What Did Seine Saint Denis Witnesses Really See?
Seine-Saint-Denis has a documented UFO history, but not the dramatic kind. In the public GEIPAN/CNES record, the department is better understood as a compact urban observation zone where unusual lights are often traced to aircraft, planets, lanterns, meteors, distress flares or entertainment lighting.
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
That does not make the department uninteresting. It makes it useful. Seine-Saint-Denis sits beside Paris, includes dense residential sightlines, lies under busy aviation corridors, and is close enough to major airports and large light shows for ordinary objects to look strange from balconies, roads and tower blocks. Its UFO history is therefore less about a single landmark mystery than about how official investigation turns striking witness impressions into cautious classifications.
What the official record actually shows
GEIPAN, the French government body within CNES that collects, investigates, archives and publishes reports of unidentified aerospace phenomena, is the main source for Seine-Saint-Denis cases. CNES describes GEIPAN as the national unit created in 1977 to collect, analyse and archive UAP reports and inform the public.[CNES]cnes.frOpen source on cnes.fr. GEIPAN’s own English mission page gives the same basic role: collecting, analysing, investigating, publishing and archiving sighting reports.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
For a reader, the key point is that GEIPAN’s categories are not a scale of excitement. They are an assessment of what remains after investigation. Its classification method rests on two ideas: how strange the case remains after inquiry, and how “consistent” the available information is — meaning how much reliable, objective material supports the testimony.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frmethodologie classification geipanmethodologie classification geipan Nationally, GEIPAN’s live statistics in June 2026 showed most published cases were either identified or probably identified, while only a small minority were classed as unexplained after investigation.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
Within Seine-Saint-Denis, the same pattern is visible. The department’s strongest lesson is not that witnesses are careless, but that urban skies generate many convincing misperceptions. A light may appear stationary because an aircraft is approaching head-on. A cluster of navigation lights may be read as a triangular craft. A planet can seem object-like when watched anxiously after a first surprising sighting. A public light show can paint clouds in ways that look like moving objects.
Why Seine-Saint-Denis produces confusing sightings
Seine-Saint-Denis is not a rural sky-watching department. It is part of the dense north-eastern edge of Greater Paris, where many observations are made from flats, streets, balconies and roads with narrow horizons, light pollution and limited reference points. That matters because a witness often sees only a fragment of the sky and cannot easily judge distance, speed or altitude.
Aviation is especially important. Paris Charles de Gaulle airport lies north-east of Paris and partly extends into Tremblay-en-France in Seine-Saint-Denis, according to the French airport-noise authority ACNUSA.[ACNUSA]acnusa.frOpen source on acnusa.fr. Paris Aéroport also identifies Charles de Gaulle as a major hub for national and international airlines.[Paris Aéroport]parisaeroport.frOpen source on parisaeroport.fr. Nearby Le Bourget and Orly also matter for some sightlines, even when they are outside the department, because aircraft on approach, departure or alignment can be visible from Seine-Saint-Denis.
This does not mean every report is “just a plane”. It means aircraft are a serious first hypothesis in this department. GEIPAN’s case files show investigators repeatedly checking directions, wind, airport approach paths, apparent motion and whether the witness was seeing landing lights, navigation lights, military aircraft, or aircraft turning in a way that changed the pattern of lights.
The 1993 Pantin case: a former mystery becomes a lesson in reanalysis
The Pantin sighting of 30 May 1993 is one of the most useful Seine-Saint-Denis cases because it shows how an old “unidentified” file can change when later tools and experience are applied. GEIPAN states that the Pantin case had previously been classed D, but was later re-examined and split into two separate observations.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
The first observation began at about 4.15 am, when a witness on a balcony reported an orange rectangular luminous form that seemed stationary for around 15 minutes, then moved slowly, changed direction and disappeared towards the horizon. The witness also reported a red flashing light and no sound. GEIPAN’s later assessment was that this was probably an aircraft, with landing lights and an anti-collision light producing the impression of an orange rectangular object at distance.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
The second part of the same morning was different. The witness then reported a white circular form that seemed stationary and remained visible until about 6 am. GEIPAN linked this second observation to Venus, noting that the duration, slow apparent movement, colour and disappearance in cloudy conditions supported a planetary explanation.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
The Pantin file matters because it weakens the idea that a case once labelled unexplained must stay unexplained forever. It also shows a common UFO-history trap: a witness can describe two genuinely puzzling impressions, while investigation later separates them into two different ordinary causes.
Aircraft and airport-linked cases
Several Seine-Saint-Denis reports make most sense against the department’s aviation environment.
In Villemomble in February 2013, a witness repeatedly saw yellow lights to the south-east that appeared, shifted slightly and disappeared. GEIPAN found that the direction matched the zone where aircraft from the south align for Orly when winds come from the west or north-west. The witness was probably seeing directional landing lights from aircraft around 20 km away, visible only while the aircraft faced the observer.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
In Épinay-sur-Seine in May 2015, a witness saw a triangular shape suggested by lights at the corners, with red and white flashing lights and the sound of a low aircraft. GEIPAN’s published account says the case had many characteristics of an aircraft and notes that when observers see points of light but not wings or fuselage, they can mentally reconstruct a dark triangular volume between the lights. It classified the case as a probable aircraft observation.[CarteOvni.fr]carteovni.frepinay sur seine 2015 0509166epinay sur seine 2015 0509166
Aulnay-sous-Bois in February 1981 is another instructive aviation-adjacent file. A witness saw orange fireballs with grey smoke trails descending slowly and silently. The inquiry found that airport firefighters nearby had launched parachute distress flares at about the same time; GEIPAN’s derived public record classifies the case as probably identified.[CarteOvni.fr]carteovni.fraulnay sous bois 1981 0200859aulnay sous bois 1981 0200859
Together, these cases show why Seine-Saint-Denis reports often begin with dramatic language but end with cautious explanations. The witnesses were not necessarily inventing anything. They were interpreting lights in a complex airspace.
Urban lights, lanterns and sky-tracers
Not all explanations are aircraft. Some of the department’s more recent cases point to changing urban light culture: private events, lantern releases, powerful projectors and amusement-park shows.
In Aubervilliers on 8 February 2015, a witness saw a silent, flickering red light moving horizontally before changing direction and vanishing. GEIPAN judged that the behaviour, colour, short duration, weekend timing and wind direction were consistent with a Thai lantern, or possibly a luminous balloon, and classified the case B.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
Two recent GEIPAN cases show the growing importance of sky-tracers — powerful moving lights projected into clouds. In Noisy-le-Grand on 6 January 2025, a witness filmed and photographed multiple white lights moving in circles with halos. GEIPAN classified the case A, identifying sky-tracers from Disneyland Paris.[Geipan]geipan.frOpen source on geipan.fr. In Neuilly-sur-Marne on 26 August 2025, a nearly two-hour observation of coloured luminous forms, halos and localised brightening in clouds was also identified as sky-tracers from Disneyland Paris’s night show.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
These cases are especially valuable for modern readers because they explain a type of sighting that can look extraordinary on video. A camera may capture moving patches of light on clouds, while the projector source remains hidden below the horizon or outside the frame. From a flat in Seine-Saint-Denis, the effect can seem local, silent and aerial.
Older weak cases: what “insufficient information” really means
Several Seine-Saint-Denis files are class C, meaning the available information is too limited for a firm conclusion. This is not the same as saying the phenomenon was extraordinary. It means the investigation cannot go far enough.
In Les Lilas in August 1977, Drancy in January 1978, Le Blanc-Mesnil in March 1981, Villemomble in October 1986, Noisy-le-Sec in December 1988, Gagny in April 1996 and Rosny-sous-Bois in July 2010, the department’s public case lists include reports that remain in the “lack of reliable information” category rather than class D unexplained-after-investigation.[CarteOvni.fr]carteovni.frOpen source on carteovni.fr.
The Gagny case of 20 April 1996 illustrates the problem. A witness reported a silent cylindrical object with flashing lights, moving more slowly than an aircraft, then climbing after a turn. The reported duration was about ten minutes, but GEIPAN says no other information is available, so the case is classified C.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
The Noisy-le-Sec 1988 file is even clearer. A person reported, in 2011, a luminous phenomenon with a trail seen in late December 1988. GEIPAN noted that the characteristics could match the widely observed atmospheric re-entry of debris from the Cosmos 1954 satellite on 21 December 1988, but the witness did not provide a precise date or time, making the link impossible to confirm. The case was therefore classed C.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
For readers, this is one of the most important distinctions in UFO history. A weak file can remain unresolved because it lacks timing, direction, angular height, photographs, radar data or corroborating witnesses. That is different from a well-documented event resisting explanation.
Media, archives and the 1970s UFO climate
Seine-Saint-Denis also appears in a broader French media context. A CNES-linked psychological and media study of UFO press coverage examined the period from 1 January 1974 to 31 December 1980, noting that this was chosen partly because precise instructions had been given to the gendarmerie from 1974 for reports of UFO observations.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frEtude psychoEtude psycho
That study found that newspaper UFO reports often gave limited witness detail, sometimes left the number of witnesses vague, and frequently presented nocturnal lights. In its analysis of Le Parisien Libéré, it noted that the paper mentioned no identifications and that, when phenomena could be classified from the article text, most were nocturnal lights.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frEtude psychoEtude psycho
This matters for Seine-Saint-Denis because several of its older cases belong to exactly that era: the late 1970s and early 1980s, when local press attention, police or gendarmerie reports and public fascination overlapped. The archival value is real, but so are the limits. Short newspaper accounts and old witness statements rarely preserve the exact data needed for later reconstruction.
Is there a Seine-Saint-Denis “flap”?
A “flap” is a short period when many UFO reports cluster in time and place. Seine-Saint-Denis does show small clusters in the official-derived record, but not a strong department-wide wave.
The clearest bunching occurs around the late 1970s and early 1980s, with Les Lilas in 1977, Drancy in 1978, Aulnay-sous-Bois and Le Blanc-Mesnil in 1981, and later Villemomble in 1986 and Noisy-le-Sec in 1988.[CarteOvni.fr]carteovni.frOpen source on carteovni.fr. Another modern cluster appears in the early-to-mid 2010s, with cases at Bagnolet, Gagny, Villemomble, Romainville, Noisy-le-Grand, Aubervilliers and Épinay-sur-Seine.[CarteOvni.fr]carteovni.frOpen source on carteovni.fr.
But the pattern is not strong enough to support a dramatic “wave” claim. The later cluster is largely made up of cases with probable explanations such as aircraft, lanterns or other identifiable lights. The older cluster includes several class C cases where the problem is not stubborn mystery but missing information.
The most honest conclusion is that Seine-Saint-Denis has recurring urban sighting conditions rather than a famous UFO flap: many observers, busy skies, artificial lighting, constrained viewpoints and occasional media attention.
What counts as the best evidence here?
The best evidence in Seine-Saint-Denis is not a single extraordinary object. It is the way cases can be tested against ordinary causes.
The strongest files tend to include at least one of the following:
- Precise timing and direction. The Villemomble 2013 aircraft explanation depended on matching the observed direction with Orly approach geometry and wind conditions.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
- Images or video. The Noisy-le-Grand 2025 case had photo and video evidence, which helped GEIPAN classify the lights as Disneyland sky-tracers.[Geipan]geipan.frOpen source on geipan.fr.
- Environmental checks. The Aubervilliers lantern case used wind direction and the social timing of a weekend night to support a probable explanation.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
- Later reanalysis. The Pantin 1993 case shows how software, accumulated experience and better reconstruction can turn a once-unexplained case into two more ordinary explanations.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
The weakest files are those with vague dates, no exact time, no angular measurements, no independent witnesses and no usable imagery. Those can remain interesting human stories, but they are poor evidence for a truly anomalous event.
What later reporting has strengthened or weakened
Later reporting has mostly weakened the more mysterious reading of Seine-Saint-Denis UFO history. The strongest example is Pantin: once treated as a single unexplained case, it was later split and reclassified as a probable aircraft sighting plus Venus.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
Recent cases have also tended to strengthen mundane explanations rather than build a new mystery. Noisy-le-Grand and Neuilly-sur-Marne in 2025 show how videos of strange cloud lights can be resolved as sky-tracers when direction, time and known light shows are checked.[Geipan]geipan.frOpen source on geipan.fr.
The broad public framing has shifted too. CNES has long stressed that most UFO testimony concerns normal phenomena misinterpreted by observers, listing examples such as moonrise, unusual clouds, atmospheric re-entry, lightning-related effects and other ordinary causes.[CNES]cnes.frgeipan ouvre dossiersgeipan ouvre dossiers Contemporary French coverage of GEIPAN likewise presents the subject as serious but methodical, with most cases investigated for rational explanations rather than treated as evidence of alien craft.[leparisien.fr]leparisien.frSur la piste des ovnis avec les chercheurs du GeipanSur la piste des ovnis avec les chercheurs du Geipan
That does not make the witnesses irrelevant. It makes their reports useful raw material. Seine-Saint-Denis is a good example of how a serious UFO archive can preserve unusual experiences without endorsing the most exotic interpretation.
How to read a Seine-Saint-Denis UFO claim
A good Seine-Saint-Denis UFO claim should be read through four questions.[carteovni.fr]carteovni.frsaint denis 2009 0402259saint denis 2009 0402259
First, where was the witness looking? In this department, direction matters because aircraft routes, airport alignments and distant light sources can sit low on the horizon and appear stranger than they are. The Villemomble and Épinay-sur-Seine files show how much turns on sightline and aviation context.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
Second, was the object really an object? Several cases involve lights from which the witness inferred a shape. GEIPAN’s Épinay-sur-Seine discussion is especially helpful here: points of light can create an apparent triangular outline even when the solid body is not visible.[CarteOvni.fr]carteovni.frepinay sur seine 2015 0509166epinay sur seine 2015 0509166
Third, how complete is the record? A class C file is not a trophy mystery. It usually means there is too little reliable information to decide. Gagny 1996 and Noisy-le-Sec 1988 are good examples of reports that remain limited by missing data.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
Fourth, has the case been revisited? Pantin shows why older classifications should not be read as final mythology. A case can become less mysterious when later investigators reconstruct the sky, aircraft paths or astronomical conditions more carefully.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
The department’s real place in French UFO history
Seine-Saint-Denis is not one of France’s great unresolved UFO theatres. It has no well-supported department-defining class D case in the current public-derived listing, and many of its memorable reports have plausible explanations or weak documentation.[CarteOvni.fr]carteovni.frOpen source on carteovni.fr.
Its importance lies elsewhere. It is a compact case study in urban UFO investigation: how ordinary lights become extraordinary from a balcony; how aircraft, flares, lanterns and planets mimic structured craft; how official records preserve both witness experience and sceptical reconstruction; and how later reanalysis can change a case’s status.
For a public-facing history of UFOs in Seine-Saint-Denis, the honest story is therefore not “nothing happened” and not “mystery solved forever”. Something did happen: people saw things they could not identify, sometimes with genuine surprise and concern. The best available record shows that, in this department, the most reliable explanations usually point back to the busy, lit, aircraft-filled sky over north-eastern Paris.
eBay marketplace picks
Marketplace Samples
Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.
Endnotes
1.
Source: carteovni.fr
Link:https://carteovni.fr/departement/seine-saint-denis
2.
Source: cnes.fr
Link:https://cnes.fr/en/projects/geipan
3.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/missions-methodes-et-resultats
4.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: methodologie classification geipan
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/actualites/methodologie-classification-geipan
5.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/stats
6.
Source: acnusa.fr
Link:https://www.acnusa.fr/aeroport-de-paris-charles-de-gaulle-91
7.
Source: carteovni.fr
Title: epinay sur seine 2015 0509166
Link:https://carteovni.fr/cas/epinay-sur-seine-2015-0509166
8.
Source: carteovni.fr
Title: aulnay sous bois 1981 0200859
Link:https://carteovni.fr/cas/aulnay-sous-bois-1981-0200859
9.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/fr/cas/2025-01-51677?field_date_value=2019-08-31&field_is_new_value=1&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date&page=20&sort=asc
10.
Source: cnes.fr
Title: geipan ouvre dossiers
Link:https://cnes.fr/actualites/geipan-ouvre-dossiers
11.
Source: leparisien.fr
Title: Sur la piste des ovnis avec les chercheurs du Geipan
Link:https://www.leparisien.fr/sciences/sur-la-piste-des-ovnis-avec-les-chercheurs-du-geipan-29-01-2023-VLKA3XPAXZHJXENFZSTSTZI2HM.php
12.
Source: leparisien.fr
Link:https://www.leparisien.fr/societe/jai-vu-un-triangle-sombre-dans-le-ciel-avec-une-lumiere-en-dessous-la-chasse-aux-ovnis-fascine-toujours-autant-21-09-2022-G6RVNEIROVGCBMZU6NQK7ITUMU.php
13.
Source: carteovni.fr
Title: saint denis 2009 0402259
Link:https://carteovni.fr/cas/saint-denis-2009-0402259
14.
Source: carteovni.fr
Title: pantin 1993 0501303
Link:https://carteovni.fr/cas/pantin-1993-0501303
15.
Source: carteovni.fr
Link:https://carteovni.fr/commune/le-blanc-mesnil-93
16.
Source: carteovni.fr
Title: le blanc mesnil 1981 0700874
Link:https://carteovni.fr/cas/le-blanc-mesnil-1981-0700874
17.
Source: carteovni.fr
Title: aulnay sous bois 93
Link:https://carteovni.fr/commune/aulnay-sous-bois-93
18.
Source: carteovni.fr
Title: rosny sous bois 2010 0702655
Link:https://carteovni.fr/cas/rosny-sous-bois-2010-0702655
19.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/en/node/61235?field_date_value=2020-11-18&field_is_new_value=1&page=1
20.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date&page=146&sort=desc
21.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B12%5D=12&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation&page=57&sort=desc
22.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B11%5D=11&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B12%5D=12&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B13%5D=13&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B14%5D=14&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=1&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation&page=134&select-category-export=nothing&sort=desc&video=on
23.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/sites/default/files/Questionnaire%20terre-R210.pdf
24.
Source: leparisien.fr
Link:https://www.leparisien.fr/sciences/direct-ovnis-quels-sont-ces-phenomenes-anormaux-pourquoi-larmee-sy-interesse-posez-nous-vos-questions-15-09-2025-KGLTUFGMANHZFNEXDTFSNY7IDQ.php
25.
Source: leparisien.fr
Link:https://www.leparisien.fr/sciences/sortir-du-sensationnalisme-les-ovnis-a-laffiche-dun-colloque-inedit-a-lassemblee-nationale-en-juin-19-05-2026-M4IDUVD2S5FKNEUYEIDN2NM43Y.php
26.
Source: leparisien.fr
Title: ovnis 16 cas repertories dans l essonne 29 08 2009 619593
Link:https://www.leparisien.fr/essonne-91/guigneville-sur-essonne-91590/ovnis-16-cas-repertories-dans-l-essonne-29-08-2009-619593.php
27.
Source: leparisien.fr
Link:https://www.leparisien.fr/val-d-oise-95/ovni-l-affaire-d-haravilliers-toujours-aussi-mysterieuse-vingt-ans-apres-16-03-2018-7612386.php
28.
Source: videotheque.cnes.fr
Link:https://videotheque.cnes.fr/index.php?id_cat=3105&id_doc=39029&rang=1&urlaction=doc
29.
Source: videotheque.cnes.fr
Link:https://videotheque.cnes.fr/index.php?id_cat=3105&urlaction=cat
30.
Source: tremblay-en-france.fr
Title: royal airport
Link:https://www.tremblay-en-france.fr/35-456/mon-cadre-de-vie/vie-economique/commerces-et-entreprises/ficheAnnu/royal-airport.htm
31.
Source: parisaeroport.fr
Link:https://www.parisaeroport.fr/en/passengers/charles-de-gaulle-airport
32.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/1993-05-01303
33.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2013-02-08405
34.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2015-02-09105
35.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2025-08-51713
36.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/1996-04-01421
37.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/1988-12-02714
38.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: Etude psycho 1981 2
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/Etude_psycho_1981_2.pdf
39.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2009-04-02259
40.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/PV%20n%C2%B0632%20%282009310115%29.pdf
41.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/PV%20n%C2%B01929%20%281978308776%29.pdf
42.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: Elements enquete IPN R
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/Elements%20enquete%20IPN-R.pdf
43.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/save_json_import_files/export_cas_pub_20251127093552.csv
44.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: Compte rendu enquete94
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/Compte%20rendu%20enquete94.pdf
45.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: Courriers R2
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/Courriers-R2.pdf
46.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/Presse3.pdf
47.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/PV%20n%C2%B0351%20%281994310452%29.pdf
48.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2016-11-09584
49.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2013-12-08650?field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B0%5D=12&order=field_date_d_observation&page=%2C71&sort=asc
50.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/1981-02-00859
51.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/1981-07-00874
52.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/1986-10-01098?field_agregation_index_value=06&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=title&page=%2C106&sort=desc
53.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/en/node/48950
54.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?customGetLattitude=48.86996345993287&customGetLongitude=2.399826049804688&customGetZoom=11&field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=49.00094298321503&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=48.738983936650705&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=2.633285522460938&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=2.166366577148438&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=4%2C3&sort=asc
55.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/
56.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/node/58788
57.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: baisse cas d
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/actualites/baisse-cas-d
58.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/node/430
59.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/what-did-i-see/step-1
60.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/Compte%20rendu%20enquete647.pdf
61.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/faq-page
62.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: 2015 09 01 Spatial Point Pattern Analysis of the Unidentified
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/2015-09-01_Spatial_Point_Pattern_Analysis_of_the_Unidentified.pdf
63.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en
64.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/histoire-du-geipan
65.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/Aids_to_identification_of_flying_objects_0.pdf
66.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/mentions_legales
67.
Source: parisaeroport.fr
Link:https://www.parisaeroport.fr/
68.
Source: parisaeroport.fr
Link:https://www.parisaeroport.fr/en
69.
Source: parisaeroport.fr
Link:https://www.parisaeroport.fr/en/charles-de-gaulle-airport/
70.
Source: parisaeroport.fr
Title: roissy charles de gaulle
Link:https://www.parisaeroport.fr/fr/passagers/roissy-charles-de-gaulle
71.
Source: parisaeroport.fr
Link:https://www.parisaeroport.fr/en/passengers/cdg
72.
Source: Wikipedia
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GEIPAN
73.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Charles de Gaulle Airport
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_de_Gaulle_Airport
74.
Source: lejournaltoulousain.fr
Title: geipan toulouse vrai hero serie ovnis canal 112119
Link:https://www.lejournaltoulousain.fr/culture/geipan-toulouse-vrai-hero-serie-ovnis-canal-112119/
75.
Source: academieairespace.com
Link:https://academieairespace.com/event/geipan-studies-uaps-ufos/?lang=en
76.
Source: airport-world.fandom.com
Title: Charles de Gaulle Airport
Link:https://airport-world.fandom.com/wiki/Charles_de_Gaulle_Airport
Additional References
77.
Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xTGixa290Ds
78.
Source: youtube.com
Title: REPLAY: NASA Unveils Report on Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HuDYW5Q8aX0
79.
Source: youtube.com
Title: 7 Nations Just EXPOSED The Pentagon’s Alien Lie
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7MfYCp0aPME
80.
Source: ufowaves.org
Link:https://ufowaves.org/enquetes/gerard_deforge/docs/investigations.pdf
81.
Source: booking.com
Link:https://www.booking.com/hotel/fr/appartement-sympa-entre-paris-et-disneyland.de.html
82.
Source: mapcarta.com
Link:https://mapcarta.com/N5401451329
83.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/FRANCE24.English/posts/-franceinfocus-is-there-anybody-out-there-in-france-an-organisation-exists-whose/860539629578748/
84.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/116155073169/posts/10156976360623170/?locale=ar_AR
85.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/groups/southwestfrance/posts/1342464920438589/
86.
Source: disneyparis-hotels.com
Link:https://www.disneyparis-hotels.com/en/near-neuilly-plaisance-rer-station-2239401/3/
Topic Tree
Follow this branch
Related pages 95
- Manche UFOs
- Ariege UFOs
- Correze UFOs
- Dordogne UFOs
- Hautes Pyrenees UFOs
- +90 more in sidebar