Within Cher UFOs
Why Cher's UFOs Often Became Identifiable
Cher's official records show how planets, aircraft, Sirius, the ISS and optical effects can become convincing UFO reports.
On this page
- Planets, stars and satellites in the files
- Aircraft, helicopters and local aviation context
- Viewing stress, zoom and optical illusion
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
Many Cher UFO reports are best understood not as hoaxes, but as sincere mistakes made under difficult sky-watching conditions. GEIPAN, the French space agency unit that investigates reports of unidentified aerospace phenomena, classifies some Cher cases as fully identified and others as unresolved only because the information is too thin to test. The recurring lesson is simple: bright planets, Sirius, aircraft, lanterns, satellites, birds, insects, weather and optical effects can all look extraordinary when seen briefly, at night, near the horizon, through zoom, or without reliable distance cues. GEIPAN’s own classification system matters here: a class A case is identified after investigation, class B is probably identified, class C lacks enough reliable data, and class D remains unidentified after investigation.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
Cher is a useful department for studying these ordinary sky mistakes because its official files contain several mechanisms in miniature: Venus and Jupiter filmed with strong zoom, Sirius scintillating near the horizon, an airliner turned into a silent-looking “cigar”, lanterns changing apparent shape over Bourges, and a one-second telescope view of a shadow crossing the Moon. Those explanations do not make the witnesses foolish. They show how normal skies become strange when perception, equipment and incomplete evidence meet.
Planets, stars and satellites in the files
The clearest astronomical mistake in Cher is the Vailly-sur-Sauldre case of 10 September 2010. A witness repeatedly filmed a luminous phenomenon and perceived it as moving. GEIPAN concluded that the daytime images near sunset were Venus, while some night-time footage corresponded to Jupiter or the International Space Station. The key detail is not just “a planet was bright”; it is that strong zoom made slow apparent motion visible against trees, turning the Earth’s rotation into something the witness interpreted as object movement. GEIPAN classified the case A.[geipan.fr]geipan.frOpen source on geipan.fr.
That case is especially useful for readers because it explains why video does not automatically strengthen a UFO report. A shaky or zoomed video may preserve the mistake rather than remove it. At normal eyesight, Venus can look like a fixed bright point; through heavy zoom, small hand movements, reference points such as treetops, and the natural drift of the sky can make it appear to travel, pulse or behave oddly. The same principle affects many modern phone-camera UFO reports: the device gives the impression of precision, while actually adding instability and magnification artefacts.
Sidiailles, on 3 March 2013, shows a different astronomical trap. A driver saw a white cross-like light among the stars and then a coloured luminous phenomenon that seemed to move for about an hour and a half. Gendarmes came to the scene and filmed the oscillations. GEIPAN found that Sirius, the brightest star in the night sky, was in the relevant direction, low above the horizon, and that weather conditions could favour extreme scintillation. The file also mentions possible atmospheric optical effects and the autokinetic illusion, where a fixed point of light can seem to move when there are few visual references. GEIPAN again classified the case A.[geipan.fr]geipan.frOpen source on geipan.fr.
The Sirius explanation is not a throwaway sceptical label. Stars near the horizon twinkle more because their light passes through more atmosphere, and turbulent layers can make a bright star appear to flicker, change colour or dance. NASA’s public astronomy material gives the same basic explanation: stars lower in the sky are more affected by the atmosphere between the observer and the star.[starchild.gsfc.nasa.gov]starchild.gsfc.nasa.govWhy do stars twinkle?Why do stars twinkle?
The International Space Station adds another trap. NASA says the ISS can look like a very bright star or aircraft moving across the night sky, but without flashing lights or a change in direction. That matches why it can be confusing: it looks artificial, bright and purposeful, but not exactly like a normal aircraft. In Cher, GEIPAN’s Vailly-sur-Sauldre file shows that the ISS can appear in the same mixed bundle of observations as planets and camera effects, rather than as a dramatic standalone encounter.[NASA]nasa.govOpen source on nasa.gov.
Aircraft and local aviation context
Cher is not an empty sky. Avord air base is in the department, near Bourges, and French defence material links Avord with E-3F AWACS activity and base infrastructure. That does not mean every unexplained light is military, but it does mean aircraft should be checked carefully before stranger interpretations are entertained.[Ministère des Armées]defense.gouv.frMinistère des Armées CherMinistère des Armées Cher
The Vierzon case of 29 June 2014 is a textbook Cher aircraft mistake. A witness saw a white object passing in a straight line, without visible wings, navigation lights or contrail, and took a phone photograph. GEIPAN identified it as an Airbus A320 on a Paris-to-Toulouse flight, seen around sunset. The explanation depended on lighting: the high-altitude aircraft was side-lit by the Sun, the underside of the wings was darker than the bright sky, and the illuminated fuselage alone looked like a cigar. GEIPAN classified the case A.[geipan.fr]geipan.frOpen source on geipan.fr.
This matters because several UFO descriptions are really descriptions of what the witness could not see. “No wings” may mean the wings were too dark or too small at that angle. “No lights” may mean anti-collision lights were not visible in daylight. “No contrail” is not decisive because contrails depend on temperature and humidity at altitude. GEIPAN’s Vierzon file makes the sceptical point concrete: an ordinary airliner can lose the features that make it recognisable.
The older Nançay and Vouzeron case from 18 August 1987 shows the harder version of the same problem. Three witnesses in two nearby Cher communes reported an unusual luminous phenomenon. Their descriptions differed: two lights, a bright white cigar-like glow, a large white glow with smaller lights, and a red flashing light. On re-examination, GEIPAN noted that the reports contained several aircraft-like features, including multiple lights, strong brightness and a turn. It also observed that flights departing Paris towards West Africa regularly pass the region and may turn near Nançay. Because the old file lacked the data needed to identify a specific aircraft, GEIPAN classified it C rather than as a strong unexplained case.[geipan.fr]geipan.frNotes d'enquete27Notes d'enquete27
When several lights become one “object”
One of the most common UFO mistakes is mentally connecting separate lights into a single structure. Cher has a good example from Bourges on 28 April 2018. During an evening with friends, several people saw pale yellow-white points of light moving silently in the sky. The apparent form changed from triangular to more circular, but no physical structure linking the lights was visible. GEIPAN concluded that the witnesses had probably seen sky lanterns, helped by the timing: a weekend night during Printemps de Bourges, a setting favourable to festive lantern releases. The wind direction recorded at Bourges also matched the reported movement. GEIPAN classified the case A.[geipan.fr]geipan.frOpen source on geipan.fr.
The important mechanism is not simply “lanterns exist”. It is that a group of independent lights can invite the brain to draw a shape between them. Once that imagined outline appears, a loose formation of lanterns can become a “triangle”, then seem to change form as the separate lights drift at slightly different speeds. GEIPAN’s Bourges file says exactly this: the witnesses were surprised by the change in configuration, which could be taken as a change in object shape if one imagines a form between lights.[geipan.fr]geipan.frOpen source on geipan.fr.
The Bourges triangular report of 12 July 2007 shows the weaker end of the evidence scale. Two witnesses reportedly saw a triangular aerial phenomenon for about a minute over Bourges, but they did not wish to give a formal statement, making investigation impossible for lack of information. GEIPAN’s page therefore gives no robust explanatory reconstruction. The case is worth mentioning because it shows how a potentially interesting shape report can remain evidentially thin when there is no full testimony to test.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
Viewing stress, zoom and optical illusion
Cher’s files repeatedly show that the observer is often trying to make sense of too little information. A bright point near the horizon has no reliable distance. A distant aircraft can look silent. A phone camera can shake. A telescope narrows the field of view so much that a bird or insect can become a strange passing shadow. These are not exotic psychological claims; they are practical problems built into night observation.
The Lugny-Champagne case of 8 April 2025 is a neat example. A resident was observing the Moon through a telescope just after midnight and saw a large shadow cross the field of view for about one second. He did not see a physical object pass between him and the Moon, but rather a transparent-looking shadow. GEIPAN judged the case weak because it had one witness and a fleeting indirect observation through an instrument. The suggested hypothesis was a flying animal, such as a bird, insect or bat, crossing the telescope’s line of sight, but GEIPAN could not consolidate it, so the case was classed C.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
This case is valuable because it is modern, instrument-assisted and still weak. A telescope does not automatically make an observation more reliable. It magnifies and isolates a tiny patch of sky, removes surrounding context, and makes nearby objects crossing the optical path look dramatic. A one-second event with no second witness and no recorded trace can be entirely sincere while remaining impossible to identify confidently.
Why explained does not mean worthless
The explained Cher cases are not embarrassing leftovers in the UFO record. They are the part of the record that teaches readers how to evaluate the rest. Vailly-sur-Sauldre shows how planets and the ISS can be bundled into repeated filmed observations. Sidiailles shows how Sirius can become a coloured, oscillating light. Vierzon shows how a normal airliner can lose its wings and become a cigar at sunset. Bourges 2018 shows how separate lanterns can become an apparent changing craft. Lugny-Champagne shows why a telescope glimpse can still be too thin to resolve.[Geipan+4geipan.fr+4geipan.fr]geipan.frOpen source on geipan.fr.
These cases also show the difference between three common outcomes:<div class="content-enhancement content-enhancement--metric" markdown="1">
- Identified: the evidence fits a known cause strongly enough, as with Venus, Sirius, an airliner or lanterns.
- Plausibly explained but not proven: the file points towards an aircraft or animal, but lacks enough data for certainty.
- Unresolved because weak: the case remains open in a database sense, but not because it has strong evidence for an extraordinary event.</div>
That distinction is central to Cher’s UFO history. The department’s pattern is not a build-up of dramatic unexplained craft. It is a local archive of real observers encountering ordinary sky phenomena under conditions that made them hard to recognise. GEIPAN’s structure, with public case files and explicit classifications, makes those mistakes visible rather than leaving them as folklore.[CNES]cnes.frOpen source on cnes.fr.
How to read a Cher sky report more carefully
A useful first question is not “could this be a UFO?” but “what information would separate one explanation from another?” Cher’s files suggest a practical reading method.
Start with direction, height and duration. Sirius at Sidiailles was low in the relevant direction; the 1987 Nançay and Vouzeron report lacked the angular precision that would have helped test the aircraft idea. Then check time of day. The Vierzon airliner looked strange because of sunset lighting, while Vailly-sur-Sauldre involved evening and night observations where planets and the ISS were plausible. Next, ask whether the witness saw one object or several lights. Bourges 2018 shows how separate lanterns can be mentally joined into a triangle or circle. Finally, treat instruments and video as evidence to be interpreted, not automatic proof. Heavy zoom, phone shake, telescopic fields of view and brief clips can add their own distortions.[Geipan+4geipan.fr+4geipan.fr]geipan.frNotes d'enquete27Notes d'enquete27
This does not mean every report should be dismissed. It means Cher’s best-documented ordinary mistakes set a baseline. A stronger case would need more than surprise: independent witnesses who had not influenced each other, precise positions in the sky, reliable timing, original images or video with metadata, aviation and satellite checks, weather data, and enough duration to compare the report with known objects. Without those elements, even an honest and vivid account may remain only a fragile sky memory.
Amazon book picks
Further Reading
Books and field guides related to Why Cher's UFOs Often Became Identifiable. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.
The UFO Experience
Directly addresses how UFO reports are investigated and classified, matching the article's focus on identifiable cases.
UFOs
Provides context for evaluating reported aerial phenomena and official investigations.
Bad Astronomy
Explains common misunderstandings involving planets, stars, optical effects and sky observations.
The Demon-haunted World
Focuses on critical thinking, perception and extraordinary claims, themes central to mistaken UFO sightings.
eBay marketplace picks
Marketplace Samples
Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.
Endnotes
1.
Source: cnes.fr
Link:https://cnes.fr/en/projects/geipan
2.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/fr/cas/2010-09-02697?field=&order=title&page=19&sort=desc
3.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/fr/cas/2013-03-08428?field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=2007-03-01&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_classification_des_cas&page=32&sort=asc
4.
Source: starchild.gsfc.nasa.gov
Title: Why do stars twinkle?
Link:https://starchild.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/StarChild/questions/question26.html
5.
Source: space.com
Title: why do stars twinkle
Link:https://www.space.com/why-do-stars-twinkle
6.
Source: nasa.gov
Link:https://www.nasa.gov/spot-the-station/
7.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/fr/cas/2014-06-08728
8.
Source: geipan.fr
Title: Notes d’enquete27
Link:https://geipan.fr/sites/default/files/Notes%20d%27enquete27.pdf
9.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/en/node/58232?field=&order=field_date_d_observation&page=24&sort=desc
10.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/fr/cas/1980-10-00813
11.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/fr/cas/1965-07-02569?field=&order=title&page=150&sort=desc
12.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_date_value=2007-03-01&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation_textuel&page=101&sort=asc
13.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/sites/default/files/Questionnaire%20terre-R63.pdf
14.
Source: geipan.fr
Title: Questionnaire terre R545
Link:https://geipan.fr/sites/default/files/Questionnaire%20terre-R545.pdf
15.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?customGetLattitude=46.94358292648825&customGetLongitude=4.4989013671875&customGetZoom=7&field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=49.11702904077932&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=44.77013681219717&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=7.668457031250001&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=1.329345703125&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation&page=%2C144&sort=desc
16.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_date_value=2020-11-18&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=1&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation&page=20&sort=asc
17.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?customGetLattitude=45.735486641128446&customGetLongitude=-0.615234375&customGetZoom=5&field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=54.52108149544362&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=36.94989178681327&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=14.326171875000002&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=-15.556640625000002&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_classification_des_cas&page=12&sort=asc
18.
Source: cnes.fr
Link:https://cnes.fr/projets/geipan
19.
Source: zis.gov.rs
Title: Glasnik 8 2018
Link:https://www.zis.gov.rs/wp-content/uploads/Glasnik-8-2018-.pdf
20.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/node/58788
21.
Source: defense.gouv.fr
Title: Ministère des Armées Cher
Link:https://www.defense.gouv.fr/sites/default/files/ministere-armees/Cher%20-%20Le%20projet%20de%20budget%202025%20pour%20la%20D%C3%A9fense%20%2802%2012%202024%29.pdf
22.
Source: defense.gouv.fr
Title: avord lantenne radar 3f awacs demontee premiere france
Link:https://www.defense.gouv.fr/air/actualites/avord-lantenne-radar-3f-awacs-demontee-premiere-france
23.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/node/53235?field_agregation_index_value=c&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&page=%2C320
24.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/node/53259
25.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/node/61337
26.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2025-04-51638
27.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/node/412
28.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/faq-page
29.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/histoire-du-geipan
30.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/missions-methodes-et-resultats
31.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/missions-methodes-et-resultats
32.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/node/58791
33.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: export cas pub 20251127093552.csv
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/save_json_import_files/export_cas_pub_20251127093552.csv
34.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?field_date_valu_valu=04-23&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation_textuel&page=65&sort=desc
35.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?customGetLattitude=46.94358292648825&customGetLongitude=4.4989013671875&customGetZoom=7&field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id=All&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=49.11702904077932&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=44.77013681219717&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=7.668457031250001&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=1.329345703125&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&page=%2C19
36.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/Questionnaire%20terre-R547.pdf
37.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation_textuel&page=65&sort=desc
38.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=lune&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date&page=%2C9&sort=desc
39.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=c&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation_textuel&page=35&sort=desc
40.
Source: defense.gouv.fr
Link:https://www.defense.gouv.fr/air/nos-aeronefs/nos-avions/awacs
41.
Source: reservistes.defense.gouv.fr
Link:https://www.reservistes.defense.gouv.fr/document-poste/6724
42.
Source: defense.gouv.fr
Title: NAR Première répétition défilé aérien 14 juillet
Link:https://www.defense.gouv.fr/sites/default/files/ministere-armees/NAR_Premi%C3%A8re%20r%C3%A9p%C3%A9tition%20d%C3%A9fil%C3%A9%20a%C3%A9rien%2014%20juillet.pdf
43.
Source: defense.gouv.fr
Title: Guide des unités
Link:https://www.defense.gouv.fr/sites/default/files/ministere-armees/Guide%20des%20unit%C3%A9s.pdf
44.
Source: defense.gouv.fr
Title: 20.06.2025 Guide médias du défilé du 14 Juillet 2025
Link:https://www.defense.gouv.fr/sites/default/files/ministere-armees/20.06.2025%20Guide%20m%C3%A9dias%20du%20d%C3%A9fil%C3%A9%20du%2014%20Juillet%202025.pdf
45.
Source: Wikipedia
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GEIPAN
46.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Avord Air Base
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avord_Air_Base
47.
Source: gendarmerie.interieur.gouv.fr
Title: des gendarmes face aux phenomenes aerospatiaux non identifies
Link:https://www.gendarmerie.interieur.gouv.fr/gendinfo/terrain/immersion/2018/des-gendarmes-face-aux-phenomenes-aerospatiaux-non-identifies
48.
Source: imagesdefense.gouv.fr
Link:https://imagesdefense.gouv.fr/fr/l-avion-de-detection-e3f-awacs-de-l-edca-escadron-de-detection-et-de-controle-aeroportes-36-berry-de-la-ba-702-base-aerienne-d-avord-n-204-702-cd-de-l-escadrille-br-257-masse-d-armes-au-parking-de-nuit-derive-et-radar-au-premier-plan.html
49.
Source: uapedia.ai
Link:https://uapedia.ai/wiki/geipan-frances-official-uap-unit/
50.
Source: newspaceeconomy.ca
Title: GEIPA N: Frances UAP Investigation Unit
Link:https://newspaceeconomy.ca/2025/07/29/geipan-frances-uap-investigation-unit/
51.
Source: academieairespace.com
Link:https://academieairespace.com/event/geipan-studies-uaps-ufos/?lang=en
Additional References
52.
Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-pEo_j_RGpM
53.
Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dDxYZyMEmUU
54.
Source: youtube.com
Title: France’s Official UFO Investigation Agency (GEIPAN)
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lXi5B0NTwVc
55.
Source: faa.gov
Link:https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/atpubs/aim_html/chap2_section_2.html
56.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/echolivecork/posts/there-is-an-association-called-cero-in-france-which-brings-people-together-who-c/1285504190272280/
57.
Source: researchgate.net
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/359217358The_Impact_of_Physical_Sciences_on_the_Study_of_Unidentified_Aerial_Phenomena_UAP_in_Extraterrestrial_Intelligence-_Academic_and_Societal_Implications_Cambridge_Scholars_Publishing_pp
58.
Source: cfinotebook.net
Link:https://www.cfinotebook.net/notebook/operation-of-aircraft-systems/aircraft-lighting
59.
Source: instagram.com
Link:https://www.instagram.com/p/DYpSsIhjoP5/?img_index=2
60.
Source: instagram.com
Link:https://www.instagram.com/base_aerienne_702_avord/?hl=en
61.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/baseaerienne702avord/?locale=fr_FR
Topic Tree