Within Paris UFOs
Does Paris Have a Landmark UFO Case?
Paris has many official UFO reports, but its public GEIPAN record points more to classification lessons than to one famous mystery.
On this page
- What GEIPAN classifications mean
- Why C cases are not strong mysteries
- How Paris compares with stronger French cases
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
Paris does not have a single landmark UFO case in GEIPAN’s public record in the way that some French departments have a famous unresolved incident. The more useful answer is almost the opposite: Paris is a strong lesson in classification. Its official files contain reports that may sound dramatic at first — lights, shapes, photographs, fast movement, silent objects — but the public record repeatedly ends in ordinary explanations, probable explanations, or insufficient information rather than a robust unresolved case. GEIPAN, the French space agency CNES unit responsible for collecting, investigating and publishing reports of unidentified aerospace phenomena, classifies cases by how well the information supports a conclusion, not by how strange the first description sounds.[CNES]cnes.frGEIPAN7 Jul 2025 — GEIPAN, the French UAP research and information group created by CNES in 1977, collects, analyses and archives inf…
The key Paris story is therefore not “what was the great Paris UFO?” but “why does a city with many reports still lack a strong landmark mystery?” The answer lies in GEIPAN’s distinction between explained cases, probable identifications, weak or unusable cases, and genuinely unexplained cases after investigation. Paris has many entries, but the public pattern points more towards balloons, aircraft, lanterns, astronomical objects, photographic artefacts and weak evidence than towards one enduring, well-supported anomaly.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frGeipan Recherche de cas | GEIPANGeipan Recherche de cas | GEIPAN
What GEIPAN Classifications Mean
GEIPAN’s public system is often misunderstood because the labels look simpler than they are. A case classed A is identified without ambiguity; B means GEIPAN considers an explanation very probable; C means the observation cannot be analysed properly because the available information is insufficient; D means the case remains unexplained despite the information available to GEIPAN. Since the 2008 refinement of the system, D may be divided into D1 and D2, with D2 reserved for very strange and strongly supported cases, such as those with several independent witnesses, images, video or ground traces.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frGeipan Le glossaire du Geipan | GEIPANGeipan Le glossaire du Geipan | GEIPAN
That distinction is vital for Paris. A C case is not a trophy mystery. GEIPAN’s own glossary stresses that C cases are not of the same order as A, B, D1 or D2 cases, because they are cases where GEIPAN could not reach a conclusion rather than cases that remained unexplained after a strong investigation. The classification depends on two ideas: “strangeness”, meaning how far the event remains from a known explanation, and “consistency”, meaning the amount and reliability of usable information. If the case is too thin for the level of strangeness claimed, it falls into C rather than becoming a strong unknown.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frGeipan Le glossaire du Geipan | GEIPANGeipan Le glossaire du Geipan | GEIPAN
This is why Paris can have a visible GEIPAN footprint without having a landmark UFO case. A city report may include a sincere witness, a striking description and even a photograph, but still fail as evidence if the sightline is unclear, the duration is very short, the object is not captured usefully, or there are no independent witnesses in a densely populated area. GEIPAN’s method is designed to separate “not identified by the witness” from “not explainable after investigation”.
Why Paris Has Records but No Strong Landmark Case
The public Paris entries show a repeated pattern: many reports are interesting as examples of investigation, but few are strong as mysteries. On GEIPAN’s case-search pages, Paris entries include classifications A, B and C across a range of common phenomenon types: aircraft, Jupiter, Venus, lanterns, child’s balloons, light reflections, photographic artefacts, bolides and insufficient information. A search page listing Paris cases, for example, includes a bird-related photographic artefact from 9 March 2008, Jupiter on 15 December 2013, Venus on 14 February 2017, lanterns in 2008 and 2011, and several C cases marked as lacking reliable information.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frGeipan Recherche de cas | GEIPANGeipan Recherche de cas | GEIPAN
That range matters because it makes Paris a record of urban misidentification rather than a record dominated by one exceptional event. The capital’s sky is visually busy: air traffic, reflected light, dense buildings, public events, phones, windows, glare, advertising and balloons all create conditions in which ordinary phenomena can become hard to identify. GEIPAN does not need to assume bad faith to explain this. The witness may have seen something real; the investigative question is whether the available evidence supports an unusual conclusion.
The 1997 Case That Almost Looks Like Paris’s Landmark
The closest thing to a “missing landmark case” in the Paris GEIPAN record is the 24 August 1997 case. It has several elements that, at first glance, look promising: a witness, photographs, police involvement, technical handling of slides, and an earlier D classification by SEPRA, GEIPAN’s predecessor. The witness reported seeing and photographing two phenomena over Paris at 20:01. After contacting a scientific magazine, the matter reached the civil aviation authority and then the air-transport gendarmerie, which opened an inquiry. Gendarmes visited the witness, viewed nine slides, and sent eight of them through official photographic examination channels.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
That is the kind of procedural trail that can make a case look important. It was not merely a casual internet claim. It involved a formal witness statement, photographic material, a later supplementary interview, a sketch, SEPRA correspondence and an external image-related exchange. SEPRA originally classed it D because the case was difficult to untangle: what the witness said he saw, what appeared on the slides, what appeared after cleaning and printing, and what the witness later said after seeing the print were not the same evidential thing.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
GEIPAN’s later review changed the meaning of the case. The review concluded that the phenomenon seen by the witness was not present on the slides examined by the gendarmes. A boomerang-like mark that drew attention on the photographs was identified as residue from development chemicals. A later paper print from a cleaned slide contained an artefact by chance, in a hollow five-sided form, but no equivalent existed on the original slide. GEIPAN also noted that the witness was later influenced, consciously or unconsciously, by what he had seen on the paper print, so that the originally reported object — described more like wind-blown greasy paper with ragged edges — later became a much more remarkable five-sided object.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
The final result is telling. GEIPAN reclassified the case as C, not because it was solved in a clean A-category way, but because the remaining witness description lacked enough reliable information to identify the object. The little that remained was compatible with a light object, such as debris, paper or a balloon, being carried by the wind. That is why the 1997 file is important for Paris: it is not a landmark mystery, but a landmark warning about photographs, memory, artefacts and old classifications.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
Why C Cases Are Not Strong Mysteries
Paris has several C cases that can seem tempting to treat as unresolved UFOs, but that would misread the classification. In GEIPAN’s system, C means the case cannot be properly analysed because essential information is missing, contradictory or too weak. It is a record of investigative insufficiency, not a claim that the event resisted all ordinary explanations.
The 23 June 2014 Paris case is a compact example. A witness saw several orange lights in the sky at 22:45, with a rapid disappearance and another object apparently joining the group. GEIPAN noted that the report resembled lanterns seen along the wind direction, but the observation was made through a car windscreen while the witness was driving, lasted about five seconds, and had no independent corroboration despite the populated setting. The result was C: lack of information and cross-checking.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
The 23 May 2010 case shows a different kind of uncertainty. A witness on a sixth-floor balcony reported a silent oblong object that moved oddly and was seen again minutes later. GEIPAN considered a balloon difficult to reconcile with the described motion, while also mentioning possible visual phenomena such as a phosphene or floater that could not be proved. Because of insufficient consistency, meteorological inconsistencies and no independent witnesses, the case was classed C.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
The A13 Paris-to-Caen case from January 2012 adds a useful aviation angle. Two travellers reported a silent shiny cylindrical object that first appeared still and then moved rapidly before disappearing with a cloud-like plume. GEIPAN considered aircraft and a cylindrical thermal balloon reflecting the Sun. It requested radar traces from the air force, but the single trace obtained was unusable and did not match the testimony; the time, location and direction were also too imprecise or contradictory to support a conclusion. The result again was C, not a strong unknown.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
These examples are valuable precisely because they are not spectacular. They show how a report can remain unresolved in everyday language while still being weak in evidential terms. “Unexplained because the evidence is poor” is different from “unexplained despite strong evidence”.
How Paris Compares With Stronger French Cases
Paris’s missing landmark case becomes clearer when compared with stronger French files. GEIPAN itself points to Trans-en-Provence, in the Var department, as a famous 1981 case in which a witness reported a saucer-like object landing and taking off near his property, followed by ground traces. In GEIPAN’s public case search, Trans-en-Provence remains listed as a D case, and CNES material uses it as an example of a highly strange, strongly mediatised French case.[Geipan+2Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
That comparison does not mean Trans-en-Provence is proven as extraordinary. Sceptical criticism exists, including criticism that the ground traces may have had a more ordinary origin and that aspects of the original investigation were flawed. A Skeptical Inquirer assessment, for example, argued that the reported traces resembled tyre marks and that this line of explanation was not followed adequately.[Skeptical Inquirer]skepticalinquirer.orgOpen source on skepticalinquirer.org.
The comparison is still useful because it clarifies what Paris lacks. A stronger landmark case usually has at least some combination of enduring documentation, unusually high strangeness, meaningful corroboration, physical traces, radar or sensor evidence, multiple independent witnesses, or a classification that remains unexplained after stronger investigation. The Paris files highlighted above tend instead to collapse into weak consistency, likely ordinary triggers, artefact problems, or insufficient cross-checking.
What the Paris Record Really Teaches
Paris’s public GEIPAN record is best read as a case study in how official investigation downgrades mystery when evidence is examined carefully. The city produces reports, but the reports do not automatically become strong UFO history. A light in the sky may be a lantern. A triangular object may be a novelty balloon. A bright changing point may be reflective Mylar. A photographed shape may be a bird, a reflection, the Moon or a processing artefact. A C classification may simply mean that the witness report cannot be tested.
The 1997 case is the most instructive because it had the appearance of a serious case and an older D classification, yet later review weakened rather than strengthened it. GEIPAN did not convert it into an explanation with certainty; it converted it into a lesson about evidential contamination. The photographed features were not the phenomenon described, the later print affected the witness’s story, and the original observation could not be reconstructed with enough precision.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
For a Paris UFO history, that is the central point. The capital’s official record matters not because it hides a dramatic missing saucer case, but because it shows how easily a famous-looking case can dissolve into classification problems. Paris has many sightings, but the public GEIPAN trail points towards a cautious conclusion: its strongest value is methodological, not legendary.
Amazon book picks
Further Reading
Books and field guides related to Does Paris Have a Landmark UFO Case?. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.
The UFO Experience
Explains classification approaches similar to those discussed in official files.
eBay marketplace picks
Marketplace Samples
Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.
Endnotes
1.
Source: cnes.fr
Link:https://cnes.fr/en/projects/geipan
2.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/sites/default/files/Compte%20rendu%20enquete22.pdf
3.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/sites/default/files/Compte%20rendu%20enquete10.pdf
4.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Meeting France’s UFO detectives • FRANCE 24 English
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zczcBLukQ6s
5.
Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hn2xTieploU
6.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Geipan: France is also interested in UFOs
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OLXDikL331Y
7.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/node/58788
8.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: Geipan Recherche de cas | GEIPAN
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?order=title&page=99&sort=asc
9.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2019-08-50889
10.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: Geipan Le glossaire du Geipan | GEIPAN
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/glossaire
11.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: Geipan Evolution de la CLASSIFICATION DES CAS | GEIPAN
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/actualites/evolution-classification-des-cas
12.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: Geipan La méthodologie de classification au GEIPAN | GEIPAN
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/actualites/methodologie-classification-geipan
13.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2012-12-50053
14.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/1997-09-01474
15.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2014-06-08722
16.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2010-05-02582
17.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2012-01-08182
18.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/1981-01-00849
19.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/en/search/cas?order=field_date&page=%2C470&sort=asc&undefined=
20.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/node/58786
21.
Source: skepticalinquirer.org
Link:https://skepticalinquirer.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/29/2009/01/p47.pdf?ref=thegalacticmind.com
22.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/node/60631
23.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/faq-page
24.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/en/search/cas?field_date_value=2023-08-04&field_is_new_value=1&page=%2C26
25.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/
26.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/node/58792
27.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=2020-11-18&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=1&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=title&page=21&sort=asc
28.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en
29.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=Paris&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date&page=%2C9&sort=desc
30.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/node/422
31.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/missions-methodes-et-resultats
32.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas?field_agregation_index_value=Ain&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date&page=%2C23&sort=asc
33.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/node/58791
34.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=avion&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation&page=4%2C6&sort=desc
35.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=avion&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_classification_des_cas&page=4%2C6&sort=asc
36.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: journees etudes
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/journees_etudes.pdf
37.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/save_json_import_files/export_cas_pub_20251127093552.csv
38.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: Compte rendu enquete43
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/Compte%20rendu%20enquete43.pdf
39.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2025-06-51662
40.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2015-05-09168
41.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2007-10-02481
42.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2021-11-51263
43.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2008-07-02144?field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=title&page=100&sort=asc
44.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=2020-11-18&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=1&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=title&page=21&sort=asc
45.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?customGetLattitude=41.2370859051563&customGetLongitude=7.550679783806908&customGetZoom=5&field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B13%5D=13&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=50.708634400828224&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=31.765537409484374&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=20.22890244005691&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=-5.127542872443095&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=title&page=28&sort=asc
46.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=120&sort=asc
47.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/1980-04-50836
48.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=46&sort=desc
49.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?customGetLattitude=46.94358292648825&customGetLongitude=4.4989013671875&customGetZoom=7&field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id=All&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=49.11702904077932&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=44.77013681219717&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=7.668457031250001&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=1.329345703125&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=36%2C26&sort=asc
50.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B13%5D=13&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B14%5D=14&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B15%5D=15&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B16%5D=16&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=1&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=57.70414723434193&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=19.642587534013032&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=49.921875&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=-9.843750000000002&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation&page=44%2C35&select-category-export=nothing&sort=desc&video=on
51.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B13%5D=13&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B14%5D=14&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B15%5D=15&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B16%5D=16&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date&page=26%2C37&select-category-export=nothing&sort=asc
52.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?customGetLattitude=46.94358292648825&customGetLongitude=4.4989013671875&customGetZoom=7&field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=49.11702904077932&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=44.77013681219717&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=7.668457031250001&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=1.329345703125&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date&page=6%2C0&sort=desc
53.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: Compte rendu enquete171
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/Compte%20rendu%20enquete171.pdf
54.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation&page=9&sort=desc
55.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: missions methodes et resultats
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/missions-methodes-et-resultats
56.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: methodologie classification geipan
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/actualites/methodologie-classification-geipan
57.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: geipan revisite cas
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/actualites/geipan-revisite-cas
58.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/faq-page
59.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: baisse cas d
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/actualites/baisse-cas-d
60.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/histoire-du-geipan
61.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: missions methodes et resultat
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/actualites/missions-methodes-et-resultat
62.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/node/58700
63.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: News V3 VBA February20 2018 V1
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/News-V3-VBA-February20-2018_V1.pdf
64.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B13%5D=13&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B14%5D=14&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B15%5D=15&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B16%5D=16&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=1&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=57.70414723434193&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=19.642587534013032&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=49.921875&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=-9.843750000000002&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation&page=37%2C10&select-category-export=nothing&sort=desc&video=on
65.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas?field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=2007-03-01&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&page=%2C470
66.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B13%5D=13&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B14%5D=14&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B15%5D=15&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B16%5D=16&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation&page=15&select-category-export=nothing&sort=asc
67.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas?customGetLattitude=31.44806648214027&customGetLongitude=-12.832031250000002&customGetZoom=4&field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B14%5D=14&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B15%5D=15&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=52.32191088594773&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=10.574222078332806&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=17.050781250000004&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=-42.71484375000001&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=title&page=%2C11&select-category-export=nothing&sort=asc
68.
Source: Wikipedia
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GEIPAN
69.
Source: youtube.com
Title: GEIPA N: qui étudie les ovnis?
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O4vKMT7ytTk
70.
Source: uapedia.ai
Link:https://uapedia.ai/wiki/geipan-frances-official-uap-unit/
71.
Source: academieairespace.com
Link:https://academieairespace.com/event/geipan-studies-uaps-ufos/?lang=en
72.
Source: academieairespace.com
Title: geipan studies uaps ufos
Link:https://academieairespace.com/documents-et-medias/geipan-studies-uaps-ufos/?lang=en
73.
Source: newspaceeconomy.ca
Title: GEIPA N: Frances UAP Investigation Unit
Link:https://newspaceeconomy.ca/2025/07/29/geipan-frances-uap-investigation-unit/
Additional References
74.
Source: instagram.com
Link:https://www.instagram.com/reel/DI_63RJP_9n/?hl=en-gb
75.
Source: instagram.com
Link:https://www.instagram.com/reel/DZer0NNNhw7/
76.
Source: researchgate.net
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Classification-of-D1-D2-and-D3-Panel-a-Distribution-of-subjects-in-D1-D2-and-D3_fig8_327777842
77.
Source: dokumen.pub
Link:https://dokumen.pub/extraterrestrial-intelligence-academic-and-societal-implications-1nbsped-1527577279-9781527577275.html
78.
Source: nationalgeographic.fr
Link:https://www.nationalgeographic.fr/espace/france-qui-se-cache-derriere-le-geipan-le-bureau-des-ovnis-en-france-etrange-enquetes
79.
Source: ufouap.net
Link:https://www.ufouap.net/en/cases/trans-en-provence-ufo-case
80.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/groups/tvmoviesseries.ntgroup/posts/3218853144962650/
81.
Source: france-science.com
Link:https://france-science.com/en/caipan-ii-international-conference-on-unidentified-aerospace-phenomena-organized-by-geipan-in-toulouse/
82.
Source: worldwide.espacenet.com
Link:https://worldwide.espacenet.com/help?locale=en_EP&method=handleQuickHelp&quickHelpPage=classificationsearchCPC.7
83.
Source: oie.int
Link:https://www.oie.int/en/what-we-do/standards/codes-and-manuals/terrestrial-manual-online-access/?L=1&htmfile=chapitre_diagnostic_techniques.htm&id=169
Topic Tree