What Loiret's UFO Files Really Show
Loiret’s UFO history is not built around one famous, still-unexplained “classic” case.
Page outline Jump by section
Why Loiret Matters in French UFO Records
Loiret has a particular place in French UFO mapping because it appears both in official case files and in wider statistical work. A 2015 spatial analysis of French UAP reports, using GEIPAN data from 1951 to 2013, found that population density and other environmental variables explained part of the national distribution, but that several areas still showed higher local intensity not explained by the model; Loiret was one of the departments named in that residual pattern. That does not mean Loiret is a proven “hotspot” in the popular sense, or that its cases point to one exotic cause. It means the department is interesting enough to be visible in aggregate data as well as in individual files.[arXiv]arxiv.orgOpen source on arxiv.org.
The department also sits in a useful investigative setting. Orléans and its surrounding communes produce reports from drivers, families and residents under varied conditions: motorways, rural roads, terraces, gardens and the outskirts of a major urban area. The presence of Orléans-Bricy Air Base is especially important, because several Loiret reports involve aviation explanations or military-aircraft context rather than purely astronomical or folk-UFO interpretations. GEIPAN’s own project page lists the French gendarmerie, police, Air and Space Force, CNRS and Météo-France among its partners, which helps explain why aviation, weather, image analysis and witness procedure often appear together in the case files.[CNES]cnes.frGEIPAN | CNESGEIPAN | CNES
The broader French framework is also unusually transparent compared with many countries. CNES began opening its UFO archives online in 2007, with the EU’s CORDIS service reporting at the time that the archive included documents and eyewitness accounts from across France. GEIPAN’s current national figures now show 24.6% of phenomena clearly identified, 39.7% probably identified, 32.4% unidentified because of lack of data, and 3.3% unidentified after investigation. For Loiret, that national context matters: the most responsible reading is not “everything was solved”, but “most robust cases move towards conventional explanations, while weakly documented cases often remain unclear for lack of data”.[CORDIS]cordis.europa.euCORDISFrance opens UFO archives | News | CORDIS | European CommissionCORDISFrance opens UFO archives | News | CORDIS | European Commission
The 1979 Red Light Near Saint-Florent: A Classic Misread Moon Case
One of the most instructive Loiret files is the Saint-Florent case of 30 June 1979, originally tied in GEIPAN’s text to an older GEPAN classification under the name Coullons. Four people travelling between Saint-Florent and Villemurlin saw a red phenomenon that seemed to descend towards the road. Witnesses described forms such as a banana shape or a drop shape, saw it move slowly, became frightened, and went to the gendarmerie. The gendarmes inspected the presumed site that night and again the next day, finding a 1.60 metre fire site with warm ash; an early local hypothesis involved brush-fire embers.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
GEIPAN’s later re-examination found the brush-fire explanation weaker than another possibility: the setting Moon. The file says the Moon was setting, its red colour matched the description, and its azimuth corresponded to the axis of the D54 road. The agency’s conclusion is careful but firm: the witnesses’ perception was not dismissed, but their interpretation was. GEIPAN classifies the case as A, meaning an identified phenomenon, with the specific explanation of confusion with the Moon at moonset.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
This case matters because it shows a pattern found throughout Loiret’s files. The report sounds vivid at first: a red object, fear, a road, a possible ground mark, and multiple witnesses. Yet the strongest later evidence comes from geometry, timing and sky position, not from the emotional intensity of the encounter. It is a good example of how a sincere and memorable UFO report can become a conventional astronomical case once the sightline is reconstructed.
Pithiviers 1979: “Triangle” Lights and the Orléans-Bricy Aviation Link
The Pithiviers case of 2 December 1979 is one of the clearest Loiret examples of an apparently strange formation being reassessed as aviation. A couple and their children saw numerous flashing lights of different colours, apparently arranged as a triangle, with a whistling sound. The lights appeared stationary, then moved in single file and disappeared. Only two gendarmerie witness statements were collected, and GEIPAN notes that the case had previously been classified D before re-examination.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
The later GEIPAN conclusion is that the witnesses probably saw a convoy of military helicopters heading towards Orléans-Bricy Air Base. The agency points to the file-indian movement towards the base, possible pauses, colours matching aircraft navigation and landing lights, and flashing effects caused by the geometry of fixed and anti-collision lights. GEIPAN also explains the perceived triangle as a common night-time interpretation error: witnesses may mentally connect separate points of light into the outline of a solid object even when no solid outline has actually been observed.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
The doubts in this case are still worth noting. GEIPAN describes the file’s consistency as mediocre: there were no angular measurements, no drawings, no photos or video, and the gendarmerie investigation was brief. Even so, the agency judged the helicopter hypothesis strong enough for a B classification, meaning a probable identification rather than a fully proven one. That distinction is important for Loiret as a whole: “probably explained” is not the same as “airtight”, but it is also not an unresolved mystery.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
Orléans and the Problem of Thin but Tempting Cases
Loiret’s files around Orléans include several reports that sound dramatic but depend on limited information. The Orléans case of 19 October 2014 involved a witness and his brother-in-law seeing three red spheres move silently, first in a line and then as a dark triangle. GEIPAN considered a group of three sky lanterns possible because of the red colour, silence, straight-line movement, suitable duration, and the weekend setting, but key information was missing, especially the direction of travel. The file was therefore classified C: not identifiable because of insufficient information and cross-checking.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
The Saint-Denis-de-l’Hôtel case of 24 March 1997 is similar in evidential shape but different in possible explanation. A motorist on the N60, about four kilometres from the Fay-aux-Loges interchange, saw rows of lights moving in a cloudy sky. GEIPAN noted that a nightclub skytracker could fit several features: lights without a visible solid object, geometric patterns, a low cloud deck that could catch beams, the proximity of Orléans, and known use of such lighting around that period. But the agency could not verify the original lighting source more than 20 years later, and it also noted that no known projector example fully matched the witness’s described geometric form. The case remained C because the data were too weak.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
These cases are valuable precisely because they resist a neat binary answer. A C classification is not a claim that something extraordinary happened. It usually means that the case cannot be responsibly identified because the observation is too short, the witness base is too small, the angles are missing, the object was not photographed, or the possible source cannot be reconstructed after many years. For readers, this is one of the most important distinctions in Loiret’s UFO history: unresolved in an archive often means under-documented, not necessarily mysterious in a stronger sense.
The 2007 Orléans Photographs: When Images Help but Do Not End Debate
The Orléans case of 1 November 2007 stands out because it included five digital photographs. A passenger travelling by car near Orléans saw a dark object that seemed to change shape, rotate, and disappear near or into a cumulonimbus cloud. The witness initially compared it to a hang-glider, while the photos and gendarmerie notes described changing appearances such as a dome or parallelogram, with dark or metallic-looking features. The Orléans-Bricy base reported no relevant air movement in the time and place concerned, and local weather services reported no apparent meteorological aerial deployment in the previous days.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
GEIPAN rejected the idea of a piloted aircraft, partly because entering a cumulonimbus would be hazardous and because no accident or fallen aircraft was reported. The agency instead favoured a tethered balloon or helikite, a hybrid kite-balloon device that can be used for scientific work, filming, communications or other practical purposes. The changing shapes in the photos were considered typical of such objects, and the disappearance could be explained by the object passing behind the cloud, being pulled down, or possibly being damaged. The case was classified B, a probable identification.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
This file is a useful caution against assuming that photographs automatically settle a UFO case. Images can improve consistency and allow shape and brightness analysis, but they do not always prove distance, size, altitude or ownership. In the Orléans 2007 case, the photographs helped GEIPAN move away from a vague “unknown object” label towards a plausible object class, but they did not identify a specific operator or recover a physical device.
The 2016 Lantern Cluster Around Chécy and Mardié
The late-August 2016 Loiret reports show how one explanation can recur across nearby places. At Chécy on 23 August, a witness and his son saw a silent orange incandescent sphere move from east to west for about 30 seconds. The child described it as a fireball, but GEIPAN found the observation closely matched a Thai sky lantern: orange colour, flame-like appearance, silence, movement with the wind, and a summer evening suitable for festive lantern releases. The case was classified A, very probably a sky lantern.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
Five days later, at Mardié on 28 August 2016, a witness at a dinner with about 30 guests saw between seven and ten orange lights pass silently and successively through the night sky, each with similar appearance, speed and altitude. A photograph was taken, though GEIPAN records only one formal testimony. The agency again concluded that the repeated lights were consistent with sky lanterns: the movement matched the wind, the repeated appearance was typical, image colour analysis using IPACO was compatible with lanterns, and the weekend night setting suited a festive release. GEIPAN classified the case A.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
Taken together, Chécy and Mardié show why local UFO history should be read as patterns rather than isolated anecdotes. A single orange light might feel strange to a witness; a run of similar orange lights on summer evenings near populated areas strongly points towards an ordinary social cause. This does not make the witnesses unreliable. It shows how a technology or custom visible in the sky can generate a local mini-flap without requiring any single dramatic event.
Recent Loiret Cases: Aircraft, Photos and Better Cross-Checking
The 21 October 2021 case on the D6 from Chevilly towards Sougy is a modern example of a report that looked unusual to a driver but had enough context for a strong identification. The witness saw a small green light low to the left, moving slowly and then appearing to accelerate; he stopped, got out, photographed and filmed the phenomenon. GEIPAN records the case as A and summarises it as a night-time observation of a green light that was identified as a military A400M transport aircraft.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
The reasoning is aviation-based and local. GEIPAN concluded that the aircraft was very probably an A400M from Orléans-Bricy, operating in very-low-altitude exercise conditions. The file points to aircraft light colours, the aircraft’s presence near the base, the witness’s difficulty judging speed and distance at night, and the likelihood that the perceived “acceleration” came from changing viewing angle rather than a sudden burst of speed. GEIPAN also addressed the absence of noise: the aircraft may have been around 3.6 km away rather than the witness’s original estimate of 30 metres, and wind direction was not carrying sound towards him.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
Nearby Loiret entries from 2021 also show how mixed the modern record is. GEIPAN’s search table lists Meung-sur-Loire on 25 March 2021 as an A-class aircraft case, Bou on 17 September 2021 as a C case lacking reliable information, and the Chevilly-Sougy D6 case as an A-class aircraft identification. That spread is typical: some recent reports are solved, some are probably explained, and some remain too poorly documented to close.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
What the Loiret Pattern Really Suggests
The strongest pattern in Loiret is not exotic craft, secret bases or a single repeating phenomenon. It is the diversity of ordinary triggers: the setting Moon, military aircraft, helicopters, lanterns, possible nightclub lights, tethered balloons, and under-specified observations. This variety is exactly why department-level UFO history is useful. It lets readers see the ecology of sightings: roads create moving witness viewpoints, cities create lights and entertainment sources, rural skies make familiar objects appear isolated, and airbase activity adds aircraft that can look strange when seen briefly or at night.
Loiret also demonstrates why GEIPAN’s classification system should be read carefully. In practical terms:<div class="content-enhancement content-enhancement--example" markdown="1">
- A cases are identified: Saint-Florent as the Moon, Chécy and Mardié as lanterns, and Chevilly-Sougy as an aircraft.
- B cases are probably identified: Pithiviers as helicopters, Orléans 2007 as a tethered balloon or helikite.
- C cases are not good mysteries so much as weak files: Orléans 2014 and Saint-Denis-de-l’Hôtel 1997 both had plausible explanations, but not enough data to confirm them.
- D cases are the rarest nationally in the current CNES figures, and the prominent Loiret examples found in the public files are mostly reclassified away from that stronger unresolved category after review.[CNES+2GEIPAN]cnes.frGEIPAN | CNESGEIPAN | CNES</div>
The department’s UFO history is therefore best read as a case study in investigation rather than belief. The interesting question is not simply “was it a UFO?” but “what evidence survived long enough to test?” In Loiret, the answer varies sharply. Multiple witnesses and emotional certainty did not prevent the Saint-Florent Moon explanation. Photographs helped Orléans 2007 but still left a probable rather than exact object identification. The 1997 and 2014 cases remained C not because they were more astonishing, but because crucial details were missing.
How to Read a Loiret UFO Claim Today
A useful Loiret UFO claim should be assessed by what can still be checked. The most important details are exact time, precise location, direction of view, duration, angular height, colour, sound, movement against landmarks, weather, wind, nearby events, aircraft activity, and whether any independent witnesses or images exist. GEIPAN’s own methodology describes receiving testimony, creating a file, analysing it, investigating and processing it, while using recognised scientific knowledge and avoiding speculative hypotheses.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frGEIPANMission & Geipan | GEIPANGEIPANMission & Geipan | GEIPAN
For Loiret specifically, three checks matter again and again. First, look west and low on the horizon for Moon or planet misidentifications, especially with red or orange shapes near the horizon. Second, check aviation routes and Orléans-Bricy activity before treating moving coloured lights as anomalous. Third, treat orange silent lights on summer or weekend evenings as possible lanterns until wind direction, repetition and duration argue otherwise. These checks are not debunking shortcuts; they are the explanations that have repeatedly survived contact with the department’s own documented cases.
The fair conclusion is that Loiret has a real UFO record, but not a simple mystery narrative. Its files are richer than a sceptical dismissal and weaker than an extraordinary-claims catalogue. They show sincere witnesses, sometimes striking descriptions, occasional photographs, official gendarmerie involvement, and a recurring pattern in which later investigation often weakens the exotic reading of the original report.
eBay marketplace picks
Marketplace Samples
Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.
Endnotes
1.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: GEIPANMission & Geipan | GEIPAN
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/missions-methodes-et-resultats
2.
Source: cnes.fr
Title: GEIPAN | CNES
Link:https://cnes.fr/en/projects/geipan
3.
Source: arxiv.org
Link:https://arxiv.org/abs/1509.00571
4.
Source: cordis.europa.eu
Title: CORDISFrance opens UFO archives | News | CORDIS | European Commission
Link:https://cordis.europa.eu/article/id/27439-france-opens-ufo-archives
5.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?customGetLattitude=49.42700809484137&customGetLongitude=-0.9608752280473711&customGetZoom=7&field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=51.49757451349519&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=47.35644167618756&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=2.2526257485151295&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=-4.174376204609872&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation&page=2%2C37&sort=desc
6.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/sites/default/files/PV%20n%C2%B0154%20%281982308101%29.pdf
7.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/
8.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/sites/default/files/PV%20n%C2%B01131%20%282021351090%29.pdf
9.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/sites/default/files/PV%20n%C2%B0365%20%281979308718%29.pdf
10.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/en/faq-page
11.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_date_value=2007-03-01&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation&page=13&sort=desc
12.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=116&order=field_departement_textuel&page=73&select-category-export=nothing&sort=desc
13.
Source: cnes.fr
Link:https://cnes.fr/projets/geipan
14.
Source: videotheque.cnes.fr
Link:https://videotheque.cnes.fr/index.php?id_cat=3105&urlaction=cat
15.
Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hn2xTieploU
16.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Geipan: France is also interested in UFOs
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OLXDikL331Y
17.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/1979-06-00635
18.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/1979-12-01704
19.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2014-10-09028
20.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/1997-05-01457?order=title&page=46&sort=desc&undefined=
21.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2007-11-50223
22.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2016-08-50314
23.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2016-08-50312
24.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/node/60144?page=%2C30&undefined=
25.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/node/58792
26.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en
27.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas
28.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/
29.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/node/58791
30.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas?field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date&page=%2C8&sort=asc
31.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas?customGetLattitude=46.94358292648825&customGetLongitude=4.4989013671875&customGetZoom=7&field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=49.11702904077932&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=44.77013681219717&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=7.668457031250001&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=1.329345703125&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=title&page=%2C189&sort=asc
32.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas?field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_classification_des_cas&page=%2C490&sort=desc
33.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas?field_agregation_index_value=avion&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation&page=%2C31&sort=asc
34.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas?field_agregation_index_value=Gard&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date&page=%2C56&sort=asc
35.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas?field_agregation_index_value=orange&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date&page=%2C39&sort=asc
36.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas?field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=%2C101&sort=desc
37.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas?field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B0%5D=11&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=49.816720843571765&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=47.71715357016648&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=4.345092773437501&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=0.8074951171875001&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date&page=%2C9&select-category-export=nothing&sort=asc
38.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas?field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B13%5D=13&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date&page=%2C131&sort=asc
39.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas?field_agregation_index_value=Ain&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=title&page=%2C38&sort=asc
40.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/PV%20n%C2%B0154%20%281982308101%29.pdf
41.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B11%5D=11&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date&page=12&sort=desc
42.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/en/search/cas?field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B0%5D=11&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=%2C58&sort=desc
43.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas?field_agregation_index_value=avion&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=%2C23&sort=asc
44.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/PV%20n%C2%B01131%20%282021351090%29.pdf
45.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: Compte rendu enquete515
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/Compte%20rendu%20enquete515.pdf
46.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation&page=30&sort=desc
47.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?customGetLattitude=43.9503570933062&customGetLongitude=-3.31787109375&customGetZoom=5&field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B11%5D=11&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=53.014783245859235&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=34.88593094075317&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=8.920898437500002&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=-15.556640625000002&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation_textuel&page=3&sort=desc
48.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=76&s=09&sort=desc
49.
Source: Wikipedia
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GEIPAN
Additional References
50.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Ancient Aliens: 300+”Flying Saucer” Incidents in France (Season 19) | History
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dcMrAX4zRwo
51.
Source: youtube.com
Title: UFOs, aliens: why is Trump declassifying?
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d1Olr4FyNbs
52.
Source: reddit.com
Link:https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1f8uqwk/archive_of_geipan/
53.
Source: smithsonianmag.com
Link:https://www.smithsonianmag.com/air-space-magazine/department-of-flying-saucers-2294791/
54.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/orleansactu/posts/-courrier-des-lecteurs-objet-volant-non-identifi%C3%A9-bonjour-savez-vous-ce-qui-a-su/1259792222636046/
55.
Source: nationalgeographic.fr
Link:https://www.nationalgeographic.fr/espace/france-qui-se-cache-derriere-le-geipan-le-bureau-des-ovnis-en-france-etrange-enquetes
56.
Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/shorts/LwJZgCv6ocg
57.
Source: connexionfrance.com
Title: inside frances ufo bureau we explain what people have seen
Link:https://www.connexionfrance.com/news/inside-frances-ufo-bureau-we-explain-what-people-have-seen/189460
58.
Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JLLj07iCttI
59.
Source: completefrance.com
Title: flying saucers in france a history of ufo sightings
Link:https://www.completefrance.com/travel/flying-saucers-in-france-a-history-of-ufo-sightings/
Topic Tree
Follow this branch
Related pages 95
- Manche UFOs
- Ariege UFOs
- Correze UFOs
- Dordogne UFOs
- Hautes Pyrenees UFOs
- +90 more in sidebar