Within Charente Maritime UFOs
Why Coastal Lights Become UFO Reports
Recent reports show how lanterns, drones, the ISS and coastal conditions can turn familiar sights into UFO reports.
On this page
- Lantern cases at Saujon and Breuil Magne
- Drones, planets and the ISS as suspects
- How coastal weather changes what witnesses see
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
In Charente-Maritime, many modern UFO reports are best understood as night-light cases rather than encounters with solid unknown craft. The department has real UFO history, including older unresolved or disputed files, but its recent GEIPAN record shows a more prosaic pattern: orange lights, bright planets, possible drones, satellites, aircraft and weather-shaped optical effects can all look striking when seen over a coast, estuary or town at night. The point is not that every witness is careless. It is that familiar lights often become unfamiliar when distance, height, wind, cloud and darkness remove the usual clues.
This matters because Charente-Maritime is unusually well placed for such mistakes. It has a long Atlantic coastline, holiday crowds, private celebrations, airfields, maritime lights, estuary weather and open night horizons. The Saujon and Breuil-Magné lantern cases show how a simple orange light can enter the UFO record; the Saintes astronomical cases show how planets near the Moon can do the same; and the wider French record shows why drones, the International Space Station and satellite trains are now part of any serious explanation of modern night sightings.
Why lanterns keep fooling witnesses
The most useful modern Charente-Maritime examples are the lantern cases at Saujon in 2015 and Breuil-Magné in 2024. They are not spectacular in a “classic UFO” sense, but they are valuable because they show the mechanism in detail: a warm-coloured light, silent movement, uncertain distance, and a witness trying to interpret something seen briefly in a night sky.
At Saujon, two witnesses reported two very bright orange objects moving rapidly and silently between about 11 pm and 11.15 pm on 23 May 2015. GEIPAN classified the case as B, meaning a probable identification, and listed the phenomenon as a Thai lantern. The explanation rested on the colour, silence, short duration, weekend timing, and a west-to-east movement compatible with westerly wind data from Cognac. GEIPAN’s summary was cautious rather than dismissive: the sighting was a probable lantern release, perhaps from a nearby private celebration, but there was only one collected testimony.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
The Breuil-Magné case is even more instructive because it had video evidence. On 28 July 2024, a resident filmed what appeared to be an incandescent ball from an apartment window. The witness estimated it at about 300 metres altitude and 500 metres to one kilometre away, moving horizontally and silently, with a faint heat-like halo. As it moved, the light dimmed, darkened, and appeared to emit slight black smoke before disappearing behind roofs. GEIPAN found the case well documented despite having only one witness, because the video gave investigators a concrete view of the phenomenon in its surroundings.[geipan.fr]geipan.frCompte rendu d'enquete3Compte rendu d'enquete3
GEIPAN’s conclusion was firm: Breuil-Magné was classified A, an identified case, as a sky lantern carried by the wind. The investigation noted that the apparent track matched a 15 km/h wind, that the shape and glow were consistent with a lantern, and that the darkening plus faint smoke were typical of a lantern whose burner had consumed itself. The launch point could not be established, but GEIPAN considered a private summer celebration plausible.[geipan.fr]geipan.frCompte rendu d'enquete3Compte rendu d'enquete3
What makes these cases useful for readers is the mismatch between what witnesses feel they are seeing and what a lantern can actually do. GEIPAN’s own guidance says it has received many reports since around 2008 of orange balls moving silently across the night sky, and lists common witness descriptions: spheres, triangles, discs, ellipses, orange or reddish colours, apparent rapid motion, group movement, and little or no sound.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frGeipan Microsoft WordGeipan Microsoft Word
The coastal setting sharpens the effect. GEIPAN’s lantern guide notes that lanterns drift with wind and local air currents, which can vary around residential, industrial, commercial and seaside areas. It also warns that witnesses often overestimate distance and speed because a lantern is intrinsically much closer and dimmer than it may appear. A lantern at roughly 100 metres can be perceived as something much farther away, larger and faster, especially when the observer has no reference object against a dark sky.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frGeipan Microsoft WordGeipan Microsoft Word
Planets, the Moon and the problem of fixed lights
Not all modern night-light reports involve moving objects. Some begin with the opposite problem: a bright light that appears too fixed, too large, or too oddly placed to be a star. In Charente-Maritime, the Saintes cases in 2016 show how an ordinary astronomical object can become a UFO report when it appears near the Moon or near obstacles on the horizon.
On 21 March 2016 at about 11 pm, a witness in Saintes observed a very bright, round, white, fixed light to the left of the Moon. The observation lasted about an hour with the naked eye and binoculars, and the witness later noted that the light was gone by 4 am. GEIPAN classified the case A: a misidentification of Jupiter. Its reconstruction found that Jupiter matched the witness’s description and position relative to the Moon, and that the reported motion over several hours corresponded to the sky configuration that night.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
The same witness reported another Saintes sighting on 13 July 2016, this time a very bright white stationary light in a clear south-western sky at about 11.30 pm. GEIPAN again classified the case A, as an astronomical observation. Mars or Saturn, both close to the Moon that evening, fitted the report. GEIPAN also noted a revealing psychological detail: when the light seemed to vanish after about 30 seconds, the witness interpreted that disappearance as a sudden departure at enormous speed, whereas a passing cloud could have hidden the object.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
These two Saintes cases are small but important because they explain a common UFO-reporting trap. A planet is not doing anything strange. The strangeness is created by the viewing situation: low elevation, nearby Moon, partial blockage by trees or buildings, binocular viewing, thin cloud and the lack of depth cues. Once a witness has mentally labelled the point of light as an object rather than a planet, ordinary disappearance behind cloud can feel like acceleration.
This matters for Charente-Maritime because much of the department offers open views: estuaries, beaches, flat marshes, harbours and low skylines. A planet low over the coast can appear brighter, more isolated and more “placed” than it would in a crowded urban sky. The same geography that makes the department attractive for night walks and holiday viewing also makes bright astronomical objects easier to misread.
Drones, satellites and the new moving-light problem
Since the 2010s, the night-sky problem has changed. Earlier UFO witnesses often had to choose between aircraft, stars, meteors and lanterns. Modern witnesses also have drones, satellite trains and highly publicised space hardware in mind. These explanations should not be used lazily, but they now belong in the first round of checks for any recent Charente-Maritime light report.
Drones are especially awkward because they can hover, move slowly, change direction and show coloured lights. French rules do not make them irrelevant: they make unauthorised night sightings more ambiguous. The French transport ministry states that open-category drone flights do not require prior authorisation if the rules are met, but night flight is prohibited, flight in public urban space is prohibited, and maximum altitude is 120 metres; exemptions from the night-flight ban may be granted by the competent prefect.[Ministères Écologie et Transport]ecologie.gouv.frOpen source on gouv.fr.
That means a night-time drone-like light in Charente-Maritime should not be treated as impossible simply because the rules are restrictive. It might be an authorised professional operation, an illegal or mistaken recreational flight, or something else entirely. GEIPAN’s wider case record includes drone explanations for night lights elsewhere in France; for example, a 2022 case at Frontignan involved a bright green flashing light, first apparently stationary and then moving, which GEIPAN identified as a drone.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
Satellites create a different kind of confusion. NASA’s public “Spot the Station” guidance says the International Space Station can look like a very bright star or aircraft moving across the sky, but without flashing lights or direction changes; it also moves faster than a typical aircraft.[NASA]nasa.govOpen source on nasa.gov. The Planetary Society similarly describes the ISS as a bright, solid light that crosses the sky in minutes and does not blink like an aircraft.[The Planetary Society]planetary.orghow to spot the isshow to spot the iss
For Charente-Maritime, this is relevant because a bright object crossing a clear coastal sky after sunset can be both ordinary and impressive. The absence of flashing aircraft lights may make it feel less identifiable, not more. Satellite trains add another layer: GEIPAN has received many reports in France of luminous rows, bars, halos or moving points linked to SpaceX Starlink launches, and National Geographic’s account of GEIPAN describes a 4 May 2021 wave of reports from multiple regions that was explained by a Falcon 9 launch and Starlink satellite train.[National Geographic]nationalgeographic.frNational Geographic Qui se cache derrière le GEIPAN, le "bureau des ovnis" enNational Geographic Qui se cache derrière le GEIPAN, le "bureau des ovnis" en
Aircraft remain part of the picture too. La Rochelle – Ile de Ré Airport lists regular direct flights, including seasonal international routes and year-round domestic connections, and the airport site also points to Rochefort Charente-Maritime Airport and aeronautical activity such as flying clubs and general aviation.[Aéroport La Rochelle]larochelle.aeroport.frOpen source on aeroport.fr. In a coastal department, a distant aircraft can seem to hover when approaching head-on, vanish when turning, or appear oddly bright when landing lights point towards the observer.
How coastal weather changes what people think they saw
Weather is not just background information in Charente-Maritime; it can be part of the sighting. A light seen through haze, low cloud or marine moisture can look larger, softer, lower or more diffuse than the source really is. This does not require exotic mirages. Ordinary cloud and moisture can remove sharp edges, spread glare, and make lights appear as blobs, patches or glowing masses rather than points.
GEIPAN’s handling of lantern cases shows why wind matters. In Saujon, the west-to-east motion mattered because it matched the reported direction and available wind information. In Breuil-Magné, the apparent path of the incandescent object was judged coherent with a 15 km/h wind. In both cases, the witness did not need to feel a strong wind at ground level for the object aloft to drift.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
Cloud can also turn a simple event into a dramatic ending. In the July 2016 Saintes astronomical case, GEIPAN noted that the sudden extinction of a bright object could have been caused by a cloud passing in front of it, while the witness interpreted the disappearance as a rapid departure.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr. This is a recurring lesson: when the light source disappears, the mind often supplies motion.
Artificial light pollution adds another layer. The modern night sky is not naturally dark for most European observers. A global atlas of artificial night sky brightness found that more than 99% of people in Europe live under light-polluted skies and that the Milky Way is hidden from around 60% of Europeans.[arXiv]arxiv.orgarXiv The new world atlas of artificial night sky brightnessarXiv The new world atlas of artificial night sky brightness For UFO reporting, the practical effect is that people may rarely see a rich star field, but they do see isolated bright planets, aircraft lights, lanterns, satellites and reflections. A single bright point therefore feels more conspicuous than it might under a truly dark sky.
The coastal setting can make this even more misleading. Lights over water lack familiar distance markers. Harbour lights, aircraft, lanterns and planets near the horizon may all occupy the same apparent zone of sky. Reflections, haze and low cloud can blur the distinction between a light in the air, a light on the ground and a light reflected from below. The result is not a special “UFO zone”, but a place where ordinary optical uncertainty is unusually common.
What makes a modern night-light report stronger or weaker
A fair reading of Charente-Maritime’s modern night-light record should avoid two mistakes. The first is to treat every orange or white light as already solved. The second is to treat every witness’s uncertainty as evidence of something extraordinary. GEIPAN’s method sits between those extremes: it gathers direct testimony, technical details, drawings, photos or videos where available, and then tests ordinary hypotheses before deciding whether a case is identified, probably identified, too weakly documented, or still unexplained. GEIPAN describes itself as a CNES technical department whose mission is to collect, analyse, investigate, publish and archive UAP reports, and it stresses that witness testimony is the basis of its work but must be submitted through a technical questionnaire.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frGeipan Comprendre un Phénomène | GEIPANGeipan Comprendre un Phénomène | GEIPAN
For modern night lights in Charente-Maritime, the strongest reports are not necessarily the strangest-sounding. They are the ones with exact time, exact location, direction of view, duration, angular movement, weather, wind, photos or video, and ideally multiple independent witnesses from different positions. Breuil-Magné is a good example: the report sounded dramatic, but the video and wind analysis made the explanation stronger, not weaker.[geipan.fr]geipan.frCompte rendu d'enquete3Compte rendu d'enquete3
Weak reports often lack the details needed to separate a lantern from a drone, a satellite from an aircraft, or a planet from an object hidden by cloud. A short phone video can help, but it can also mislead if it lacks buildings, stars, horizon, sound, timestamps or original file metadata. A witness’s estimate of height and distance is especially fragile at night, because a small nearby lantern and a large distant object can occupy the same apparent size in the sky.
The practical lesson for Charente-Maritime’s UFO history is therefore modest but important. Modern night-light cases are not a sideshow; they explain why the department’s recent record contains so many ordinary outcomes. Saujon and Breuil-Magné show how festive lanterns enter the UFO pipeline. Saintes shows how planets can look misplaced or mobile when viewed through expectation and cloud. Drones and satellites show how newer technologies can produce reports that older investigators did not have to consider as often. Coastal weather ties them together by removing the visual clues people normally use to judge distance, scale and motion.
What these explanations do, and do not, settle
Ordinary explanations do not erase Charente-Maritime’s older or better unresolved UFO material. They do, however, change how modern reports should be read. A night light over the department is not automatically meaningful because it is silent, bright, orange, steady, low, fast-looking or seen near the coast. Those are precisely the features that lanterns, planets, satellites, drones, aircraft and weather-shaped lights can produce.
The most balanced conclusion is that modern Charente-Maritime UFO reporting is less about one hidden phenomenon than about a busy visual environment. Holiday celebrations launch lantern-like objects. Bright planets sit near the Moon. The ISS and satellites cross the sky without aircraft-style flashing. Drones can hover or show coloured points. Aircraft approach and turn around La Rochelle and Rochefort. Low cloud, haze, wind and sea horizons then distort the witness’s sense of distance and motion.
That does not make witnesses foolish. It makes their reports human. The value of the recent cases is that they show the investigation moving from impression to mechanism. When the mechanism fits the timing, weather, direction, video and behaviour, the mystery weakens. When those details are absent, the honest answer is usually not “extraordinary craft” but “not enough information”.
Amazon book picks
Further Reading
Books and field guides related to Why Coastal Lights Become UFO Reports. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.
UFOs
Provides context for evaluating reported sightings and distinguishing stronger cases from conventional explanations.
The UFO Experience
Explores how UFO reports are investigated and interpreted, including misidentifications and observational errors.
Identified Flying Objects
Encourages critical examination of UFO reports and competing explanations for unusual aerial observations.
Turn Left at Orion
Helps readers identify planets and other celestial objects that are commonly mistaken for UFOs.
eBay marketplace picks
Marketplace Samples
Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.
Endnotes
1.
Source: geipan.fr
Title: Compte rendu d’enquete3
Link:https://geipan.fr/sites/default/files/Compte%20rendu%20d%27enquete3.pdf
2.
Source: nasa.gov
Link:https://www.nasa.gov/spot-the-station/
3.
Source: planetary.org
Title: how to spot the iss
Link:https://www.planetary.org/articles/how-to-spot-the-iss
4.
Source: arxiv.org
Title: arXiv The new world atlas of artificial night sky brightness
Link:https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.01041
5.
Source: cnes.fr
Link:https://cnes.fr/en/projects/geipan
6.
Source: cnes.fr
Title: serie ovnis 5 choses savoir geipan
Link:https://cnes.fr/actualites/serie-ovnis-5-choses-savoir-geipan
7.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?customGetLattitude=45.735486641128446&customGetLongitude=-0.615234375&customGetZoom=5&field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=54.52108149544362&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=36.94989178681327&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=14.326171875000002&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=-15.556640625000002&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=26&sort=asc
8.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B0%5D=11&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation&page=43%2C10&select-category-export=nothing&sort=asc
9.
Source: geipan.fr
Title: Compte rendu enquete582
Link:https://geipan.fr/sites/default/files/Compte%20rendu%20enquete582.pdf
10.
Source: space.com
Title: how to track the international space station
Link:https://www.space.com/how-to-track-the-international-space-station
11.
Source: youtube.com
Title: GEIPAN: qui étudie les ovnis?
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O4vKMT7ytTk
12.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Geipan: France is also interested in UFOs
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OLXDikL331Y
13.
Source: youtube.com
Title: GEIPAN: Tout savoir sur les OVNIS et Phénomènes Aérospatiaux (PAN)
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CWt2zkuxRNQ
14.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2015-05-09185
15.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: Geipan Microsoft Word
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/INFORMATION_GEIPAN_-LES_LANTERNES_VOLANTES__UNE_MEPRISE_COURANTE_GPUBLIC.pdf
16.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2016-03-09442
17.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2016-07-09552
18.
Source: ecologie.gouv.fr
Link:https://www.ecologie.gouv.fr/politiques-publiques/exploitation-drones-categorie-ouverte
19.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2022-09-51393
20.
Source: nationalgeographic.fr
Title: National Geographic Qui se cache derrière le GEIPAN, le”bureau des ovnis” en
Link:https://www.nationalgeographic.fr/espace/france-qui-se-cache-derriere-le-geipan-le-bureau-des-ovnis-en-france-etrange-enquetes
21.
Source: larochelle.aeroport.fr
Link:https://www.larochelle.aeroport.fr/en/
22.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: Geipan Comprendre un Phénomène | GEIPAN
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/qu-ai-je-vu/etape-1
23.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: Geipan Methodology | GEIPAN
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/node/58788
24.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/en/node/57271?field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B0%5D=12&order=field_date&page=40&sort=asc
25.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2024-07-51613
26.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B12%5D=12&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B13%5D=13&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B14%5D=14&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B15%5D=15&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B16%5D=16&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=1&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_classification_des_cas&page=22&select-category-export=nothing&sort=asc&video=on
27.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/temoignage/10433
28.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?fbclid=IwAR32Xw4FPA6L6uMbDrVI3ET3EnoPyLceNnyDp2Blb9uRHMC5hwUcF_wg6Fk&field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation&page=40%2C34&sort=desc
29.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?order=field_date_d_observation_textuel&page=14&sort=desc
30.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=1&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=title&page=129%2C19&select-category-export=nothing&sort=asc&video=on
31.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation_textuel&page=152&sort=asc
32.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: lanternes thailandaises
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/actualites/lanternes-thailandaises
33.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B11%5D=11&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=1&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=116&order=field_date&page=%2C14&select-category-export=nothing&sort=desc&video=on
34.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2015-08-09301?field_agregation_index_value=orange&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_classification_des_cas&page=%2C25&sort=desc
35.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/
36.
Source: service-public.gouv.fr
Link:https://www.service-public.gouv.fr/particuliers/vosdroits/F34630
37.
Source: larochelle.aeroport.fr
Link:https://www.larochelle.aeroport.fr/en/flights-and-destinations/horaires-des-vols-en-temps-reel/
38.
Source: larochelle.aeroport.fr
Title: comptoir informations
Link:https://www.larochelle.aeroport.fr/en/services/comptoir-informations/
39.
Source: larochelle.aeroport.fr
Link:https://www.larochelle.aeroport.fr/en/passenger-information/enregistrement/
40.
Source: ladepeche.fr
Link:https://www.ladepeche.fr/2021/01/21/geipan-voici-les-trois-nouveaux-phenomenes-etranges-les-plus-observes-dans-le-ciel-9325511.php
41.
Source: var.gouv.fr
Title: Guide d utilisation de drones de loisirs
Link:https://www.var.gouv.fr/Demarches/Professions-et-activites-reglementees/Activites-aeriennes/Drones-de-loisir/Guide-d-utilisation-de-drones-de-loisirs
Additional References
42.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/CNESFrance/posts/vous-lavez-vu-hier-ou-vous-avez-h%C3%A9sit%C3%A9-%C3%A0-vous-y-plonger-20-minutes-vous-dit-tout/10164611426355301/?locale=ko_KR
43.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/France3Occitanie/posts/comment-fonctionne-le-geipan-le-groupe-d%C3%A9tudes-et-dinformations-sur-les-ph%C3%A9nom%C3%A8n/971177045625594/
44.
Source: uavcoach.com
Link:https://uavcoach.com/drone-laws-in-france/
45.
Source: studiosport.fr
Link:https://www.studiosport.fr/guides/drones/le-vol-de-nuit-avec-un-drone.html?srsltid=AfmBOorK3FMLLp4TpgVTd57C4UmvOHCRBPsM_yjcw4Mo9_8-dzukyaTq
46.
Source: reddit.com
Link:https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/7swd9e/i_just_saw_a_star_moving_around_and_then_stopping/
47.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/scalgarve/posts/rough-seas-warning-starting-today-2nd-december-2025the-ipma-have-issued-yellow-a/1184785263803348/
48.
Source: orbitalradar.com
Link:https://orbitalradar.com/iss-tracker
49.
Source: skyscanner.net
Link:https://www.skyscanner.net/flights/arrivals-departures/lrh/la-rochelle-arrivals-departures
50.
Source: flightradar24.com
Link:https://www.flightradar24.com/data/airports/lrh
51.
Source: instagram.com
Link:https://www.instagram.com/reel/DQJhBeFCoCu/?hl=en
Topic Tree