Within Aisne UFOs
Why So Many Aisne UFOs Became Ordinary
Aisne's official UFO archive is less a catalogue of mysteries than a lesson in how Sun, Venus, lanterns, aircraft, birds, and weak data shape reports.
On this page
- What the A, B and C classifications mean
- Recurring causes across Aisne towns
- Why credible witnesses can still misread the sky
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
Aisne’s official UFO record is striking because it is not dominated by unsolved mysteries. In GEIPAN’s public archive, the department reads more like a practical lesson in how unusual sky reports are sorted: some are identified outright, some are judged probably explained, and others remain weak because the data are too thin. The recurring explanations are familiar but important: Venus, bright meteors, the setting Sun, lanterns, aircraft or helicopters, birds, insects, projected lights, and ordinary visual misperception.
GEIPAN is the French official body, within CNES, that collects, analyses, archives and publishes reports of unidentified aerospace phenomena. Nationally, CNES says only a small minority of cases remain unexplained after investigation, while many are clearly or probably identified, or cannot be assessed properly for lack of data. Aisne fits that pattern closely: its value is less about a single dramatic “classic case” than about how repeated explanations reshape local UFO history.[CNES]cnes.frGEIPAN | CNESGEIPAN | CNES…
What the A, B and C classifications mean
GEIPAN’s categories are easy to misunderstand. A case classed A is not “important” in the sensational sense; it is a report that has been explained after investigation. A case classed B is probably explained. A case classed C is not necessarily strange or impressive: it is a case that cannot be properly identified because the information is insufficient. D is the genuinely unexplained category after investigation, with D1 and D2 used for different levels of strangeness and evidential strength.[cnes-geipan.fr]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
That distinction matters for Aisne. A local report can sound dramatic in witness language — a red object at the horizon, a silent triangle, a darting light, a cluster of points — and still end up outside the “unexplained” category. GEIPAN’s own methodology rests on two measures: residual strangeness after known explanations have been tested, and consistency, meaning the quantity and reliability of the available evidence. A single witness, a vague direction, an uncertain time, or a missing photograph can quickly weaken a case even when the witness appears sincere.[cnes-geipan.fr]cnes-geipan.frLa méthodologie de classification au GEIPAN | GEIPANLa méthodologie de classification au GEIPAN | GEIPAN
For Aisne, the most revealing pattern is the weight of A, B and C cases. This does not mean people were foolish or dishonest. It means many reports were either compatible with known phenomena or too poorly documented to support a stronger conclusion. The department therefore offers a useful counterweight to the more dramatic side of UFO culture: official “UFO records” can preserve ordinary causes as carefully as unresolved puzzles.
Recurring causes across Aisne towns
Aisne’s GEIPAN entries are spread across towns and villages rather than concentrated in one obvious hotspot. The explanations recur because the same viewing conditions recur: night skies, low horizons, brief observations, distant lights, festival dates, incomplete witness questionnaires, and objects seen without enough context.
Several explanations appear again and again.
Astronomical sources are among the clearest. At Coulonges-Cohan in January 1979, two witnesses saw a bright sphere in the eastern sky between about 5.30 and 7.00 in the morning. GEIPAN says the witness credibility was not in doubt, but the report was imprecise; the phenomenon shared key features with Venus, which was present in the relevant part of the sky, possibly softened by mist or a halo effect. The case, originally among older weaker files, was reassessed as a B case: probable Venus.[cnes-geipan.fr]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
Bright meteors and atmospheric entries also explain some short, vivid reports. Saint-Simon, observed on 19 January 1955, involved three people seeing a white luminous disc with an orange trail moving from north-east to south-west for around five seconds, with no sound. GEIPAN classifies it as a B case: probable bolide, meaning a bright meteoroid entering the atmosphere.[cnes-geipan.fr]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
Lanterns and festive lights are especially relevant for modern reports. Chauny’s 14 July 2009 case involved red lights moving at constant speed, forming a V, then disappearing into cloud after a short observation. GEIPAN noted that similar observations had appeared in the local press and judged the case a probable sighting of flying lanterns, then fashionable at festive events.[cnes-geipan.fr]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
Aircraft, helicopters and projected lights explain another group. Venizel, reported on 30 June 2011, is listed as a B case with the phenomenon type “helicopter”. Montcornet, on 29 July 2000, was classed A after several family witnesses saw large luminous circles rotating in the sky; the investigation found a discotheque light effect reflected on cloud. Saint-Michel and Jeantes, both dated 15 November 2009 in the GEIPAN case list, are likewise listed as B cases involving light animation.[cnes-geipan.fr+2cnes-geipan.fr]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
Birds, insects and nearby objects show why video is not always decisive. In Laon in May 2021, a witness filmed a flickering nocturnal light and a fast, erratic bright object. GEIPAN classified the case B, judging it probably a bird or insect close to the witness and briefly lit by a streetlamp; the object appeared blurred while the background was relatively sharp, a clue that it was near the camera rather than high in the sky.[cnes-geipan.fr]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
Together, these cases make Aisne’s official record unusually good at illustrating the gap between witness experience and final classification. A light can be sincerely puzzling in the moment and still become ordinary once direction, time, duration, weather, astronomy and local activity are checked.
The setting Sun case that changed category
The Guise case of 24 October 1977 is one of the most useful Aisne examples because it shows how reassessment can alter the meaning of an old report. Three residents saw, near the horizon, a red or fiery ball with small flame-like effects. The observation lasted several minutes and was serious enough to lead to gendarmerie interviews and local press coverage. It was first treated as a weakly explained file, but GEIPAN later re-examined it.[cnes-geipan.fr]cnes-geipan.frNotes enqueteNotes enquete
The re-examination found that the object was seen low toward the west, in the direction of Saint-Quentin and Macquigny, at roughly the time of sunset. The witness descriptions — a red object at the horizon, gradual disappearance, deformation, and flickering through branches — matched a setting Sun distorted by horizon conditions and vegetation. GEIPAN’s case list now records Guise as an A case with the explanation “setting Sun”.[cnes-geipan.fr]cnes-geipan.frNotes enqueteNotes enquete
This is a crucial pattern for Aisne. The official archive does not merely collect first impressions; it also preserves later reinterpretations. A dramatic local sighting can become more ordinary not because witnesses were ignored, but because their accounts were precise enough to test against the sky at that time and place.
Why credible witnesses can still misread the sky
A recurring lesson from Aisne is that credibility and accuracy are not the same thing. A sincere witness can misread distance, size, speed or direction, especially at night. A light without a clear reference point can look closer than it is. A distant aircraft can seem silent. A planet can appear to move when stared at in darkness. Several unrelated lights can be perceived as one object.
Chartèves, on 20 May 2020, is a good example. A witness reported two groups of white balls and red points moving rapidly and erratically in a clear night sky for more than half an hour; his wife and son were also involved. GEIPAN judged the case B, with a probable astronomical explanation involving the stars Arcturus and Vega. The report specifically mentions the autokinetic effect, an optical illusion in which a fixed point of light in darkness appears to move erratically. GEIPAN did note a remaining difficulty: the red points reported by the first witness were not seen by the second witness.[Geipan]geipan.frOpen source on geipan.fr.
Baulne-en-Brie, on 7 July 2013, shows a different problem. A witness at a night-sky observation session saw a white point appear to make a rapid 90-degree turn. GEIPAN explained that two satellite tracks, one ending as a satellite leaves sunlight and another beginning as a different satellite enters sunlight, can create the impression of a single object changing course. The case remained C because the available information was not strong enough, and the report notes incomplete cooperation with follow-up questions.[cnes-geipan.fr]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
Saint-Quentin, on 14 January 2012, shows how a classic “triangle” report can weaken under scrutiny. A witness saw three small white lights outlining a dark triangular mass moving quickly and silently. GEIPAN considered an aircraft-like explanation, checked radar information, but found no matching aircraft track. Even so, because the testimony was unique, the movement was regular and the information remained limited, the case was classed C rather than D.[cnes-geipan.fr]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
Condé-sur-Aisne, on 6 August 2015, pushes the same point further. A witness briefly saw a grey triangle with orange-red lights at each corner, which then seemed to depart very quickly. GEIPAN suggested that this kind of triangular description often involves a contour or Gestalt illusion: separate points of light are mentally joined into a single dark object. The file also notes possible sources such as lanterns, aircraft or satellites, but classifies the case C because the observation was too short and the time window too broad for a reliable conclusion.[cnes-geipan.fr]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
The difference between weak, ordinary and unresolved
Aisne’s GEIPAN record is useful because it separates three things that are often blurred in public UFO discussion.
An ordinary case has a reasonably secure explanation. Guise’s sunset and Montcornet’s projected discotheque lights fall into this group. They are not failed UFO stories; they are successful investigations, because the original strangeness is reduced by evidence.[cnes-geipan.fr]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
A probably ordinary case is still not the same as a mystery. Saint-Simon’s bolide, Coulonges-Cohan’s Venus, Chauny’s lanterns, Fère-en-Tardenois’s meteor, Laon’s bird or insect, and Chartèves’s stars are B cases: GEIPAN’s preferred explanation is considered very probable rather than absolutely proven.[Geipan+5cnes-geipan.fr+5cnes-geipan.fr]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
A weak case is different again. C cases are not automatically more mysterious than B cases. In Aisne, C often means the opposite: the record lacks the timing, direction, corroboration or witness follow-up needed to reach a robust answer. Jussy, Baulne-en-Brie, Gauchy, Saint-Quentin and Condé-sur-Aisne appear in this weaker evidential territory, where GEIPAN may discuss possible causes but stops short of a firm classification.[cnes-geipan.fr+4cnes-geipan.fr+4cnes-geipan.fr]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
That distinction is one of the most important things a reader can take from Aisne. “Not identified” can mean “genuinely unexplained after investigation”, but it can also mean “not enough reliable information”. The department’s record leans heavily towards the latter categories and probable explanations, rather than a catalogue of strong unresolved anomalies.
Why Aisne’s pattern matters
Aisne does not need a famous unsolved landing case to be valuable in French UFO history. Its importance lies in showing how an official archive works at department level. The cases are local, varied and often modest, but together they demonstrate the practical mechanics of investigation: compare testimony with known sky phenomena, test directions and times, consider human perception, check whether multiple witnesses are independent, and downgrade certainty when the evidence is thin.
This also changes how local UFO stories should be read. A report from Guise, Chauny or Saint-Quentin should not be treated only as folklore or as a claim waiting to be believed. It should be read as a chain of evidence: what was seen, how long it lasted, who saw it, what was recorded, what was checked later, and whether the final explanation actually accounts for the oddest part of the description.
The strongest lesson from Aisne is not that all UFO reports are worthless. It is that ordinary causes can be surprisingly varied, and that a sincere sighting can become less mysterious through careful reconstruction. GEIPAN’s Aisne files show Sun, Venus, meteors, lanterns, aircraft, birds, insects, satellites, projected lights and missing data doing much of the work that a dramatic retelling might otherwise assign to the unknown.
Amazon book picks
Further Reading
Books and field guides related to Why So Many Aisne UFOs Became Ordinary. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.
The UFO Experience
Explains UFO reporting, classification, witness testimony, and how many sightings receive conventional explanations.
UFOs
Provides context for evaluating official investigations and distinguishing unexplained cases from solved reports.
The Demon-Haunted World
Rating: 4.5/5 from 43 Google Books ratings
Directly addresses misperception, cognitive errors, and scientific evaluation of unusual observations.
Mistakes Were Made (but Not by Me)
Helps explain why sincere witnesses can misinterpret events and remain confident in mistaken conclusions.
eBay marketplace picks
Marketplace Samples
Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.
Endnotes
1.
Source: cnes.fr
Title: GEIPAN | CNES
Link:https://cnes.fr/en/projects/geipan
2.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: Methodology | GEIPAN
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/node/58788
3.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/glossaire
4.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: La méthodologie de classification au GEIPAN | GEIPAN
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/actualites/methodologie-classification-geipan
5.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/1979-01-00592
6.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/1955-01-00033
7.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2009-07-02441?order=field_date&page=115&sort=desc
8.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/temoignage/7552
9.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2000-07-01549
10.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B0%5D=12&order=field_departement_textuel&page=%2C0&sort=asc
11.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2021-05-51196
12.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: Notes enquete
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/Notes%20enquete.pdf
13.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?customGetLattitude=46.124763699209396&customGetLongitude=2.406005859375001&customGetZoom=6&field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=50.52739681329302&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=41.72213058512578&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=8.745117187500002&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=-3.9331054687500004&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_classification_des_cas&page=114&sort=desc&undefined=
14.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/fr/cas/2020-05-50965
15.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2013-07-08662?field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B0%5D=13&page=%2C27
16.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2012-01-08175?field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=title&page=%2C234&sort=asc
17.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2015-08-09268
18.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2014-06-08707
19.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/en/node/54125
20.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas?field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B13%5D=13&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date&page=%2C28&sort=asc
21.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/save_json_import_files/export_cas_pub_20251127093552.csv
22.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/1978-09-00542
23.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: baisse cas d
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/actualites/baisse-cas-d
24.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: evolution classification des cas
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/actualites/evolution-classification-des-cas
25.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: deux nouveaux cas d1
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/actualites/deux-nouveaux-cas-d1
26.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/node/412
27.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/histoire-du-geipan
28.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: geipan revisite cas
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/actualites/geipan-revisite-cas
29.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/faq-page
30.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/node/58701
31.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/missions-methodes-et-resultats
32.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=avion&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=%2C8&sort=asc
33.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/en/search/cas?order=title&page=%2C524&sort=asc&undefined=
34.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%255B11%255D=11&field_date_d_observation_value%255Bmax%255D=&field_date_d_observation_value%255Bmin%255D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%255Bmax%255D=&field_latitude_value%255Bmin%255D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%255Bmax%255D=&field_longitude_value%255Bmin%255D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation&page=59&sort=desc
35.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?customGetLattitude=50.04976591053777&customGetLongitude=1.8017578125000002&customGetZoom=8&field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=51.07246834624619&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=49.027063474829355&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=3.6694335937500004&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=-0.06591796875000001&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=%2C7&sort=asc
36.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B0%5D=12&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=%2C101&sort=asc
37.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%255Bmax%255D=&field_date_d_observation_value%255Bmin%255D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%255Bmax%255D=&field_latitude_value%255Bmin%255D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%255Bmax%255D=&field_longitude_value%255Bmin%255D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_classification_des_cas&page=%2C310&sort=asc
38.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B13%5D=13&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B14%5D=14&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B15%5D=15&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B16%5D=16&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=%2C16&select-category-export=nothing&sort=asc
39.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&order=field_date&page=109&sort=desc
40.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?customGetLattitude=49.98977423589942&customGetLongitude=3.5211181640625004&customGetZoom=8&field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id=All&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=51.01375465718821&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=48.96579381461063&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=5.388793945312501&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=1.6534423828125002&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=title&page=6%2C0&sort=asc
41.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas?field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=%2C300&sort=desc
42.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?customGetLattitude=46.124763699209396&customGetLongitude=2.406005859375001&customGetZoom=6&field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=50.52739681329302&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=41.72213058512578&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=8.745117187500002&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=-3.9331054687500004&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation&page=72%2C0&sort=desc&undefined=
43.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=title&page=109&s=09&sort=desc
44.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?customGetLattitude=50.04976591053777&customGetLongitude=1.8017578125000002&customGetZoom=8&field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=51.07246834624619&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=49.027063474829355&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=3.6694335937500004&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=-0.06591796875000001&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=16%2C21&sort=desc
45.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=avion&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation_textuel&page=1&sort=desc
46.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=165&sort=desc
47.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B11%5D=11&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_classification_des_cas&page=%2C119&select-category-export=nothing&sort=asc
48.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?customGetLattitude=50.04976591053777&customGetLongitude=1.8017578125000002&customGetZoom=8&field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=51.07246834624619&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=49.027063474829355&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=3.6694335937500004&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=-0.06591796875000001&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation_textuel&page=3&sort=desc
49.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B0%5D=11&order=field_departement_textuel&page=%2C9&sort=asc
50.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas?amp=&field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation_textuel&page=%2C524&sort=desc
51.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas?field_agregation_index_value=orange&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=title&page=%2C27&sort=desc
52.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas?field_agregation_index_value=Ain&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation_textuel&page=%2C135&sort=desc
53.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/search/cas?field_agregation_index_value=orange&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=title&page=26%2C27&sort=desc
54.
Source: cnes.fr
Title: rapport cospar 2018
Link:https://cnes.fr/sites/default/files/2024-06/rapport-cospar-2018.pdf
55.
Source: cnes.fr
Link:https://cnes.fr/sites/default/files/2026-01/cnesmag-99-en_0.pdf
56.
Source: cnes.fr
Title: mag 90 60 years en
Link:https://cnes.fr/sites/default/files/2024-08/cnesmag-90-60-years-en.pdf
57.
Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hn2xTieploU
58.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Meeting France’s UFO detectives • FRANCE 24 English
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zczcBLukQ6s
59.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Geipan: France is also interested in UFOs
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OLXDikL331Y
60.
Source: academia.edu
Link:https://www.academia.edu/99067452/GEIPAN_classification_with_text_mining_and_machine_learning
61.
Source: uapedia.ai
Link:https://uapedia.ai/wiki/geipan-frances-official-uap-unit/
Additional References
62.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Identifying UFOs / Anti-Myth Superpowers
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7GtoO00G_No
63.
Source: researchgate.net
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/369507030_GEIPAN_classification_with_text_mining_and_machine_learning
64.
Source: artdroit.org
Link:https://artdroit.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Dire-lauthenticit%C3%A9-dune-oeuvre-dart.pdf
65.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/CNESFrance/posts/ne-dites-plus-ovni-mais-plut%C3%B4t-pan-cest-le-terme-utilis%C3%A9-par-le-geipan-notre-gro/10163463849650301/
66.
Source: france-science.com
Link:https://france-science.com/en/caipan-ii-international-conference-on-unidentified-aerospace-phenomena-organized-by-geipan-in-toulouse/
67.
Source: handle.uba.uva.nl
Link:https://handle.uba.uva.nl/personal/search?identifier=e9058a34-0acb-4618-bd1b-a5a1e9a2a0e5
68.
Source: cd-genomics.com
Title: pan genome definition classification
Link:https://www.cd-genomics.com/pop-genomics/resources/pan-genome-definition-classification.html
69.
Source: documents1.worldbank.org
Link:https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099092503072311321/pdf/P17681101aecda0030813c00da46bc7f312.pdf
70.
Source: youtube.com
Title: UFOs: GEIPAN is working on the issue (Toulouse)
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nnOX-NXZFqE
71.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Karst Tates
Link:https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karst_Tates
Topic Tree