Within Loir et Cher UFOs
Why Ordinary Skies Made Unusual UFO Reports
Satellites, sky lanterns, insects and shadows explain much of the modern record while showing why sincere witnesses can still be puzzled.
On this page
- Satellite passes over Blois and Oisly
- Lantern reports around celebrations
- Photographs, insects and other visual traps
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
Modern Loir-et-Cher UFO reports are most useful not because they reveal a hidden mystery, but because they show how easily ordinary sky events become puzzling witness cases. In the public GEIPAN/CNES record, the department has ten listed cases and no current class D cases, meaning none are left unexplained after investigation; the recent record is dominated instead by satellites, lanterns, aircraft, photographic artefacts and visual effects.[CarteOvni.fr]carteovni.frOVNI dans le Loir-et-Cher (41) — CarteOvni.frLe département Loir-et-Cher compte 10 cas recensés par le GEIPAN, dont 0 non identifiés (cla…
That makes the department a strong local case study in misidentification. The witness reports are not silly or worthless: several involved silent lights, apparent formations, odd colours, strange shapes, or photographs that only became puzzling after the event. But when investigators added timing, wind, aircraft tracks, satellite passes, lighting geometry and image analysis, the more extraordinary interpretations generally weakened. GEIPAN’s role is precisely to collect, analyse, archive and publish such reports, whether they arrive through its website, the gendarmerie, civil aviation or other channels.[CNES]cnes.frGEIPAN7 Jul 2025 — Based in Toulouse, this body has several distinct missions. First, it collects eyewitness accounts about unidentif…
What “misidentified” means in the Loir-et-Cher record
A misidentification is not the same as a hoax. In the Loir-et-Cher files, it usually means that a real observation was made, but the first interpretation was incomplete. A witness saw a moving light, a shape near an aircraft, or an odd mark in a photograph; the later explanation depended on context the witness did not have at the time.
GEIPAN’s classification system is important here. Class A means a phenomenon was identified after investigation, class B means it was probably identified, class C means it could not be identified because information was lacking, and class D means it remained unidentified after investigation.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frGEIPANMethodologyClassification C: Phenomenon not identified due to lack of data or information. Classification D: Phenomenon not identif… Loir-et-Cher’s public record, as summarised by CarteOvni from GEIPAN/CNES data, contains four class A cases, five class B cases, one class C case and no class D cases. Blois appears most often, with four listed reports, while Oisly, Villerbon, Selles-Saint-Denis, Savigny-sur-Braye and Lamotte-Beuvron each appear once.[CarteOvni.fr]carteovni.frOVNI dans le Loir-et-Cher (41) — CarteOvni.frLe département Loir-et-Cher compte 10 cas recensés par le GEIPAN, dont 0 non identifiés (cla…
The modern cases are especially revealing because they cover several different mechanisms. Some are moving lights in the sky. Some are celebration-related lanterns. Some are optical or photographic traps. Some involve aircraft, not as mysterious craft, but as ordinary planes whose shadows, spacing or lighting created a misleading impression. The pattern is local, but the lesson is broader: a UFO report often begins with a sincere perception and only becomes understandable after the scene is reconstructed.
Satellite passes over Blois and Oisly
The clearest modern mechanism in Loir-et-Cher is the satellite or high-altitude moving-light report. These cases tend to look impressive because the object is silent, steady, bright enough to catch attention, and often visible only briefly. Without a reference point for height or distance, a satellite can feel much lower, faster or stranger than it is.
The Oisly case of 8 May 2008 is the simplest example. GEIPAN lists it as a class A case in Loir-et-Cher and identifies the phenomenon as the International Space Station.[Geipan]geipan.frOpen source on geipan.fr. In a small commune such as Oisly, away from dense urban lighting, a bright orbital pass can stand out sharply. The key point is not that the ISS is obscure; it is that most people are not checking orbital pass predictions while looking at the night sky. A bright, silent object moving steadily across the heavens can look highly unusual until the exact time and direction are compared with satellite data.
Blois gives a more complex version of the same problem. In the 28 December 2017 case, a witness near the forest of Blois saw two luminous points moving north to south in a clear, starry sky at around 5 a.m.; the event was brief, silent and visually striking. CarteOvni summarises the report as a roughly thirty-second observation with no particular noise heard and a disappearance towards the horizon.[CarteOvni.fr]carteovni.frblois 2017 1250478blois 2017 1250478 GEIPAN’s investigation report, published in 2020, records the case as Blois, 28 December 2017, and describes the witness’s account of two moving points in the early morning sky.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
Lantern reports around celebrations
The second major modern Loir-et-Cher mechanism is the paper lantern: warm-coloured, silent, wind-borne lights released during celebrations or private events. These reports are persuasive because they often involve several lights moving in sequence, which can feel like formation flight. They are also usually seen at night, when distance, height and speed are hard to judge.
The Selles-Saint-Denis report of 14 July 2014 is almost a textbook case. GEIPAN lists it as class A, with the phenomenon identified as a Thai lantern. The report involved seven observed phenomena at about 1 a.m., and the public summary describes successive yellow-orange balls moving silently through the night sky.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr. The date is important. In France, 14 July is a major celebration night, so lanterns, fireworks and other festive lights are more plausible than they would be on an ordinary evening. GEIPAN’s summary also notes that the described north-west to south-east movement was broadly consistent with light winds recorded at nearby Romorantin, about 15 kilometres away.[Geipan]geipan.frOpen source on geipan.fr.
Savigny-sur-Braye on 29 November 2014 is less certain but follows the same logic. GEIPAN classifies the case as B and identifies it as a probable Thai lantern. The witness saw a rapid, silent, yellow-orange luminous form moving in a straight line at about 11.15 p.m.; GEIPAN’s English summary notes that no other witness was found and that a Saturday-night orange light suggested a lantern probably released nearby after a private celebration.[Geipan]geipan.frOpen source on geipan.fr.
These two cases show the difference between a strong identification and a probable one. At Selles-Saint-Denis, there were multiple features pointing the same way: colour, silence, sequential appearance, date, and wind compatibility. At Savigny-sur-Braye, the interpretation is plausible but thinner: one witness, one light, and a social context that makes lanterns likely but not provable. GEIPAN’s A/B distinction keeps that uncertainty visible.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frGEIPANMethodologyClassification C: Phenomenon not identified due to lack of data or information. Classification D: Phenomenon not identif…
The interesting local point is that lantern reports cluster around human behaviour rather than geography. Nothing about Selles-Saint-Denis or Savigny-sur-Braye requires a special UFO hotspot. What matters is a night-time release, a viewer at the right angle, and enough surprise for the witness to report it. In a rural or semi-rural department, a few warm lights moving silently above dark fields can look more extraordinary than the same lights would in a city centre full of competing illumination.
Photographs, insects and other visual traps
Not all modern misidentifications are live sky sightings. Some begin when a photograph is reviewed later and something unexpected appears in the image. This is a different kind of UFO report because the witness may not have seen the “object” directly at the time. The puzzle is then not only “what was in the sky?” but “what did the camera record?”
Blois on 11 May 2008 is the key Loir-et-Cher example. GEIPAN’s case search identifies it as a class B report and gives the phenomenon as a photographic artefact, specifically an insect.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr. This kind of case can be deceptively strong to a casual viewer because a nearby insect, bird or piece of debris may appear blurred, elongated, metallic or disk-like when frozen by the camera. Without knowing its distance from the lens, the viewer may interpret it as a large object in the sky rather than a small object close to the camera.
The Villerbon case of 14 May 2014 shows a related visual trap without relying on a photograph. A witness saw a cigar-shaped phenomenon near an airliner and thought it was flying alongside the aircraft. GEIPAN classifies the case as A and identifies the phenomenon as an airliner-related effect. The English case summary says the apparent object was certainly the shadow of the aircraft on a nearby layer of non-condensed microparticles, supported by the relative positions of the witness, aircraft and sun, the joint movement of the aircraft and apparent phenomenon, nearby cloud, and comparable examples.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
This is one of the more subtle Loir-et-Cher cases because the witness reportedly excluded the shadow explanation. That is exactly why the file matters. A witness can make a reasonable judgement from the ground and still lack the full three-dimensional geometry of the scene. A shadow cast on haze, cloud or a particle layer can appear detached from its source, especially when both move together from the witness’s viewpoint. The result is not a classic saucer story, but it is a good demonstration of how the sky can generate convincing false objects.
Why sincere witnesses still get puzzled
The Loir-et-Cher files are a useful corrective to two bad readings of UFO reports. The first is the overexcited reading: every strange light must be evidence of something extraordinary. The second is the dismissive reading: every explained case proves the witness was careless. The actual record sits between those positions.
Several mechanisms in the department are genuinely hard to read in real time. Satellites and aircraft can be silent or nearly silent at ground level. Lanterns can drift in groups, fade out, and appear to follow one another. Insects close to a lens can look like distant craft. Aircraft shadows can appear as separate shapes. All of these impressions become stronger when the witness has only seconds to interpret the scene.
The local geography can also help ordinary lights feel more dramatic. Loir-et-Cher includes the city of Blois, rural communes, forested Sologne landscapes, and darker skies where isolated lights stand out. The departmental case list itself shows that modern reports are not confined to one dramatic location: Blois, Oisly, Selles-Saint-Denis, Savigny-sur-Braye and Villerbon each contribute different kinds of misidentification.[CarteOvni.fr]carteovni.frOVNI dans le Loir-et-Cher (41) — CarteOvni.frLe département Loir-et-Cher compte 10 cas recensés par le GEIPAN, dont 0 non identifiés (cla…
The best way to read these cases is therefore not as failures, but as worked examples. A report becomes stronger when multiple independent data points support it: several witnesses, precise timing, direction, duration, weather, photographs with context, and checks against aircraft or satellite data. A report becomes weaker when it depends on one brief observation, a later-noticed image mark, or a description that closely matches a known mechanism. GEIPAN’s classification system makes that difference visible by separating certain identifications, probable identifications, under-documented cases and unexplained cases.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frGEIPANMethodologyClassification C: Phenomenon not identified due to lack of data or information. Classification D: Phenomenon not identif…
What these cases change about Loir-et-Cher’s UFO history
The modern misidentification record changes the tone of the Loir-et-Cher UFO story. This is not a department whose public GEIPAN/CNES record is led by unresolved modern mysteries. It is a department where the most useful recent cases explain how UFO reports are made, tested and often reduced to ordinary causes. CarteOvni’s department summary is blunt on that point: ten public cases, no class D cases, and a modern list containing satellites, lanterns, aircraft, photographic artefacts and other identified or probably identified phenomena.[CarteOvni.fr]carteovni.frOVNI dans le Loir-et-Cher (41) — CarteOvni.frLe département Loir-et-Cher compte 10 cas recensés par le GEIPAN, dont 0 non identifiés (cla…
That does not make the page uninteresting. It makes it practical. Blois and Oisly show how satellites and tracked aerial objects can puzzle observers. Selles-Saint-Denis and Savigny-sur-Braye show how celebration lights become apparent formations. Blois 2008 and Villerbon 2014 show how cameras, insects, shadows and lighting geometry can create apparent objects that were never unusual craft at all.[Geipan+3GEIPAN+3Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
The strongest conclusion is a modest one: modern Loir-et-Cher UFO reports are best read as a local catalogue of perception under uncertainty. The witnesses saw something; the investigations usually found something ordinary behind it. For a department-level UFO history, that is still valuable, because it shows how balanced investigation works when the answer is not “mystery solved by belief” or “witness dismissed”, but a careful narrowing of possibilities until the sky becomes ordinary again.
Amazon book picks
Further Reading
Books and field guides related to Why Ordinary Skies Made Unusual UFO Reports. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.
Mistakes Were Made (but Not by Me)
Useful for understanding interpretation errors and belief persistence.
eBay marketplace picks
Marketplace Samples
Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.
Endnotes
1.
Source: carteovni.fr
Link:https://carteovni.fr/departement/loir-et-cher
2.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/node/58788
3.
Source: cnes.fr
Link:https://cnes.fr/en/projects/geipan
4.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/node/58791
5.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/node/412
6.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?customGetLattitude=46.124763699209396&customGetLongitude=2.406005859375001&customGetZoom=6&field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=50.52739681329302&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=41.72213058512578&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=8.745117187500002&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=-3.9331054687500004&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_classification_des_cas&page=29&sort=asc&undefined=
7.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?customGetLattitude=46.94358292648825&customGetLongitude=4.4989013671875&customGetZoom=7&field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=49.11702904077932&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=44.77013681219717&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=7.668457031250001&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=1.329345703125&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation&page=23%2C31&sort=asc
8.
Source: carteovni.fr
Title: blois 2017 1250478
Link:https://carteovni.fr/cas/blois-2017-1250478
9.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/Compte%20rendu%20enquete540.pdf
10.
Source: arxiv.org
Link:https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.09735
11.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/en/node/56726?field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B11%5D=11&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=1&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation_textuel&page=%2C72&select-category-export=nothing&sort=desc&video=on
12.
Source: carteovni.fr
Title: selles saint denis 2014 0708740
Link:https://carteovni.fr/cas/selles-saint-denis-2014-0708740
13.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/fr/temoignage/8383
14.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/en/node/56995?field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_classification_des_cas&page=%2C148&s=09&sort=asc
15.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B0%5D=12&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation&page=43%2C33&sort=desc
16.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/en/node/56619?customGetLattitude=46.94358292648825&customGetLongitude=4.4989013671875&customGetZoom=7&field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id=All&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=49.11702904077932&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=44.77013681219717&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=7.668457031250001&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=1.329345703125&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=%2C61&sort=asc
17.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/sites/default/files/15_VALLEE_full.pdf
18.
Source: carteovni.fr
Title: villerbon 2014 0508699
Link:https://carteovni.fr/cas/villerbon-2014-0508699
19.
Source: carteovni.fr
Title: blois 2011 1002824
Link:https://carteovni.fr/cas/blois-2011-1002824
20.
Source: arxiv.org
Link:https://arxiv.org/html/2502.06794v1
21.
Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hn2xTieploU
22.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Geipan: France is also interested in UFOs
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OLXDikL331Y
23.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/temoignage/8244
24.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/temoignage/8206
25.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas?field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B12%5D=12&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B13%5D=13&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B14%5D=14&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B15%5D=15&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B16%5D=16&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=1&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=%2C32&select-category-export=nothing&sort=asc&video=on
26.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_=&field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=title&page=30&sort=desc
27.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=c&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation_textuel&page=8&sort=asc
28.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas?customGetLattitude=46.94358292648825&customGetLongitude=4.4989013671875&customGetZoom=7&field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id=All&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=49.11702904077932&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=44.77013681219717&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=7.668457031250001&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=1.329345703125&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date&page=%2C59&sort=asc
29.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: export cas pub 20251127093552.csv
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/save_json_import_files/export_cas_pub_20251127093552.csv
30.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=2007-03-01&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation&page=45&sort=desc
31.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?order=field_date_d_observation&page=45&sort=desc&undefined=
32.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B12%5D=12&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=27%2C4&sort=asc
33.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=orange&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_classification_des_cas&page=7&sort=asc
34.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?customGetLattitude=46.124763699209396&customGetLongitude=2.406005859375001&customGetZoom=6&field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=50.52739681329302&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=41.72213058512578&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=8.745117187500002&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=-3.9331054687500004&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date&page=124&sort=asc&undefined=
35.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B12%5D=12&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B13%5D=13&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B14%5D=14&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B15%5D=15&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B16%5D=16&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=1&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=88%2C7&select-category-export=nothing&sort=desc&video=on
36.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/missions-methodes-et-resultats
37.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/what-did-i-see/step-1
38.
Source: Wikipedia
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GEIPAN
Additional References
39.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Meeting France’s UFO detectives • FRANCE 24 English
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zczcBLukQ6s
40.
Source: researchgate.net
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/376891986_A_global_picture_of_unidentified_anomalous_phenomena_Towards_a_cross-cultural_understanding_of_a_potentially_universal_issue
41.
Source: instagram.com
Link:https://www.instagram.com/reel/DVeXbVwjU-B/
42.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/FRANCE24.English/posts/-franceinfocus-is-there-anybody-out-there-in-france-an-organisation-exists-whose/860539629578748/
43.
Source: reddit.com
Link:https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1kdtweb/new_aaro_director_jon_kosloski_says_the_pentagon/
44.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/Newsweek/posts/perspective-these-first-files-say-implicitly-what-officials-wont-explicitly-for-/1331714295495678/
45.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/groups/spacehipsters/posts/1345679132143633/
46.
Source: en.clickpetroleoegas.com.br
Link:https://en.clickpetroleoegas.com.br/desde-os-anos-1970-a-franca-mantem-um-arquivo-oficial-que-investigou-e-catalogou-centenas-de-encontros-com-ovnis-tornou-relatorios-publicos-vml97/
47.
Source: youtube.com
Title: UFOs: GEIPAN is working on the issue (Toulouse)
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nnOX-NXZFqE
48.
Source: youtube.com
Title: No, they’re not aliens — those lights in the sky were Space X satellites
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YgPipToquz4
Topic Tree