What Makes Seine Maritime's UFO Files Worth Reading?
Seine-Maritime’s UFO history is not built around one famous “landing” case, but around a steadier pattern: coastal and rural night sightings, a handful of older reports preserved in French official files, and many ordinary misidentifications involving aircraft, planets, meteors, lanterns, satellites, balloons or insufficient data.
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
The strongest Seine-Maritime material is therefore not proof of exotic craft. It is a useful record of how unusual sky reports are made, sorted, explained, left unresolved, or downgraded when the evidence is too thin.
Why Seine-Maritime appears often in French UFO files
Seine-Maritime has the right ingredients for recurring UAP reports: a long Channel coastline, busy skies around Rouen and Le Havre, ports, rural plateaux, dark coastal horizons, and a mix of amateur astronomy, aviation, shipping lights and weather effects. That does not make the department a UFO “hotspot” in the sensational sense. It means it produces exactly the kind of ambiguous visual reports that GEIPAN was created to handle.
A 2022 French media roundup, based on GEIPAN figures at the time, placed Seine-Maritime among the departments with many reported aerospace phenomena, giving 50 reports and 18 then-unidentified cases. That figure should be used cautiously because GEIPAN’s database is dynamic: cases can be reclassified when new information, better astronomy software, satellite data or renewed analysis becomes available.[Planet]planet.frOvnis: les 12 départements où il y a le plus de signalementOvnis: les 12 départements où il y a le plus de signalement
GEIPAN’s own classification system is essential for reading these files. Class A means the phenomenon was identified after investigation; B means probably identified; C means not identified because the information is inadequate; D means not identified after investigation. Since 2008, GEIPAN has also used a more detailed approach based on two ideas: the residual strangeness of the report after investigation and the consistency of the evidence.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
That distinction is especially important in Seine-Maritime. Many cases sound dramatic in witness language but fall into C because the date is uncertain, the account was made long after the event, the witness saw the phenomenon only briefly, or the description changed. A C case is not a strong mystery; it is usually a weak file.
The 1989 Saint-Martin-de-Boscherville case: the department’s clearest unresolved file
The best-known official Seine-Maritime case is the 12 January 1989 sighting at Saint-Martin-de-Boscherville, west of Rouen. GEIPAN classifies it as D, meaning the phenomenon remained unidentified after investigation, not merely because of missing information. The report describes a woman driving at night who saw, for only a few seconds, a huge silent cylindrical object around 30 metres above marshland. It was said to have a dome emitting yellow light and a series of red and white luminous portholes at its base. As she passed, the lights went out, then reappeared seconds later much higher in the sky. GEIPAN states that the investigations did not produce enough additional information to identify the phenomenon.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
This case matters locally because it has several features readers associate with classic UFO narratives: low altitude, apparent structure, silence, proximity, and an abrupt change in apparent position. It is also memorable because it happened in a specific landscape, the marshes around Saint-Martin-de-Boscherville, rather than as a vague “light in the sky”.
The doubts are just as important. The observation lasted only seconds. There appears to have been a single principal witness account in the official summary. No radar, photograph, physical trace or independent timed sequence is presented in the GEIPAN page. The D classification therefore marks a genuine unresolved official file, but not a high-proof event. It is better read as “unexplained on the available record” than as evidence for a craft.
A popular French entertainment article later repackaged the same case as one of the striking unsolved French GEIPAN cases, calling attention to the “windows” or portholes motif. That shows the case’s media appeal, but the official GEIPAN page remains the stronger source because it gives the classification, date, department and investigation outcome without turning the sighting into a dramatic claim.[10h26]topito.com10h26Top 10 des observations d'OVNI non élucidées en France d10h26Top 10 des observations d'OVNI non élucidées en France d
Ouville-l’Abbaye in 1981: a strange story weakened by time
The Ouville-l’Abbaye report is one of the most interesting Seine-Maritime files because it shows how a case can be strange but still weak. GEIPAN records the event as an October 1981 observation, reported to GEIPAN only in 2013. The witness described several red-orange lights marking the outline of a dark mass, moving silently near a farm, reversing direction, then ascending and disappearing rapidly. GEIPAN classified the case as C for lack of reliable information.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
The investigation file is unusually revealing. GEIPAN noted that the witness associated the date with a television programme and that the precise day remained uncertain. The witness and his future wife observed from inside the house, through glass, and did not go outside during the sighting. GEIPAN considered astronomical and aviation explanations unlikely because of the reported low, slow movement near trees, but it also considered a farm or construction vehicle possible. That hypothesis was not strong, partly because of the described height and final rapid departure, but the report was more than 30 years old and lacked a secure date.[Geipan]geipan.frCompte rendu enquete159Compte rendu enquete159
The useful lesson is not that Ouville-l’Abbaye was solved. It was not. The useful lesson is that “unexplained” and “strong” are not the same. GEIPAN’s conclusion was that the case remained strange, but the evidence lacked consistency: delayed testimony, imprecise dating, limited corroboration and no physical record.[Geipan]geipan.frCompte rendu enquete159Compte rendu enquete159
For readers comparing Seine-Maritime cases, Ouville-l’Abbaye sits below Saint-Martin-de-Boscherville in evidential value. It is more detailed as a witness story, but weaker as an investigation because the report came decades after the event.
The 1954 wave in Pays de Caux: vivid local memory, difficult evidence
Any local UFO history of Seine-Maritime has to mention the French 1954 wave. Across France, the autumn of 1954 produced an exceptional burst of press reports about lights, discs, landings and close encounters. A later research overview describes the 1954 wave as especially dominated by French reports, with October as the peak month in a much wider international dataset.[Academia]academia.eduThe Worldwide UFO Wave of 1954The Worldwide UFO Wave of 1954
In Seine-Maritime, local retellings focus heavily on the Pays de Caux and the Le Havre–Fécamp coastal area. One local historical article claims more than 40 Seine-Maritime cases for 1954, including 29 in the Pays de Caux, and says September and October concentrated most of the local reports. This is useful as a guide to local UFO memory, but it is not the same as a modern official case review. Many 1954 accounts depend on local press extracts, later catalogues and retrospective UFO compilations rather than full contemporary investigation files.[Site de havre-secret!]havre-secret.frSite de havre-secret!Les Dossiers Secrets de la "Vague de 54'" en Pays CauchoisSite de havre-secret!Les Dossiers Secrets de la "Vague de 54'" en Pays Cauchois
Fécamp is a good example. Later UFO catalogues cite local press reports from late September 1954 describing luminous oval objects seen by a municipal official and other residents. The account is intriguing because it involves multiple witnesses and a named civic role, but it still relies on press reporting and later compilation rather than a GEIPAN-style modern investigation.[Ufologie]ufologie.patrickgross.orgOpen source on patrickgross.org.
The 1954 material should therefore be presented as historically important but evidentially uneven. It shows that Seine-Maritime was part of France’s classic flying-saucer wave. It does not, by itself, establish a set of robust unresolved cases. Local newspapers preserved excitement, witness names and atmosphere; they rarely preserved the technical details needed today: exact bearings, weather data, astronomical checks, aircraft movements, duration measured reliably, and independent statements taken before stories circulated.
The ordinary explanations are not boring — they are the pattern
The strongest department-level finding is that many Seine-Maritime reports become ordinary once investigated. That does not make the witnesses foolish. It shows how difficult sky observation is, especially at night, near horizons, over water, or when a bright object is seen without distance cues.
A Le Havre case from 18 September 1998 illustrates this well. Several witnesses reported three aligned lights and a brighter globe. GEIPAN classified the case B and concluded that the likely explanation was Jupiter and three of its satellites, visible under favourable conditions at that period.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
Another Le Havre case, from 25 November 1989, shows a different problem: contradictions inside the evidence. A witness first described three lights in a triangular form, but later testimony used a press article and referred to five orange discs. GEIPAN classified the file C because the inconsistent information prevented analysis.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
Lillebonne in 2005 is a useful middle case. An amateur astronomer reported two very bright white points low in the east, fading out over a short period. GEIPAN noted contradictory data about whether the phenomenon was fixed or moving quickly and whether the duration was around 30 seconds or several minutes. It considered an atmospheric re-entry possible but not confirmable, and classified the case C.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
More recent Seine-Maritime entries show the same pattern with modern objects. GEIPAN search results list local reports explained or probably explained as the International Space Station, Iridium flashes, satellite triplets, aircraft, Thai lanterns, a sky-tracer, balloons, a bird, a meteor or bolide, and aircraft. Examples include Petit-Couronne in 2010 classified as the ISS, Montivilliers in 2012 probably a commercial aircraft, Saint-Léger-aux-Bois in 2013 as an Iridium flash, Petit-Quevilly in 2014 as a triplet of satellites, and Colleville in 2024 as a sky-tracer.[Geipan+2Geipan]geipan.frOpen source on geipan.fr.
This is where sceptical interpretation earns its place. The most common explanations do not require deception. They require imperfect perception, unusual viewing geometry, lack of scale, memory drift, and the natural tendency to interpret lights as solid objects.
Aviation, ports and coastal skies: why local setting matters
Seine-Maritime’s geography shapes its reports. Le Havre, Dieppe, Rouen and the Channel coast offer many opportunities for ambiguous sightings: aircraft lights changing apparent speed, ships or offshore lights seen across dark water, bright planets close to the horizon, sky-tracers from events, and meteors over open coastal sky.
GEIPAN’s national method is designed precisely for these cross-checks. It works with partners including the gendarmerie, police, the Air and Space Force, CNRS and Météo-France, and its investigations combine physical sciences with human factors rather than assuming extraordinary causes.[CNES]cnes.frOpen source on cnes.fr.
The gendarmerie connection matters because many older French UFO files entered official channels through witness statements. GEIPAN’s mission page also says that sighting reports and investigation conclusions are published while preserving witness anonymity. That makes France unusual: ordinary local cases, including Seine-Maritime cases, can be read as official public records rather than only as folklore or magazine retellings.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frmissions methodes et resultatsmissions methodes et resultats
Still, official publication is not official endorsement of an exotic explanation. GEIPAN explicitly says it is not an organisation trying to identify extraterrestrial life or advanced technologies. Its job is to examine reported aerospace phenomena and, where possible, explain them using recognised knowledge.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frmissions methodes et resultatsmissions methodes et resultats
How to read a Seine-Maritime UFO case without being misled
A good local reading starts with classification, but does not stop there. In Seine-Maritime, the same dramatic words can mean very different things depending on the file.
A practical ranking looks like this:
- Stronger unresolved file: Saint-Martin-de-Boscherville, because GEIPAN classifies it D after investigation, even though the observation was brief and lacks hard instrumental evidence.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
- Strange but weak file: Ouville-l’Abbaye, because the story is detailed and odd, but GEIPAN classifies it C due to late reporting, uncertain date and limited reliability.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
- Historically important but hard to test: the 1954 Pays de Caux and Fécamp material, because it belongs to France’s famous wave but rests heavily on press and later catalogue traditions.[Site de havre-secret!]havre-secret.frSite de havre-secret!Les Dossiers Secrets de la "Vague de 54'" en Pays CauchoisSite de havre-secret!Les Dossiers Secrets de la "Vague de 54'" en Pays Cauchois
- Probably explained or low-strangeness cases: reports such as Le Havre 1998, Petit-Couronne 2010, Montivilliers 2012 or Petit-Quevilly 2014, where GEIPAN or its database points towards planets, satellites, aircraft or other known sources.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
- Unusable or underpowered cases: C files where contradictions, missing times, imprecise locations or delayed testimony prevent meaningful analysis, such as the Le Havre 1989 and Lillebonne 2005 examples.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
This approach keeps the subject interesting without inflating it. The reader does not have to choose between “aliens visited Seine-Maritime” and “everyone was mistaken”. The more accurate conclusion is that the department has a mixed record: a few unresolved or unusual reports, many weak files, and many cases that fit known sky phenomena.
What the record really says
Seine-Maritime’s UFO record is valuable because it is ordinary in the best sense. It shows the full life cycle of local UFO history: a witness sees something startling; police, investigators or later researchers preserve the account; official reviewers test astronomy, aircraft, satellites, weather and human perception; some cases are explained, some are too thin, and a small number remain unresolved.
The department’s most memorable official case remains Saint-Martin-de-Boscherville in 1989. Ouville-l’Abbaye is the best example of a vivid but weakened file. The 1954 Pays de Caux material gives the page historical depth, but it should be treated as archival folklore and press history unless individual cases can be tied to stronger primary documentation. The modern GEIPAN listings, meanwhile, show how often the answer is not a mystery object but a known light seen under misleading conditions.
That is the balanced conclusion for Seine-Maritime: not an empty record, not a confirmed UFO corridor, but a department with enough official and historical material to reward careful reading — especially when unresolved cases, weak cases and explained cases are kept separate.
eBay marketplace picks
Marketplace Samples
Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.
Endnotes
1.
Source: cnes.fr
Link:https://cnes.fr/en/projects/geipan
2.
Source: planet.fr
Title: Ovnis: les 12 départements où il y a le plus de signalement
Link:https://www.planet.fr/faits-divers-ovnis-les-12-departements-ou-il-y-a-le-plus-de-signalement.2542909.807918.html
3.
Source: geipan.fr
Title: Compte rendu enquete159
Link:https://geipan.fr/sites/default/files/Compte%20rendu%20enquete159.pdf
4.
Source: academia.edu
Title: The Worldwide UFO Wave of 1954
Link:https://www.academia.edu/2261290/The_Worldwide_UFO_Wave_of_1954
5.
Source: havre-secret.fr
Title: Site de havre-secret!Les Dossiers Secrets de la”Vague de 54’” en Pays Cauchois
Link:https://www.havre-secret.fr/2022/02/05/les-dossiers-secrest-de-la-vague-de-54-en-pays-cauchois/
6.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=116&order=field_departement_textuel&page=140&select-category-export=nothing&sort=asc
7.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=avion&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=4&sort=desc
8.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_date_value=2007-03-01&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=title&page=40&sort=desc
9.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_classification_des_cas&page=3&sort=desc
10.
Source: geipan.fr
Title: Courriers R60
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/sites/default/files/Courriers-R60.pdf
11.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B13%5D=13&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B14%5D=14&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B15%5D=15&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B16%5D=16&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=1&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=57.70414723434193&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=19.642587534013032&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=49.921875&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=-9.843750000000002&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation&page=14&select-category-export=nothing&sort=asc&video=on
12.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_classification_des_cas&page=28&sort=desc
13.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B11%5D=11&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B12%5D=12&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B13%5D=13&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B14%5D=14&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=1&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_classification_des_cas&page=123&select-category-export=nothing&sort=asc&video=on
14.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B12%5D=12&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B13%5D=13&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B14%5D=14&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B15%5D=15&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B16%5D=16&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=1&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=18&select-category-export=nothing&sort=desc&video=on
15.
Source: academia.edu
Link:https://www.academia.edu/99067452/GEIPAN_classification_with_text_mining_and_machine_learning
16.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: missions methodes et resultats
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/missions-methodes-et-resultats
17.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/stats
18.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/node/412
19.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/1989-01-01162?field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_classification_des_cas&page=4%2C17&sort=desc
20.
Source: topito.com
Title: 10h26Top 10 des observations d’OVNI non élucidées en France d
Link:https://www.topito.com/top-observations-ovni-non-elucidees-france
21.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/1981-10-08550
22.
Source: ufologie.patrickgross.org
Link:https://ufologie.patrickgross.org/1954/27sep1954fecampf.htm
23.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/1998-09-01712
24.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/1989-11-01192
25.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2005-11-01849
26.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B0%5D=12&order=field_departement_textuel&page=55&sort=asc
27.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/node/58788
28.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: Questionnaire terre R29
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/Questionnaire%20terre-R29.pdf
29.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/what-did-i-see/step-1
30.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/en/search/cas?field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_valu_valu=04-23&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation_textuel&page=%2C426&sort=desc
31.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=c&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=123&sort=asc
32.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=1&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation&page=5%2C0&sort=asc
33.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas?field_agregation_index_value=Gard&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date&page=%2C51&sort=asc
34.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_date_value=2007-03-01&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date&page=9&sort=asc
35.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=c&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation&page=119&sort=desc
36.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/1976-06-00306?field_agregation_index_value=06&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation&page=%2C96&sort=asc
37.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: methodologie classification geipan
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/actualites/methodologie-classification-geipan
38.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/glossaire
39.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: baisse cas d
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/actualites/baisse-cas-d
40.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/actualites/evolution-classification-des-cas
41.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/histoire-du-geipan
42.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/search/cas
43.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: geipan revisite cas
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/actualites/geipan-revisite-cas
44.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?field_date_valu_valu=04-23&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation&page=28&sort=asc
45.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: export cas pub 20251127093552.csv
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/save_json_import_files/export_cas_pub_20251127093552.csv
46.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=c&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_classification_des_cas&page=17&sort=desc
47.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B0%5D=12&order=field_departement_textuel&page=9&sort=desc
48.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?field_date_valu_valu=04-23&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=25&sort=desc
49.
Source: ufologie.patrickgross.org
Link:https://ufologie.patrickgross.org/1954/summer1954lehavref.htm
50.
Source: ufologie.patrickgross.org
Link:https://ufologie.patrickgross.org/1954/12mars1954rouenf.htm
51.
Source: ufologie.patrickgross.org
Link:https://www.ufologie.patrickgross.org/1954/28sep1954fecampf.htm
52.
Source: ufologie.patrickgross.org
Link:https://ufologie.patrickgross.org/1954/summer1954lehavre2f.htm
53.
Source: ufologie.patrickgross.org
Link:https://ufologie.patrickgross.org/1954/1954f.htm
54.
Source: Wikipedia
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GEIPAN
55.
Source: uapedia.ai
Link:https://uapedia.ai/wiki/geipan-frances-official-uap-unit/
56.
Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hn2xTieploU
57.
Source: academieairespace.com
Link:https://academieairespace.com/event/geipan-studies-uaps-ufos/?lang=en
58.
Source: newspaceeconomy.ca
Title: GEIPA N: Frances UAP Investigation Unit
Link:https://newspaceeconomy.ca/2025/07/29/geipan-frances-uap-investigation-unit/
Additional References
59.
Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rVDxsz0zVTc
60.
Source: youtube.com
Title: France’s Military Planned to Contact the “Watchers” — Pentagon UFO Files Part 2
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wGoa2yYOaWg
61.
Source: youtube.com
Title: UFO Reverse Engineering, Crash Retrievals, and the Pentagon’s New Files
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ecEY2xNFzPw
62.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Meeting France’s UFO detectives
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zczcBLukQ6s
63.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/Rouenenphoto/posts/museedesbeauxarts-louis-bouilhet-est-un-po%C3%A8te-fran%C3%A7ais-n%C3%A9-%C3%A0-cany-le-27-mai-1821-/1527238715433277/
64.
Source: gettyimages.co.jp
Link:https://www.gettyimages.co.jp/%E5%86%99%E7%9C%9F/estelle-lef%C3%A9bure-hallyday
65.
Source: instagram.com
Link:https://www.instagram.com/p/DZN5uzcN_GA/
66.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/www.defimedia.info/posts/ph%C3%A9nom%C3%A8ne-impressionnant-vu-de-gris-grisune-internaute-nous-a-fait-parvenir-une-/748748940610736/
67.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/FRANCE24.English/posts/-franceinfocus-is-there-anybody-out-there-in-france-an-organisation-exists-whose/860539629578748/
68.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/groups/southwestfrance/posts/1342464920438589/
Topic Tree
Follow this branch
Related pages 95
- Manche UFOs
- Ariege UFOs
- Correze UFOs
- Dordogne UFOs
- Hautes Pyrenees UFOs
- +90 more in sidebar