Within Hautes Pyrenees UFOs
What The Official Files Really Say
The department's public UFO record is best read through GEIPAN's labels, where most cases are identified or probably explained.
On this page
- How GEIPAN labels A, B, C and D cases
- Key Hautes Pyrenees files from 1980 to 2025
- Why explained cases still matter
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
Hautes-Pyrénées is a useful department for understanding what France’s official UFO files actually do — and do not — show. In the public GEIPAN archive, the strongest pattern is not a run of spectacular unsolved encounters, but a set of reports that usually become clearer when investigators compare witness testimony with video, weather, aircraft tracks, local terrain, festive events and ground activity. The department’s published files include confirmed or probable lanterns at Lourdes and Maubourguet, a probable atmospheric re-entry at Bagnères-de-Bigorre, an Airbus test flight seen from Fontrailles, and a recent Jézeau case traced to night maintenance lights on an antenna structure. The result is not a dismissal of witnesses. It is a reminder that a sincere, detailed sighting can still be caused by an ordinary object seen under unfamiliar conditions.[Geipan+3Geipan+3Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
How GEIPAN labels A, B, C and D cases
GEIPAN is the French public body, within CNES, that collects, analyses, archives and publishes reports of unidentified aerospace phenomena. CNES describes it as an organisation created in 1977, based in Toulouse, working with partners such as the gendarmerie, police, the Air and Space Force, CNRS and Meteo France. Its job is not to prove extraordinary claims, but to test reported observations against known aerospace, astronomical, meteorological, perceptual and human causes.[CNES]cnes.frOpen source on cnes.fr.
The four main GEIPAN labels are easy to misunderstand. An A case means the phenomenon is identified after investigation. A B case means the phenomenon is probably identified. A C case is not identified because the data are too poor or incomplete. A D case remains unidentified after investigation. GEIPAN also explains that cases can be revisited if new information becomes available.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frGeipan Methodology | GEIPANGeipan Methodology | GEIPAN
For Hautes-Pyrénées, this distinction matters because many files sit in A or B, not D. A B label is not a “mystery confirmed”; it usually means the best ordinary explanation is strong but not proven beyond all possible doubt. GEIPAN’s method weighs two ideas: the remaining strangeness after testing explanations, and the consistency of the case, meaning the amount and reliability of useful information. Its classification note says that a case may end up as A or B when the strangeness is low enough, as C when the observation is not workable, and as D only when a sufficiently strange and sufficiently consistent case remains unexplained.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frGeipan La méthodologie de classification au GEIPAN | GEIPANGeipan La méthodologie de classification au GEIPAN | GEIPAN
Nationally, the archive also gives perspective. GEIPAN’s dynamic statistics, dated 25 June 2026, list 3,368 published classified cases: 28.0% A, 38.8% B, 30.1% C and 3.1% D. That national pattern is important for reading Hautes-Pyrénées: most official UFO reports are not treated as exotic, and a large share of “unidentified” material is unresolved because the evidence is too weak, not because it is highly anomalous.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frGeipan Statistics | GEIPANGeipan Statistics | GEIPAN
What the Hautes-Pyrénées file list shows
The public case-search page for GEIPAN lists a compact but revealing set of Hautes-Pyrénées cases. The department’s entries include Lourdes in 2009 and 2015, Maubourguet in 2009, Tarbes in 2009 and 2018, Bagnères-de-Bigorre in 1980 and 2017, Fontrailles in 2017, Estaing in 1989, and Jézeau in 2024. The recurring official explanations are not one dramatic category but a mixture of lanterns, aircraft, birds, ground lights, condensation trails, a balloon, a probable re-entry and small ambiguous objects.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frGeipan Recherche de cas | GEIPANGeipan Recherche de cas | GEIPAN
This makes the department a good test case for reading GEIPAN properly. The archive is not a local catalogue of confirmed craft; it is a record of reported observations and the reasoning used to classify them. A case can be valuable even when solved, because the solved cases show which conditions repeatedly create convincing UFO impressions: orange lights at night, silent objects drifting with wind, distant aircraft lights appearing almost fixed, poor-quality video, mountain relief distorting apparent motion, and human activity on ridges or antenna structures.
The department also shows why the file attachments matter. Some cases have gendarmerie statements, questionnaires, photographs, video, weather documents, trajectory reconstructions or field-investigation reports. Those materials often change the story from “a strange light was seen” to “this particular light, from this direction, at this time, under these wind or flight conditions, most likely matches a known cause”.
The lantern cluster: Lourdes and Maubourguet
The clearest Hautes-Pyrénées lesson comes from the lantern cases. On 23 July 2009 at Lourdes, GEIPAN classified the case as A, with the phenomenon type listed as lanterns. The file includes correspondence, a police/gendarmerie-style record, a screen capture and witness video. GEIPAN’s summary is blunt: the observation was filmed, and the video left no doubt that the objects were flying lanterns.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
That case matters because it shows the value of video when it is good enough. A witness report alone might preserve uncertainty: lights in the sky, movement, brightness, possible formation, no obvious engine noise. But when the footage captures the characteristic behaviour of lanterns, the official explanation can move from “probable” to “identified”.
Maubourguet on 22 August 2009 is more instructive because it remained B rather than A. Several people reported a silent orange ball around 21:30, moving roughly west to east, seeming to pause, then disappearing rapidly towards the south. GEIPAN found the lantern explanation probable because the colour, silence, movement with a light westerly wind and the nearby Rencontres de Maubourguet event all fitted a lantern release. The apparent pause could be explained by movement towards the observers, and the sudden disappearance by the flame going out.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
Lourdes on Christmas night 2015 adds another layer. Two witnesses saw and filmed a red-orange light moving in a clear sky at 18:40, with no sound, before it disappeared. GEIPAN classified it B, as a probable lantern. The file notes a festive date, a reddish-orange luminous object, a short duration, weak wind readings from Tarbes-Lourdes-Pyrénées airport, and a local relief pattern that could plausibly bend the apparent path through nearby valleys. The video helped, but GEIPAN still called the video only partly useful because it was tightly framed and lacked surrounding reference points.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
These three files make a practical point for the reader: lantern cases are not solved simply by saying “orange light equals lantern”. GEIPAN looks for fit across several features: colour, silence, motion, wind, date, local event context, duration and disappearance. When enough of those line up, a dramatic-looking light becomes ordinary without implying that the witness invented it.
Bagnères-de-Bigorre: an older case with real limits
The 25 August 1980 Bagnères-de-Bigorre case is one of the more interesting older Hautes-Pyrénées files because it looks more substantial at first glance. GEIPAN records multiple witnesses and a luminous circular form seen between about 21:25 and 22:00. It moved without any particular sound, was visible only briefly, and disappeared from view behind buildings. The Pic du Midi observatory was contacted, but nothing particular was noted there. GEIPAN classifies the case B, with the public summary pointing to a probable atmospheric re-entry.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
This is exactly where readers need to be careful. The case is not weak in the sense of being a single throwaway anecdote; it has multiple witness entries and an official file. But it is also not a strong unresolved case. The observation was short, the meteorological details in at least one witness entry are listed as unknown, and the archive does not present a firm exotic conclusion.[Geipan]geipan.frOpen source on geipan.fr.
The B label is doing important work here. It says the official explanation is plausible but not perfect. For a historical department-level UFO history, that is still valuable: it shows how older files often sit between public memory and modern certainty. They may be serious enough to record, but too limited to turn into a landmark mystery.
Fontrailles: how an aircraft becomes a triangle
The Fontrailles case of 31 October 2017 is one of the best Hautes-Pyrénées examples of a sighting that sounds unusual until the geometry is reconstructed. Three witnesses in a garden saw a bright point in the eastern sky at about 18:05, then three white points apparently at the ends of an anthracite object. They heard no noise, and the lights went out before the object disappeared. GEIPAN classified the case A: aircraft.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
The explanation was not a generic “probably a plane”. GEIPAN identified the likely source as an Airbus test flight, not a regular scheduled flight. The aircraft’s trajectory was long aligned towards the witnesses, making it appear almost stationary. Its landing or test lights were visible in twilight at great distance, with the file discussing distances of roughly 100 km at the start of the aligned portion and about 40 km later. The reconstitution gave a more than 60 km stretch of track aligned with the viewing location, lasting around ten minutes.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
This case matters because it explains a common UFO trap: a distant aircraft heading nearly towards the observer does not look like a normal crossing aircraft. It can appear fixed, very bright, silent and then suddenly fade when it turns away. The “three lights in a triangle” detail did not make the aircraft explanation weaker. GEIPAN considered how aircraft lights, separation between lamps, possible landing gear lights and reflections from sunlit surfaces could produce the effect. It also noted weaknesses in the witness material, including possible influence between witnesses and the absence of original photograph metadata.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
For Hautes-Pyrénées, Fontrailles is one of the most useful official files because it shows how an explanation can be both mundane and technically detailed. It is a solved case, but not a trivial one.
Jézeau: the 2024 case that looked stranger than it was
The Jézeau case, observed on 10 July 2024 and updated by GEIPAN in March 2026, is the most recent high-value example in the department’s public record. Two witnesses, a mother and son, saw a very bright white light near an antenna relay on a hill, from about 01:00 to 04:00 for the first witness and about 02:30 to 04:00 for the second. The light seemed to move irregularly, split at times, and send smaller white lights vertically downwards before they rose again. No sound was heard, and a short video was made.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
Why explained cases still matter
Explained cases are often treated as less interesting than unresolved ones, but for Hautes-Pyrénées they are the centre of the story. They show how a public UFO archive can be useful without feeding a myth. A lantern file teaches how colour, wind, event timing and extinguishing flames can create an uncanny report. An aircraft file teaches why lights can appear stationary and silent. A maintenance-light file teaches why mountain terrain and ridgelines can turn ground activity into an apparent aerial phenomenon.
GEIPAN itself makes a similar point in its methodology material. It stresses that human testimony is central but fragile: distance, speed and size are hard to judge when the object is not recognised; emotion can increase perceived strangeness; and later memory or interpretation can alter the report. The organisation also notes that explained and unexplained cases are both useful, because explained cases help improve the reliability of whatever remains unexplained.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frGeipan Methodology | GEIPANGeipan Methodology | GEIPAN
For this department, the most responsible reading is therefore not “nothing happened” and not “official files prove UFOs”. Something did happen in each reported case: witnesses saw lights or objects that were puzzling to them. The official question is narrower and more testable: what best explains the observation? In Hautes-Pyrénées, the answer is usually a known cause, sometimes confirmed and sometimes probable.
The official record in plain terms
The Hautes-Pyrénées GEIPAN files point to a cautious conclusion. The department has public UFO reports worth reading, but the public archive does not currently show a strong cluster of unexplained, high-consistency D cases dominating the local record. Instead, it shows a practical investigation pattern: collect the account, preserve witness material, compare it with known phenomena, use terrain and timing, and publish a classification.
The cases are still historically useful because they reveal the local conditions that make UFO reports convincing: Pyrenean relief, dark valleys, tourist and festive settings around Lourdes and Maubourguet, aircraft activity visible at long range, and isolated lights on hills or infrastructure. In that sense, the official files do not make Hautes-Pyrénées less interesting. They make it more instructive. They show how the UFO question often changes, under investigation, from “What was that object?” to “Which ordinary source could look extraordinary from this exact place, at this exact time?”<section class="further-reading-section" data-page-toc-exclude aria-labelledby="further-reading-title"><div class="fr-section-shell"><div class="fr-section-header"><div class="fr-section-heading"><p class="fr-section-kicker">Amazon book picks</p><h3 class="fr-heading" id="further-reading-title">Further Reading</h3></div><p class="fr-intro">Books and field guides related to What The Official Files Really Say. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.</p></div><div class="fr-books-grid"><article class="fr-book-card">Book<div class="fr-book-info"><h4 class="fr-book-title">The Report on Unidentified Flying Objects</h4><p class="fr-book-author">By Edward J. Ruppelt</p><p class="fr-book-desc">Documents official case-review processes.</p><div class="fr-book-actions">
See on Amazon</div></div></article><article class="fr-book-card">Book
<div class="fr-book-info"><h4 class="fr-book-title">The UFO Experience</h4><p class="fr-book-author">By Joseph Allen Hynek</p><p class="fr-book-desc">Strong match for official classification systems and case analysis.</p><div class="fr-book-actions">
See on Amazon</div></div></article><article class="fr-book-card">Book
<div class="fr-book-info"><h4 class="fr-book-title">UFOs</h4><p class="fr-book-author">By Leslie Kean</p><p class="fr-book-desc">Emphasizes documented reports and evidence.</p><div class="fr-book-actions">
See on Amazon</div></div></article><article class="fr-book-card">Book
<div class="fr-book-info"><h4 class="fr-book-title">UFOs Explained</h4><p class="fr-book-author">By Philip J. Klass</p><p class="fr-book-desc">Focuses on resolving sightings through ordinary explanations.</p><div class="fr-book-actions">
See on Amazon</div></div></article></div><div class="fr-section-footer"><div class="fr-browse-links" aria-label="Browse more on Amazon">Browse more on Amazon:The Report on Unidentified Flying ObjectsThe UFO ExperienceUFOs</div><p class="fr-disclosure">As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.</p></div></div></section><section class="further-reading-section" data-page-toc-exclude data-ebay-localized-links data-ebay-visual-market="EBAY_GB" aria-labelledby="merchant-block-title"><div class="fr-section-shell"><div class="fr-section-header"><div class="fr-section-heading"><p class="fr-section-kicker">eBay marketplace picks</p><h3 class="fr-heading" id="merchant-block-title">Marketplace Samples</h3></div><p class="fr-intro">Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.</p><div class="fr-ebay-market-toolbar"><div class="fr-ebay-market-picker">UsingUSA<div class="fr-ebay-market-menu" data-ebay-market-menu role="listbox" hidden></div></div></div></div><div class="fr-ebay-market-panel" data-ebay-market-panel="EBAY_GB" data-ebay-market-default="1"><div class="fr-books-grid"><article class="fr-book-card">
<div class="fr-book-info"><p class="fr-book-kicker">Example eBay listing</p><h4 class="fr-book-title">Dru Blair Signed POWER Rockwell B-1B Aviation Art Print Framed Poster 36" X 24"</h4>SearcheBay.co.uk: aviation art print<div class="fr-book-actions">
Browse similar oneBay.co.uk</div></div></article><article class="fr-book-card">
<div class="fr-book-info"><p class="fr-book-kicker">Example eBay listing</p><h4 class="fr-book-title">Boeing C-17 aviation art print by Keith Woodcock</h4>SearcheBay.co.uk: aviation art print<div class="fr-book-actions">
Browse similar oneBay.co.uk</div></div></article><article class="fr-book-card">
<div class="fr-book-info"><p class="fr-book-kicker">Example eBay listing</p><h4 class="fr-book-title">WW2 Spitfire Over White Cliffs RAF Aviation Poster Print Framed Canvas Wall Art</h4>SearcheBay.co.uk: aviation art print<div class="fr-book-actions">
Browse similar oneBay.co.uk</div></div></article><article class="fr-book-card">
<div class="fr-book-info"><p class="fr-book-kicker">Example eBay listing</p><h4 class="fr-book-title">Ba Concorde Supersonic Jet Landing Canvas Wall Art Picture Print</h4>SearcheBay.co.uk: aviation art print<div class="fr-book-actions">
Browse similar oneBay.co.uk</div></div></article></div><div class="fr-section-footer">
Browse more oneBay.co.uk<p class="fr-disclosure">Example items shown for inspiration; availability and pricing can change. Branchoria may earn a commission if you purchase through outbound eBay links.</p></div></div></div></section>
Endnotes
1.
Source: cnes.fr
Link:https://cnes.fr/en/projects/geipan
2.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/fr/temoignage/3161
3.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/fr/temoignage/7095
4.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/en/node/61370
5.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=2023-02-16&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=1&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=title&page=4%2C15&sort=asc
6.
Source: cnes.fr
Link:https://cnes.fr/projets/geipan
7.
Source: cnes.fr
Title: serie ovnis 5 choses savoir geipan
Link:https://cnes.fr/actualites/serie-ovnis-5-choses-savoir-geipan
8.
Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hn2xTieploU
9.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Meeting France’s UFO detectives • FRANCE 24 English
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zczcBLukQ6s
10.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Geipan: France is also interested in UFOs
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OLXDikL331Y
11.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2009-07-02376
12.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2009-08-08221
13.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2017-10-09772
14.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2024-07-51592
15.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: Geipan Methodology | GEIPAN
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/node/58788
16.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: Geipan La méthodologie de classification au GEIPAN | GEIPAN
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/actualites/methodologie-classification-geipan
17.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: Geipan Statistics | GEIPAN
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/stats
18.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: Geipan Recherche de cas | GEIPAN
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B11%5D=11&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B12%5D=12&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B13%5D=13&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B14%5D=14&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=1&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=65%2C0&select-category-export=nothing&sort=asc&video=on
19.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2015-12-09380
20.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/en/node/48659?order=field_classification_des_cas&page=46&sort=asc&undefined=
21.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B12%5D=12&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=27%2C4&sort=asc
22.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=orange&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date&page=6%2C21&sort=asc
23.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B12%5D=12&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation&page=40%2C3&sort=desc
24.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=2007-03-01&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=98%2C0&sort=desc
25.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=avion&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation&page=24&sort=desc
26.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=06&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation&page=22&sort=desc
27.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: Compte rendu enquete819
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/Compte%20rendu%20enquete819.pdf
28.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: methodologie classification geipan
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/actualites/methodologie-classification-geipan
29.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: baisse cas d
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/actualites/baisse-cas-d
30.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: baisse cas d
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/actualites/baisse-cas-d
31.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/node/58791
32.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/node/58894?page=%2C45
33.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/1993-11-01335
34.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/1980-03-00751
35.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/1993-05-01303
36.
Source: Wikipedia
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GEIPAN
37.
Source: uapedia.ai
Title: GEIPA N: France’s Official UAP Unit
Link:https://uapedia.ai/wiki/geipan-frances-official-uap-unit/
38.
Source: academieairespace.com
Link:https://academieairespace.com/event/geipan-studies-uaps-ufos/?lang=en
Additional References
39.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Why NOBODY Talks About The Real UFO Geography
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OZn3kge28e4
40.
Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qeKE6RtfpcI
41.
Source: nrpyrenees.fr
Title: un ovni dans le ciel des hautes pyrenees un temoin raconte,5994164
Link:https://www.nrpyrenees.fr/2018/12/24/un-ovni-dans-le-ciel-des-hautes-pyrenees-un-temoin-raconte%2C5994164.php
42.
Source: france-science.com
Title: CAIPA N II International Conference on Unidentified Aerospace
Link:https://france-science.com/en/caipan-ii-international-conference-on-unidentified-aerospace-phenomena-organized-by-geipan-in-toulouse/
43.
Source: reddit.com
Link:https://www.reddit.com/r/todayilearned/comments/1qa0lyb/til_that_france_has_a_dedicated_unit_to_finding/
44.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Groupe d’études des phénomènes aérospatiaux non identifiés
Link:https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Groupe_d%27%C3%A9tudes_des_ph%C3%A9nom%C3%A8nes_a%C3%A9rospatiaux_non_identifi%C3%A9s
45.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Unexplained UFOs near Rennes: filmed reenactment of the Étrelles case
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I7MToY5eaBY
46.
Source: ladepeche.fr
Title: 2930385 ovni ciel hautes pyrenees temoin raconte
Link:https://www.ladepeche.fr/article/2018/12/24/2930385-ovni-ciel-hautes-pyrenees-temoin-raconte.html
47.
Source: echosciences.nouvelle-aquitaine.science
Link:https://echosciences.nouvelle-aquitaine.science/evenements/1-7794e978-6083-49f9-91dc-c70540689d47
48.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Le Chapelet depuis la Grotte de Lourdes
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W5Ul-x_XIlA
Topic Tree