Within Aube UFOs
Was Mailly le Camp A Classic UFO Case?
The 1954 Mailly-le-Camp report shows how a dramatic military-era UFO story became a probable sunset-lit aircraft case.
On this page
- The military camp setting and witness account
- Why the sighting sounded dramatic at first
- How the aircraft explanation changed the case
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
Mailly-le-Camp is Aube’s earliest prominent official UFO file, but it is not a strong surviving mystery. The sighting took place at the military camp on 27 October 1954, during the famous French saucer wave, and it first sounded impressive because the main witness was a colonel, the setting was military, and the object was described as a brilliant metallic-looking segment in the clear evening sky. GEIPAN, the French space-agency unit that now publishes and classifies unidentified aerospace reports, lists the case as category B: a phenomenon probably identified after investigation, with the specific explanation “aircraft”.[geipan.fr]geipan.frOpen source on geipan.fr.
The case matters because it shows a pattern that recurs in Aube’s UFO history: a dramatic first account becomes less exotic when timing, viewing geometry and witness uncertainty are weighed together. At Mailly, the crucial detail is that the object appeared just after sunset, slightly north of the setting sun, and the witness himself considered a likely explanation: an aircraft turning while lit from below by the low sun.[geipan.fr]geipan.frOpen source on geipan.fr.
The military-camp setting and witness account
Mailly-le-Camp was not an ordinary village backdrop. The military camp, created in 1902, is a large training area associated with French land-force exercises and military history; the present local description places it between Reims and Troyes, shared between Aube and Marne, and covering roughly 12,000 hectares.[maillylecamp.fr]maillylecamp.frcoordonnees du camp militairecoordonnees du camp militaire That setting explains why later UFO retellings gave the case more weight than a routine roadside light: witnesses at a military site, especially those linked with aviation or weapons testing, sound at first like unusually competent observers.
GEIPAN’s file says that two people, including a colonel, saw the object at about 17:45 on Wednesday 27 October 1954 at the camp. The observation was brief. The object was described as a very bright segment against a blue-green clear sky, slightly north of the setting sun, two to three minutes after sunset. It was placed between about 45 and 20 degrees above the horizon, apparently motionless for 10 to 15 seconds, with a total viewing time of 25 to 30 seconds.[geipan.fr]geipan.frOpen source on geipan.fr.
The archived witness page adds a few useful limits. GEIPAN records the witness as male, the environment as agricultural land, the local time as 17:45, the frame of reference as the sky, and the number of observed phenomena as one. It also records unknown or unspecified data for weather, distance, apparent speed, noise and environmental effects.[geipan.fr]geipan.frOpen source on geipan.fr. Those missing fields matter. They do not make the witness unreliable, but they do make the case hard to use as evidence for anything more unusual than a visual misidentification.
The original Ministry of Air observation form, preserved as a scan in GEIPAN’s documents, is especially revealing. It records the witness’s rank as colonel, the local time as 17:45, the place as Camp de Mailly, and the reported sunset time as 17:38 local. It also shows the report’s structured prompts: direction, duration, angular height, apparent size, shape, brightness and colour.[geipan.fr]geipan.frOpen source on geipan.fr. In other words, this was not merely a newspaper anecdote. It entered an official reporting channel, but the information captured was still sparse, partly handwritten and partly difficult to read.
Why the sighting sounded dramatic at first
Mailly belongs to the autumn 1954 French saucer wave, a period when reports of discs, cigars, lights and landed craft circulated heavily in France. The broader 1954 wave is often treated by UFO writers as the first large European UFO wave, and one strongly associated with French reports.[Academia]academia.eduThe Worldwide UFO Wave of 1954The Worldwide UFO Wave of 1954 That context made any late-October sighting easier to absorb into a national story about unusual objects in the sky.
The Mailly account also had three features that made it memorable:
- A military witness. The report was associated with a colonel, and later secondary accounts emphasised military and technical competence. GEIPAN’s case page confirms that only the colonel’s testimony was collected in the observation report, which is an important narrowing of the evidence.[geipan.fr]geipan.frOpen source on geipan.fr.
- A strange shape. The object was not described as a simple point of light. It was a brilliant segment, apparently metallic, inclined about 30 degrees from the vertical, and later reduced to a point before disappearing.[geipan.fr]geipan.frOpen source on geipan.fr.
- A military-camp location. Mailly’s long role as a major training site gives the story an aviation-and-defence flavour, especially because the camp had been used for military training for decades.[Terre Defense]terre.defense.gouv.frlhistoire du camp mailly du centaclhistoire du camp mailly du centac
Those details explain why the case survived in UFO catalogues. Patrick Gross’s 1954 case catalogue preserves not only the GEIPAN summary but also later references by Charles Garreau and Raymond Lavier, who treated the quality of the witnesses as a reason to take the sighting seriously.[Ufologie]ufologie.patrickgross.orgOpen source on patrickgross.org. The case therefore sits at the intersection of official paperwork, saucer-wave culture and military credibility.
But credibility is not the same as identification. A trained observer can still be surprised by an object seen briefly in unusual lighting. In fact, a trained observer may give a better report of the exact conditions that point to an ordinary explanation. At Mailly, the sunset geometry is not a side detail; it is the centre of the case.
The sunset problem at the heart of the case
The strongest mundane explanation is not a generic “it was probably a plane” dismissal. It is a specific optical scenario: an aircraft, possibly turning, reflecting the low sun after sunset in a way that made its fuselage or underside appear as a bright segment.
GEIPAN’s own description says the object appeared two to three minutes after sunset, slightly north of the setting sun, against a clear sky. It then notes that the witness thought he had probably seen an aircraft in a turn, illuminated from below by the setting sun. GEIPAN’s conclusion is category B, meaning a probable identification: aircraft lit by the setting sun.[geipan.fr]geipan.frOpen source on geipan.fr.
That explanation fits several features better than a solid exotic craft would:<div class="content-enhancement content-enhancement--insight-grid" markdown="1">
- The short duration fits a reflective alignment that lasts only while the aircraft, sun and observer are in the right geometry.
- The bright segment fits a fuselage or wing surface catching sunlight while other parts of the aircraft remain hard to see.
- The apparent change into a point fits a turn or change of reflection angle, where an elongated glint collapses visually into a smaller bright highlight.
- The silence and lack of effects fit a distant aircraft rather than a nearby object over the camp.</div>
GEIPAN has used similar reasoning in later cases where aircraft surfaces reflected low sun. In a 2014 Paris case, for example, GEIPAN identified a brief, dazzling white object as sunlight reflected from an Airbus fuselage, noting that the aircraft’s orientation was ideal for reflection while the wings were much less visible.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr. That later case does not prove Mailly, but it shows the mechanism GEIPAN has in mind: a real aircraft can look like a detached, brilliant object when only the reflecting part is visible.
The original observation form’s advice also points toward a cautious reading. The printed instructions warn observers to estimate only angular values for size, height and movement, because any other estimate is likely to be impossible or wrong; they also warn about reflections and refractions of luminous objects.[geipan.fr]geipan.frOpen source on geipan.fr. Mailly’s report contains angular estimates, but not enough supporting data to reconstruct a flight path or identify a particular aircraft.
How the aircraft explanation changed the case
The aircraft explanation changes Mailly from a “classic UFO case” into a useful historical control case. It remains interesting, but mainly because it shows how an apparently strong UFO story can weaken when the witness’s own interpretation and the lighting conditions are kept in view.
GEIPAN’s classification system is important here. A category B case is not a fully nailed-down identification; it means the phenomenon was probably identified after investigation. Category A is reserved for a perfectly identified phenomenon, category C for cases left unidentified through lack of information, and category D for cases still unidentified after investigation.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr. Mailly is therefore not “debunked beyond all doubt”, but it is also not an unresolved official UFO case in GEIPAN’s sense.
What the military angle does, and does not, prove
The word “military” can mislead readers in two opposite ways. Believers may treat it as near-proof, because military witnesses are assumed to be expert sky observers. Sceptics may treat it as irrelevant, because even experts make mistakes. The better reading is narrower: the military setting improves the seriousness of the report, but it does not override the physical circumstances of the sighting.
The report’s setting is genuinely relevant. Mailly was a major camp; the witness was recorded as a colonel; later accounts connected the group with technical or aviation-related activity; and the report reached an Air Ministry observation form rather than surviving only as hearsay.[geipan.fr]geipan.frOpen source on geipan.fr. These points explain why the case has a place in Aube’s UFO history.
Yet the same file also carries its own limiting evidence. The witness’s probable-aircraft suggestion appears directly in GEIPAN’s description and in the archived transcription of the report.[geipan.fr]geipan.frOpen source on geipan.fr. This is unusual compared with many later UFO narratives, where sceptical explanation is added from outside. At Mailly, the ordinary explanation is already inside the case.
That is why the most balanced assessment is not “soldiers saw a UFO over a military camp”. It is: a military witness reported a brief, striking, sunset-adjacent object at Mailly-le-Camp, and the surviving official file supports a probable aircraft reflection rather than an unexplained craft.
What Mailly adds to Aube’s UFO history
Within Aube, Mailly-le-Camp is valuable because it sets the tone for much of the department’s official record. The case has the ingredients of a dramatic UFO story — 1954, military personnel, a brilliant object, an official file — but the final classification points back to a familiar source of misidentification. GEIPAN’s Aube listing places Mailly as a category B aircraft case, alongside later Aube entries explained as Venus, Sirius, Thai lanterns or other ordinary phenomena.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
That does not make the case worthless. On the contrary, it is one of the best Aube examples for showing how evidence should be read:<div class="content-enhancement content-enhancement--metric" markdown="1">
- The witness status raises the reporting value, but does not settle the interpretation.
- The 1954 wave context explains why the case was remembered, but does not make it stranger.
- The official paperwork preserves useful detail, but also shows missing data and uncertainty.
- The sunset timing is decisive, because it gives the aircraft-reflection explanation real explanatory power.</div>
For a department-level UFO history, Mailly is therefore not a landmark mystery so much as a landmark correction. It is the oldest prominent Aube file in the official record, but its importance lies in how the extraordinary reading faded. The most durable lesson is that a short-lived bright shape seen near sunset, even by a military witness, can be compelling at first glance and still be best understood as an aircraft caught in the last light of the sun.
Amazon book picks
Further Reading
Books and field guides related to Was Mailly le Camp A Classic UFO Case?. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.
The UFO Experience
Provides a framework for evaluating UFO reports and distinguishing strong cases from misidentifications.
UFOs
Explores how military and government witnesses affect perceptions of UFO cases, a key aspect of the Mailly-le-Camp story.
The Demon-Haunted World
Rating: 4.5/5 from 43 Google Books ratings
Encourages critical examination of extraordinary claims, aligning with the article's evidence-based treatment of UFO reports.
The UFO Encyclopedia
Places historic sightings such as those from the 1954 French wave into broader investigative context.
eBay marketplace picks
Marketplace Samples
Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.
Endnotes
1.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/fr/cas/1954-10-09243
2.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/fr/temoignage/87
3.
Source: maillylecamp.fr
Title: coordonnees du camp militaire
Link:https://www.maillylecamp.fr/pages/vivre-a-mailly/-coordonnees-du-camp-militaire.html
4.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/sites/default/files/PV%20n%C2%B0624%20%281954309673%29.pdf
5.
Source: academia.edu
Title: The Worldwide UFO Wave of 1954
Link:https://www.academia.edu/2261290/The_Worldwide_UFO_Wave_of_1954
6.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/en/search/cas?customGetLattitude=46.94358292648825&customGetLongitude=4.4989013671875&customGetZoom=7&field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id=All&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=49.11702904077932&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=44.77013681219717&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=7.668457031250001&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=1.329345703125&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=title&page=%2C196&sort=desc
7.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/sites/default/files/15_VALLEE_full.pdf
8.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation&page=1&select-category-export=nothing&sort=asc
9.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B12%5D=12&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=title&page=36&sort=desc
10.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=2004-04-23&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=154%2C0&sort=desc
11.
Source: academia.edu
Title: CUSSAC 1967 2007 By Jean Marc GILLOT
Link:https://www.academia.edu/41478441/CUSSAC_1967_2007_By_Jean_Marc_GILLOT
12.
Source: academia.edu
Link:https://www.academia.edu/99067452/GEIPAN_classification_with_text_mining_and_machine_learning
13.
Source: academia.edu
Link:https://www.academia.edu/12870685/NORWAY_IN_UFO_PHOTOGRAPHS_THE_FIRST_CATALOGUE
14.
Source: youtube.com
Title: UFOs: GEIPAN is working on the issue (Toulouse)
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nnOX-NXZFqE
15.
Source: youtube.com
Title: GEIPAN: Tout savoir sur les OVNIS et Phénomènes Aérospatiaux (PAN)
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CWt2zkuxRNQ
16.
Source: arcismaillyramerupt.fr
Link:https://arcismaillyramerupt.fr/commune/mailly-le-camp/
17.
Source: terre.defense.gouv.fr
Title: lhistoire du camp mailly du centac
Link:https://www.terre.defense.gouv.fr/centac/mieux-nous-connaitre/lhistoire-du-camp-mailly-du-centac
18.
Source: ufologie.patrickgross.org
Link:https://www.ufologie.patrickgross.org/1954/27oct1954maillylecampf.htm
19.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/en/node/56506
20.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/node/58788
21.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=12&sort=asc
22.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/search/cas?customGetLattitude=46.124763699209396&customGetLongitude=2.406005859375001&customGetZoom=6&field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=50.52739681329302&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=41.72213058512578&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=8.745117187500002&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=-3.9331054687500004&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation_textuel&page=%2C516&sort=asc&undefined=
23.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: export cas pub 20251127093552.csv
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/save_json_import_files/export_cas_pub_20251127093552.csv
24.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: baisse cas d
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/actualites/baisse-cas-d
25.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/node/412
26.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: Compte rendu enquete171
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/Compte%20rendu%20enquete171.pdf
27.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/missions-methodes-et-resultats
28.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/Compte%20rendu%20enquete411.pdf
29.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/what-did-i-see/step-1
30.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/Compte%20rendu%20enquete9.pdf
31.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/Compte%20rendu%20enquete365.pdf
32.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/node/58791
33.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: 2015 09 01 Spatial Point Pattern Analysis of the Unidentified
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/2015-09-01_Spatial_Point_Pattern_Analysis_of_the_Unidentified.pdf
34.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/stats
35.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/UFO_Waves.An_International_Bibliography__November__1_2015.pdf
36.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas?field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=116&order=field_date_d_observation&page=%2C262&select-category-export=nothing&sort=asc
37.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas?customGetLattitude=46.124763699209396&customGetLongitude=2.406005859375001&customGetZoom=6&field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=50.52739681329302&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=41.72213058512578&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=8.745117187500002&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=-3.9331054687500004&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation_textuel&page=%2C514&sort=asc&undefined=
38.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B12%5D=12&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_classification_des_cas&page=%2C163&sort=asc
39.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B12%5D=12&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B13%5D=13&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B14%5D=14&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B15%5D=15&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B16%5D=16&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=1&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_classification_des_cas&page=1%2C7&select-category-export=nothing&sort=asc&video=on
40.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?customGetLattitude=46.94358292648825&customGetLongitude=4.4989013671875&customGetZoom=7&field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=49.11702904077932&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=44.77013681219717&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=7.668457031250001&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=1.329345703125&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&page=59
41.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=c&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation_textuel&page=8&sort=asc
42.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/Aids_to_identification_of_flying_objects_0.pdf
43.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/qu-ai-je-vu/etape-1
44.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: Compte rendu enquete697
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/Compte%20rendu%20enquete697.pdf
45.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Mailly le Camp
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mailly-le-Camp
46.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Camp de Mailly
Link:https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camp_de_Mailly
47.
Source: internationalbcc.co.uk
Title: mailly le camp
Link:https://internationalbcc.co.uk/about-ibcc/news/mailly-le-camp/
48.
Source: uapedia.ai
Link:https://uapedia.ai/wiki/geipan-frances-official-uap-unit/
49.
Source: cnes.fr
Link:https://cnes.fr/en/projects/geipan
50.
Source: francearchives.gouv.fr
Link:https://francearchives.gouv.fr/facomponent/e233e37121060da37b17920f734038fed98ed1d3
Additional References
51.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Ancient Aliens: 300+”Flying Saucer” Incidents in France
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dcMrAX4zRwo
52.
Source: researchgate.net
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/369507030_GEIPAN_classification_with_text_mining_and_machine_learning
53.
Source: researchgate.net
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Trench-networks-within-the-military-camp-of-Mailly-le-Camp-delimited-by-a-green-line_fig4_358825987
54.
Source: alamy.com
Link:https://www.alamy.com/stock-photo/camp-mailly.html
55.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/aurignyairservices/posts/did-you-know-this-is-called-a-pilots-glory-a-rare-effect-caused-when-sunlight-sc/1373679104803774/
56.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/Page.VarMatin/posts/on-a-analys%C3%A9-cet-%C3%A9trange-ph%C3%A9nom%C3%A8ne/1471937501643950/
57.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/InternationalBomberCommandCentre/posts/on-the-3rd-may-this-year-the-town-of-mailly-le-camp-in-the-north-central-region-/1238992971668395/
58.
Source: reddit.com
Link:https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/wntr6c/this_is_the_accurate_representation_of_the/
59.
Source: reddit.com
Link:https://www.reddit.com/r/todayilearned/comments/1qa0lyb/til_that_france_has_a_dedicated_unit_to_finding/
60.
Source: lifeterrainsmilitaires.fr
Link:https://www.lifeterrainsmilitaires.fr/en/life-naturarmy-2/the-pilot-sites/the-champagne-camps/
Topic Tree