What Really Happened in Deux Sevres Skies?
Deux-Sèvres does not have a single famous UFO case on the scale of France’s best-known national incidents, but it does have a useful, well-documented departmental pattern: a small archive of official French aerospace-phenomenon files in which most reports are later judged as lanterns, storm light, sky-tracer projectors, atmospheric entries or too weakly...
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
That makes Deux-Sèvres interesting for a different reason from more dramatic UFO lore. It shows how French official UFO history often works at ground level: a witness report, sometimes a gendarmerie file, a technical questionnaire, weather checks, possible aviation or astronomical comparisons, and then a cautious classification. In this department, the story is less “aliens over Poitou” than a long record of ordinary skies producing puzzling memories, a few genuinely stubborn cases, and many reports that become less mysterious once the setting, date, weather and witness detail are checked.
What the official record shows in Deux-Sèvres
The strongest starting point is GEIPAN, the French Space Agency’s public unit for collecting, analysing and publishing reports of unidentified aerospace phenomena. GEIPAN says its role is to collect testimony, investigate, archive and publish case material, while protecting witness anonymity; it also makes clear that it is not a research body for extraterrestrial life or paranormal claims.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frGeipan Classification | GEIPANGeipan Classification | GEIPAN
A search of GEIPAN’s case database for Deux-Sèvres brings up a compact set of cases from 1978 to 2025. The list includes Beauvoir-sur-Niort and Saint-Maixent-l’Ecole in 1978, Sainte-Soline and Courlay in 1980, Saint-Loup-Lamaire in 1984, Niort in 1997, Sepvret in 1999, Saint-Varent in 2009, Saint-Maixent-l’Ecole in 2014, Airvault to Viennay in 2015, Parthenay in 2022 and Coulon in 2025. The classifications are mixed: some A or B cases are identified or probably identified, several C cases lack reliable data, and Sainte-Soline is listed as D.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frGeipan Recherche de cas | GEIPANGeipan Recherche de cas | GEIPAN
GEIPAN’s classification system matters because it prevents a common misunderstanding. A category A case is considered identified after investigation, B is probably identified, C is not identified because the data are insufficient, and D is not identified after investigation. Since 2008, GEIPAN has also described cases through two central ideas: “strangeness”, meaning how far the report remains from known explanations, and “consistency”, meaning how much reliable, objective information is available.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frGeipan Classification | GEIPANGeipan Classification | GEIPAN
For Deux-Sèvres, that distinction is essential. A C case can sound mysterious in a short retelling, but its official meaning is often “we cannot work this properly”, not “something extraordinary survived a strong investigation”. Conversely, a D case such as Sainte-Soline carries more weight because the official file says no explanation was found, though that still does not convert a witness report into proof of an exotic craft.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
The Sainte-Soline case is the department’s unresolved anchor
The most important Deux-Sèvres case in the GEIPAN archive is Sainte-Soline, dated 16 August 1980. GEIPAN summarises it as the observation of a luminous object shaped like a mushroom cap. At about 3.30 am, a witness returning from a local dance reportedly saw, above a field, an object estimated at around 15 metres across, giving off a strong red light. The witness approached to roughly 400 metres, became frightened and left; during the journey, the object was said to remain silent and to pass over the village while still emitting red light. GEIPAN notes that no ground or vegetation traces were found and that no explanation was identified.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
This case matters because it has three features that make it stand out from the rest of the departmental record. First, the description is more concrete than a vague “light in the sky”: a shape, colour, estimated size, distance and silence are all part of the report. Secondly, GEIPAN classifies it as D, with the type described as a strange to very strange phenomenon of medium to strong consistency. Thirdly, the lack of physical traces limits what can be done with the report today.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
The main doubt is not that the witness necessarily invented the story; GEIPAN’s own methodology treats witness testimony as central, while also stressing how perception, emotion, memory and later interpretation can change what is reported. The problem is evidential: a single dramatic account without physical effects, photographs, instrumental detection or multiple independent witness chains remains hard to test decades later.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frGeipan Methodology | GEIPANGeipan Methodology | GEIPAN
So Sainte-Soline should be read as Deux-Sèvres’ strongest official unresolved case, but not as a confirmed close encounter. It is better understood as a case where the available file did not allow GEIPAN to reduce the report to a known phenomenon.
The 1978 cluster shows how “UFO waves” can mix real witnesses and weak data
Two Deux-Sèvres reports from early 1978 show why departmental UFO history needs careful sorting. At Beauvoir-sur-Niort on 26 February 1978, several people reportedly saw a silver, bright form in the sky and described a luminous explosion that vanished instantly, with no sound. GEIPAN’s file includes a gendarmerie document and multiple witness entries from places including La Foye-Monjault, Beauvoir-sur-Niort and Périgné, but the conclusion is not exotic: the summary says the brief lights were probably linked to storm activity, and the description notes that gendarmerie patrols observed flashes from distant storms that night.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
Saint-Maixent-l’Ecole, dated 16 March 1978, is different. Witnesses reportedly saw an oval object, red-orange in colour, moving horizontally from the north-east towards the south-west at low altitude and without noise before disappearing behind the landscape. GEIPAN classifies this case as C because of a lack of reliable information. That does not mean the event is disproved; it means the file does not contain enough dependable material to support a confident explanation or a strong unresolved conclusion.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
These two 1978 cases are useful side by side. Beauvoir-sur-Niort shows a report that sounds unusual but is plausibly explained by a known natural setting. Saint-Maixent-l’Ecole shows how a more object-like report can remain officially unresolved only in the weaker sense of “not enough reliable data”. For readers, this is one of the central lessons of the Deux-Sèvres record: “unidentified” is not one category. It can mean explained late, probably explained, insufficiently documented, or genuinely unexplained after a stronger investigation.
The 1980 reports: one strong unresolved file, one weak close-range puzzle
The year 1980 brings the department’s most notable contrast. Sainte-Soline is the stronger unresolved file, while Courlay, reported less than a month later, is intriguing but officially weaker.
Aviation and atmospheric cases point away from spacecraft explanations
Deux-Sèvres has at least one case with an aviation setting. On 26 August 1999, in a file labelled “[AERO XLF]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr. Sepvret”, a pilot on a flight to Paris Charles de Gaulle reportedly saw, for about five seconds, a white incandescent ball on a descending trajectory more than 10 kilometres from the aircraft. GEIPAN concluded that the observation was probably an atmospheric re-entry.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
This is a useful corrective to a common assumption about pilot sightings. A pilot report can be valuable because it may include trained observation and an aviation context, but it is not automatically extraordinary. GEIPAN’s own methodology notes that even experienced sky users can be surprised by celestial bodies, satellites re-entering the atmosphere or meteorites.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frGeipan Methodology | GEIPANGeipan Methodology | GEIPAN
Saint-Loup-Lamaire in 1984 points in a similar direction. A motorist and passenger reportedly saw a cylindrical, javelin-like, scintillating form cross the sky very fast for about three seconds and disappear before the horizon. GEIPAN judged that the description resembled an atmospheric re-entry.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
Taken together, the aviation and fast-sky cases show that not every spectacular light is a “craft” case. In Deux-Sèvres, several reports that might sound dramatic in isolation become more ordinary when duration, trajectory, speed and appearance are compared with known atmospheric events.
Lanterns and sky-tracers explain much of the modern record
From the late 1990s onwards, the most common pattern in the Deux-Sèvres GEIPAN files is not a wave of structured craft but misidentified lights. Two explanations recur: Thai lanterns and sky-tracer projectors.
At Saint-Varent on 10 November 2009, a witness saw a large orange-yellow light while closing the shutters at 6.15 pm. It came from the south-east, made no sound, moved north and disappeared. After the gendarmerie investigation, the witness formally identified the photographed phenomenon as a Thai-style lantern, and GEIPAN classified the case as A.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
Saint-Maixent-l’Ecole on Christmas Day 2014 is similar but classified B: a witness saw two silent, non-flashing red balls moving gently east before disappearing. GEIPAN judged this a probable lantern release, noting the festive night, the slow motion and compatibility with the wind direction recorded at Niort.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
The Airvault-to-Viennay case of 6 September 2015 adds a more complex example. A driver saw eight or nine yellow-orange lights, first in a square and then in an irregular line, stopped to observe, and photographed one of them. GEIPAN found the appearance, colour, weekend timing and close view of one circular orange-yellow light consistent with Thai lanterns, while also noting that the witness’s speed estimate was not reliable. The case was classified B.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
Sky-tracers explain another strand. In Niort, an old observation reported in 2013 but said to have occurred in late August 1997 involved whitish oval shapes turning in a cloudy sky, visible for hours from several places around Niort and Echiré. GEIPAN judged this very probably a sky-tracer: projectors used by nightclubs or events, whose beams can make oval patches on cloud, especially on Saturday nights and during the summer holiday period.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
Coulon on 3 July 2025 shows the same explanation in a recent setting. A witness saw seven or eight small green lights arranged in a circle, rotating, moving jerkily, regrouping into a drop shape, then passing over the house and returning to a circular pattern. GEIPAN found the likely explanation to be event lighting from sky-tracers or similar projectors. Low cloud conditions were considered favourable for projected light patches, Niort was only about 9 kilometres away, and GEIPAN noted that a sky-tracer can be visible at that sort of distance, although no specific local event using one was confirmed.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
These cases matter because they demonstrate a recurring local lesson: the most “structured” light patterns are not always the hardest to explain. Rotating circles, repeated sweeps, oval patches and silent movement across cloud are exactly the features that can make ground-based projectors look aerial.
The Parthenay 2022 case shows why “not identified” can mean “not enough cooperation”
The Parthenay case of 20 October 2022 is one of the more recent unresolved-in-practice reports, but GEIPAN classifies it as C rather than D. At about 7 am, a witness on a terrace saw two intense yellow lights in the north-western sky. One light reportedly moved very rapidly to the right, leaving a brief orange trail before disappearing; the total observation lasted about 15 seconds.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
GEIPAN’s checks reportedly found no aircraft or helicopter in the area at the relevant time, no matching known astronomical fireball, and judged a two-drone explanation unlikely because of the orange trail. But the case still landed in category C because there was only one witness, no photograph, and the witness did not respond to requests for further information.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
This is an important distinction for readers. Parthenay is not presented by GEIPAN as “probably explained”. But neither is it a strong unexplained case. The missing follow-up information is part of the evidence, not a side detail. In a case lasting only seconds, small clarifications about direction, angle, exact timing, weather, view obstruction and the witness’s position can make the difference between a solvable report and an unworkable one.
The older 1954 “flap” belongs in the margins, not the centre
Deux-Sèvres also appears in catalogues of France’s famous 1954 flying-saucer wave, but these older reports are much less secure than the modern GEIPAN files. Patrick Gross’s catalogue of 1954 French cases lists Deux-Sèvres entries including Melle and Parthenay in early October, but the same catalogue flags some as lacking information or credibility, and secondary entries often trace back to older UFO magazines or compilations rather than full official case files.[Ufologie]ufologie.patrickgross.orgOpen source on patrickgross.org.
A Bouillé-Loretz report from August 1954, later published in a UFO magazine, describes a witness seeing a yellow-orange incandescent “cigar” pass between local landmarks for about 15 seconds, travelling roughly from the direction of Thouars towards Montreuil-Bellay. The account is vivid but late-published and thinly corroborated, so it should be treated as folklore-adjacent UFO history rather than a strong evidential case.[Ufologie]ufologie.patrickgross.orgOpen source on patrickgross.org.
There are also scattered references to Saint-Maixent-l’Ecole, Augé and Bressuire in 1954-era compilations or press-derived summaries. One listing says two witnesses at Saint-Maixent-l’Ecole saw a red-orange cigar on 3 October 1954, while another page reproduces a brief report of an oval or haloed luminous object near Bressuire. These accounts help place Deux-Sèvres inside the national 1954 wave, but they are not comparable in evidential quality to GEIPAN files with published investigation summaries, witness forms or gendarmerie documents.[Ufologie]ufologie.patrickgross.orgOpen source on patrickgross.org.
The cautious conclusion is that 1954 gives the department historical texture, not a reliable anchor case. It shows how UFO stories circulated through press snippets, specialist catalogues and later retellings, but it should not dominate a balanced page on Deux-Sèvres UFO history.
What patterns emerge across the department?
The Deux-Sèvres record is small enough to read case by case, but several patterns stand out.
Night-time lights dominate. Many reports involve orange, yellow, red, white or green lights seen at night or in low-light conditions: lantern-like balls, projected shapes on cloud, fast incandescent objects, oval lights or brief luminous explosions. This is typical of many UFO archives because night observations reduce distance and size cues.
Several cases become more ordinary with context. Beauvoir-sur-Niort points towards storm light; Saint-Varent, Saint-Maixent-l’Ecole 2014 and Airvault-to-Viennay point towards lanterns; Niort 1997 and Coulon 2025 point towards sky-tracers; Sepvret 1999 and Saint-Loup-Lamaire 1984 point towards atmospheric re-entry.[Geipan+7Geipan+7Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
How strong is the evidence overall?
The evidence for UFO activity in Deux-Sèvres is real in the limited sense that people made reports, some reports were recorded by gendarmerie or GEIPAN, and several remain in the public archive. It is not strong evidence for alien visitation, secret aircraft or a hidden local phenomenon.
The best evidence is official documentation: GEIPAN case pages, attached questionnaires, gendarmerie records and published investigation conclusions. These are stronger than later UFO catalogues because they usually preserve dates, locations, witness conditions, explanations considered and classification outcomes.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frGeipan Recherche de cas | GEIPANGeipan Recherche de cas | GEIPAN
The main weakness is that most cases rely on human observation without independent measurement. Photographs are absent, failed, or not decisive in several important files; many reports have only one witness; some are old; and some lack precise dates or follow-up answers. GEIPAN’s own classification system is designed for exactly this problem: it separates the apparent strangeness of a report from the consistency of the data available to investigate it.[Geipan+2Geipan]cnes-geipan.frGeipan Classification | GEIPANGeipan Classification | GEIPAN
For a reader trying to judge the department fairly, the most defensible position is this: Deux-Sèvres has one notable official unresolved case at Sainte-Soline, a handful of insufficiently documented puzzling reports, and a broader pattern of explained or probably explained night-light observations. That is not a debunking of every witness, but it does weaken any sweeping claim that the department shows a persistent extraordinary UFO presence.
What a balanced Deux-Sèvres UFO history should remember
Deux-Sèvres is a good example of why local UFO history needs patient sorting rather than excitement or dismissal. The department’s cases are not all the same. A lantern at Saint-Varent, a probable sky-tracer at Coulon, a possible atmospheric re-entry seen by a pilot near Sepvret, an insufficiently documented report at Parthenay and the unresolved Sainte-Soline case each tell a different kind of story.[Geipan+4Geipan+4Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
The most useful takeaway is not that Deux-Sèvres is a UFO hotspot. It is that the department’s archive shows the full range of French UFO investigation in miniature: local witnesses, rural roads, village skies, gendarmerie paperwork, old press echoes, modern projectors, festive lanterns, meteor-like objects, and one case that still resists a tidy explanation.<section class="further-reading-section" data-page-toc-exclude aria-labelledby="further-reading-title"><div class="fr-section-shell"><div class="fr-section-header"><div class="fr-section-heading"><p class="fr-section-kicker">Amazon book picks</p><h3 class="fr-heading" id="further-reading-title">Further Reading</h3></div><p class="fr-intro">Books and field guides related to What Really Happened in Deux Sevres Skies?. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.</p></div><div class="fr-books-grid"><article class="fr-book-card">Book<div class="fr-book-info"><h4 class="fr-book-title">UFOs</h4><p class="fr-book-author">By Leslie Kean</p><p class="fr-book-desc">Explores official investigations and unresolved cases similar to GEIPAN files.</p><div class="fr-book-actions">
See on Amazon</div></div></article><article class="fr-book-card">Book
<div class="fr-book-info"><h4 class="fr-book-title">The Report on Unidentified Flying Objects</h4><p class="fr-book-author">By Edward J. Ruppelt</p><p class="fr-book-desc">Shows how governments evaluate unexplained reports.</p><div class="fr-book-actions">
See on Amazon</div></div></article><article class="fr-book-card">Book
<div class="fr-book-info"><h4 class="fr-book-title">The UFO Experience</h4><p class="fr-book-author">By Joseph Allen Hynek</p><p class="fr-book-desc">Focuses on case classification and investigation methods.</p><div class="fr-book-actions">
See on Amazon</div></div></article><article class="fr-book-card">Book
<div class="fr-book-info"><h4 class="fr-book-title">The Believing Brain</h4><p class="fr-book-author">By Michael Shermer</p><p class="fr-book-desc">Helps explain why unusual experiences are interpreted in different ways.</p><div class="fr-book-actions">
See on Amazon</div></div></article></div><div class="fr-section-footer"><div class="fr-browse-links" aria-label="Browse more on Amazon">Browse more on Amazon:UFOsThe Report on Unidentified Flying ObjectsThe UFO Experience</div><p class="fr-disclosure">As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.</p></div></div></section><section class="further-reading-section" data-page-toc-exclude data-ebay-localized-links data-ebay-visual-market="EBAY_GB" aria-labelledby="merchant-block-title"><div class="fr-section-shell"><div class="fr-section-header"><div class="fr-section-heading"><p class="fr-section-kicker">eBay marketplace picks</p><h3 class="fr-heading" id="merchant-block-title">Marketplace Samples</h3></div><p class="fr-intro">Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.</p><div class="fr-ebay-market-toolbar"><div class="fr-ebay-market-picker">UsingUSA<div class="fr-ebay-market-menu" data-ebay-market-menu role="listbox" hidden></div></div></div></div><div class="fr-ebay-market-panel" data-ebay-market-panel="EBAY_GB" data-ebay-market-default="1"><div class="fr-books-grid"><article class="fr-book-card">
<div class="fr-book-info"><p class="fr-book-kicker">Example eBay listing</p><h4 class="fr-book-title">America. New France Map 1719. La Nouvelle France En 1719. Framed Print. Antique.</h4>SearcheBay.co.uk: France map print<div class="fr-book-actions">
Browse similar oneBay.co.uk</div></div></article><article class="fr-book-card">
<div class="fr-book-info"><p class="fr-book-kicker">Example eBay listing</p><h4 class="fr-book-title">Map Of France Educational Poster Travel Tourism Physical Map Print - A5 A4 A3</h4>SearcheBay.co.uk: France map print<div class="fr-book-actions">
Browse similar oneBay.co.uk</div></div></article><article class="fr-book-card">
<div class="fr-book-info"><p class="fr-book-kicker">Example eBay listing</p><h4 class="fr-book-title">France Map Poster | Laminated Educational Wall Art Print for Schools & Home</h4>SearcheBay.co.uk: France map print<div class="fr-book-actions">
Browse similar oneBay.co.uk</div></div></article><article class="fr-book-card">
<div class="fr-book-info"><p class="fr-book-kicker">Example eBay listing</p><h4 class="fr-book-title">France Map Poster Laminated Poster Educational School Wall Art Print A5 - A1</h4>SearcheBay.co.uk: France map print<div class="fr-book-actions">
Browse similar oneBay.co.uk</div></div></article></div><div class="fr-section-footer">
Browse more oneBay.co.uk<p class="fr-disclosure">Example items shown for inspiration; availability and pricing can change. Branchoria may earn a commission if you purchase through outbound eBay links.</p></div></div></div></section>
Endnotes
1.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/1980-08-01694
2.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: Geipan Classification | GEIPAN
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/node/58787
3.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: Geipan Methodology | GEIPAN
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/node/58788
4.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: Geipan Recherche de cas | GEIPAN
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=34%2C8&sort=asc
5.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/1978-02-00490
6.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/1978-03-00499
7.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/1980-09-00804
8.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/1999-08-01537
9.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/1984-02-01018
10.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2009-11-02462
11.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2014-12-09063
12.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2015-09-09311
13.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/1997-08-08418
14.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2025-07-51666
15.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2022-10-51426
16.
Source: ufologie.patrickgross.org
Link:https://ufologie.patrickgross.org/1954/1954f.htm
17.
Source: ufologie.patrickgross.org
Link:https://www.ufologie.patrickgross.org/1954/begoct1954parthenay2f.htm
18.
Source: ufologie.patrickgross.org
Link:https://ufologie.patrickgross.org/1954/aug1954bouilleloretzf.htm
19.
Source: ufologie.patrickgross.org
Link:https://ufologie.patrickgross.org/1954/2oct1954lusignan2f.htm
20.
Source: ufologie.patrickgross.org
Link:https://ufologie.patrickgross.org/1954/3oct1954bressuiref.htm
21.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/en/search/cas?field_date_value=2024-08-12&field_is_new_value=1&order=title&page=3%2C4&sort=desc
22.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/en/search/cas?field_date_valu_valu=04-23&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_classification_des_cas&page=%2C291&sort=asc
23.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/
24.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/search/cas?customGetLattitude=46.124763699209396&customGetLongitude=2.406005859375001&customGetZoom=6&field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=50.52739681329302&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=41.72213058512578&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=8.745117187500002&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=-3.9331054687500004&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=%2C4&sort=asc&undefined=
25.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=2021-11-23&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=1&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_classification_des_cas&page=4%2C1&sort=desc
26.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=2021-06-26&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=1&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=4%2C1&sort=asc
27.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B0%5D=14&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B1%5D=15&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B2%5D=16&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=1&select-category-export=nothing&sort=asc
28.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas?field_agregation_index_value=Ain&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=title&page=%2C27&sort=asc
29.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=avion&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=5&sort=asc
30.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas?field_agregation_index_value=Ain&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation_textuel&page=%2C135&sort=desc
31.
Source: rr0.org
Link:https://rr0.org/org/eu/fr/cnes/geipan
32.
Source: ufologie.patrickgross.org
Link:https://ufologie.patrickgross.org/1954/26sep1954chabeuil.htm
33.
Source: ufologie.patrickgross.org
Link:https://ufologie.patrickgross.org/1954/30sep1954marcillysurviennef.htm
34.
Source: ufologie.patrickgross.org
Link:https://www.ufologie.patrickgross.org/1954/8nov1954latessouallef.htm
35.
Source: ufologie.patrickgross.org
Link:https://ufologie.patrickgross.org/1954/2oct1954dieuzef.htm
36.
Source: ufologie.patrickgross.org
Link:https://ufologie.patrickgross.org/1954/2oct1954favergesf.htm
37.
Source: ufologie.patrickgross.org
Link:https://ufologie.patrickgross.org/1954/24sep1954digesf.htm
38.
Source: vivre-a-niort.com
Link:https://www.vivre-a-niort.com/fileadmin/ville/archives/VAN/2014/avril/data/catalogue.pdf
39.
Source: cnes.fr
Link:https://cnes.fr/projets/geipan
40.
Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hn2xTieploU
41.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Geipan: France is also interested in UFOs
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OLXDikL331Y
42.
Source: youtube.com
Title: GEIPAN: Tout savoir sur les OVNIS et Phénomènes Aérospatiaux (PAN)
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CWt2zkuxRNQ
Additional References
43.
Source: youtube.com
Title: UFOs: GEIPAN is working on the issue (Toulouse)
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nnOX-NXZFqE
44.
Source: deux-sevres.fr
Link:https://www.deux-sevres.fr/les-festivals-en-deux-sevres
45.
Source: facebook.com
Title: croyez vous aux ovnis en 1989 la belgique était secouée par le témoignage de 2 g
Link:https://www.facebook.com/RTLTVI/videos/croyez-vous-aux-ovnis-en-1989-la-belgique-%C3%A9tait-secou%C3%A9e-par-le-t%C3%A9moignage-de-2-g/2244045665999777/
46.
Source: facebook.com
Title: témoin dun ovni en 1986 ce pilote français raconte pour la première fois les dét
Link:https://www.facebook.com/100044394970859/posts/t%C3%A9moin-dun-ovni-en-1986-ce-pilote-fran%C3%A7ais-raconte-pour-la-premi%C3%A8re-fois-les-d%C3%A9t/1278500640306423/
47.
Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C94mtZ8L7R4
48.
Source: instagram.com
Title: Clément (@theclems) • Instagram photos and videos Guide-conférencier
Link:https://www.instagram.com/theclems/
49.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Ancient Aliens: French Government EXPOSES Evidence of UFOs (Special) | History
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2wBIkZ646gA
50.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Liste der Kantone im Département Deux Sèvres
Link:https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liste_der_Kantone_im_D%C3%A9partement_Deux-S%C3%A8vres
51.
Source: fildelhistoire.com
Title: Le Gendarme des Extraterrestres
Link:https://fildelhistoire.com/2025/10/17/le-gendarme-des-extraterrestres/
52.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Police officers confront the unexplained
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BUgjzQ7vpsg
Topic Tree
Follow this branch
Related pages 95
- Manche UFOs
- Ariege UFOs
- Correze UFOs
- Dordogne UFOs
- Hautes Pyrenees UFOs
- +90 more in sidebar