When An Allier Mystery Lost Its Mystery

Introduction

The 1990 red descending object

The observation was reported as happening around 22:20 on the night of 30 April to 1 May 1990. GEIPAN’s case page summarises it as several witnesses, in two places within the same commune, seeing a very bright red phenomenon moving silently on a descending path. One witness, labelled T1 in the file, reported a similar object twice, about five minutes apart. The published GEIPAN summary also notes that the duration estimates varied, but were short, and that the disappearance was described either as hidden by the landscape or progressive.[cnes-geipan.fr]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.

The gendarmerie material preserved in the later GEIPAN report gives the case its local texture. T1 said he first saw a red light through partly open shutters, got up, opened them, and saw a large red disc, apparently as big as the Moon, descending diagonally without sound. He then reported a second, similar object five minutes later, descending more vertically. T2 described a very bright red-orange oval shape, with a red trail, apparently somewhere towards the forest of Château Charles and Lapeyrouse, moving downwards but not especially fast. T3 described a vivid red “ball of fire” or beam-like light, silent, lasting around 30 seconds, and said it illuminated the forest below.[cnes-geipan.fr+2cnes-geipan.fr]cnes-geipan.frBEAUNE D'ALLIER (03) 30.04.1990 [E Cgei CR T,C S] compte rendu enqueteBEAUNE D'ALLIER (03) 30.04.1990 [E Cgei CR T,C S] compte rendu enquete

Those details are why the case was not simply dismissed. It had several witnesses, the accounts were broadly compatible, and the phenomenon sounded striking: red, bright, silent, descending, apparently low, and seen from more than one place. GEIPAN’s later report says the two observation points were about 1.3 kilometres apart, and that the accounts were coherent enough to infer that the witnesses were probably describing the same phenomenon.[cnes-geipan.fr]cnes-geipan.frBEAUNE D'ALLIER (03) 30.04.1990 [E Cgei CR T,C S] compte rendu enqueteBEAUNE D'ALLIER (03) 30.04.1990 [E Cgei CR T,C S] compte rendu enquete

But the file also contained weaknesses. Not all people said to have seen the event gave formal testimony. No trace was found on the ground. Different local brigades did not collect other witnesses. There were no photographs, no instrument records, no precise altitude, no reliable distance estimate, and no secure physical recovery. The first investigation was closed in late May 1990 and sent to SEPRA, GEIPAN’s predecessor, which classified it as a class D unexplained case.[cnes-geipan.fr]cnes-geipan.frBEAUNE D'ALLIER (03) 30.04.1990 [E Cgei CR T,C S] compte rendu enqueteBEAUNE D'ALLIER (03) 30.04.1990 [E Cgei CR T,C S] compte rendu enquete Reclassified Files illustration 1

Why GEIPAN moved from D to B

GEIPAN’s 2019 re-examination opened by saying that old cases classified at the time as A, B, C or D were being revisited using new technical tools and accumulated investigation experience. In this case, the report explicitly states that the previously class D case, then named Montmarault 1990, belonged to a set of recently re-examined files.[cnes-geipan.fr]cnes-geipan.frBEAUNE D'ALLIER (03) 30.04.1990 [E Cgei CR T,C S] compte rendu enqueteBEAUNE D'ALLIER (03) 30.04.1990 [E Cgei CR T,C S] compte rendu enquete

The review considered two main explanations: an atmospheric re-entry, such as a satellite or rocket debris fall, and a flare, especially a distress flare. A re-entry initially had some appeal because witnesses described a luminous disc with a trail, slow movement and no sound. GEIPAN checked recorded re-entries around 30 April and 1 May 1990, including debris associated with Cosmos 2053, a Titan 3C rocket stage, Foton 3 and Cosmos 2073. The report concluded that no re-entry matched the observation properly; one possible object would have been in the wrong part of the sky, and the reported repetition five minutes later also counted against a re-entry.[cnes-geipan.fr]cnes-geipan.frBEAUNE D'ALLIER (03) 30.04.1990 [E Cgei CR T,C S] compte rendu enqueteBEAUNE D'ALLIER (03) 30.04.1990 [E Cgei CR T,C S] compte rendu enquete

The flare hypothesis fitted more of the awkward details. The colour was red, the path was descending, there was no noise, the phenomenon appeared local rather than widely reported across hundreds of kilometres, and the repeated sighting after a few minutes made sense if someone had fired more than one flare. GEIPAN also noted that the forest illumination suggested the source was probably fairly close to the ground, which again weakened the space-debris idea and strengthened a local flare explanation.[cnes-geipan.fr]cnes-geipan.frBEAUNE D'ALLIER (03) 30.04.1990 [E Cgei CR T,C S] compte rendu enqueteBEAUNE D'ALLIER (03) 30.04.1990 [E Cgei CR T,C S] compte rendu enquete

What the reclassification changed

The most important change was not simply a label. The case moved from “unexplained after investigation” to “probably explained after re-analysis”. That shift changes how the story should be read in Allier’s UFO history. A class D case invites the reader to ask why a reasonably investigated report resisted explanation. A class B case asks a different question: which ordinary phenomenon best accounts for the witnesses’ experience, and how strong is that account?

In Beaune-d’Allier, GEIPAN’s reasoning reduced the mystery in three ways. First, it narrowed the event to a local phenomenon, because no wide regional witness pattern matched what one would expect from a spectacular atmospheric re-entry. Second, it treated the repetition after five minutes as a clue rather than an embellishment; two flares fired in succession are easier to imagine than two matching space re-entries. Third, it gave weight to the report that the light illuminated the forest below, since a near-ground light source fits a flare better than high-altitude debris.[cnes-geipan.fr]cnes-geipan.frBEAUNE D'ALLIER (03) 30.04.1990 [E Cgei CR T,C S] compte rendu enqueteBEAUNE D'ALLIER (03) 30.04.1990 [E Cgei CR T,C S] compte rendu enquete

The review also shows how a real witness experience can be both sincere and misread. GEIPAN’s methodology explicitly treats testimony as central, but also fragile. Its public methodology notes that distance, speed and trajectory can be hard for witnesses to judge when the object is not recognised, and that emotion, memory and later interpretation can alter the way an observation is described. That does not mean the witnesses invented the event. It means the account needs to be tested against known phenomena and against the limits of human perception.[cnes-geipan.fr]cnes-geipan.frMethodology | GEIPANMethodology | GEIPAN

For readers, the practical lesson is that “unexplained” is not a permanent property of a story. It is a status given under the evidence and tools available at a particular time. GEIPAN’s classification page states that reclassification is possible when new elements arrive, and that class D cases require periodic re-evaluation. Beaune-d’Allier is a clean example of that principle in action.[cnes-geipan.fr]cnes-geipan.frClassification | GEIPANClassification | GEIPAN Reclassified Files illustration 2

What it says about old unexplained files in Allier

Beaune-d’Allier should not be used to wave away every unresolved Allier report. It should be used to read the older files more carefully. Several Allier cases remain class C not because they are strong anomalies, but because they lack the reliable information needed for a firm conclusion.

The Yzeure file from 24 September 1979, for example, describes a single witness seeing what first looked like an aircraft trail, then an orange disc that stayed fixed briefly before moving very quickly and turning bright white. GEIPAN’s summary says no other testimony was collected and that the case lacks information.[cnes-geipan.fr]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.

Cosne-d’Allier in January 1985 is another useful comparison. That file contains two threads: flashes near a ruined house that the investigation quickly linked to a short circuit on an electric fence, and a separate yellow triangular light seen by motorists in the same broad period. The second report remained class C because no local brigade saw the phenomenon and no further information could be gathered.[cnes-geipan.fr]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.

Châtel-de-Neuvre in October 1989 is thinner still. GEIPAN’s summary describes one witness seeing an object resembling an aircraft, which disappeared rapidly towards the horizon, and says the information provided did not allow analysis. That is a weak unresolved file, not a robust unexplained encounter.[cnes-geipan.fr]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.

Cérilly in October 1994 illustrates a different kind of insufficiency. A gendarme reportedly found a circle of slag-like stone fragments while mushroom picking, with nearby leaves taking on a sulphur-green colour; when he returned the next day, he could not find the spot again. The failure to relocate the place meant there was no meaningful physical investigation to build on.[cnes-geipan.fr]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.

Châtel-Montagne, reported in 2014 about a childhood sighting from summer 1998, shows how delay can weaken even a vivid memory. GEIPAN recorded a dark cylindrical object with lit portholes, apparently skimming the treetops, but the witness could not give a precise date, no adult confirmed the observation, and a possible solar-balloon explanation could not be checked against the wind. GEIPAN therefore left the case in class C for lack of reliable information.[cnes-geipan.fr]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.

Seuillet in 2009 and Saint-Prix in 2016 show that the problem is not only old paper files. Seuillet involved a silent triangular form with lights, but GEIPAN found the case complex, poorly consistent and partly perhaps involving the Moon, an aircraft or fireworks without being able to settle the sequence. Saint-Prix involved a stationary white luminous bar, but the witness did not complete the requested gendarmerie testimony or follow-up meetings, leaving GEIPAN unable to treat the case properly.[cnes-geipan.fr]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.

These class C files are worth preserving because they show what people reported and where investigative gaps occurred. They are not, however, equivalent to a strong class D case. Beaune-d’Allier’s reclassification makes that distinction clearer: an old unexplained label can weaken when enough structure remains to test ordinary explanations, while a class C label often means the structure was never strong enough.

The case’s place in the Allier record

Beaune-d’Allier now occupies a modest but important place in Allier’s UFO history. It is not the department’s great unsolved mystery. It is a worked example of how an apparently dramatic rural night sighting can be downgraded when investigators compare witness detail with known aerospace and local-light phenomena.

The file also helps explain why Allier’s public record looks less sensational than a list of sighting headlines might suggest. GEIPAN’s search results for the department place Beaune-d’Allier alongside class C files such as Yzeure, Cosne-d’Allier, Châtel-de-Neuvre, Cérilly, Châtel-Montagne and Seuillet, and class A or B identifications involving the Moon, flares, balloons, aircraft or other ordinary causes.[cnes-geipan.fr]cnes-geipan.frRecherche de cas | GEIPANRecherche de cas | GEIPAN

For a public-facing history of UFOs in Allier, that is the point. The department’s interest lies less in spectacular proof than in the sorting process: which accounts become explained, which remain too thin to analyse, and which details make the difference. In Beaune-d’Allier, the decisive details were not exotic. They were red colour, silence, descent, repeated appearance, local visibility and likely proximity to the ground.

The result is a quieter but stronger conclusion: the 1990 Beaune-d’Allier sighting remains historically interesting, but no longer stands as a good unexplained UFO case. Its value is evidential and comparative. It shows how the mystery can shrink when an old file is re-opened carefully, and it gives readers a better way to interpret the older unresolved Allier files that still sit in the archive. Reclassified Files illustration 3 <section class="further-reading-section" data-page-toc-exclude aria-labelledby="further-reading-title"><div class="fr-section-shell"><div class="fr-section-header"><div class="fr-section-heading"><p class="fr-section-kicker">Amazon book picks</p><h3 class="fr-heading" id="further-reading-title">Further Reading</h3></div><p class="fr-intro">Books and field guides related to When An Allier Mystery Lost Its Mystery. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.</p></div><div class="fr-books-grid"><article class="fr-book-card">Book<div class="fr-book-info"><h4 class="fr-book-title">The UFO Experience</h4><p class="fr-book-author">By Joseph Allen Hynek</p><p class="fr-book-desc">Explains UFO case classification and investigation, directly relevant to reclassification debates.</p><div class="fr-book-actions"> See on Amazon</div></div></article><article class="fr-book-card">Book<div class="fr-book-info"><h4 class="fr-book-title">UFOs</h4><p class="fr-book-author">By Leslie Kean</p><p class="fr-book-desc">Provides context for how UFO reports are assessed and debated.</p><div class="fr-book-actions"> See on Amazon</div></div></article><article class="fr-book-card">Book<div class="fr-book-info"><h4 class="fr-book-title">Identified Flying Objects</h4><p class="fr-book-author">By Dr. Michael P. Masters</p><p class="fr-book-desc">Represents a modern perspective on interpreting unusual aerial reports.</p><div class="fr-book-actions"> See on Amazon</div></div></article><article class="fr-book-card">Book<div class="fr-book-info"><h4 class="fr-book-title">The Demon-haunted World</h4><p class="fr-book-author">By Carl Sagan</p><p class="fr-book-desc">Focuses on critical thinking and evaluating extraordinary claims using evidence.</p><div class="fr-book-actions"> See on Amazon</div></div></article></div><div class="fr-section-footer"><div class="fr-browse-links" aria-label="Browse more on Amazon">Browse more on Amazon:The UFO Experience UFOs Identified Flying Objects</div><p class="fr-disclosure">As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.</p></div></div></section><section class="further-reading-section" data-page-toc-exclude data-ebay-localized-links data-ebay-visual-market="EBAY_GB" aria-labelledby="merchant-block-title"><div class="fr-section-shell"><div class="fr-section-header"><div class="fr-section-heading"><p class="fr-section-kicker">eBay marketplace picks</p><h3 class="fr-heading" id="merchant-block-title">Marketplace Samples</h3></div><p class="fr-intro">Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.</p><div class="fr-ebay-market-toolbar">Shop location<div class="fr-ebay-market-picker">UsingUSA<div class="fr-ebay-market-menu" data-ebay-market-menu role="listbox" hidden></div></div></div></div><div class="fr-ebay-market-panel" data-ebay-market-panel="EBAY_GB" data-ebay-market-default="1"><div class="fr-books-grid"><article class="fr-book-card"><div class="fr-book-info"><p class="fr-book-kicker">Example eBay listing</p><h4 class="fr-book-title">Map Of France Educational Poster Travel Tourism Physical Map Print - A5 A4 A3</h4>SearcheBay.co.uk: France map print<div class="fr-book-actions"> Browse similar oneBay.co.uk</div></div></article><article class="fr-book-card"><div class="fr-book-info"><p class="fr-book-kicker">Example eBay listing</p><h4 class="fr-book-title">France Map Poster | Laminated Educational Wall Art Print for Schools & Home</h4>SearcheBay.co.uk: France map print<div class="fr-book-actions"> Browse similar oneBay.co.uk</div></div></article><article class="fr-book-card"><div class="fr-book-info"><p class="fr-book-kicker">Example eBay listing</p><h4 class="fr-book-title">France Map Poster Laminated Poster Educational School Wall Art Print A5 - A1</h4>SearcheBay.co.uk: France map print<div class="fr-book-actions"> Browse similar oneBay.co.uk</div></div></article><article class="fr-book-card"><div class="fr-book-info"><p class="fr-book-kicker">Example eBay listing</p><h4 class="fr-book-title">America. New France Map 1719. La Nouvelle France En 1719. Framed Print. Antique.</h4>SearcheBay.co.uk: France map print<div class="fr-book-actions"> Browse similar oneBay.co.uk</div></div></article></div><div class="fr-section-footer"> Browse more oneBay.co.uk<p class="fr-disclosure">Example items shown for inspiration; availability and pricing can change. Branchoria may earn a commission if you purchase through outbound eBay links.</p></div></div></div></section>

Endnotes

1. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/en/node/50247?field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B0%5D=12&page=%2C169

2. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: BEAUNE D’ALLIER (03) 30.04.1990 [E Cgei CR T,C S] compte rendu enquete
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/2026-04/BEAUNE-D%27ALLIER%20%2803%29%2030.04.1990%20%5BE-Cgei%20CR%20T%2CC%20S%5D%20compte%20rendu%20enquete.pdf

3. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: Classification | GEIPAN
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/en/node/58787

4. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: Methodology | GEIPAN
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/en/node/58788

5. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/1979-09-00662

6. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/1985-01-01047

7. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/node/50204?field_agregation_index_value=&order=field_departement_textuel&page=2&sort=asc

8. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/1994-10-01373

9. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/1998-08-08965

10. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2009-05-02319

11. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2016-01-09408

12. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: Recherche de cas | GEIPAN
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?customGetLattitude=46.124763699209396&customGetLongitude=2.4169921874999996&customGetZoom=6&field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id=All&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=50.52739681329302&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=41.72213058512578&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=9.8876953125&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=-5.053710937500001&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=3%2C0&sort=asc

13. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?customGetLattitude=46.94358292648825&customGetLongitude=4.4989013671875&customGetZoom=7&field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id=All&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=49.11702904077932&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=44.77013681219717&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=7.668457031250001&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=1.329345703125&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=1%2C23&sort=asc

14. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas?field_agregation_index_value=lune&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=%2C28&sort=desc

15. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B13%5D=13&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B14%5D=14&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B15%5D=15&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B16%5D=16&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=title&page=46%2C2&select-category-export=nothing&sort=desc

16. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/en/search/cas?field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%255B11%255D=11&field_date_d_observation_value%255Bmax%255D=&field_date_d_observation_value%255Bmin%255D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%255Bmax%255D=&field_latitude_value%255Bmin%255D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%255Bmax%255D=&field_longitude_value%255Bmin%255D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation&page=%2C423&sort=asc

17. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_classification_des_cas&page=130&sort=asc

18. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/en/search/cas?field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B13%5D=13&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date&page=%2C104&sort=asc

19. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_classification_des_cas&page=130&sort=asc

20. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=avion&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=%2C8&sort=asc

21. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_date_value=2007-03-01&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation&page=39&sort=asc

22. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B0%5D=13&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B1%5D=14&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation_textuel&page=9%2C32&select-category-export=nothing&sort=desc

23. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B13%5D=13&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B14%5D=14&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B15%5D=15&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B16%5D=16&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation&page=21%2C8&select-category-export=nothing&sort=asc

24. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=164&sort=desc

25. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=Ain&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=%2C0&sort=asc

26. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=163&sort=desc

27. Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/fr/temoignage/4754

28. Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B11%5D=11&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B12%5D=12&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B13%5D=13&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B14%5D=14&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=1&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation&page=121&select-category-export=nothing&sort=desc&video=on

29. Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?customGetLattitude=46.94358292648825&customGetLongitude=4.4989013671875&customGetZoom=7&field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id=All&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=49.11702904077932&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=44.77013681219717&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=7.668457031250001&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=1.329345703125&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation&page=43&sort=desc

30. Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?customGetLattitude=41.2370859051563&customGetLongitude=7.550679783806908&customGetZoom=5&field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B13%5D=13&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=50.708634400828224&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=31.765537409484374&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=20.22890244005691&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=-5.127542872443095&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=0&sort=asc

31. Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=116&order=field_date_d_observation&page=125&select-category-export=nothing&sort=desc

32. Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas?field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation&page=%2C426&sort=asc

33. Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B0%5D=13&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B1%5D=14&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date&page=47&select-category-export=nothing&sort=desc

34. Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date&page=152&sort=desc

35. Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B0%5D=13&order=field_date&page=45&sort=desc

36. Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=c&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation&page=119&sort=desc

37. Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=163&select-category-export=nothing&sort=desc

38. Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_date_valu_valu=04-23&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=163&sort=desc

Additional References

39. Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hn2xTieploU

<summary>Source snippet</summary><p>Meeting France's UFO detectives • FRANCE 24 English…</p>

40. Source: youtube.com
Title: 7 completely crazy official UFO cases
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DNuDh287q0Q

<summary>Source snippet</summary><p>Unexplained UFOs near Rennes: filmed reenactment of the Étrelles case…</p>

41. Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/groups/426356184471512/posts/1420102591763528/

42. Source: youtube.com
Title: Unexplained UFOs near Rennes: filmed reenactment of the Étrelles case
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I7MToY5eaBY

<summary>Source snippet</summary><p>WHAT DO WE REALLY KNOW ABOUT UFOs?…</p>

43. Source: youtube.com
Title: Meeting France’s UFO detectives • FRANCE 24 English
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zczcBLukQ6s

<summary>Source snippet</summary><p>7 completely crazy official UFO cases…</p>

44. Source: amis-de-montlucon.com
Title: 2 AM Archives Amis de Montluçon
Link:https://amis-de-montlucon.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/2-AM-Archives-Amis-de-Montluc%CC%A7on.pdf

45. Source: carteovni.fr
Title: beaune d allier 1990 0401654
Link:https://carteovni.fr/cas/beaune-d-allier-1990-0401654

46. Source: carteovni.fr
Title: chatel montagne 1998 0808965
Link:https://carteovni.fr/cas/chatel-montagne-1998-0808965

47. Source: carteovni.fr
Title: cosne d allier 1985 0101047
Link:https://carteovni.fr/cas/cosne-d-allier-1985-0101047

48. Source: carteovni.fr
Title: chatel de neuvre 03
Link:https://carteovni.fr/commune/chatel-de-neuvre-03