Within Haut Rhin UFOs
Why These Two Haut Rhin Cases Still Matter
Two modest but officially unresolved reports show why the department's best UFO evidence deserves caution rather than hype.
On this page
- What witnesses reported at Huningue and Rixheim
- What GEIPAN could and could not eliminate
- Why unresolved does not mean proven extraordinary
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
Huningue in 1980 and Rixheim in 2009 are the two Haut-Rhin cases that best show what an “unresolved” UFO report does, and does not, mean in the official French record. Both are listed by GEIPAN, the French space agency’s unit for collecting and analysing reports of unidentified aerospace phenomena, as class D: not identified after investigation. But neither case is a clean proof of an extraordinary craft. Huningue is stronger as a human observation because one witness was an aviation professional and the reported object was unusual; Rixheim is stronger as a documented investigation because GEIPAN checked radar, astronomy and satellite possibilities in detail. In both, the residue is modest: the available evidence does not fit a confident mundane explanation, yet it also lacks photographs, multiple independent corroboration or usable radar confirmation. That is exactly why these two cases matter within Haut-Rhin’s UFO history: they invite caution rather than hype.[Geipan+2Geipan]cnes-geipan.frGeipanHUNINGUE (68) 26.05.1980 | GEIPAN…
Why these two cases stand out in Haut-Rhin
Haut-Rhin has many reports that can be explained by aircraft, satellites, stars, lanterns, drones, reflections or other ordinary causes. GEIPAN’s national statistics put that pattern in perspective: only 3.3% of cases are listed as unidentified after investigation, while far larger shares are identified, probably identified, or not identifiable because of insufficient data. GEIPAN also says its role is to collect, analyse and archive witness accounts, not to prove alien visitation.[CNES]cnes.frGEIPAN | CNESGEIPAN | CNES
That makes Huningue and Rixheim important for a department-level history of UFO reports. They are not the most dramatic stories in Alsatian UFO lore, and they are not the kind of case that can carry a sweeping claim about visitors from elsewhere. Their value is narrower and more useful: they show what remains when official investigators cannot make the case fit a known explanation, but also cannot turn the testimony into hard evidence.
A further distinction matters. GEIPAN’s class D means “not identified after investigation”; class C means “not identified due to lack of data or information”. That difference is crucial for readers. Huningue and Rixheim are not simply forgotten scraps with no information. They were investigated enough to be kept in the unresolved category, but the evidence is still not strong enough to establish what the witnesses saw. GEIPAN also notes that C and D cases may be re-examined if new information becomes available.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
What witnesses reported at Huningue and Rixheim
The two reports are very different. Huningue is a more classical “object” case: a shaped, apparently metallic thing seen in daylight or early evening, with a dome-like form and a silent departure. Rixheim is a modern “point of light” case: a brief night-time observation of a moving white light whose apparent change of direction and acceleration troubled the witness.
At Huningue, on 26 May 1980 at about 7 pm, two walkers saw an unusual object in a clear sky. GEIPAN’s summary says one witness was an officer and flight mechanic, which gives the report added weight because the witness was not simply unfamiliar with aircraft. The object was described as metallic, with a round base and a silver dome-shaped upper part. It appeared stationary at an estimated 200 to 300 metres above the ground, seemed to oscillate on its axis, and had a darker underside with intermittent reddish luminescence. The observation lasted about six minutes, with no reported noise or condensation trail, before the object disappeared into clouds in successive stages.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frGeipanHUNINGUE (68) 26.05.1980 | GEIPAN…
GEIPAN’s witness-entry details add a few useful constraints. The main witness was recorded as a 50-year-old man; the observation took place in an urbanised environment; the event was registered as a single object in the sky; the apparent speed was recorded as stationary or variable; and the sound field notes total silence. These are not proof of a craft, but they do show why the report was treated as more than a vague light in the sky.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
What GEIPAN could not eliminate
Huningue remains unresolved partly because the strongest possible corroborating clue was weak. GEIPAN records that Basel-Mulhouse airport registered a radar echo, but that it was buried in private and general aviation traffic and was therefore of little use. No other witnesses and no further information were gathered in France or in the nearby German border area. That leaves a case with a striking witness description, a professional aviation witness, and a possible but unusable radar trace. It is suggestive, but not decisive.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frGeipanHUNINGUE (68) 26.05.1980 | GEIPAN…
Rixheim had a more detailed elimination process. GEIPAN’s summary says several hypotheses were invalidated or weakened: aircraft, because no multiradar trace was found over Rixheim in the relevant time window; Jupiter, because it was too low on the horizon; and a satellite explanation, because the passage of Cosmos 1151 Rocket did not match the full account. The case page states that the phenomenon remained unexplained even though its strangeness was low, and that the D1 classification was justified by the single testimony and the impossibility of estimating distance.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
The investigation report gives more texture. Rixheim sits close to aviation activity: near Mulhouse-Habsheim airfield and about 20 kilometres from Basel-Mulhouse airport, whose main runway orientation places Rixheim within a possible overflight area. That makes aircraft an obvious first explanation. Yet the radar review concluded that there was no multiradar track over Rixheim between 11.30 pm and midnight, a finding the investigator said seemed to exclude an aircraft in the area. The same report also noted a limitation: an exceptional authorised flight could not be ruled out purely in principle.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frCompte rendu6Compte rendu6
The satellite check is the most interesting near-miss. GEIPAN’s satellite annex identified Cosmos 1151 Rocket as a possible match for the first phase: a faint object that emerged from Earth’s shadow at about 11.44 pm local time, transited shortly afterwards, and was calculated at high elevation. But the same material leaves problems. GEIPAN’s case page says the rocket passage was at 57 degrees elevation, while the witness placed the initial light much lower. The investigation report says a satellite might explain phase one if the witness underestimated angular height and the sky was very clear, but it did not fit phase two, especially the brighter westward movement and apparent acceleration.[Geipan+2Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
What weakens the mystery
The unresolved label should not make either case sound stronger than it is. Huningue’s main weakness is the lack of independent corroboration beyond the two walkers and the unusable airport radar echo. The object was reportedly visible for six minutes, yet GEIPAN found no other witnesses and no supporting information from either France or the nearby German border area. In a busy border sky close to Basel-Mulhouse, that absence matters.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frGeipanHUNINGUE (68) 26.05.1980 | GEIPAN…
The other Huningue weakness is that the case survives mostly as a concise official summary and witness metadata rather than a rich public dossier with photographs, measured angles, timed positions, weather reconstruction, air traffic mapping or a fully exploitable radar plot. The aviation background of one witness improves the report’s credibility, but it does not remove the usual problems of distance, size and motion estimation. A stationary object “200 to 300 metres” above the ground is still an estimate made from the ground without a known size or distance marker.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
Why unresolved does not mean proven extraordinary
The most common misunderstanding is to treat “unexplained” as a positive identification of something exotic. GEIPAN’s classification system does not work that way. Its categories separate cases that are identified, probably identified, not identifiable because of lack of data, and not identified after investigation. A D case is a residual category after analysis, not a declaration that the phenomenon was alien, technological or beyond known physics.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
That distinction is especially important for Huningue and Rixheim because both cases have evidence gaps that prevent strong conclusions. Huningue has a striking description and a trained witness, but little external corroboration. Rixheim has a careful investigation, but only one witness and a brief point-light observation. In both cases, ordinary explanations were not nailed down; extraordinary explanations were not demonstrated either.
GEIPAN’s D1 and D2 language helps here. D1 cases are strange but of medium consistency, often linked to a single testimony and no photo or video record; D2 cases are very strange and of stronger consistency, with several independent witnesses, imagery or physical traces. Rixheim is explicitly treated as D1, which places it in the more cautious unresolved bracket. Huningue is listed as class D and described as a strange to very strange phenomenon of medium to strong consistency, but the public page still notes the absence of other witnesses and the poor usability of the radar echo.[Geipan+2Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
For a reader trying to understand Haut-Rhin’s UFO history, that is the key takeaway. These two cases are worth keeping because they resisted simple closure within the official record. They are also worth keeping in proportion because neither contains the kind of converging evidence that would transform an unresolved report into a landmark case.
What they add to Haut-Rhin’s UFO history
Huningue and Rixheim matter less as spectacular mysteries than as calibration points. They show the upper end of Haut-Rhin’s official unresolved material: a daylight object report involving an aviation witness near the border, and a night-time light report investigated against radar, astronomy and satellite data. Together they help separate serious local UFO history from folklore, repetition and overclaiming.
They also show how the department’s geography shapes interpretation. Huningue lies in the far south of Haut-Rhin, close to the Swiss and German border zone and the Basel-Mulhouse aviation environment. Rixheim sits near Mulhouse-Habsheim airfield and within the wider Basel-Mulhouse traffic context. In both places, aircraft, airfield activity, cross-border traffic and skywatching conditions are not background trivia; they are part of any responsible reading of the sighting.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frGeipanHUNINGUE (68) 26.05.1980 | GEIPAN…
The contrast between the two cases is also useful for internal comparison across Haut-Rhin. Huningue is more visually unusual but less analytically documented. Rixheim is less visually unusual but better investigated. One has the appeal of a shaped object; the other has the appeal of methodical exclusion. Neither is a “smoking gun”. Together, they make the same sober point: the department’s best unresolved cases deserve attention because they are unresolved after some scrutiny, not because they prove more than the evidence can bear.
A balanced reading of the evidence
The fairest reading is that Huningue remains the more intriguing witness case, while Rixheim remains the more instructive investigation case. Huningue has a rare combination of a shaped object, silence, duration and a witness with aviation experience. Rixheim has a short and less exotic observation, but it comes with documented checks against radar, Jupiter and a specific satellite candidate.[Geipan+3Geipan+3Geipan]cnes-geipan.frGeipanHUNINGUE (68) 26.05.1980 | GEIPAN…
The main doubts are equally clear. Huningue lacks usable corroboration; Rixheim may involve a misperceived transition between two lights, and its apparent acceleration may not represent real acceleration. Those doubts do not erase the cases, but they do stop them being used responsibly as proof of extraordinary visitors or secret craft.
That is why Huningue and Rixheim still matter. They are not Haut-Rhin’s invitation to believe everything. They are its reminder that an honest UFO record includes a narrow middle category: cases that were interesting enough not to be explained away, but incomplete enough not to be turned into certainty.<section class="further-reading-section" data-page-toc-exclude aria-labelledby="further-reading-title"><div class="fr-section-shell"><div class="fr-section-header"><div class="fr-section-heading"><p class="fr-section-kicker">Amazon book picks</p><h3 class="fr-heading" id="further-reading-title">Further Reading</h3></div><p class="fr-intro">Books and field guides related to Why These Two Haut Rhin Cases Still Matter. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.</p></div><div class="fr-books-grid"><article class="fr-book-card">Book<div class="fr-book-info"><h4 class="fr-book-title">UFOs</h4><p class="fr-book-author">By Leslie Kean</p><p class="fr-book-desc">Centered on unresolved and carefully documented cases.</p><div class="fr-book-actions">
See on Amazon</div></div></article><article class="fr-book-card">Book
<div class="fr-book-info"><h4 class="fr-book-title">The UFO Experience</h4><p class="fr-book-author">By Joseph Allen Hynek</p><p class="fr-book-desc">Useful for understanding what qualifies as unexplained.</p><div class="fr-book-actions">
See on Amazon</div></div></article><article class="fr-book-card">Book
<div class="fr-book-info"><h4 class="fr-book-title">Passport to Magonia</h4><p class="fr-book-author">By Jacques Vallee</p><p class="fr-book-desc">Places unexplained reports in a broader historical framework.</p><div class="fr-book-actions">
See on Amazon</div></div></article><article class="fr-book-card">Book
<div class="fr-book-info"><h4 class="fr-book-title">Dimensions</h4><p class="fr-book-author">By Jacques Vallee</p><p class="fr-book-desc">Examines stubborn cases that resist easy explanations.</p><div class="fr-book-actions">
See on Amazon</div></div></article></div><div class="fr-section-footer"><div class="fr-browse-links" aria-label="Browse more on Amazon">Browse more on Amazon:UFOsThe UFO ExperiencePassport to Magonia</div><p class="fr-disclosure">As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.</p></div></div></section><section class="further-reading-section" data-page-toc-exclude data-ebay-localized-links data-ebay-visual-market="EBAY_GB" aria-labelledby="merchant-block-title"><div class="fr-section-shell"><div class="fr-section-header"><div class="fr-section-heading"><p class="fr-section-kicker">eBay marketplace picks</p><h3 class="fr-heading" id="merchant-block-title">Marketplace Samples</h3></div><p class="fr-intro">Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.</p><div class="fr-ebay-market-toolbar"><div class="fr-ebay-market-picker">UsingUSA<div class="fr-ebay-market-menu" data-ebay-market-menu role="listbox" hidden></div></div></div></div><div class="fr-ebay-market-panel" data-ebay-market-panel="EBAY_GB" data-ebay-market-default="1"><div class="fr-books-grid"><article class="fr-book-card">
<div class="fr-book-info"><p class="fr-book-kicker">Example eBay listing</p><h4 class="fr-book-title">Ba Concorde Supersonic Jet Landing Canvas Wall Art Picture Print</h4>SearcheBay.co.uk: aviation art print<div class="fr-book-actions">
Browse similar oneBay.co.uk</div></div></article><article class="fr-book-card">
<div class="fr-book-info"><p class="fr-book-kicker">Example eBay listing</p><h4 class="fr-book-title">Arnhem Battle Gliders Signed Print</h4>SearcheBay.co.uk: aviation art print<div class="fr-book-actions">
Browse similar oneBay.co.uk</div></div></article><article class="fr-book-card">
<div class="fr-book-info"><p class="fr-book-kicker">Example eBay listing</p><h4 class="fr-book-title">WW2 Spitfire Over White Cliffs RAF Aviation Poster Print Framed Canvas Wall Art</h4>SearcheBay.co.uk: aviation art print<div class="fr-book-actions">
Browse similar oneBay.co.uk</div></div></article><article class="fr-book-card">
<div class="fr-book-info"><p class="fr-book-kicker">Example eBay listing</p><h4 class="fr-book-title">Dru Blair Signed POWER Rockwell B-1B Aviation Art Print Framed Poster 36" X 24"</h4>SearcheBay.co.uk: aviation art print<div class="fr-book-actions">
Browse similar oneBay.co.uk</div></div></article></div><div class="fr-section-footer">
Browse more oneBay.co.uk<p class="fr-disclosure">Example items shown for inspiration; availability and pricing can change. Branchoria may earn a commission if you purchase through outbound eBay links.</p></div></div></div></section>
Endnotes
1.
Source: cnes.fr
Title: GEIPAN | CNES
Link:https://cnes.fr/en/projects/geipan
2.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/Donnees%20satellitaires.pdf
3.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/fr/temoignage/3114
4.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B12%5D=12&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=title&page=36&sort=desc
5.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/en/search/cas?field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id%5B0%5D%5Btarget_id%5D=217&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=1&select-category-export=nothing&sort=asc
6.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/en/search/cas?field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B12%5D=12&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B13%5D=13&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B14%5D=14&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B15%5D=15&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B16%5D=16&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=1&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date&page=%2C10&select-category-export=nothing&sort=desc&video=on
7.
Source: cnes.fr
Link:https://cnes.fr/projets/geipan
8.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Meeting France’s UFO detectives • FRANCE 24 English
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zczcBLukQ6s
9.
Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hn2xTieploU
10.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Geipan: France is also interested in UFOs
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OLXDikL331Y
11.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/1980-05-00775
12.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2009-07-02361
13.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/node/58788
14.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: baisse cas d
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/actualites/baisse-cas-d
15.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/node/48580
16.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/temoignage/3114
17.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: Compte rendu6
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/Compte%20rendu6.pdf
18.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/glossaire
19.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: methodologie classification geipan
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/actualites/methodologie-classification-geipan
20.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/en/node/54069
21.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=116&order=field_departement_textuel&page=109&select-category-export=nothing&sort=desc
22.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?customGetLattitude=46.94358292648825&customGetLongitude=4.4989013671875&customGetZoom=7&field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=49.11702904077932&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=44.77013681219717&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=7.668457031250001&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=1.329345703125&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=14&sort=asc
23.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/save_json_import_files/export_cas_pub_20251127093552.csv
24.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?customGetLattitude=46.94358292648825&customGetLongitude=4.4989013671875&customGetZoom=7&field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=49.11702904077932&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=44.77013681219717&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=7.668457031250001&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=1.329345703125&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=44%2C0&sort=desc
25.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/
26.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/1993-11-01335
27.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/1980-03-00751
28.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/missions-methodes-et-resultats
29.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/Compte%20rendu%20enquete6.pdf
30.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: Compte rendu enquete171
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/Compte%20rendu%20enquete171.pdf
31.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/Compte%20rendu%20enquete9.pdf
32.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: deux nouveaux cas d1
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/actualites/deux-nouveaux-cas-d1
33.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/Memoire_gonin_1998.pdf
34.
Source: uapedia.ai
Link:https://uapedia.ai/wiki/geipan-frances-official-uap-unit/
35.
Source: academia.edu
Link:https://www.academia.edu/99067452/GEIPAN_classification_with_text_mining_and_machine_learning
36.
Source: Wikipedia
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GEIPAN
37.
Source: newspaceeconomy.ca
Title: GEIPA N: Frances UAP Investigation Unit
Link:https://newspaceeconomy.ca/2025/07/29/geipan-frances-uap-investigation-unit/
38.
Source: academieairespace.com
Link:https://academieairespace.com/event/geipan-studies-uaps-ufos/?lang=en
Additional References
39.
Source: trialsearch.who.int
Link:https://trialsearch.who.int/Trial2.aspx?TrialID=UNKNOWN
40.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Unexplained UFOs near Rennes: filmed reenactment of the Étrelles case
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I7MToY5eaBY
41.
Source: academia.edu
Link:https://www.academia.edu/29385801/Le_mod%C3%A8le_sociopsychologique_du_ph%C3%A9nom%C3%A8ne_OVNI_Un_cadre_conceptuel_interpr%C3%A9tatif_en_sciences_humaines
42.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/TheFrenchHistoryPodcast/posts/a-drawing-from-the-files-at-the-french-ufo-department/1337099231754482/
43.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/France3Occitanie/videos/-julien-debet-est-enqu%C3%AAteur-au-geipan-le-groupe-detudes-et-dinformations-sur-les/987261810372598/
44.
Source: instagram.com
Link:https://www.instagram.com/reel/DW0uRj4gOlJ/?hl=en
45.
Source: nationalgeographic.fr
Link:https://www.nationalgeographic.fr/espace/france-qui-se-cache-derriere-le-geipan-le-bureau-des-ovnis-en-france-etrange-enquetes
46.
Source: solve-rd.eu
Link:https://solve-rd.eu/new-podcast-episode-unsolved-cases-genetic-re-analysis-how-solve-rd-finds-the-causes-of-rare-diseases/
47.
Source: instagram.com
Link:https://www.instagram.com/reel/DYzIsnGjJkC/
48.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/telematinf2/videos/ovni-le-myst%C3%A8re-reste-entier-pour-certains-ph%C3%A9nom%C3%A8nes-a%C3%A9riens-non-identifi%C3%A9s/562162305315830/
Topic Tree