Within Gers UFOs
Why Gers Has No Official Class D Cases
Gers' official cases show how aircraft, lanterns, disco lights, satellites and weak evidence can turn strange sightings into explainable files.
On this page
- What A, B, C and D classifications mean
- Recurring explanations in Gers reports
- Why class C is not the same as unexplained
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
Gers is not a French department with a famous official “unexplained UFO” file. Its public GEIPAN record is more interesting for the opposite reason: it shows how strange-looking sky reports can be sorted into aircraft, satellites, meteors, lanterns, lighting effects, optical artefacts and cases where the information is simply too thin to decide. Independent mapping of GEIPAN’s public data lists 18 Gers cases, with 7 class A, 3 class B, 8 class C and no class D cases. That last figure matters: class D is the official category for a case left unexplained after investigation, and Gers currently has none in that public tally.[CarteOvni.fr]carteovni.frOVNI dans le Gers (32) — CarteOvni.frLe département Gers compte 18 cas recensés par le GEIPAN, dont 0 non identifiés (classe D). La carte…
This does not mean every witness was wrong, careless or imagining things. GEIPAN’s own case files often treat the witness experience seriously while separating it from the interpretation placed on it. In Gers, the useful lesson is not “nothing happened”, but “many real observations become less mysterious when timing, direction, weather, astronomy, aviation and recording artefacts are checked”.
What A, B, C and D Classifications Mean
GEIPAN is the French official body, attached to the national space agency CNES, that collects, analyses, archives and publishes reports of unidentified aerospace phenomena. CNES describes GEIPAN as having been created through the earlier French official UFO-study lineage beginning in 1977, with partners including the gendarmerie, police, the French Air and Space Force, CNRS and Météo-France.[CNES]cnes.frGEIPAN7 Jul 2025 — GEIPAN, the French UAP research and information group created by CNES in 1977, collects, analyses and archives inf…
The classification letters are easy to misunderstand. GEIPAN explains that its system depends on two ideas: residual strangeness after comparison with known explanations, and consistency, meaning the quantity and reliability of the information available.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frGeipanHow does GEIPAN classify observation cases?Strangeness (E): This is the measure of the residual strangeness after comparison with k… In plain terms, a case can look very odd to a witness but still be weak as evidence if there is no photograph, no independent corroboration, no reliable timing, no precise direction and no way to test competing explanations.
The categories are best read like this:<div class="content-enhancement content-enhancement--insight-grid" markdown="1">
- Class A means the observation has been explained without ambiguity.
- Class B means GEIPAN considers the explanation very probable, though not absolutely certain.
- Class C means the case is not properly analysable because information is missing or unreliable.
- Class D means the case remains unexplained despite the information GEIPAN has.</div>
The key point for Gers is that class C is not a deeper mystery than class B. GEIPAN’s glossary explicitly warns that class C cases are not of the same order as A, B or D cases, because they are files on which GEIPAN could not properly pronounce; they are insufficiently documented rather than robustly unexplained.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr. This distinction is central to reading the Gers record fairly.
Why Gers Has No Official Class D Cases
The absence of public class D cases in Gers does not prove that every reported event has been solved beyond all doubt. It means that, in the published GEIPAN-linked record, the department’s files either have an explanation, a probable explanation, or too little evidence to sustain a stronger conclusion. CarteOvni’s department page, based on public GEIPAN data, gives the compact picture: 18 Gers cases, no class D, and a split between identified, probably identified and insufficiently documented reports.[CarteOvni.fr]carteovni.frOVNI dans le Gers (32) — CarteOvni.frLe département Gers compte 18 cas recensés par le GEIPAN, dont 0 non identifiés (classe D). La carte…
That pattern fits GEIPAN’s national picture. CNES gives national key figures showing that only a small share of GEIPAN cases remain unidentified after investigation, while much larger shares are perfectly identified, probably identified or unidentified for lack of data.[CNES]cnes.frGEIPAN7 Jul 2025 — GEIPAN, the French UAP research and information group created by CNES in 1977, collects, analyses and archives inf… Gers sits at the sober end of that spectrum: not a hotspot of officially unexplained cases, but a useful local sample of how ordinary sky confusions enter and leave an official archive.
The department’s rural setting also matters. Gers offers dark skies, open horizons and many night-time viewing conditions in which a moving light can seem isolated, silent and hard to judge for distance. That does not make the reports trivial. It makes them a good test of interpretation. A satellite can look deliberate, a meteor can look close, a lantern can seem to climb and hover, and a light reflected on glass can appear to be an object in the sky.
Recurring Explanations in Gers Reports
The Gers files are valuable because they show different routes from “unidentified at first glance” to “ordinary once tested”. Several explanations recur, not as generic debunking labels, but as case-specific findings.
Aircraft and Near-Field Optical Confusion
The 23 November 2023 case on the D654 road between Terraube and Cologne is a modern example of how a sighting can combine two stimuli. Two witnesses travelling by car reported a black, roughly round object moving erratically in the sky. GEIPAN found that a dark military C-17 transport aircraft was in the line of sight at a compatible time, but the witness video also showed signs that the small dark “object” in the recording was extremely close to the camera or windscreen rather than a distant airborne body. The case was classified A: an observation involving a military C-17 and a very small, very close object or optical artefact near the windscreen.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
This is one of the most instructive Gers files because it does not reduce the report to a single simple mistake. A real aircraft may have drawn attention first, while a reflection, speck, focus effect or windscreen-related artefact then became fused with the original sky observation. For readers, the lesson is practical: video evidence can help, but it can also introduce its own traps when filmed through glass from a moving vehicle.
Satellites, the ISS and Starlink Flashes
The 18 August 2007 Gimont case shows how a moving point of light can remain puzzling until the sky path is checked against satellite data. The witness, an amateur astronomer, filmed a bright point moving steadily. GEIPAN notes that the video was not very exploitable and that the case had first been classed C for lack of information, but a later re-examination found that the International Space Station was visible from Gimont at the reported time. The case is now classed A as an ISS observation.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
A more recent Gers aviation file adds the newer satellite problem. In the 26 November 2024 Gaujan case, observed from a helicopter context, GEIPAN classified the report A as flashes from Starlink satellites. The public case page describes several points of light appearing and disappearing, and the investigation report notes use of original photo metadata, video, sky-position reconstruction, Stellarium and satellite-position checks to support the Starlink explanation.[Geipan]geipan.frOpen source on geipan.fr.
This matters because the satellite environment has changed. Older UFO files often revolve around aircraft, planets, meteors and lanterns. Newer reports increasingly involve satellite trains, satellite flares and moving groups of lights that are not “aircraft” in the everyday sense but are also not unexplained craft. GEIPAN’s own site has highlighted Starlink-related observations as a newly explained phenomenon in recent years.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
Meteors, Bolides and Atmospheric Entries
The 9 February 2022 Marciac case is a good example of a probable meteor explanation. A motorist saw coloured luminous balls moving from west to east on a slightly descending path, followed by a reddish trail. GEIPAN considered the description compatible with an atmospheric entry, checked for artificial space debris, and noted that a FRIPON camera at Dax recorded a bolide at 20:05 local time in a direction and trajectory consistent with the reported phenomenon. The case was classed B: probable bolide.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
The 17 July 1978 Faget-Abbatial report shows the weaker version of the same interpretive problem. A witness reported, decades later, a three-second sighting of a fluorescent green disc that seemed briefly immobile before vanishing at great speed. GEIPAN noted that some features could fit a bolide seen almost head-on, but the lack of a trail, lack of other reports and the long delay before reporting prevented a stronger conclusion. It remained class C for lack of information and corroboration.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
These two files explain the difference between a good class B and a class C. In Marciac, the timing, direction and an external recording network could be compared. In Faget-Abbatial, the observation was old, very brief and poorly corroborated. The first can be probably explained; the second can only be held as insufficiently documented.
Lanterns and Festive Night Lights
The 1 January 2015 Marsolan case is one of the clearest Gers examples of a likely festive-light confusion that could not be closed firmly. Several family members saw five red-orange luminous spheres moving silently in the night sky around 1 am. GEIPAN noted that orange balls crossing the sky over a few minutes on a major celebration night strongly suggested Thai lanterns released nearby after a private party. Yet the local wind data were not a perfect fit, the apparent altitude varied, there were no photographs, and only one formal testimony was collected. The case was therefore classed C for missing meteorological detail and lack of corroboration.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
This is the kind of file that can frustrate both believers and sceptics. The likely explanation is ordinary, but the file is not class A. That is because GEIPAN’s classification is not just about what seems likely; it is also about what can be demonstrated from the available evidence. In Gers, several cases sit in that grey zone: plausible explanation, inadequate proof.
Disco Lights and Skytracers
The Boulaur case of 24 March 1984 is probably the most memorable Gers file in this theme. Five nuns at a convent watched a bright oval or elongated phenomenon in the early morning sky for about ten minutes. GEIPAN reports that the witnesses’ sincerity and credibility were not in doubt, and the case had several features that make a report feel strong: multiple witnesses, a sustained observation and a clear description.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
Yet the later analysis pointed towards a skytracer or promotional light reflected on clouds. The date was a Saturday morning, the sky was cloudy, the movements were rapid and side-to-side, and the reported duration, brightness and form matched that kind of artificial light display. Because the hypothesis could not be verified with local venues decades later, and because there were no independent neighbour observations or repeated sightings, GEIPAN classed the case C rather than A or B.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
The Boulaur file is a useful corrective to a common mistake. A credible witness does not automatically produce a conclusive case. GEIPAN can accept that witnesses honestly saw something striking while still judging that the evidence does not support a class D mystery.
Why Class C Is Not the Same as Unexplained
For Gers, the most important reading skill is understanding class C. A class C case is often less evidentially strong than a class B case, not more. GEIPAN’s methodology says classification weighs residual strangeness against consistency, and its glossary states that where information is lacking, a case may be classed C rather than placed on the same scale as explained or genuinely unexplained files.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frGeipanHow does GEIPAN classify observation cases?Strangeness (E): This is the measure of the residual strangeness after comparison with k…
Miramont-d’Astarac, reported for 19 May 1976, is a simple example. One witness saw two red conical luminous balls pass during the night; no ground trace was found around the witness’s house, and GEIPAN classed the case C for lack of information.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr. There may have been a real sky event, but the file gives too little to test direction, altitude, duration, astronomical context, aircraft possibilities or atmospheric-entry hypotheses.
Boulaur is a richer class C case, but the logic is similar. It has stronger witness content than Miramont-d’Astarac, yet still lacks the checks that would allow GEIPAN to confirm or reject the skytracer hypothesis. Marsolan has a strong lantern-like pattern but lacks enough wind and corroboration data. Faget-Abbatial has a possible bolide shape but was reported far too late for a robust investigation.[Geipan+2Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
This is why “not identified” can mean two very different things. A class D case says, in effect, “we investigated and still cannot explain it.” A class C case says, “we do not have enough reliable material to decide.” Gers’ official record is dominated not by robust unexplained events, but by the normal limitations of witness reporting.
What the Gers Pattern Teaches Readers
The Gers record is a small but useful guide to public UFO interpretation. It shows that many “UFO” reports begin with something real: a moving light, a bright flash, an unusual formation, a recorded dot, a witness startled by behaviour that does not match everyday aircraft. The official work then asks a different question: what explanation best fits the full circumstances, and how strong is the evidence?
Several practical lessons stand out.
First, timing is often decisive. The Gimont ISS case and the Marciac bolide case both depend on matching a report to an external event at the right time. A vague “around then” can weaken a file; a precise time can transform it.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
Second, direction and height are difficult for witnesses to judge. The Gaujan Starlink investigation found that the witness’s estimated angular height was likely too high when checked against sky reconstruction.[Geipan]geipan.frCompte rendu enquete797Compte rendu enquete797 That kind of mismatch is not unusual or dishonest; it is one reason technical reconstruction matters.
Third, video does not automatically settle a case. The Terraube–Cologne vehicle case shows that a recording can reveal an artefact or near-field object rather than confirm a distant sky object.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
Fourth, multiple witnesses help, but they do not replace independent checks. Boulaur had five witnesses, yet GEIPAN still could not verify the likely lighting explanation decades later.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
Finally, ordinary explanations are not always simplistic explanations. Starlink flashes, ISS passes, bolides, lanterns, skytracers and glass reflections each have their own geometry, timing and environmental clues. The better Gers files are not dismissals; they are small case studies in how an initially strange report becomes more understandable.
The Value of an Unflashy Department Record
Gers may disappoint readers looking for a dramatic official mystery. There is no public GEIPAN class D case to anchor a claim that the department contains a landmark unexplained UFO incident. That absence is itself informative. It places Gers among the departments where the official record is chiefly a record of misidentification, probable identification and evidential limits rather than unresolved anomaly.
For a public history of UFOs in Gers, that makes the department useful in a quieter way. It shows what a careful reader should ask before treating a sighting as unexplained: Was the time precise? Were there independent witnesses? Was the direction recorded? Were aircraft, satellites, meteors and lighting checked? Was the object photographed directly, or through glass? Was the report made immediately, or decades later? Could the explanation be plausible but unverifiable?
The Gers files answer those questions case by case. Gaujan and Gimont show satellite explanations. Marciac shows a probable bolide. Marsolan shows likely lanterns without enough proof for a firmer label. Terraube–Cologne shows aircraft plus near-camera confusion. Boulaur shows how a sincere multi-witness case can remain class C because a plausible skytracer explanation cannot be verified after the fact.[Geipan+5Geipan+5Geipan]geipan.frOpen source on geipan.fr.
That is why the Gers record matters. It is not a catalogue of spectacular unknowns. It is a grounded lesson in how official UFO files should be read: with respect for witnesses, caution about memory and perception, and a clear distinction between “unexplained after investigation” and “not settled because the evidence is too thin”.<section class="further-reading-section" data-page-toc-exclude aria-labelledby="further-reading-title"><div class="fr-section-shell"><div class="fr-section-header"><div class="fr-section-heading"><p class="fr-section-kicker">Amazon book picks</p><h3 class="fr-heading" id="further-reading-title">Further Reading</h3></div><p class="fr-intro">Books and field guides related to Why Gers Has No Official Class D Cases. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.</p></div><div class="fr-books-grid"><article class="fr-book-card">Book<div class="fr-book-info"><h4 class="fr-book-title">The UFO Experience</h4><p class="fr-book-author">By Joseph Allen Hynek</p><p class="fr-book-desc">Explains UFO case classification, investigation methods, and the distinction between unexplained and insufficiently explained reports.</p><div class="fr-book-actions">
See on Amazon</div></div></article><article class="fr-book-card">Book
<div class="fr-book-info"><h4 class="fr-book-title">UFOs</h4><p class="fr-book-author">By Leslie Kean</p><p class="fr-book-desc">Focuses on documented cases and how governments evaluate aerial phenomena rather than relying on speculation.</p><div class="fr-book-actions">
See on Amazon</div></div></article><article class="fr-book-card">Book
<div class="fr-book-info"><h4 class="fr-book-title">The Demon-Haunted World</h4><p class="fr-book-author">By Carl Sagan, Ann Druyan</p><p class="fr-book-popularity">Rating: 4.5/5 from 43 Google Books ratings</p><p class="fr-book-desc">Provides a framework for evaluating unusual claims, evidence quality, and alternative explanations.</p><div class="fr-book-actions">
See on Amazon</div></div></article><article class="fr-book-card">Book
<div class="fr-book-info"><h4 class="fr-book-title">UFOs and Government</h4><p class="fr-book-author">By Michael D. Swords</p><p class="fr-book-desc">Places public UFO reporting systems and governmental assessment efforts in historical context.</p><div class="fr-book-actions">
See on Amazon</div></div></article></div><div class="fr-section-footer"><div class="fr-browse-links" aria-label="Browse more on Amazon">Browse more on Amazon:The UFO ExperienceUFOsThe Demon Haunted World</div><p class="fr-disclosure">As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.</p></div></div></section><section class="further-reading-section" data-page-toc-exclude data-ebay-localized-links data-ebay-visual-market="EBAY_GB" aria-labelledby="merchant-block-title"><div class="fr-section-shell"><div class="fr-section-header"><div class="fr-section-heading"><p class="fr-section-kicker">eBay marketplace picks</p><h3 class="fr-heading" id="merchant-block-title">Marketplace Samples</h3></div><p class="fr-intro">Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.</p><div class="fr-ebay-market-toolbar"><div class="fr-ebay-market-picker">UsingUSA<div class="fr-ebay-market-menu" data-ebay-market-menu role="listbox" hidden></div></div></div></div><div class="fr-ebay-market-panel" data-ebay-market-panel="EBAY_GB" data-ebay-market-default="1"><div class="fr-books-grid"><article class="fr-book-card">
<div class="fr-book-info"><p class="fr-book-kicker">Example eBay listing</p><h4 class="fr-book-title">Rare Original Vintage Nasa Space Crew Photographs Memorabilia</h4>SearcheBay.co.uk: space memorabilia<div class="fr-book-actions">
Browse similar oneBay.co.uk</div></div></article><article class="fr-book-card">
<div class="fr-book-info"><p class="fr-book-kicker">Example eBay listing</p><h4 class="fr-book-title">limited edition Buzz Aldrin 25th Anniversary Apollo 11 moon landing wristwatch</h4>SearcheBay.co.uk: space memorabilia<div class="fr-book-actions">
Browse similar oneBay.co.uk</div></div></article><article class="fr-book-card">
<div class="fr-book-info"><p class="fr-book-kicker">Example eBay listing</p><h4 class="fr-book-title">2 vintage 1980's Kennedy Space Centre Souvenir Pens In Original Packets</h4>SearcheBay.co.uk: space memorabilia<div class="fr-book-actions">
Browse similar oneBay.co.uk</div></div></article><article class="fr-book-card">
<div class="fr-book-info"><p class="fr-book-kicker">Example eBay listing</p><h4 class="fr-book-title">Flight of the Navigator space ship - Trimaxion 80's film memorabilia scifi prop</h4>SearcheBay.co.uk: space memorabilia<div class="fr-book-actions">
Browse similar oneBay.co.uk</div></div></article></div><div class="fr-section-footer">
Browse more oneBay.co.uk<p class="fr-disclosure">Example items shown for inspiration; availability and pricing can change. Branchoria may earn a commission if you purchase through outbound eBay links.</p></div></div></div></section>
Endnotes
1.
Source: carteovni.fr
Link:https://carteovni.fr/departement/gers
2.
Source: cnes.fr
Link:https://cnes.fr/en/projects/geipan
3.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/en/node/61240
4.
Source: geipan.fr
Title: Compte rendu enquete797
Link:https://geipan.fr/sites/default/files/Compte%20rendu%20enquete797.pdf
5.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/en/search/cas?field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=1&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_classification_des_cas&page=%2C431&select-category-export=nothing&sort=asc&video=on
6.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?amp%3Bfield_is_new_value=1&field_date_value=2024-05-28&order=field_classification_des_cas&page=5&sort=asc
7.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?field_date_value=2024-10-28&field_is_new_value=1&order=title&page=8&sort=asc
8.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_date_value=2020-11-18&field_is_new_value=1&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date&page=19&sort=asc
9.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas?field_date_value=2025-08-21&field_is_new_value=1&order=field_date_d_observation&page=%2C7&sort=desc
10.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B0%5D=11&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=33%2C9&select-category-export=nothing&sort=desc
11.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?amp%3Bfield_is_new_value=1&field_date_value=2024-05-28&order=title&page=11&sort=asc
12.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/sites/default/files/Compte%20rendu%20enquete22.pdf
13.
Source: cnes.fr
Title: ovnis pan
Link:https://cnes.fr/dossiers/ovnis-pan
14.
Source: cnes.fr
Link:https://cnes.fr/projets/geipan
15.
Source: carteovni.fr
Title: OVN I en Occitanie
Link:https://carteovni.fr/region/occitanie
16.
Source: carteovni.fr
Title: Observations OVNI par région et département
Link:https://carteovni.fr/regions
17.
Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hn2xTieploU
18.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Meeting France’s UFO detectives
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zczcBLukQ6s
19.
Source: youtube.com
Title: GEIPAN: Tout savoir sur les OVNIS et Phénomènes Aérospatiaux (PAN)
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CWt2zkuxRNQ
20.
Source: youtube.com
Title: UFOs: GEIPAN is working on the issue (Toulouse)
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nnOX-NXZFqE
21.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/node/412
22.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/glossaire
23.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2023-11-51520
24.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2007-08-01805
25.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/
26.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2022-02-51313
27.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/1978-07-09386?order=field_classification_des_cas&page=117%2C0&sort=asc&undefined=
28.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2015-01-09183
29.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/1984-03-01023
30.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/1976-07-02733
31.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/save_json_import_files/export_cas_pub_20251127093552.csv
32.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: Recherche de CASNo information is available for this page
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas
33.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2023-08-51483
34.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2015-09-09328
35.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/1991-10-01248
36.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2024-11-51595?order=title&page=%2C6&sort=desc
37.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/en/node/61241?field_date_value=2024-07-23&field_is_new_value=1&order=title&page=%2C34&sort=desc
38.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/search/cas?customGetLattitude=43.9503570933062&customGetLongitude=-3.31787109375&customGetZoom=5&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B0%5D=11&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=53.014783245859235&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=34.88593094075317&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=8.920898437500002&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=-15.556640625000002&order=title&page=%2C5&sort=asc
39.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas?field_date_value=2025-02-25&field_is_new_value=1&order=field_date_d_observation&page=%2C11&sort=desc
40.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?customGetLattitude=46.124763699209396&customGetLongitude=2.4169921874999996&customGetZoom=6&field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id=All&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=50.52739681329302&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=41.72213058512578&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=9.8876953125&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=-5.053710937500001&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=title&page=153%2C37&sort=asc
41.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?customGetLattitude=43.9503570933062&customGetLongitude=-3.31787109375&customGetZoom=5&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B0%5D=11&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=53.014783245859235&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=34.88593094075317&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=8.920898437500002&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=-15.556640625000002&order=field_departement_textuel&page=31&sort=desc
42.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_date_value=2021-06-26&field_is_new_value=1&page=3
43.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?field_date_value=2023-02-16&field_is_new_value=1&order=field_date_d_observation_textuel&page=1&sort=desc
44.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/node/58788
45.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: methodologie classification geipan
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/actualites/methodologie-classification-geipan
46.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: missions methodes et resultats
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/missions-methodes-et-resultats
47.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/node/58791
48.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: missions methodes et resultat
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/actualites/missions-methodes-et-resultat
49.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/mentions_legales
50.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: baisse cas d
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/actualites/baisse-cas-d
51.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/node/60814
52.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/node/412
53.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/en/node/61412
54.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/1979-07-00644
55.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: Procedure classif PAN
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/Procedure_classif_PAN.pdf
56.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/en/node/56062
57.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2016-03-09426
58.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/node/57355
59.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: missions methodes et resultats
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/missions-methodes-et-resultats
60.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/node/57999
61.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/1993-11-01335
62.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/en/node/57688
63.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2010-10-50728
64.
Source: uapedia.ai
Link:https://uapedia.ai/wiki/geipan-frances-official-uap-unit/
Additional References
65.
Source: journaldunet.com
Link:https://www.journaldunet.com/magazine/1546833-bp1-ce-site-on-ne-peut-plus-officiel-permet-de-voir-les-signalements-d-ovni-autour-de-chez-vous/
66.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/France3Occitanie/posts/comment-fonctionne-le-geipan-le-groupe-d%C3%A9tudes-et-dinformations-sur-les-ph%C3%A9nom%C3%A8n/971177045625594/
67.
Source: reddit.com
Link:https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1kdtweb/new_aaro_director_jon_kosloski_says_the_pentagon/
68.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/CNESFrance/posts/ne-dites-plus-ovni-mais-plut%C3%B4t-pan-cest-le-terme-utilis%C3%A9-par-le-geipan-notre-gro/10163463849650301/
69.
Source: meprises-du-ciel.fr
Link:https://meprises-du-ciel.fr/satellites-starlink/
70.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/7NEWSAdelaide/posts/the-report-cites-21-particularly-curious-cases-of-unidentified-aerial-phenomena-/889275033348864/
71.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Groupe d’études et d’informations sur les phénomènes aérospatiaux non identifiés
Link:https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Groupe_d%27%C3%A9tudes_et_d%27informations_sur_les_ph%C3%A9nom%C3%A8nes_a%C3%A9rospatiaux_non_identifi%C3%A9s
72.
Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DNuDh287q0Q
73.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Roswell, the Shocking Investigation by the Former Director of GEIPAN (CNES)!
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OJcy6BhB4iI
74.
Source: lepetitreporteur.com
Title: le geipan et les phenomenes aerospatiaux non identifies
Link:https://lepetitreporteur.com/le-geipan-et-les-phenomenes-aerospatiaux-non-identifies/
Topic Tree