www.nationalgeographic.fr/espace/france-qui-se-cache-derriere-le-geipan-le-bureau-des-ovnis-en-france-etrange-enquetes
44.
Source: reddit.com
Link:https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOB/comments/pplpwz/two_children_encounter_ufo_and_small_humanoid/
45.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/groups/spacehipsters/posts/1345679132143633/
46.
Source: amazon.it
Link:https://www.amazon.it/Close-Encounter-Cussac-Frederic-Miller/dp/6130774249?tag=searcht-20
47.
Source: youtube.com
Title: The unsolved case of the Cussac UFO
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lKRYL58nId8
Topic Tree
Follow this branch
Related pages 95
- Manche UFOs
- Ariege UFOs
- Correze UFOs
- Dordogne UFOs
- Hautes Pyrenees UFOs
- +90 more in sidebar