Within Haute Corse UFOs
Why the Early 1980 s Cases Still Matter
The early 1980s Haute-Corse cases show how striking witness stories can remain unresolved mainly because the record is too thin.
On this page
- Favalello, Vezzani and Borgo in sequence
- What witnesses said and what GEIPAN could test
- Why class C is not the same as proof
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
The early 1980s sighting cluster in Haute-Corse matters less because it proves a hidden mystery and more because it shows how quickly a small set of striking stories can become difficult to evaluate. Between March 1980 and August 1981, GEIPAN’s public record for the department includes Favalello, Vezzani and Borgo: one case judged probably explained by Venus, followed by two class C cases left unresolved because the information was not strong enough to test properly. A fourth nearby early-1980s case, Vescovato in May 1983, fits the same pattern of vivid testimony but weak evidential footing.[Geipan+3Geipan+3Geipan]cnes-geipan.frGeipanFAVALELLO (2B) 03.03.19803 Mar 1980 — Le 03 mars 1980 à partir 20h 45 des témoins dans un véhicule aperçoivent au-dessus des crêtes…
For a Haute-Corse UFO history, that is the real lesson. These cases are not official “unknowns after investigation”. They are mostly older gendarmerie-era reports with limited corroboration, no recovered physical evidence, and often no independent records such as photographs, radar data, aviation traces or multiple separated witness groups. GEIPAN’s own classification system is important here: class B means “probably identified”, while class C means “not identified due to lack of data or information”, not a confirmed extraordinary object.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
The small cluster that defines Haute-Corse’s early record
Haute-Corse has only a modest public GEIPAN footprint. A department-level index derived from GEIPAN data lists five cases for Haute-Corse overall: two class B cases, three class C cases and no class D cases. The early 1980s dominate that list: Favalello on 3 March 1980, Vezzani on 27 April 1980, Borgo on 3 August 1981 and Vescovato on 8 May 1983.[CarteOvni.fr]carteovni.frOpen source on carteovni.fr.
That tight dating can look like a “flap” at first glance, but the files do not support a strong claim of a coordinated wave. The observations differ in setting, description and evidential strength. Favalello was a night-time observation from a moving vehicle along a winding route. Vezzani was a close-range report of a red-orange luminous ball near a house. Borgo involved a low-altitude object seen briefly near the ground. Vescovato described a night sky observation under fog-bank conditions.[Geipan+3Geipan+3Geipan]cnes-geipan.frGeipanFAVALELLO (2B) 03.03.19803 Mar 1980 — Le 03 mars 1980 à partir 20h 45 des témoins dans un véhicule aperçoivent au-dessus des crêtes…
The value of treating them as a cluster is comparative, not sensational. Read together, they show three different outcomes that often get blurred in popular retellings: a likely astronomical misperception, a close-range story that remains poorly testable, and a dramatic low-altitude account with too little follow-up evidence to bear much weight.
Favalello: a memorable chase that became a Venus case
The Favalello case began on 3 March 1980 at about 20:45, when witnesses travelling by car reported a luminous phenomenon above the ridges. GEIPAN’s summary says the witnesses described a bright object, apparently low in the night sky, which seemed to follow or match the movement of their vehicle over roughly 12 kilometres. They stopped, heard no noise and detected no smell, then later went to the gendarmerie to give a statement.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frGeipanFAVALELLO (2B) 03.03.19803 Mar 1980 — Le 03 mars 1980 à partir 20h 45 des témoins dans un véhicule aperçoivent au-dessus des crêtes…
As a story, Favalello has the ingredients that make an observation feel compelling to witnesses: night, mountain ridges, a moving car, changing sightlines, silence, and the impression that the light was reacting to the vehicle. GEIPAN’s later assessment, however, points in a more ordinary direction. The route between Favalello and Corte is described as very winding, and GEIPAN notes that Venus was particularly visible at the time, low on the horizon, with a listed magnitude of -4.10. On that interpretation, the light could appear and disappear along the ridge line as the car moved, creating the impression of pursuit or synchronised motion.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frGeipanFAVALELLO (2B) 03.03.19803 Mar 1980 — Le 03 mars 1980 à partir 20h 45 des témoins dans un véhicule aperçoivent au-dessus des crêtes…
This is why Favalello is central to the early 1980s cluster even though it is not unresolved in the strongest sense. It demonstrates the gap between an honest witness impression and a robust identification problem. A bright planet low on the horizon can look unusually large, steady and strangely positioned, especially in broken terrain. GEIPAN therefore classifies Favalello as class B, with the type of phenomenon recorded as Venus.[geipan.fr]geipan.frOpen source on geipan.fr.
The case also cautions against turning every detailed sighting into stronger evidence. Favalello had several witnesses and a prompt gendarmerie statement, yet the combination of route geometry, horizon effects and astronomical visibility was enough for GEIPAN to prefer a probable explanation. That does not imply the witnesses invented the experience; it means the experience can be explained without treating the reported object as a physical craft.
Vezzani: the close-range story that evidence could not carry
Vezzani, dated 27 April 1980, is more puzzling in narrative terms. GEIPAN describes a witness preparing to return home at around 00:30 when a red-orange ball, roughly the size of a football, approached and stopped about five metres from the house. The object was said to shine strongly with a metallic brightness. Other people in the house were woken and also saw the luminous ball, but the witnesses became frightened and went back inside. The next day, no suspicious trace was found in front of the door.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frGeipanVEZZANI (2B) 1980Obsevation d'une boule lumineuse au sol. Description. Le 27 avril 1980 un témoin observe un phénomène particulier…
The testimony page adds details that make the case feel dramatic but also show its limits. The recorded observation was close, silent, stationary and orange or fire-coloured, with an apparent size compared to a football. Yet the weather is listed as unknown, the environmental effect is unknown or unspecified, and the classification is class C for lack of reliable information.[geipan.fr]geipan.frOpen source on geipan.fr.
Vezzani therefore sits in a difficult category. It is not easily reduced to the same kind of horizon-planet explanation as Favalello, because the reported distance and location are very different. But it also lacks the supporting material needed to move beyond a strange anecdote: no trace, no instrument record, no photograph, no clearly testable trajectory, and no wider set of independent reports found by the investigation. GEIPAN’s own description ends by saying no other testimony was collected and that information was lacking.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frGeipanVEZZANI (2B) 1980Obsevation d'une boule lumineuse au sol. Description. Le 27 avril 1980 un témoin observe un phénomène particulier…
That is the distinction readers often miss. A class C case can be more narratively unusual than a class B case, but weaker as evidence. Vezzani remains interesting because it shows what a close-range account looks like when it cannot be independently checked. Its weakness is not that the witnesses were necessarily unreliable; it is that the file gives later investigators too little to discriminate between a rare atmospheric, optical, human, local or genuinely unidentified cause.
Borgo: a low-altitude object without enough cross-checks
Borgo, on 3 August 1981, extends the early cluster beyond 1980. GEIPAN records that at about 22:55 a witness observed an object for around 40 seconds at less than 400 metres away. The object was said to fly very slowly and close to the ground, lighting the landscape with a halo as it passed. It was described as rounded towards the front, emitting a large multicoloured flame, and moving east to west with a slight downward inclination. The witness reportedly feared it would hit the mountain, but no impact sound followed.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frGeipanBORGO (2B) 03.08.1981le 3 Août 1981 vers 22h 55 un témoin observe durant environ 40 secondes et à moins de 400m de lui, un objet vo…
On paper, Borgo is the most aviation-like of the three early cases: a moving object, a trajectory, low altitude, flame-like emission and concern about collision with terrain. Yet GEIPAN classifies it as class C, with the phenomenon type given as lack of reliable information. The reason is direct: during the investigation, no additional information was gathered that would allow an explanation to be established.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frGeipanBORGO (2B) 03.08.1981le 3 Août 1981 vers 22h 55 un témoin observe durant environ 40 secondes et à moins de 400m de lui, un objet vo…
That makes Borgo an important weak-evidence case rather than a strong “unknown”. A 40-second observation can be sincere and still be hard to reconstruct decades later. To test such a report properly, investigators would ideally need precise location, viewing direction, angular elevation, weather, aircraft activity, possible firework or flare activity, military or civil aviation records, and independent witnesses along the claimed path. The public summary does not show that kind of corroborating framework.
Borgo is also a useful warning against reading cinematic detail as evidential strength. The “multicoloured flame” and low flight path make the account vivid, but they do not by themselves establish what was seen. A file can be strange in description and still weak in consistency. GEIPAN’s class C label reflects that mismatch.
Vescovato shows the pattern lasted beyond 1981
Although the core sequence is Favalello, Vezzani and Borgo, the Vescovato case of 8 May 1983 belongs in the same early-1980s evidence pattern. GEIPAN lists it in Haute-Corse as class C, again with the phenomenon type recorded as lack of reliable information. One testimony page places the observation around 22:30 to 23:00 and notes fog banks as the weather condition.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frGeipanLORETO-DI-CASINCA (2B) 08.05.1983 T3VESCOVATO (2B) 1983. Observation date. 08/05/1983. region. Corse. Department. Haute-Corse. Clas…
Vescovato matters because it prevents the cluster from being reduced to a neat two-year story. The department’s early record did not suddenly produce a well-investigated landmark case after Borgo. Instead, it produced another file that remained in the same weakly resolved category. In department-level terms, that is a pattern: not repeated official confirmation of unexplained craft, but repeated difficulty converting witness reports into testable evidence.
The fog-bank detail is especially important for cautious reading. It does not explain the case by itself, but it signals that visibility and atmospheric conditions may have been part of the observation problem. When a sighting depends on night-time shape, light, apparent windows or surface features, poor visibility can make later reconstruction far less reliable.
What witnesses said and what GEIPAN could test
The early 1980s cases are best read as a comparison between testimony and testability. The witnesses gave accounts that were concrete enough to preserve: a light apparently tracking a car near Favalello, a red-orange ball near a Vezzani house, a low flying object with flame-like features near Borgo, and a later Vescovato report under imperfect visibility. The problem is that the strongest details are mostly perceptual details, not independent measurements.[Geipan+3Geipan+3Geipan]cnes-geipan.frGeipanFAVALELLO (2B) 03.03.19803 Mar 1980 — Le 03 mars 1980 à partir 20h 45 des témoins dans un véhicule aperçoivent au-dessus des crêtes…
GEIPAN’s role is not simply to collect strange stories. CNES describes GEIPAN as the French public body that collects, analyses and archives reports of unidentified aerospace phenomena, working with partners including the gendarmerie, police, air and space forces, CNRS and Météo-France. Its process includes collecting eyewitness accounts, conducting technical studies and publishing analysis reports while protecting witness anonymity.[CNES]cnes.frOpen source on cnes.fr.
For this cluster, the available public outcomes show what could and could not be tested:
- Favalello could be checked against astronomy and geography. The route, the winding road, the ridge line and Venus’s position gave GEIPAN a plausible explanatory path.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frGeipanFAVALELLO (2B) 03.03.19803 Mar 1980 — Le 03 mars 1980 à partir 20h 45 des témoins dans un véhicule aperçoivent au-dessus des crêtes…
- Vezzani had a dramatic proximity claim but little external support. The lack of traces and absence of further collected testimony left the case unresolved for lack of information.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frGeipanVEZZANI (2B) 1980Obsevation d'une boule lumineuse au sol. Description. Le 27 avril 1980 un témoin observe un phénomène particulier…
- Borgo had a trajectory-like description but no confirming data. GEIPAN says no other information was obtained during the investigation that would allow an explanation.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frGeipanBORGO (2B) 03.08.1981le 3 Août 1981 vers 22h 55 un témoin observe durant environ 40 secondes et à moins de 400m de lui, un objet vo…
- Vescovato remained in the same class C evidential zone. The file is listed as lacking reliable information, with fog banks noted in the testimony context.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frGeipanLORETO-DI-CASINCA (2B) 08.05.1983 T3VESCOVATO (2B) 1983. Observation date. 08/05/1983. region. Corse. Department. Haute-Corse. Clas…
This is why the early Haute-Corse record is more useful as a lesson in evidence grading than as a catalogue of mysteries. The cases survive because they were reported; they remain limited because the reports were not enough.
Why class C is not the same as proof
The most important interpretive point is simple: class C does not mean “unexplained despite a strong investigation”. GEIPAN defines class C as a phenomenon not identified because of a lack of data or information. Class D is the category for a phenomenon not identified after investigation.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
That distinction changes how the Haute-Corse early 1980s cluster should be understood. Vezzani, Borgo and Vescovato are not official proof that unknown craft operated over Haute-Corse. They are cases where the records were not strong enough to support a firm ordinary explanation, but also not strong enough to support a robust extraordinary conclusion. Favalello, by contrast, shows that even a memorable multi-witness experience can be downgraded once astronomy and viewing geometry are considered.[Geipan+3Geipan+3Geipan]cnes-geipan.frGeipanFAVALELLO (2B) 03.03.19803 Mar 1980 — Le 03 mars 1980 à partir 20h 45 des témoins dans un véhicule aperçoivent au-dessus des crêtes…
This also helps explain why the cluster still matters. Weak evidence is not useless evidence. It tells researchers where the archive is thin, what kinds of observation were being reported, and how official French investigators separated probable identifications from under-documented reports. It also helps readers avoid two common mistakes: dismissing every witness account as worthless, or treating every unresolved file as confirmation of something extraordinary.
What would strengthen or weaken the cluster today
Later reporting has not, on the public record, turned the early 1980s Haute-Corse cases into stronger landmark incidents. The department-level summary still shows zero class D cases, with the early 1980s files split between one probable explanation and several lack-of-information classifications.[CarteOvni.fr]carteovni.frOpen source on carteovni.fr.
The cluster would become more significant if new material emerged that connected the reports independently: local press accounts from the same nights, additional witness statements from separated locations, aviation or military logs, weather records, photographs, or documentation of physical traces collected at the time. GEIPAN’s classification guidance also leaves room for revisiting class C and D cases if new information is communicated after the initial investigation.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
At present, the opposite is truer: the passage of time weakens the cases as evidence. Memories fade, local context becomes harder to reconstruct, aircraft and weather records may be incomplete or harder to retrieve, and older files often lack the structured questionnaires, digital timestamps and image metadata that modern investigations can use. That does not erase the sightings. It narrows what can responsibly be claimed about them.
The lasting value of a weak cluster
The early 1980s Haute-Corse cluster is worth keeping in the department’s UFO history precisely because it is modest. It contains no official class D case, no famous landing, no radar-confirmed chase and no public physical evidence. What it offers instead is a compact lesson in how UFO archives work when the evidence is uneven.
Favalello shows how a puzzling road sighting can become a likely Venus case. Vezzani shows how a close-range luminous-ball story can remain unresolved because it lacks supporting data. Borgo shows how a dramatic low-altitude account can still be too thin to explain confidently. Vescovato shows that the same evidential weakness continued into 1983 rather than building into a stronger confirmed pattern.[Geipan+3Geipan+3Geipan]cnes-geipan.frGeipanFAVALELLO (2B) 03.03.19803 Mar 1980 — Le 03 mars 1980 à partir 20h 45 des témoins dans un véhicule aperçoivent au-dessus des crêtes…
For readers trying to understand Haute-Corse rather than chase folklore, that is the main takeaway: the early 1980s cases still matter, but not because they prove an extraordinary presence over the department. They matter because they show the difference between an arresting witness story, a probably identified phenomenon, and an official file that remains open-ended mainly because too little reliable information survived.<section class="further-reading-section" data-page-toc-exclude aria-labelledby="further-reading-title"><div class="fr-section-shell"><div class="fr-section-header"><div class="fr-section-heading"><p class="fr-section-kicker">Amazon book picks</p><h3 class="fr-heading" id="further-reading-title">Further Reading</h3></div><p class="fr-intro">Books and field guides related to Why the Early 1980 s Cases Still Matter. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.</p></div><div class="fr-books-grid"><article class="fr-book-card">Book<div class="fr-book-info"><h4 class="fr-book-title">UFOs</h4><p class="fr-book-author">By Leslie Kean</p><p class="fr-book-desc">Focuses on documented cases, official records, and evidential standards similar to the themes in French UFO file analysis.</p><div class="fr-book-actions">
See on Amazon</div></div></article><article class="fr-book-card">Book
<div class="fr-book-info"><h4 class="fr-book-title">The Report on Unidentified Flying Objects</h4><p class="fr-book-author">By Edward J. Ruppelt</p><p class="fr-book-desc">Examines how investigators assess witness reports, evidence quality, and unresolved cases.</p><div class="fr-book-actions">
See on Amazon</div></div></article><article class="fr-book-card">Book
<div class="fr-book-info"><h4 class="fr-book-title">The UFO Experience</h4><p class="fr-book-author">By Joseph Allen Hynek</p><p class="fr-book-desc">Explains case classification, investigation methods, and the difference between identified and unidentified reports.</p><div class="fr-book-actions">
See on Amazon</div></div></article><article class="fr-book-card">Book
<div class="fr-book-info"><h4 class="fr-book-title">The Believing Brain</h4><p class="fr-book-author">By Michael Shermer</p><p class="fr-book-desc">Explains how perception, pattern recognition, and misinterpretation can create extraordinary sighting reports.</p><div class="fr-book-actions">
See on Amazon</div></div></article></div><div class="fr-section-footer"><div class="fr-browse-links" aria-label="Browse more on Amazon">Browse more on Amazon:UFOsThe Report on Unidentified Flying ObjectsThe UFO Experience</div><p class="fr-disclosure">As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.</p></div></div></section><section class="further-reading-section" data-page-toc-exclude data-ebay-localized-links data-ebay-visual-market="EBAY_GB" aria-labelledby="merchant-block-title"><div class="fr-section-shell"><div class="fr-section-header"><div class="fr-section-heading"><p class="fr-section-kicker">eBay marketplace picks</p><h3 class="fr-heading" id="merchant-block-title">Marketplace Samples</h3></div><p class="fr-intro">Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.</p><div class="fr-ebay-market-toolbar"><div class="fr-ebay-market-picker">UsingUSA<div class="fr-ebay-market-menu" data-ebay-market-menu role="listbox" hidden></div></div></div></div><div class="fr-ebay-market-panel" data-ebay-market-panel="EBAY_GB" data-ebay-market-default="1"><div class="fr-books-grid"><article class="fr-book-card">
<div class="fr-book-info"><p class="fr-book-kicker">Example eBay listing</p><h4 class="fr-book-title">I Want To Believe Ufo Television Series - Canvas - Framed or Poster Available</h4>SearcheBay.co.uk: UFO poster<div class="fr-book-actions">
Browse similar oneBay.co.uk</div></div></article><article class="fr-book-card">
<div class="fr-book-info"><p class="fr-book-kicker">Example eBay listing</p><h4 class="fr-book-title">The X Files Ufo Minimal Movie Art Print | Film Poster | Canvas & Framed</h4>SearcheBay.co.uk: UFO poster<div class="fr-book-actions">
Browse similar oneBay.co.uk</div></div></article><article class="fr-book-card">
<div class="fr-book-info"><p class="fr-book-kicker">Example eBay listing</p><h4 class="fr-book-title">I WANT TO BELIEVE UFO POSTER TV SERIES POSTER A0-A1-A2-A3-A4-A5-A6-MAXI 191</h4>SearcheBay.co.uk: UFO poster<div class="fr-book-actions">
Browse similar oneBay.co.uk</div></div></article><article class="fr-book-card">
<div class="fr-book-info"><p class="fr-book-kicker">Example eBay listing</p><h4 class="fr-book-title">Disclosure Day Alien UFO Poster Set A3 - Set of 3 – Space Sci-Fi Wall Art Prints</h4>SearcheBay.co.uk: UFO poster<div class="fr-book-actions">
Browse similar oneBay.co.uk</div></div></article></div><div class="fr-section-footer">
Browse more oneBay.co.uk<p class="fr-disclosure">Example items shown for inspiration; availability and pricing can change. Branchoria may earn a commission if you purchase through outbound eBay links.</p></div></div></div></section>
Endnotes
1.
Source: carteovni.fr
Link:https://carteovni.fr/departement/haute-corse
2.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/fr/temoignage/3603
3.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/fr/temoignage/3106
4.
Source: cnes.fr
Link:https://cnes.fr/en/projects/geipan
5.
Source: carteovni.fr
Title: borgo 2b
Link:https://carteovni.fr/commune/borgo-2b
6.
Source: vescovato.fr
Link:https://vescovato.fr/decouvrir-la-commune/histoire/
7.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/sites/default/files/15_VALLEE_full.pdf
8.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=orange&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date&page=21&sort=asc
9.
Source: youtube.com
Link:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2j_HRCxt9sM
10.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/1980-03-00746
11.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/en/node/48555?page=%2C467&undefined=
12.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/node/49043
13.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/en/node/49382
14.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/node/412
15.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/node/58788
16.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: export cas pub 20251127093552.csv
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/save_json_import_files/export_cas_pub_20251127093552.csv
17.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=06&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=17&sort=asc
18.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/Compte%20rendu%20enquete399.pdf
19.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/Compte%20rendu%20enquete9.pdf
20.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/Compte%20rendu%20enquete6.pdf
21.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/faq-page
22.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B0%5D=13&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B1%5D=14&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=35&select-category-export=nothing&sort=desc
23.
Source: Wikipedia
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GEIPAN
24.
Source: academia.edu
Link:https://www.academia.edu/99067452/GEIPAN_classification_with_text_mining_and_machine_learning
25.
Source: uapedia.ai
Link:https://uapedia.ai/wiki/geipan-frances-official-uap-unit/
26.
Source: newspaceeconomy.ca
Title: GEIPA N: Frances UAP Investigation Unit
Link:https://newspaceeconomy.ca/2025/07/29/geipan-frances-uap-investigation-unit/
Additional References
27.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Audio Blog: Two UFO Occupant Cases From France
Link:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DgL_A0j5vvg
28.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Meeting France’s UFO detectives • FRANCE 24 English
Link:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zczcBLukQ6s
29.
Source: youtube.com
Title: France’s Official UFO Investigation Agency (GEIPAN)
Link:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lXi5B0NTwVc
30.
Source: youtube.com
Link:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k5_j6Z-HIX4
31.
Source: researchgate.net
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/369507030_GEIPAN_classification_with_text_mining_and_machine_learning
32.
Source: inspirehep.net
Link:https://inspirehep.net/literature/1253027
33.
Source: ufsn.dk
Link:https://ufsn.dk/media/ibkemt5i/le-dtr-denmarks-economic-vulnerability-to-a-loss-of-satellite-based-pnt-final-report-sent2client060219.pdf
34.
Source: ustrcr.cz
Link:https://www.ustrcr.cz/uvod/popraveni-plotzensee/
35.
Source: vandenhoeck-ruprecht-verlage.com
Link:https://www.vandenhoeck-ruprecht-verlage.com/themen-entdecken/altertumswissenschaft/graezistik/58790/frc-5-2-pherekrates-frr-43-84?srsltid=AfmBOorcglEBTiKlMhpSUgpRMNG77HuU5-UvDBlHouMrnHvZ8W28DsOq
36.
Source: unfccc.int
Link:https://unfccc.int/resource/tet/bl/bl3-02_u_l3_att2.pdf
Topic Tree