What Really Happened in Puy de Dome's UFO Files?
Puy-de-Dôme has one genuinely important place in French UFO history: the 1952 Lac Chauvet photographs, taken near a volcanic lake in the department and later argued over by photo analysts, sceptics, and UFO researchers.
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
Puy-de-Dôme has one genuinely important place in French UFO history: the 1952 Lac Chauvet photographs, taken near a volcanic lake in the department and later argued over by photo analysts, sceptics, and UFO researchers. Beyond that landmark case, the department’s public record is less a story of dramatic unresolved encounters than of ordinary sky reports filtered through France’s official investigation system, GEIPAN, the CNES unit that collects, analyses, archives, and publishes reports of unidentified aerospace phenomena.[Ipaco]ipaco.frReport Lac ChauvetReport Lac Chauvet
The short answer is that Puy-de-Dôme is best understood as a department where the UFO record is strong on documentation but weak on confirmed mystery. Several official cases are explained or probably explained as aircraft, lanterns, reflections, astronomical objects, balloons, or likely atmospheric re-entry; others remain classed as insufficiently documented rather than truly unexplained. The Lac Chauvet photographs still matter historically, but a detailed 2016 technical reanalysis argued that the images were compatible with a small thrown object rather than a large unknown craft.[Geipan+2Geipan]geipan.frRecherche de cas | GEIPANRecherche de cas | GEIPAN
Why Puy-de-Dôme matters in French UFO history
For a mainstream reader, Puy-de-Dôme’s UFO significance rests on a contrast. On one side is the romance of the landscape: volcanic peaks, high plateaux, open rural views, and a long aviation history around Clermont-Ferrand and Aulnat. On the other is the dry official record, where most sightings lose some of their mystery once investigators compare witness impressions with weather, aircraft movements, astronomy, lighting effects, and available photographs or videos.
France is unusual because it has a public, state-linked UFO investigation body. CNES says GEIPAN was created in 1977, collects and analyses eyewitness accounts, and publishes documented cases, while working with partners including the gendarmerie, police, the air and space force, CNRS, and Météo-France.[CNES]cnes.frGEIPAN | CNESGEIPAN | CNES GEIPAN’s own classification system is not a simple “real or fake” scale. It weighs the residual strangeness of a report against the consistency of the evidence: A means identified, B probably identified, C not identified because of lack of data, and D not identified after investigation.[Geipan]geipan.frClassification | GEIPANClassification | GEIPAN
That distinction matters in Puy-de-Dôme. A C case is not a strong mystery; it is often a weak file. A B case is not a confirmed unknown; it is usually a probable explanation. Even a striking witness report can fall back into the ordinary if the evidence is thin, the observation was brief, or the circumstances match common causes such as aircraft lights, lanterns, Venus, Sirius, balloons, reflections, or meteor-like re-entry.
Lac Chauvet: the department’s landmark case
The best-known Puy-de-Dôme UFO episode happened on 18 July 1952 near Lac Chauvet. According to the later technical report by Antoine Cousyn, François Louange, and Geoff Quick, André Frégnale, described as a geologist in his thirties with a strong interest in technical matters, took four photographs at about 6.10 pm showing an apparent object in the sky. The witness account said the photographs were taken over roughly 25 seconds, with the object moving silently from west to east.[Ipaco]ipaco.frReport Lac ChauvetReport Lac Chauvet
The case became important because it was not just a fleeting verbal account. It involved photographs, a known location, a named witness, and later attempts to reconstruct the geometry of the scene. Earlier favourable readings treated the images as potentially genuine photographs of a real unknown object, and the 2016 report notes that astronomer Pierre Guérin had carried out a detailed photometric analysis in the 1990s.[Ipaco]ipaco.frReport Lac ChauvetReport Lac Chauvet
What makes Lac Chauvet valuable today is not that it proves an extraordinary craft. It is valuable because it shows how hard old UFO photographs are to interpret. The 2016 IPACO-linked analysis did not simply dismiss the case by tone or prejudice. It worked through camera position, likely lens and film behaviour, blur, geometry, witness claims, and possible ordinary objects. One key finding was that the motion blur in two photographs could not reliably be used to calculate the object’s speed, because much of the blur probably came from camera movement rather than object movement.[Ipaco]ipaco.frReport Lac ChauvetReport Lac Chauvet
The same report’s conclusion was sharply sceptical. It argued that the object’s size was about 14 centimetres, with an uncertainty of no more than 30 per cent, which would rule out a large distant craft and point instead towards a staged small-object explanation. The authors considered possible thrown objects, including Frisbee-like objects and clay pigeons, while noting that some options were historically easier to obtain in France in 1952 than others.[Ipaco]ipaco.frReport Lac ChauvetReport Lac Chauvet
For Puy-de-Dôme’s UFO history, Lac Chauvet is therefore a landmark but not a settled trophy case. It began as one of the department’s most visually impressive claims; later analysis weakened the case for a large unknown aerial object. Readers should treat it as historically important, technically interesting, and contested, but not as strong evidence that an unexplained craft flew over the lake.
What the official Puy-de-Dôme files show
GEIPAN’s public search results list a spread of Puy-de-Dôme cases across several decades. The entries include older reports from Billom, Châtel-Guyon, Cournon, Veyre-Monton and Issoire, later cases around Chamalières and Artonne, and more recent reports such as Moureuille, Menat, and Espinasse. The pattern is mixed: some are identified, some probably identified, and several are C cases where the issue is lack of reliable information rather than a robust unexplained phenomenon.[Geipan]geipan.frRecherche de cas | GEIPANRecherche de cas | GEIPAN
A useful way to read the department’s record is to group the cases by what they teach.
Brief lights often become weak files. Chamalières in July 2011 is a good example. A witness reported three white luminous balls crossing part of the sky in daylight, with no photograph and only a short observation. GEIPAN considered balloons, space debris re-entry, and ball lightning-like plasma, but the file suffered from a single witness, no image, and uncertainty about the wind. It was classed C because the available data could not validate or exclude the proposed explanations.[Geipan]geipan.frCompte rendu enquete319Compte rendu enquete319
Some dramatic impressions fit common causes. At Artonne on 1 April 2013, two witnesses were intrigued by a slow, silent orange luminous ball. GEIPAN classed the case B and described it as a probable Thai lantern, noting the orange colour, lack of trail, silent movement, and movement consistent with the wind.[Geipan]geipan.frOpen source on geipan.fr.
Multiple witnesses do not automatically mean mystery. In the Saint-Amant-Roche-Savine case of 12 January 1983, several witnesses saw a yellow luminous ball followed by small blue flame-like elements, apparently disintegrating and giving the impression of a fall nearby. Authorities searched the area without result, and GEIPAN judged it probable that the witnesses had seen an atmospheric re-entry.[cnes-geipan.fr]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
Recent video does not guarantee a hard case. At Espinasse on 12 October 2023, a witness filmed fast-moving white lights at night. GEIPAN classed the case A, identifying it as four fighter aircraft. The file notes that the witness heard an aircraft-like rumble, that military aircraft were present in the relevant time and direction, and that the observed movement was consistent with Rafales passing nearby at high speed.[cnes-geipan.fr]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
The overall picture is not a “hotspot” in the dramatic sense. It is a department with a few memorable reports, one historically famous photo case, and a set of official files that show how often unusual-looking sky events are downgraded once investigators reconstruct timing, direction, witness position, and likely sources.
Aviation, terrain, and why ordinary causes matter here
Puy-de-Dôme is not an empty sky. Clermont-Ferrand Auvergne Airport sits at Aulnat, east of Clermont-Ferrand, and the site has a long aviation history. The official airport history notes the creation of a mixed military and civil aerodrome and the closure of the military air base in 1985.[clermont-aeroport.com]clermont-aeroport.comOpen source on clermont-aeroport.com. CNES also lists aviation and military partners among the organisations relevant to GEIPAN’s work, which is important when a sighting may involve aircraft, flight paths, training, or radar-related checks.[CNES]cnes.frGEIPAN | CNESGEIPAN | CNES
This context does not “explain away” every report in advance. It simply raises the prior likelihood that some lights, engine sounds, fast tracks, and unusual formations may be aircraft-related. The Espinasse case shows that well: the witness lived in a military overflight area and still found the observation odd, but GEIPAN’s cross-check with aircraft data led to an ordinary explanation.[cnes-geipan.fr]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
The department’s geography also matters. Volcanic relief, valleys, elevated viewing points, and changing weather can make distance and speed hard to judge. A bright object low over a ridge can look close; a high aircraft can seem silent; a lantern can appear larger than it is; a reflection inside a vehicle can be mistaken for an outside light. GEIPAN’s Puy-de-Dôme list includes explanations such as reflection, Venus, Sirius, aircraft, lanterns, a LED balloon, and a hoax, which is exactly the range of mundane causes that tends to appear in regional UFO files.[Geipan]geipan.frRecherche de cas | GEIPANRecherche de cas | GEIPAN
The strongest doubts and the fairest reading
The strongest sceptical point about Puy-de-Dôme is simple: the official record does not show a cluster of high-consistency, unexplained D cases dominating the department. Instead, many cases are A, B, or C. GEIPAN says only a small proportion of its national cases remain unexplained after investigation, and its classification page stresses that D cases require both residual strangeness and sufficient consistency.[Geipan]geipan.frClassification | GEIPANClassification | GEIPAN
The strongest pro-UFO point is narrower but still worth taking seriously. Witnesses often describe observations that are genuinely puzzling to them at the time, and some reports include multiple witnesses, official involvement, photographs, or video. The Saint-Amant-Roche-Savine witnesses were convinced enough that authorities carried out searches; the Chamalières witness made a formal statement after GEIPAN contact; the Espinasse witness tried to film the lights; and Lac Chauvet produced photographs that remained debated for decades.[Ipaco+3cnes-geipan.fr+3Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
A fair reading sits between dismissal and belief. Puy-de-Dôme has produced sincere reports and at least one historically significant photographic controversy. But later investigation has generally weakened the more extraordinary interpretations. In the official files, “unidentified” often means “not enough reliable information”, not “evidence of an unknown craft”. In the Lac Chauvet case, the most substantial modern technical analysis argues against a large remote object.
How to judge a Puy-de-Dôme UFO claim
A reader encountering a local Puy-de-Dôme UFO story should ask five practical questions before treating it as important.
First, is it in GEIPAN’s database, and if so, what is the classification? A and B point towards identification or probable identification; C points towards insufficient data; D would be the strongest official unresolved category. GEIPAN’s classification page defines these categories and explains that consistency and residual strangeness are both necessary for a strong unexplained case.[Geipan]geipan.frClassification | GEIPANClassification | GEIPAN
Second, was the observation documented at the time? A gendarmerie statement, original photograph, video file, aircraft check, weather record, or official investigation report is far more useful than a retold anecdote. The Chamalières file is instructive because even a formal witness statement left GEIPAN with too little evidence to conclude.[Geipan]geipan.frCompte rendu enquete319Compte rendu enquete319
Third, did later reporting strengthen or weaken the original claim? Lac Chauvet became more interesting because it attracted technical analysis, but that analysis also made the extraordinary interpretation less persuasive.[Ipaco]ipaco.frReport Lac ChauvetReport Lac Chauvet
Fourth, does the explanation match the local setting? In Puy-de-Dôme, plausible checks include aircraft from or near Clermont-Ferrand/Aulnat, military overflights, lanterns at celebrations, bright planets or stars, re-entry-like fireballs, balloons, and reflections from vehicles or windows. GEIPAN’s own Puy-de-Dôme entries repeatedly point to that range of explanations.[Geipan]geipan.frRecherche de cas | GEIPANRecherche de cas | GEIPAN
Fifth, is the claim being inflated beyond the file? A C case should not be promoted as a strong mystery. A photograph should not be treated as proof without geometry, provenance, and image analysis. A sincere witness should not be mocked, but sincerity is not the same as identification.
Bottom line
Puy-de-Dôme’s UFO history is most memorable for Lac Chauvet and most useful for what its official files teach about investigation. The department offers a compact lesson in how UFO history is made: a striking sighting is reported, local and official records preserve it, investigators test ordinary explanations, and later analysts either strengthen or weaken the claim.
In Puy-de-Dôme, the balance currently favours caution. Lac Chauvet remains historically important but technically disputed; Chamalières 2011 remains unresolved only because the evidence was too thin; Artonne 2013 was probably a lantern; Saint-Amant-Roche-Savine 1983 was probably atmospheric re-entry; and Espinasse 2023 was identified as fighter aircraft. That does not make the witnesses foolish. It makes the department a good example of why UFO history is less about jumping to extraordinary answers than about preserving the report, testing the details, and being honest about what the evidence can and cannot bear.
eBay marketplace picks
Marketplace Samples
Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.
Endnotes
1.
Source: ipaco.fr
Title: Report Lac Chauvet
Link:https://www.ipaco.fr/ReportLacChauvet.pdf
2.
Source: cnes.fr
Title: GEIPAN | CNES
Link:https://cnes.fr/en/projects/geipan
3.
Source: geipan.fr
Title: Recherche de cas | GEIPAN
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=41&sort=desc
4.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/fr/cas/2013-04-08454?field_date_value=2007-03-01&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=title&page=160&sort=desc
5.
Source: geipan.fr
Title: Classification | GEIPAN
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/en/node/58787
6.
Source: geipan.fr
Title: Compte rendu enquete319
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/sites/default/files/Compte%20rendu%20enquete319.pdf
7.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/1983-01-00954
8.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2023-10-51478
9.
Source: clermont-aeroport.com
Link:https://www.clermont-aeroport.com/en/history
10.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/missions-methodes-et-resultats
11.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/note_tech_17.pdf
12.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/PV%20n%C2%B01698%20%282009310552%29.pdf
13.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/en/search/cas?field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B13%5D=13&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=title&page=%2C127&sort=desc
14.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/en/search/cas?field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=116&order=title&page=%2C466&select-category-export=nothing&sort=asc
15.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?customGetLattitude=46.124763699209396&customGetLongitude=2.406005859375001&customGetZoom=6&field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=50.52739681329302&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=41.72213058512578&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=8.745117187500002&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=-3.9331054687500004&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation_textuel&page=149&sort=desc&undefined=
16.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/en/search/cas?field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B13%5D=13&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_classification_des_cas&page=%2C159&sort=asc
17.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?field_date_valu_valu=04-23&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_classification_des_cas&page=120&sort=asc
18.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas?field_agregation_index_value=avion&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation&page=%2C53&sort=asc
19.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/en/search/cas?field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation&page=%2C20&sort=desc
20.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B0%5D=12&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date&page=57%2C6&sort=desc
21.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/en/node/52492
22.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas?field_agregation_index_value=militaire&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=title&page=%2C2&sort=desc
23.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas?field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B11%5D=11&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=1&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=116&order=field_classification_des_cas&page=%2C84&select-category-export=nothing&sort=asc&video=on
24.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas?field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B0%5D=13&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B1%5D=14&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_classification_des_cas&page=%2C171&select-category-export=nothing&sort=asc
25.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: export cas pub 20251127093552.csv
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/save_json_import_files/export_cas_pub_20251127093552.csv
26.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas?customGetLattitude=43.9503570933062&customGetLongitude=-3.31787109375&customGetZoom=5&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B0%5D=11&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=53.014783245859235&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=34.88593094075317&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=8.920898437500002&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=-15.556640625000002&order=title&page=%2C11&sort=desc
27.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=c&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_classification_des_cas&page=24%2C12&sort=desc
28.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas?field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B0%5D=13&order=field_classification_des_cas&page=%2C40&sort=asc
29.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/PV%20n%C2%B0591%20%282011310781%29.pdf
30.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/en/node/55938
31.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas?field_agregation_index_value=Gard&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date&page=%2C29&sort=asc
32.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=PV&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=title&page=%2C1&sort=asc
33.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/en/search/cas?field_=&field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date&page=%2C81&sort=asc
34.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=Avion+triangle+&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation&page=1&sort=desc
35.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/sites/default/files/PV%20AERO%20%281956211491%29.pdf
36.
Source: geipan.fr
Title: detection louange 2
Link:https://geipan.fr/sites/default/files/detection_louange_2.pdf
37.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/sites/default/files/Compte%20rendu%20enquete22.pdf
38.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/fr/cas/2012-08-08277?field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=title&page=148&sort=asc
39.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/fr/cas/2014-07-09121?field=&order=field_date_d_observation&page=46&sort=desc
40.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/fr/cas/2012-09-08328
41.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/en/node/57184?customGetLattitude=35.188709584047814&customGetLongitude=-33.92578125&customGetZoom=3&field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B11%5D=11&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=70.72897946208789&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=-0.3515602939922709&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=25.839843750000004&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=-93.69140625&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=33&sort=asc
42.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/en/node/57948?field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B0%5D=12&page=%2C22
43.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas?field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B0%5D=13&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date&page=7%2C6&sort=asc
44.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_date_value=2007-03-01&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=title&page=7&sort=asc
45.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas?field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=%2C81&sort=asc
46.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_date_value=2004-04-23&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation&page=62&sort=desc
47.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B12%5D=12&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B13%5D=13&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B14%5D=14&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B15%5D=15&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B16%5D=16&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=1&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=28&select-category-export=nothing&sort=desc&video=on
48.
Source: clermont-aeroport.com
Title: corporate and sustainable development
Link:https://www.clermont-aeroport.com/en/corporate-and-sustainable-development
49.
Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hn2xTieploU
50.
Source: youtube.com
Title: UFO Emits Weird White Material Onto Small French Town | Close Encounters
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hfrg0rhIaGg
51.
Source: Wikipedia
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GEIPAN
Additional References
52.
Source: youtube.com
Title: France’s Official UFO Investigation Agency (GEIPAN)
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lXi5B0NTwVc
53.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Pierre Bescond: Why France Studied UFOs at the Highest Level
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jWKfvL0666E
54.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Meeting France’s UFO detectives • FRANCE 24 English
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zczcBLukQ6s
55.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/TheFrenchHistoryPodcast/posts/a-drawing-from-the-files-at-the-french-ufo-department/1337099231754482/
56.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/groups/ufodaily/posts/1307301794230378/
57.
Source: imagesdefense.gouv.fr
Link:https://imagesdefense.gouv.fr/fr/prise-d-armes-a-la-base-d-aulnat.html
58.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/france3provencealpes/videos/un-ovni-dans-le-ciel-de-corr%C3%A8ze-/1477018715679274/
59.
Source: baaa-acro.com
Link:https://www.baaa-acro.com/zone/puy-de-dome?page=2
60.
Source: instagram.com
Link:https://www.instagram.com/reel/DW0uRj4gOlJ/?hl=en
61.
Source: reddit.com
Link:https://www.reddit.com/r/todayilearned/comments/1qa0lyb/til_that_france_has_a_dedicated_unit_to_finding/
Topic Tree
Follow this branch
Related pages 95
- Manche UFOs
- Ariege UFOs
- Correze UFOs
- Dordogne UFOs
- Hautes Pyrenees UFOs
- +90 more in sidebar