Why So Many Haute Loire UFOs Were Explained

Introduction

Many Haute-Loire UFO reports become less mysterious when they are read through GEIPAN’s case files rather than through memory, rumour or dramatic retellings. In this department, the most useful pattern is not a run of spectacular unresolved cases, but a set of ordinary sky objects that looked puzzling from rural roads, upland villages and open horizons: Venus, the Moon, balloons, the International Space Station and modern rocket activity. GEIPAN, the French space agency’s public investigation unit for unidentified aerospace phenomena, classifies several Haute-Loire reports as identified or probably identified, while a weaker case remains unresolved mainly because the information is insufficient.[CNES]cnes.frGEIPAN7 Jul 2025 — GEIPAN, the French UAP research and information group created by CNES in 1977, collects, analyses and archives inf… Overview image for Explained Cases That matters because Haute-Loire is exactly the sort of landscape where a bright point low on the horizon, a silent object drifting over a valley, or a glowing trail from a space launch can feel more structured and deliberate than it really is. The official record does not make witnesses look foolish. It shows how sincere observations can be transformed by distance, darkness, terrain, expectation and incomplete reference points.

Why GEIPAN’s Labels Change the Story

GEIPAN’s categories are central to understanding Haute-Loire. Category A means the phenomenon has been identified after investigation. Category B means it has probably been identified. Category C means it has not been identified because the data are too weak or incomplete. Category D is reserved for cases still unidentified after investigation. GEIPAN says it weighs two broad factors: the “strangeness” left after comparison with known phenomena, and the “consistency” of the information collected.[cnes-geipan.fr]cnes-geipan.frHow does GEIPAN classify observation cases?Strangeness (E): This is the measure of the residual strangeness after comparison with known p…

This distinction is especially important for Haute-Loire because a public case file is not the same thing as a confirmed mystery. A sighting may appear in the official database because it was reported, recorded and assessed, not because GEIPAN considered it extraordinary. The department’s accessible GEIPAN record contains a striking number of explained or probably explained cases: Brioude in 1956 is classed B as a probable stratospheric balloon; Ally in 1976 is classed A as Venus; Auvers in 1980 is classed A as the Moon; Saint-Cirgues in 1994 is classed B as a probable Mylar balloon; Sainte-Sigolène in 2012 is classed A as the ISS; and Malrevers in 2021 is classed A as a Falcon 9 upper-stage effect.[cnes-geipan.fr+5cnes-geipan.fr+5cnes-geipan.fr]cnes-geipan.frAERO MIL] BRIOUDE (43) 20.09.1956Le GEIPAN classe ce cas en B: observation d'un ballon stratosphérique dont l'origine n'a pas été trouv…

The result is a more restrained but more interesting local history. Haute-Loire’s UFO record is not just a list of strange lights. It is a case study in how official checking can separate three very different things: a strong explanation, a probable explanation, and a file that remains open mainly because the evidence is thin.

Venus, the Moon and Rural Horizons

The Ally case from 1 December 1976 is the clearest example of how a familiar object can become a persuasive local UFO report. Several witnesses saw a bright stationary object above the horizon for about fifteen minutes. It made no particular noise and disappeared from view. The gendarmerie found no ground traces, and the later investigation established that the same luminous phenomenon had appeared on several evenings in the direction indicated by the witnesses. GEIPAN’s conclusion was simple: the witnesses had observed Venus.[cnes-geipan.fr]cnes-geipan.frALLY (43) 01.12.1976Le 1er décembre 1976 plusieurs témoins observent la présence au-dessus de la ligne d'horizon d'un objet lumineux et s…

This is not a trivial explanation. Venus is one of the most common sources of UFO reports because it can be intensely bright, low in the sky and apparently fixed. In a rural setting, especially where the horizon is broken by hills, trees and village skylines, a planet can appear to hover near a landmark. If the observer expects an aircraft, the absence of engine noise and the lack of obvious movement can make the sighting feel more mysterious rather than less.

Auvers, on 17 August 1980, shows the same principle with a different object. GEIPAN lists the case as category A, with the type of phenomenon identified as the Moon. The public case entry is brief, but its classification still matters: the Moon is large, familiar and predictable, yet it can look strange when seen low, partly obscured, reddened, distorted by atmosphere, or framed by terrain.[Geipan]geipan.frOpen source on geipan.fr.

For Haute-Loire readers, the useful lesson is not that witnesses cannot recognise the sky. It is that recognition depends on context. A bright body near the horizon may be judged against roads, ridges, farm buildings or tree lines rather than against a clear astronomical chart. GEIPAN’s work turns the question from “did they see something?” into “what known object was in that direction at that time?” Explained Cases illustration 1

Balloons Look Different in Mountain Air

The best-known Haute-Loire case is also one of the best demonstrations of why a probable explanation can still be historically interesting. On 20 September 1956, two military pilots near Brioude saw a spherical aluminium-coloured object while flying in formation. They climbed in an attempt to approach it, but could not catch up, and eventually abandoned the pursuit. GEIPAN classifies the case as B: probable observation of a stratospheric balloon whose origin was not found.[cnes-geipan.fr]cnes-geipan.frAERO MIL] BRIOUDE (43) 20.09.1956Le GEIPAN classe ce cas en B: observation d'un ballon stratosphérique dont l'origine n'a pas été trouv…

The file gives the key reason. A translucent, roughly spherical balloon with a slight bulge at its base had reportedly been seen during the same day in the Clermont-Ferrand sky, drifting slowly at about 20 kilometres altitude before becoming invisible when it was no longer sunlit. GEIPAN notes that the impression of being followed and the impossibility of getting closer are characteristic perceptual illusions when observing a distant object. In this case, the balloon was still around 17 kilometres from the pilots at one point, and climbing to about 32,000 feet reduced the distance only to around 10 kilometres.[cnes-geipan.fr]cnes-geipan.frAERO MIL] BRIOUDE (43) 20.09.1956Le GEIPAN classe ce cas en B: observation d'un ballon stratosphérique dont l'origine n'a pas été trouv…

That is a valuable correction to a common assumption. A pilot report can be sincere, detailed and aviation-related without being immune to distance error. The Brioude case matters precisely because it sounds strong at first: trained witnesses, daylight, an apparent object, and an attempted approach. Yet the official explanation does not require dishonesty or incompetence. It requires a distant, high-altitude balloon and the normal difficulty of judging scale and motion against a largely empty sky.

ISS Passes and Modern Launches Have Changed the Case Mix

Older Haute-Loire explanations often involve planets, the Moon and balloons. More recent files add a modern source of confusion: visible space infrastructure. On 1 March 2012 at Sainte-Sigolène, GEIPAN classed a silent moving luminous spherical object as category A, identifying it as the International Space Station. The English case entry gives the phenomenon type as ISS and records a very low strangeness score of 0.12.[cnes-geipan.fr]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.

The ISS is a classic UFO generator because it is silent, bright and steady. It does not blink like a conventional aircraft, and it can cross the sky quickly enough to feel purposeful. For a witness who does not already know when and where to look, an ISS pass can seem like a self-luminous craft moving without obvious propulsion.

Malrevers, on 26 May 2021, shows how the problem has moved beyond simple satellite spotting. GEIPAN classed the report as category A after identifying the observed luminous phenomenon as effects from the Falcon 9 upper stage used for the Starlink 28 launch. The case description refers to the upper stage reigniting for deorbiting, producing a gas cloud visible over south-western France at around 22:55, with witnesses in France and Spain filming similar effects.[cnes-geipan.fr]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.

This is one of the most important Haute-Loire explanations because it belongs to the current era of frequent commercial launches. A rocket upper-stage burn can create a diffuse glowing cloud, a bright point, a halo, or an elongated shape, depending on lighting, altitude and viewing geometry. GEIPAN also linked the Malrevers description to similar observations after another Starlink launch earlier in May 2021, showing that this was not an isolated interpretive guess but part of a recognisable pattern.[cnes-geipan.fr]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.

For a department-level UFO history, this changes the balance. Haute-Loire’s night sky is not just affected by local aircraft, weather and astronomy. It is also crossed by global orbital activity that may be visible for a few dramatic minutes and then leave little local evidence behind. Explained Cases illustration 2

What Category C and D Really Mean

A category C case is often misunderstood. It does not mean GEIPAN has found a strong mystery. It means the available information is not good enough to identify the phenomenon. That distinction is important in the Salettes case of 19 June 2008, which GEIPAN lists as category C. The search record describes it as a Haute-Loire case with the broad reason “lack of reliable information”.[cnes-geipan.fr]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.

For readers, this is the difference between “unexplained” and “unexplainable”. A weakly documented moving yellow light on a rural road may remain unidentified because there is no photograph, no triangulation, no precise direction, no reliable duration, no matching astronomical or traffic reconstruction, or no sufficient follow-up data. That does not make it worthless, but it makes it fragile.

Category D is different. GEIPAN defines D as a phenomenon not identified after investigation, with newer practice also distinguishing levels of unresolved cases. In the accessible Haute-Loire examples discussed here, the better-known local files do not form a strong run of category D landmark cases. Instead, the department’s record is dominated by A and B outcomes, plus at least one C file where the problem is insufficient information rather than high evidential strength.[cnes-geipan.fr]cnes-geipan.frHow does GEIPAN classify observation cases?Strangeness (E): This is the measure of the residual strangeness after comparison with known p…

This is one of the most useful takeaways from Haute-Loire. A public UFO database contains several kinds of uncertainty. Some cases are explained. Some are probably explained. Some are too poorly documented to close. Only a smaller subset are genuinely unresolved after stronger investigation.

Why Haute-Loire Produces Convincing Mistakes

The Haute-Loire pattern makes sense once the local setting is taken seriously. Much of the department is rural, elevated or broken by valleys and ridges. That creates ideal conditions for misjudging height, distance and direction. A bright light low over a horizon may seem close. A balloon in a hollow may look as though it is manoeuvring near the ground. A satellite or rocket plume may seem to cross a familiar landscape while actually being hundreds of kilometres away.

GEIPAN’s own methodology is designed for this problem. It looks for known aerospace and natural phenomena that could explain the perceived strangeness: aircraft, balloons, lanterns, meteors, orbital activity, astronomical bodies and perceptual effects. Its stated method is not simply to label a case, but to collect testimony, create a record, perform a first analysis, investigate where needed, classify the case, anonymise it and publish the result.[cnes-geipan.fr]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.

Haute-Loire’s explained cases show several recurring mechanisms:

Low-horizon astronomy: Venus at Ally and the Moon at Auvers show how familiar celestial bodies can become unfamiliar when seen near terrain or through atmospheric effects.[cnes-geipan.fr]cnes-geipan.frALLY (43) 01.12.1976Le 1er décembre 1976 plusieurs témoins observent la présence au-dessus de la ligne d'horizon d'un objet lumineux et s…
Distance and scale error: Brioude shows how even trained pilots can misread the distance and apparent behaviour of a high-altitude balloon.[cnes-geipan.fr]cnes-geipan.frAERO MIL] BRIOUDE (43) 20.09.1956Le GEIPAN classe ce cas en B: observation d'un ballon stratosphérique dont l'origine n'a pas été trouv…<div class="content-enhancement content-enhancement--insight-grid" markdown="1">
Local air and reflective materials: Saint-Cirgues shows how a metallic balloon can drift, reflect sunlight and appear structured in morning mountain conditions.[cnes-geipan.fr]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
Silent orbital movement: Sainte-Sigolène shows how the ISS can look like a bright, noiseless object crossing the sky.[cnes-geipan.fr]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
Spaceflight debris and burns: Malrevers shows how modern launch activity can create luminous clouds and shapes visible far from the launch site.[cnes-geipan.fr]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.</div>

The common thread is not that witnesses invented stories. It is that the sky offers few reliable cues. Without instruments, a nearby small object and a distant large object can look alike. A stationary planet can seem to hover. A balloon drifting with weak currents can seem to choose a path. A rocket-related gas cloud can appear suddenly and vanish before a witness has time to understand it.

Re-Examination Can Weaken a Mystery

One of the most revealing Haute-Loire examples is Saint-Cirgues because the case changed meaning over time. GEIPAN explicitly says it was part of a set of older cases re-examined with newer technical tools and accumulated investigative experience. The file notes that GEIPAN had little experience with balloon cases at the time of the original observation, but later knowledge made the Mylar balloon hypothesis much stronger.[cnes-geipan.fr]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.

That is an important historical point. UFO cases are not fixed in amber. A report that once looked difficult may become easier to interpret when investigators gain better software, better astronomical reconstruction, better satellite data, wider case comparison, or simply more experience with recurring mistakes. The Haute-Loire archive therefore shows why “unresolved at the time” should not automatically be treated as “still mysterious now”.

The same principle applies to modern launch-related cases. A glowing sky cloud caused by a rocket stage may have been extremely puzzling before widespread public tracking of launches, satellite trains and upper-stage deorbit burns. In the Starlink era, those same observations can be compared with launch times, trajectories, other reports and video from distant regions. Malrevers is a good example of a local sighting explained through a wider sky event rather than a local source.[cnes-geipan.fr]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.

This does not mean every unresolved case will eventually be explained. It means that the evidential status of a case can move in either direction. Later information can strengthen a report, but in Haute-Loire the most visible movement in the GEIPAN record is towards ordinary explanations.

What the Haute-Loire Record Teaches

The strongest lesson from GEIPAN’s Haute-Loire files is that explanation is usually specific. “It was Venus” is not a generic dismissal when the object was seen stationary near the horizon in the right direction. “It was a balloon” is not a hand-wave when the object was metallic, slow, silent and moving with conditions expected in a valley or at high altitude. “It was the ISS” is not vague scepticism when the sighting matches a bright, silent orbital pass. “It was a Falcon 9 upper-stage effect” is not a casual guess when similar phenomena were observed across a wider region at the same time.[cnes-geipan.fr+3cnes-geipan.fr+3cnes-geipan.fr]cnes-geipan.frALLY (43) 01.12.1976Le 1er décembre 1976 plusieurs témoins observent la présence au-dessus de la ligne d'horizon d'un objet lumineux et s…

For Haute-Loire’s UFO history, this makes the department more useful as an explanatory case cluster than as a catalogue of unsolved events. Its public record shows how varied ordinary causes can be: astronomy, balloons, human spaceflight and commercial launches all appear in the same departmental story. It also shows why category C should be treated cautiously. Lack of information can preserve uncertainty without adding evidential weight.

The result is a balanced picture. Haute-Loire has interesting reports, including a military-pilot case at Brioude and a reclassified mountain-balloon case at Saint-Cirgues. But GEIPAN’s explanations push the department away from sensational claims and towards a more practical question: what does the sky commonly do that people do not expect? In Haute-Loire, the answer is clear enough to shape the whole local record. Planets hover over rural horizons, the Moon can look strange through landscape and atmosphere, balloons drift in ways that seem deliberate, the ISS crosses silently overhead, and rocket activity can briefly turn the night sky into something that looks far less ordinary than it is. Explained Cases illustration 3 <section class="further-reading-section" data-page-toc-exclude aria-labelledby="further-reading-title"><div class="fr-section-shell"><div class="fr-section-header"><div class="fr-section-heading"><p class="fr-section-kicker">Amazon book picks</p><h3 class="fr-heading" id="further-reading-title">Further Reading</h3></div><p class="fr-intro">Books and field guides related to Why So Many Haute Loire UFOs Were Explained. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.</p></div><div class="fr-books-grid"><article class="fr-book-card">Book<div class="fr-book-info"><h4 class="fr-book-title">The UFO Experience</h4><p class="fr-book-author">By Joseph Allen Hynek</p><p class="fr-book-desc">Covers classification and investigation of reports.</p><div class="fr-book-actions"> See on Amazon</div></div></article><article class="fr-book-card">Book<div class="fr-book-info"><h4 class="fr-book-title">UFOs</h4><p class="fr-book-author">By Leslie Kean</p><p class="fr-book-desc">Balances witness testimony with official documentation.</p><div class="fr-book-actions"> See on Amazon</div></div></article><article class="fr-book-card">Book<div class="fr-book-info"><h4 class="fr-book-title">Bad Astronomy</h4><p class="fr-book-author">By Philip C. Plait</p><p class="fr-book-desc">Explains how celestial objects are commonly misunderstood.</p><div class="fr-book-actions"> See on Amazon</div></div></article><article class="fr-book-card">Book<div class="fr-book-info"><h4 class="fr-book-title">The Demon-haunted World</h4><p class="fr-book-author">By Carl Sagan</p><p class="fr-book-desc">Directly addresses misinterpretation, critical thinking, and unusual claims.</p><div class="fr-book-actions"> See on Amazon</div></div></article></div><div class="fr-section-footer"><div class="fr-browse-links" aria-label="Browse more on Amazon">Browse more on Amazon:The UFO Experience UFOs Bad Astronomy</div><p class="fr-disclosure">As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.</p></div></div></section><section class="further-reading-section" data-page-toc-exclude data-ebay-localized-links data-ebay-visual-market="EBAY_GB" aria-labelledby="merchant-block-title"><div class="fr-section-shell"><div class="fr-section-header"><div class="fr-section-heading"><p class="fr-section-kicker">eBay marketplace picks</p><h3 class="fr-heading" id="merchant-block-title">Marketplace Samples</h3></div><p class="fr-intro">Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.</p><div class="fr-ebay-market-toolbar">Shop location<div class="fr-ebay-market-picker">UsingUSA<div class="fr-ebay-market-menu" data-ebay-market-menu role="listbox" hidden></div></div></div></div><div class="fr-ebay-market-panel" data-ebay-market-panel="EBAY_GB" data-ebay-market-default="1"><div class="fr-books-grid"><article class="fr-book-card"><div class="fr-book-info"><p class="fr-book-kicker">Example eBay listing</p><h4 class="fr-book-title">Vintage 1940s Pilot Flight Record & Log Book Warren Airways Aviation Memorabilia</h4>SearcheBay.co.uk: pilot memorabilia<div class="fr-book-actions"> Browse similar oneBay.co.uk</div></div></article><article class="fr-book-card"><div class="fr-book-info"><p class="fr-book-kicker">Example eBay listing</p><h4 class="fr-book-title">Vintage SEMMB Aviation Pilot Safety Harness Assembly (Memorabilia Item)</h4>SearcheBay.co.uk: pilot memorabilia<div class="fr-book-actions"> Browse similar oneBay.co.uk</div></div></article><article class="fr-book-card"><div class="fr-book-info"><p class="fr-book-kicker">Example eBay listing</p><h4 class="fr-book-title">Thomas Cook Pilot Captain Flight Crew Memorabilia Collectible Wings</h4>SearcheBay.co.uk: pilot memorabilia<div class="fr-book-actions"> Browse similar oneBay.co.uk</div></div></article><article class="fr-book-card"><div class="fr-book-info"><p class="fr-book-kicker">Example eBay listing</p><h4 class="fr-book-title">MONTEGO AIRLINES Flight 828 Pilot Wings - Lapel Pin - MANIFEST</h4>SearcheBay.co.uk: pilot memorabilia<div class="fr-book-actions"> Browse similar oneBay.co.uk</div></div></article></div><div class="fr-section-footer"> Browse more oneBay.co.uk<p class="fr-disclosure">Example items shown for inspiration; availability and pricing can change. Branchoria may earn a commission if you purchase through outbound eBay links.</p></div></div></div></section>

Endnotes

1. Source: cnes.fr
Link:https://cnes.fr/en/projects/geipan

<summary>Source snippet</summary><p>GEIPAN7 Jul 2025 — GEIPAN, the French UAP research and information group created by CNES in 1977, collects, analyses and archives inf…</p>

2. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?customGetLattitude=46.124763699209396&customGetLongitude=2.406005859375001&customGetZoom=6&field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=50.52739681329302&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=41.72213058512578&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=8.745117187500002&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=-3.9331054687500004&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=59&sort=asc&undefined=

<summary>Source snippet</summary><p>Recherche de cas | GEIPAN[AERO MIL] BRIOUDE (43) 20.09.1956, 20/09/1956, B, Haute-Loire, Ballon, 30/03/2015, 1956-09-20, voir. ALLY (43)…</p>

3. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/node/412

<summary>Source snippet</summary><p>How does GEIPAN classify observation cases?Strangeness (E): This is the measure of the residual strangeness after comparison with known p…</p>

4. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/1956-09-09134

<summary>Source snippet</summary><p>[AERO MIL] BRIOUDE (43) 20.09.1956Le GEIPAN classe ce cas en B: observation d'un ballon stratosphérique dont l'origine n'a pas été trouv…</p>

5. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/1976-12-00365

<summary>Source snippet</summary><p>ALLY (43) 01.12.1976Le 1er décembre 1976 plusieurs témoins observent la présence au-dessus de la ligne d'horizon d'un objet lumineux et s…</p>

6. Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/en/node/48665

7. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/1994-10-01372

8. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/node/58856

9. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2021-05-51304

10. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=2007-03-01&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation&page=24&sort=asc

11. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=1&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=title&page=129%2C19&select-category-export=nothing&sort=asc&video=on

12. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/node/58788

13. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date&page=59&sort=asc

14. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=1&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation&page=138&select-category-export=nothing&sort=desc&video=on

15. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation_textuel&page=6&sort=asc

16. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: export cas pub 20251127093552.csv
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/save_json_import_files/export_cas_pub_20251127093552.csv

17. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?customGetLattitude=46.124763699209396&customGetLongitude=2.406005859375001&customGetZoom=6&field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=50.52739681329302&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=41.72213058512578&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=8.745117187500002&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=-3.9331054687500004&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation_textuel&page=149&sort=desc&undefined=