Page outline Jump by section
What the official Aisne record actually shows
The strongest starting point for Aisne is GEIPAN, the public French UAP archive run within CNES, the French space agency. GEIPAN says its mission is to collect, analyse, investigate, publish and archive reports of unidentified aerospace phenomena, not to prove extraterrestrial visitation or run a national air-defence service. Its classification system separates identified cases, probable identifications, cases lacking enough reliable information, and genuinely unexplained cases after investigation.[CNES]cnes.frOpen source on cnes.fr.
In the Aisne cases visible in GEIPAN’s case search, the published pattern is dominated by A, B and C classifications rather than D. In plain English, that means the archive is mostly made up of identified or probably identified events, plus reports that cannot be worked up properly because the data are too weak. The listed Aisne entries include, among others, Cuffies, Trélou-sur-Marne, Coulonges-Cohan, Guise, Saint-Paul-aux-Bois, Laon, Saint-Quentin, Sains-Richaumont, Fère-en-Tardenois, Gauchy, Venizel, Saint-Simon, Chartèves, Condé-sur-Aisne, Jussy and Chauny, with classifications ranging from A to C and explanations such as the setting Sun, Venus, a bolide, a helicopter, a bird, an astronomical source and flying lanterns.[cnes-geipan.fr]cnes-geipan.frRecherche de cas | GEIPANRecherche de cas | GEIPAN
This matters because many local UFO histories are built around the most dramatic retellings. Aisne’s official record points in a different direction. The department’s UFO history is best read as a collection of witness reports whose meaning changed once investigators compared testimony with astronomy, aircraft activity, meteor behaviour, video analysis and the limits of the original evidence.
Why the 1955 Saint-Simon case still matters
The most historically interesting official Aisne case is probably Saint-Simon, observed on 19 January 1955. GEIPAN records three people seeing a luminous phenomenon travelling from north-east to south-west at about 22:10. The witnesses described a white luminous disc followed by a long orange trail. The observation lasted about five seconds, with no sound. A gendarmerie inquiry did not find additional firm witnesses, although one person may have seen something without being able to confirm the date. GEIPAN classifies the case as B: a probable bolide, meaning a bright meteor or meteoroid entering the atmosphere.[cnes-geipan.fr]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
Saint-Simon is worth singling out because it sits close in time to the famous French UFO wave of autumn 1954, when reports across France generated intense press and public attention. That wider national wave is often invoked in UFO literature, but the Aisne case itself is more restrained. It has multiple witnesses and a gendarmerie paper trail, yet its short duration, silent passage and luminous trail are all compatible with a meteor-like event.[Complete France]completefrance.comComplete France Flying saucers in France: A history of UFO sightingsComplete France Flying saucers in France: A history of UFO sightings
The case also shows why aviation and military context should be handled carefully. Saint-Simon-Clastres had a significant airfield history: developed during the Second World War, later reused in the 1950s as a NATO dispersed operating base, and situated in the same broad area as Saint-Simon and Clastres in Aisne. That background is relevant to local sky-watching culture and to possible confusion with aircraft in some cases, but it does not automatically make the 1955 luminous-trail report a military incident. GEIPAN’s own conclusion points instead to a bolide.[Wikipedia]WikipediaSaint-Simon – Clastres Air BaseSaint-Simon – Clastres Air Base
The 1977–1980 cluster: striking reports, later ordinary explanations
Several Aisne cases from the late 1970s and 1980 show how older reports can look impressive in witness form and become less mysterious after re-examination.
At Guise on 24 October 1977, three residents reported a red or fiery ball on the horizon between roughly 17:15 and 18:00. They described a luminous object with flame-like details, lasting five to ten minutes before disappearing gradually at the horizon. Gendarmes later patrolled but found nothing abnormal and collected no additional testimony. GEIPAN notes that the witnesses’ sincerity and credibility were not questioned, but reclassified the case as A because the duration, colour, position and disappearance matched the setting Sun in the direction indicated by the witnesses.[cnes-geipan.fr]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
That is an important distinction. The official finding does not say the witnesses were foolish or dishonest. It says they likely saw a real, familiar object under conditions that made it feel strange. For readers trying to understand UFO history, Guise is a useful case precisely because it separates witness credibility from interpretation.
Modern Aisne reports show familiar causes, not stronger mystery
The later Aisne cases do not form a clear escalation. They mostly show how contemporary reports can still be puzzling at first sight, but are often resolved through contextual checks.
Chauny, on 14 July 2009, is a good example. A witness reported red lights moving silently at constant speed, forming a V and disappearing into cloud after about ten seconds. GEIPAN classified the case as B, a probable observation of flying lanterns, noting that many similar observations had been reported in the local press and that such lanterns were especially fashionable during festive events. The date, Bastille Day, is a useful reminder that cultural timing can matter as much as sky conditions.[cnes-geipan.fr]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
At Venizel on 30 June 2011, a person travelling by car with her husband repeatedly noticed a low, moving object with flashing lights and no distinctive sound. GEIPAN found the observation compatible with a helicopter flying at night. The Amiens gendarmerie air section confirmed it had been flying in the sector that day, although it could no longer give the exact route, so the case was classified B rather than A.[cnes-geipan.fr]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
The Laon case of 20 May 2021 is especially relevant because it included video. A resident filmed a brief nocturnal luminous movement that seemed rapid, jerky and difficult to follow. GEIPAN judged the case to have moderate strangeness and good consistency because there was a single witness and video, but concluded that the blurred object against a sharper background indicated something very close to the camera. Its movement and appearance were considered consistent with a bird or nocturnal insect briefly lit by a streetlamp. The case was classified B.[cnes-geipan.fr]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
Baulne-en-Brie, on 7 July 2013, sits at the boundary between explanation and insufficient evidence. A witness at a night-sky observation event reported a white point of light making a sharp 90-degree turn in less than three seconds. GEIPAN noted that two separate satellite tracks, one ending as a satellite leaves sunlight and another beginning nearby as a different satellite enters sunlight, can create the impression of a single object changing course. But because the witness did not provide enough follow-up information, and because the observation occurred during a UFO-oriented sky-watch where expectation could affect interpretation, GEIPAN classified the case as C for lack of reliable information.[cnes-geipan.fr]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
What the doubtful cases tell us about Aisne
Aisne’s C cases are not the same as strong unexplained cases. In GEIPAN’s method, C means the phenomenon is not identified because the data are too limited or unreliable, not because investigators have ruled out normal explanations. GEIPAN’s classification page explains that the system weighs both “strangeness” and “consistency”: a report can sound odd, but if the information is thin, contradictory or untestable, it should not be upgraded into a robust mystery.[cnes-geipan.fr]cnes-geipan.frClassification | GEIPANClassification | GEIPAN
That distinction is crucial for Aisne. Trélou-sur-Marne’s two-sphere description is visually striking, but it rests on limited testimony and no corroboration. Baulne-en-Brie sounds dramatic because of the reported right-angle turn, yet GEIPAN records very low consistency and a plausible satellite-related perceptual scenario that could not be tested further. Several other Aisne entries in the official list are simply labelled as lacking reliable information, including Cuffies, Sains-Richaumont, Gauchy, Condé-sur-Aisne and Jussy.[cnes-geipan.fr+2cnes-geipan.fr]cnes-geipan.frRecherche de cas | GEIPANRecherche de cas | GEIPAN
This does not make the witnesses irrelevant. It makes the cases historically useful in a different way. They show the ordinary failure points in UFO evidence: single-witness reports, imprecise times, missing angles and directions, no independent corroboration, no usable imagery, delayed reporting, and the difficulty of reconstructing a sky event long after it happened.
Gendarmerie records are important, but they are not magic proof
A recurring feature in Aisne’s older cases is the role of the gendarmerie. GEIPAN case files often include formal reports, witness statements or police-style documentation. Nationally, the French gendarmerie explains that once witness statements are recorded, they are passed to GEIPAN, which then investigates the nature of the phenomenon. The same gendarmerie account also warns that witness testimony is fragile, because there can be a difference between what people saw and what they think they saw.[Gendarmerie Nationale]gendarmerie.interieur.gouv.frcomment la gendarmerie prend elle en compte les etrangetes dans le cielcomment la gendarmerie prend elle en compte les etrangetes dans le ciel
That warning fits Aisne very well. Guise had several witnesses and a press mention, yet the later conclusion was the setting Sun. Saint-Paul-aux-Bois involved four witnesses and rapid gendarmerie involvement, yet GEIPAN’s later analysis pointed to Venus. Venizel had an aviation-related check, and the likely answer was a gendarmerie helicopter. In these cases, official paperwork helps preserve what was reported, but it does not by itself validate the most exotic interpretation.[cnes-geipan.fr+2cnes-geipan.fr]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
The best way to read these records is therefore neither dismissive nor credulous. A gendarmerie report can strengthen the historical reliability of a sighting claim: someone really did report something, at a certain time, in a certain place, with a recorded description. But the explanation still depends on astronomy, meteorology, aircraft activity, witness geometry, image analysis and the quality of the remaining evidence.
Aviation and military links: relevant background, limited explanatory weight
Aisne has a real aviation and military landscape. Saint-Simon-Clastres, for example, was used by German forces during the Second World War, then by American forces after liberation, and later redeveloped in the 1950s as a NATO dispersed operating base before being abandoned after France’s 1967 withdrawal from NATO’s integrated military command. Laon-Couvron was also a significant Cold War air base near Laon.[Wikipedia]WikipediaSaint-Simon – Clastres Air BaseSaint-Simon – Clastres Air Base
For UFO history, that matters in two ways. First, it means some residents lived in places where aircraft, airfields and military infrastructure were part of the local background. Secondly, it provides plausible ordinary explanations for some reports, especially lights, low-flying objects or aircraft-like movement.
How Aisne fits into French UFO history
Aisne is best understood as a department-level archive of ordinary and borderline UFO reporting rather than a home of landmark national cases. It has old reports from the 1950s, a small late-1970s cluster, several modern reports, and some cases that show how later technical review can change the interpretation. It also sits in a northern French region where airfields, military history, rural horizons, night roads and local press coverage could all shape how unusual sky events were noticed and remembered.
Compared with famous French cases such as Quarouble, Valensole or Trans-en-Provence, Aisne’s cases are less spectacular and less central to national UFO lore. That does not make them worthless. They are useful because they show the everyday machinery of French UFO investigation: witnesses report something strange; gendarmes or GEIPAN collect details; investigators test mundane explanations; and many reports either resolve or remain too poorly documented to carry much evidential weight. GEIPAN’s national statistics reinforce that general picture: most published cases are identified or probably identified, while only a small share remain unexplained after investigation.[cnes-geipan.fr]cnes-geipan.frStatistics | GEIPANStatistics | GEIPAN
The main takeaway is sober but interesting. Aisne’s UFO history is not empty, but it is not a catalogue of strong unresolved incidents either. Its most instructive cases are those where the human experience of strangeness was real, while the later evidence pointed to something familiar: a bolide over Saint-Simon, the setting Sun at Guise, Venus at Saint-Paul-aux-Bois and Coulonges-Cohan, lanterns over Chauny, a helicopter near Venizel, and a nearby bird or insect in a Laon video. That is exactly why Aisne belongs in a serious department-level UFO project: it shows how UFO history is made not only from mysteries that survive, but from mysteries that gradually become understandable.<section class="further-reading-section" data-page-toc-exclude aria-labelledby="further-reading-title"><div class="fr-section-shell"><div class="fr-section-header"><div class="fr-section-heading"><p class="fr-section-kicker">Amazon book picks</p><h3 class="fr-heading" id="further-reading-title">Further Reading</h3></div><p class="fr-intro">Books and field guides related to What Did Aisne's UFO Reports Really Show?. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.</p></div><div class="fr-books-grid"><article class="fr-book-card">Book
<div class="fr-book-info"><h4 class="fr-book-title">The UFO Experience</h4><p class="fr-book-author">By Joseph Allen Hynek</p><p class="fr-book-desc">Examines classification systems and investigative methods useful for understanding reported aerial anomalies.</p><div class="fr-book-actions">
See on Amazon</div></div></article><article class="fr-book-card">Book
<div class="fr-book-info"><h4 class="fr-book-title">In Plain Sight: an Investigation Into UFOs and Impossible Sci…</h4><p class="fr-book-author">By Ross Coulthart</p><p class="fr-book-desc">Explores how UFO reports are investigated, interpreted and debated, matching the article's focus on evidence and case assessment.</p><div class="fr-book-actions">
See on Amazon</div></div></article><article class="fr-book-card">Book
<div class="fr-book-info"><h4 class="fr-book-title">UFOs</h4><p class="fr-book-author">By Leslie Kean</p><p class="fr-book-desc">Focuses on documented reports, government files and investigative standards similar to the GEIPAN context.</p><div class="fr-book-actions">
See on Amazon</div></div></article><article class="fr-book-card">Book
<div class="fr-book-info"><h4 class="fr-book-title">Passport to Magonia: from Folklore to Flying Saucers</h4><p class="fr-book-author">By Jacques Vallee</p><p class="fr-book-desc">Places unusual sighting reports within broader historical and cultural patterns, complementing regional case studies.</p><div class="fr-book-actions">
See on Amazon</div></div></article></div><div class="fr-section-footer"><div class="fr-browse-links" aria-label="Browse more on Amazon">Browse more on Amazon:The UFO ExperienceIn Plain Sight: an Investigation Into UFOs and Impossible ScienceUFOs</div><p class="fr-disclosure">As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.</p></div></div></section><section class="further-reading-section" data-page-toc-exclude data-ebay-localized-links data-ebay-visual-market="EBAY_GB" aria-labelledby="merchant-block-title"><div class="fr-section-shell"><div class="fr-section-header"><div class="fr-section-heading"><p class="fr-section-kicker">eBay marketplace picks</p><h3 class="fr-heading" id="merchant-block-title">Marketplace Samples</h3></div><p class="fr-intro">Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.</p><div class="fr-ebay-market-toolbar"><div class="fr-ebay-market-picker">UsingUSA<div class="fr-ebay-market-menu" data-ebay-market-menu role="listbox" hidden></div></div></div></div><div class="fr-ebay-market-panel" data-ebay-market-panel="EBAY_GB" data-ebay-market-default="1"><div class="fr-books-grid"><article class="fr-book-card">
<div class="fr-book-info"><p class="fr-book-kicker">Example eBay listing</p><h4 class="fr-book-title">UFO DIGITAL ART PRINT A4 Gerry Anderson UK TV 1970s from my original drawing</h4>SearcheBay.co.uk: UFO art print<div class="fr-book-actions">
Browse similar oneBay.co.uk</div></div></article><article class="fr-book-card">
<div class="fr-book-info"><p class="fr-book-kicker">Example eBay listing</p><h4 class="fr-book-title">UFO Over Forest Framed Wall Art Poster Canvas Print Picture</h4>SearcheBay.co.uk: UFO art print<div class="fr-book-actions">
Browse similar oneBay.co.uk</div></div></article><article class="fr-book-card">
<div class="fr-book-info"><p class="fr-book-kicker">Example eBay listing</p><h4 class="fr-book-title">UFO ALIEN POSTER ART PRINT - FRAMED OPTIONS - CHOOSE SIZE! B</h4>SearcheBay.co.uk: UFO art print<div class="fr-book-actions">
Browse similar oneBay.co.uk</div></div></article><article class="fr-book-card">
<div class="fr-book-info"><p class="fr-book-kicker">Example eBay listing</p><h4 class="fr-book-title">UFO Over Desert Highway Sci-Fi Abduction Poster Print Framed Canvas Wall Art</h4>SearcheBay.co.uk: UFO art print<div class="fr-book-actions">
Browse similar oneBay.co.uk</div></div></article></div><div class="fr-section-footer">
Browse more oneBay.co.uk<p class="fr-disclosure">Example items shown for inspiration; availability and pricing can change. Branchoria may earn a commission if you purchase through outbound eBay links.</p></div></div></div></section>
Endnotes
1.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: Recherche de cas | GEIPAN
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?customGetLattitude=50.04976591053777&customGetLongitude=1.8017578125000002&customGetZoom=8&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=51.07246834624619&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=49.027063474829355&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=3.6694335937500004&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=-0.06591796875000001&order=field_departement_textuel&page=0&sort=asc
2.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: Classification | GEIPAN
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/node/58787
3.
Source: cnes.fr
Link:https://cnes.fr/en/projects/geipan
4.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/1955-01-00033
5.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Saint-Simon – Clastres Air Base
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saint-Simon_%E2%80%93_Clastres_Air_Base
6.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/1977-10-00446
7.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/1979-01-00591
8.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/1979-01-00592
9.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/1980-03-00743
10.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2009-07-02441
11.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2011-06-02786
12.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2021-05-51196
13.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2013-07-08662?field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B0%5D=13&page=%2C27
14.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Base aérienne de Laon-Couvron
Link:https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Base_a%C3%A9rienne_de_Laon-Couvron
15.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: Statistics | GEIPAN
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/stats
16.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/missions-methodes-et-resultats
17.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en
18.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/search/cas?customGetLattitude=45.735486641128446&customGetLongitude=-0.615234375&customGetZoom=5&field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=54.52108149544362&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=36.94989178681327&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=14.326171875000002&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=-15.556640625000002&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date&page=%2C534&sort=asc
19.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/en/node/51484
20.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas?field_agregation_index_value=PV&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=title&page=%2C2&sort=asc
21.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/en/search/cas?field_date_valu_valu=04-23&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_classification_des_cas&page=%2C291&sort=asc
22.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas?field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B13%5D=13&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date&page=%2C28&sort=asc
23.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas?field_date_value=2024-10-28&field_is_new_value=1&page=%2C1
24.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas?amp=&field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation_textuel&page=%2C524&sort=desc
25.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas?field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B0%5D=12&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation_textuel&page=%2C215&sort=asc
26.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=165&sort=desc
27.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas?field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation&page=%2C201&sort=desc
28.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/PV%20n%C2%B0202%20%281980308514%29.pdf
29.
Source: Wikipedia
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GEIPAN
30.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Base aérienne de Saint Simon Clastres
Link:https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Base_a%C3%A9rienne_de_Saint-Simon_-_Clastres
31.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Quartier Mangin
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quartier_Mangin
32.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Militärflugplatz Clastres Saint Simon
Link:https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milit%C3%A4rflugplatz_Clastres-Saint-Simon
33.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: UFO sightings in France
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UFO_sightings_in_France
34.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/sites/default/files/PV%20n%C2%B01012%20%281977309019%29.pdf
35.
Source: couvron.fr
Title: Quartier Mangin
Link:https://www.couvron.fr/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Quartier-Mangin.pdf
36.
Source: completefrance.com
Title: Complete France Flying saucers in France: A history of UFO sightings
Link:https://www.completefrance.com/travel/flying-saucers-in-france-a-history-of-ufo-sightings/
37.
Source: gendarmerie.interieur.gouv.fr
Title: comment la gendarmerie prend elle en compte les etrangetes dans le ciel
Link:https://www.gendarmerie.interieur.gouv.fr/gendinfo/actualites/2022/comment-la-gendarmerie-prend-elle-en-compte-les-etrangetes-dans-le-ciel
38.
Source: 387bg.com
Link:https://387bg.com/Stations/Clastres/Clastres.htm
39.
Source: projets-environnement.gouv.fr
Link:https://www.projets-environnement.gouv.fr/page/fiche/?q=recordsid%3A2018129819
40.
Source: servicehistorique.sga.defense.gouv.fr
Title: defense.gouv.fr Saint-Simon
Link:https://www.servicehistorique.sga.defense.gouv.fr/ark/1083421
Additional References
41.
Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hn2xTieploU
42.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Meeting France’s UFO detectives
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zczcBLukQ6s
43.
Source: instagram.com
Link:https://www.instagram.com/reel/DVeXbVwjU-B/
44.
Source: instagram.com
Link:https://www.instagram.com/p/DVpDiEnDfj3/
45.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/France3Occitanie/posts/comment-fonctionne-le-geipan-le-groupe-d%C3%A9tudes-et-dinformations-sur-les-ph%C3%A9nom%C3%A8n/971177045625594/
46.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/aisnenouvelle/?locale=fa_IR
47.
Source: instagram.com
Link:https://www.instagram.com/reel/DHoGgeopQsY/?hl=en
48.
Source: carteovni.fr
Link:https://carteovni.fr/commune/laon-02
49.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/lecourrierpicard/posts/picardie-des-lueurs-suspectes-ont-%C3%A9t%C3%A9-observ%C3%A9es-dans-le-ciel-dans-les-d%C3%A9partemen/10150421780164134/
50.
Source: nationalgeographic.fr
Link:https://www.nationalgeographic.fr/espace/france-qui-se-cache-derriere-le-geipan-le-bureau-des-ovnis-en-france-etrange-enquetes
Topic Tree
Follow this branch
Related pages 95
- Manche UFOs
- Ariege UFOs
- Correze UFOs
- Dordogne UFOs
- Hautes Pyrenees UFOs
- +90 more in sidebar