What Really Happened in Tarn’s UFO Files?

Introduction

The case that gives Tarn its strongest place in French UFO history is the 1989 Bertre incident, often known as “Les Tuiles”. It involved a bright, silent object reported above a house roof, followed by allegedly displaced and discoloured tiles. GEIPAN still classifies it as an unexplained D case. That makes it interesting, but not conclusive: the file is stronger than a fleeting light in the sky, yet still depends heavily on witness testimony, site interpretation, and later assessment of physical traces.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr. Overview image for What Really Happened in Tarn's UFO Files?

What the official record says about Tarn

The most useful starting point is GEIPAN, the French public body within CNES that collects, analyses and publishes reports of unidentified aerospace phenomena. CNES says GEIPAN was created in 1977, works with partners including the gendarmerie, police, Air and Space Force, CNRS and Météo-France, and publishes documented accounts on its website after investigation.[CNES]cnes.frGEIPAN | CNESGEIPAN | CNES

GEIPAN’s categories matter because they prevent a simple “real or fake” reading of the Tarn record. Class A means identified after investigation, B means probably identified, C means not identified because the data are insufficient, and D means not identified after investigation. GEIPAN also explains that its classification weighs two ideas: residual strangeness after comparison with known explanations, and consistency, meaning the quantity and reliability of the collected information.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frGeipan Methodology | GEIPANGeipan Methodology | GEIPAN

For Tarn, an independent map built from GEIPAN/CNES public data lists 26 cases: 6 class A, 8 class B, 11 class C and 1 class D. The same summary shows that Albi is the most frequently represented commune in the department’s public case list, followed by Castres, Labruguière and Gaillac.[CarteOvni.fr]carteovni.frCarte Ovni.fr OVN I dans le Tarn (81) — Carte Ovni.frCarte Ovni.fr OVN I dans le Tarn (81) — Carte Ovni.fr That pattern does not prove those places are “hotspots” in any physical sense. It more likely reflects population, reporting routes, visibility, local media attention and the uneven survival of records.

The national context is also important. CNES says only a small share of all GEIPAN cases remain unexplained after investigation, while a much larger share are identified, probably identified, or unresolved for lack of data.[CNES]cnes.frGEIPAN | CNESGEIPAN | CNES Tarn fits that wider French pattern: most reports are not landmark mysteries; they are ordinary-looking case files where aircraft, balloons, astronomical objects, brief observation time or poor data are central to the assessment. What Really Happened in Tarn's UFO Files? illustration 1

The Bertre roof case is Tarn’s landmark incident

The Bertre case took place on 4 September 1989, around 4.30 am, at “Les Tuiles” in Tarn. GEIPAN summarises the report as the observation of a very bright object stationary above a roof, followed by unexplained effects on roof tiles. The witness, who had insomnia, saw a strong glow through an open window, then a roughly 10-metre square of light in a lucerne field below. According to the GEIPAN case summary, the light came from a stationary, multi-faceted, spinning-top-shaped object above the house roof; after about 30 seconds it disappeared suddenly without sound or smell.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.

What makes the case more substantial than many brief night-sky reports is the alleged physical aftermath. GEIPAN states that the witness later found canal-type roof tiles that had become brownish and had shifted, creating a leak. A contractor who repaired the roof reportedly confirmed that tiles were twisted clockwise over a length of three to five metres and that the ridge had sagged at the location associated with the observation. SEPRA, GEIPAN’s predecessor within the CNES system, did not find an explanation.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.

Local press treatment helped fix the incident in Tarn’s UFO memory. A 2003 article in La Dépêche du Midi described the witness, François Aujoulet of Bertre, being woken by a light over a field, then reporting a silent material-looking object projecting a bright area of light. The same article noted that the gendarmerie drew up a report, SEPRA investigators visited and samples were taken, but no scientific explanation had been given.[ladepeche.fr]ladepeche.frOvnis: l'étrange triangle tarnaisOvnis: l'étrange triangle tarnais

The case still needs caution. Its strongest points are the official file, the on-site investigation history, the roof-tile claim, and the fact that GEIPAN continues to classify it as D. Its weaknesses are equally important: it appears to rest on a very small witness base, the observation lasted less than a minute, and the interpretation of roof damage depends on linking later physical findings to the sighting rather than to mundane building, weathering or structural causes. In other words, Bertre is not evidence that an extraordinary craft was present; it is evidence that a puzzling report with claimed material traces resisted the explanation available to the official investigators.

Why the weaker cases still matter

Most Tarn entries are not like Bertre. Many are useful precisely because they show how easily a strange report can remain technically “unidentified” without becoming a strong mystery.

Castelnau-de-Montmiral in 1975 is a good example. A witness travelling along a local road reported being frightened by a luminous spherical object that moved vertically and silently. GEIPAN later noted that the Moon was setting west-north-west in the same general direction as the observation, and that a Moon partly masked by low cloud could have contributed to the impression of a roughly spherical light. GEIPAN still classed the case as C, not because the Moon explanation solved every detail, but because the remaining data were not precise enough to settle the apparent motion and local atmospheric conditions.[Geipan]geipan.frOpen source on geipan.fr.

The 2015 Castres case shows another common problem: an observation can sound dramatic, yet fail because the geometry is missing. The witness reported two close observations of an orange or grey object, including a rapid vertical descent and later movement back towards the zenith. GEIPAN’s summary lists missing angular data, missing azimuths for appearance and disappearance, incomplete information about possible condensation trails, and unknown durations for phases of the observation; the case was classed C for lack of reliable information.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.

The 2015 Sérénac case is even more compressed. A witness saw, for only two or three seconds, a silent, straight-moving luminous object with bright green and orange colours. GEIPAN considered the observation strange and did not exclude a drone, but the short duration, lack of photograph and lack of additional witness evidence made the file too thin to investigate properly. It too was classed C.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.

These cases matter because they explain the difference between “unexplained” and “strong”. A C case is not a hidden D case. It is usually a case where the record cannot carry the weight readers may want to put on it. What Really Happened in Tarn's UFO Files? illustration 2

Identified cases show the usual traps

Recent Tarn cases also show how normal objects can look odd under everyday viewing conditions. At Marssac-sur-Tarn in 2020, a driver stopped after seeing a dark, shape-changing object in the sky and took two photos and two videos. GEIPAN classed the case B, a probable balloon, because the object’s shape, dark colour and path were consistent with a balloon and the indicated trajectory matched the wind direction. The photos and videos did not show the object clearly enough to validate the hypothesis fully, but the overall strangeness was low.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.

At Ambres in 2024, a witness reported a bright light, coloured lights, a rectangular luminous area and a soft engine noise. GEIPAN identified the case as a class A airliner sighting. The investigation matched the observation with a Lufthansa flight approaching Toulouse, with navigation data, aircraft lighting, landing lights, altitude and timing all fitting the reported path closely enough for a firm identification.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.

These examples are valuable for Tarn readers because they give a practical filter for older cases. Bright lights, colour changes, silence, apparent hovering or unusual shape do not automatically imply an exotic object. Aircraft seen head-on, landing lights, balloons, drones, the Moon near the horizon and very brief viewing windows can all produce sincere but misleading impressions.

Local memory is wider than the official case list

The official GEIPAN list is not the whole of Tarn’s UFO folklore. Local journalism and local investigators have claimed a broader history. In 2003, La Dépêche du Midi reported that Didier Gomez of the Tarn association Planète Ovni had counted 73 unusual phenomena in Tarn since 1952, while also noting that many had found down-to-earth explanations. The same article named the 1989 Bertre case and a 1997 “blue ball” reported by multiple witnesses around Albi, Puygouzon and Carmaux as among the more significant local stories.[ladepeche.fr]ladepeche.frOvnis: l'étrange triangle tarnaisOvnis: l'étrange triangle tarnais

That wider local count should be treated carefully. It is useful as evidence of local interest and archive-building, not as a verified catalogue of unexplained events. Local UFO groups often preserve witness memories and press clippings that would otherwise disappear, but their counts may combine strong cases, weak cases, duplicates, rumours, explained sightings and reports that never reached official investigation.

The 1997 material illustrates the problem. The local press account of a “blue ball” is more vivid than many official summaries, but the GEIPAN-derived public listing for Gaillac in May 1997 describes a much thinner class C case: a witness saw luminous “streaks” with a small trail for a few seconds, with no other information available.[CarteOvni.fr]carteovni.frgaillac 1997 0501660gaillac 1997 0501660 The difference does not mean one source is lying; it shows how local memory, media narration and official case construction can preserve different versions of what people thought mattered. What Really Happened in Tarn's UFO Files? illustration 3

The best reading of Tarn’s UFO history

Tarn’s UFO record is best read as a layered local archive rather than a single mystery. At the centre is Bertre, the one case that remains officially unexplained after investigation and includes a claimed physical trace. Around it sits a ring of class C reports: sometimes intriguing, sometimes dramatic, but weakened by short duration, single witnesses, missing direction data, lack of photographs or uncertain dates. Around those are class A and B cases where GEIPAN found or favoured ordinary explanations such as aircraft and balloons.[Geipan+3Geipan+3Geipan]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.

The main lesson is not that Tarn is a hidden UFO capital. It is that the department provides a compact example of how French UFO investigation works at ground level. A report begins with a witness; it may pass through the gendarmerie, local press or GEIPAN; investigators compare it with aircraft, astronomy, weather, human perception and available physical evidence; and the final label depends as much on data quality as on strangeness.[Geipan]cnes-geipan.frGeipan Methodology | GEIPANGeipan Methodology | GEIPAN

For readers trying to judge the cases, three questions are more useful than asking whether a sighting was “real”. Was there more than one independent witness? Was the direction, duration, elevation and timing recorded precisely enough to test aircraft, astronomy or weather explanations? Did any photograph, video, radar return or physical trace survive in a form that can be checked independently? In Tarn, only Bertre comes close to becoming a landmark case under those tests, and even there the evidence supports caution rather than certainty.

Conclusion

Tarn’s UFO history is modest but revealing. It has one officially unexplained flagship case, several under-documented but interesting reports, and a larger local memory shaped by press coverage and private investigators. The strongest evidence belongs to the Bertre roof incident because it combines a detailed official file, alleged physical effects and a continuing D classification. The strongest doubts are also clear: limited witnesses, short observations and the difficulty of proving that later physical traces were caused by the reported phenomenon.

That balance is what makes Tarn worth studying. It is not a department where the evidence justifies dramatic claims. It is a department where the boundary between unexplained, weakly sourced and explained cases can be seen unusually clearly.<section class="further-reading-section" data-page-toc-exclude aria-labelledby="further-reading-title"><div class="fr-section-shell"><div class="fr-section-header"><div class="fr-section-heading"><p class="fr-section-kicker">Amazon book picks</p><h3 class="fr-heading" id="further-reading-title">Further Reading</h3></div><p class="fr-intro">Books and field guides related to What Really Happened in Tarn's UFO Files?. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.</p></div><div class="fr-books-grid"><article class="fr-book-card">Book<div class="fr-book-info"><h4 class="fr-book-title">The UFO Experience</h4><p class="fr-book-author">By Joseph Allen Hynek</p><p class="fr-book-desc">Fits a broad overview of regional UFO files.</p><div class="fr-book-actions"> See on Amazon</div></div></article><article class="fr-book-card">Book<div class="fr-book-info"><h4 class="fr-book-title">UFOs</h4><p class="fr-book-author">By Leslie Kean</p><p class="fr-book-desc">Offers broader context for official cases.</p><div class="fr-book-actions"> See on Amazon</div></div></article><article class="fr-book-card">Book<div class="fr-book-info"><h4 class="fr-book-title">Passport to Magonia</h4><p class="fr-book-author">By Jacques Vallee</p><p class="fr-book-desc">Strong match for French UFO history.</p><div class="fr-book-actions"> See on Amazon</div></div></article><article class="fr-book-card">Book<div class="fr-book-info"><h4 class="fr-book-title">The Demon-haunted World</h4><p class="fr-book-author">By Carl Sagan</p><p class="fr-book-desc">Supports the page's focus on ordinary explanations.</p><div class="fr-book-actions"> See on Amazon</div></div></article></div><div class="fr-section-footer"><div class="fr-browse-links" aria-label="Browse more on Amazon">Browse more on Amazon:The UFO Experience UFOs Passport to Magonia</div><p class="fr-disclosure">As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.</p></div></div></section><section class="further-reading-section" data-page-toc-exclude data-ebay-localized-links data-ebay-visual-market="EBAY_GB" aria-labelledby="merchant-block-title"><div class="fr-section-shell"><div class="fr-section-header"><div class="fr-section-heading"><p class="fr-section-kicker">eBay marketplace picks</p><h3 class="fr-heading" id="merchant-block-title">Marketplace Samples</h3></div><p class="fr-intro">Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.</p><div class="fr-ebay-market-toolbar">Shop location<div class="fr-ebay-market-picker">UsingUSA<div class="fr-ebay-market-menu" data-ebay-market-menu role="listbox" hidden></div></div></div></div><div class="fr-ebay-market-panel" data-ebay-market-panel="EBAY_GB" data-ebay-market-default="1"><div class="fr-books-grid"><article class="fr-book-card"><div class="fr-book-info"><p class="fr-book-kicker">Example eBay listing</p><h4 class="fr-book-title">Paul the Alien Garage Figure Collectable Statue Handmade 90Cm ⚠️FULL PAINTED ⚠️</h4>SearcheBay.co.uk: UFO collectible figure<div class="fr-book-actions"> Browse similar oneBay.co.uk</div></div></article><article class="fr-book-card"><div class="fr-book-info"><p class="fr-book-kicker">Example eBay listing</p><h4 class="fr-book-title">Varginha Alien Figure on Display Stand – Metallic Bronze UFO Lore Statue | Gift</h4>SearcheBay.co.uk: UFO collectible figure<div class="fr-book-actions"> Browse similar oneBay.co.uk</div></div></article><article class="fr-book-card"><div class="fr-book-info"><p class="fr-book-kicker">Example eBay listing</p><h4 class="fr-book-title">VINTAGE SILVERCORN ALIEN FIGURE GREEN TUBE UFO 1999</h4>SearcheBay.co.uk: UFO collectible figure<div class="fr-book-actions"> Browse similar oneBay.co.uk</div></div></article><article class="fr-book-card"><div class="fr-book-info"><p class="fr-book-kicker">Example eBay listing</p><h4 class="fr-book-title">Green alien figurine on a stand model Area 51 UFO space alien 24cm</h4>SearcheBay.co.uk: UFO collectible figure<div class="fr-book-actions"> Browse similar oneBay.co.uk</div></div></article></div><div class="fr-section-footer"> Browse more oneBay.co.uk<p class="fr-disclosure">Example items shown for inspiration; availability and pricing can change. Branchoria may earn a commission if you purchase through outbound eBay links.</p></div></div></div></section>

Endnotes

1. Source: carteovni.fr
Title: Carte Ovni.fr OVN I dans le Tarn (81) — Carte Ovni.fr
Link:https://carteovni.fr/departement/tarn

2. Source: cnes.fr
Title: GEIPAN | CNES
Link:https://cnes.fr/en/projects/geipan

3. Source: ladepeche.fr
Title: Ovnis: l’étrange triangle tarnais
Link:https://www.ladepeche.fr/article/2003/03/05/295727-ovnis-l-etrange-triangle-tarnais.html

4. Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/en/node/46752?field=&order=title&page=26&sort=asc

5. Source: carteovni.fr
Title: gaillac 1997 0501660
Link:https://carteovni.fr/cas/gaillac-1997-0501660

6. Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=19&sort=desc

7. Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas?field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&page=%2C542&select-category-export=nothing

8. Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas?field_date_valu_valu=04-23&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation&page=%2C544&sort=desc

9. Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/sites/default/files/15_VALLEE_full.pdf

10. Source: carteovni.fr
Title: Cas OVNI faute d’information (classe C) en France
Link:https://carteovni.fr/classification/c

11. Source: carteovni.fr
Title: albi 1977 0200395
Link:https://carteovni.fr/cas/albi-1977-0200395

12. Source: youtube.com
Title: UFOs: GEIPAN is working on the issue (Toulouse)
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nnOX-NXZFqE

13. Source: youtube.com
Title: Geipan: France is also interested in UFOs
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OLXDikL331Y

14. Source: youtube.com
Title: GEIPAN: Tout savoir sur les OVNIS et Phénomènes Aérospatiaux (PAN)
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CWt2zkuxRNQ

<summary>Source snippet</summary><p>Extraterrestrial life: proof coming soon?…</p>

15. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: Geipan Methodology | GEIPAN
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/node/58788

16. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/1989-09-01666

17. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: Geipan La méthodologie de classification au GEIPAN | GEIPAN
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/actualites/methodologie-classification-geipan

18. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/en/node/59627

19. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2015-11-09357

20. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2020-11-51130

21. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2024-09-51575

22. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/Dossier%20presse-R.pdf

23. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B0%5D=12&order=field_departement_textuel&page=7%2C37&sort=desc

24. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/Temoignage%20direct-R137.pdf

25. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=147%2C11&sort=asc

26. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: GEIPA N / CNESNo information is available for this page
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/node/58792

27. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/29_LAGRANGE_full.pdf

28. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/

29. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=orange&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=26%2C27&sort=asc

30. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/PV%20n%C2%B025%20%282008309999%29.pdf

31. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/save_json_import_files/export_cas_pub_20251127093552.csv

32. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?customGetLattitude=46.124763699209396&customGetLongitude=2.406005859375001&customGetZoom=6&field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=50.52739681329302&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=41.72213058512578&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=8.745117187500002&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=-3.9331054687500004&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=19&sort=desc&undefined=

33. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas?field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation&page=%2C203&sort=desc

34. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: Compte rendu enquete807
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/Compte%20rendu%20enquete807.pdf

35. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2020-08-51050

36. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/Compte%20rendu%20enquete94.pdf

37. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_date_value=2020-11-18&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=1&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=2&sort=desc

38. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/Etude_psycho_1981_2.pdf

39. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas?field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=title&page=%2C137&sort=desc

40. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas?field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date&page=%2C120&sort=asc

41. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation&page=3%2C12&s=09&sort=asc

42. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=avion&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=title&page=26&sort=desc

43. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/en/search/cas?field_date_value=2007-03-01&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date&page=%2C117&sort=desc

44. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/en/search/cas?field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B13%5D=13&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date&page=%2C161&sort=asc

45. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: Compte rendu enquete487
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/Compte%20rendu%20enquete487.pdf

46. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/node/412

47. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: baisse cas d
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/actualites/baisse-cas-d

48. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/1993-11-01335

49. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/1980-03-00751

50. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/node/58894?page=%2C45

51. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/Compte%20rendu%20enquete6.pdf

52. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/Compte%20rendu%20enquete9.pdf

53. Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: Compte rendu enquete171
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/Compte%20rendu%20enquete171.pdf

54. Source: Wikipedia
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GEIPAN

55. Source: uapedia.ai
Link:https://uapedia.ai/wiki/geipan-frances-official-uap-unit/

56. Source: ufosightingsmap.com
Link:https://ufosightingsmap.com/sightings

57. Source: academieairespace.com
Link:https://academieairespace.com/event/geipan-studies-uaps-ufos/?lang=en

58. Source: uap-knowledge-graph.onrender.com
Link:https://uap-knowledge-graph.onrender.com/uap_deploy/events?_facet=country&_facet=obs_anti_gravity&_facet_date=scoring_updated_at&_sort_desc=description&country=fr

Additional References

59. Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/CNESFrance/posts/ne-dites-plus-ovni-mais-plut%C3%B4t-pan-cest-le-terme-utilis%C3%A9-par-le-geipan-notre-gro/10163463849650301/

60. Source: amazon.com
Link:https://www.amazon.com/OVNI-ans-d%C3%A9sinformation-Fran%C3%A7ois-Parmentier/dp/2268049892?tag=searcht-20

61. Source: reddit.com
Link:https://www.reddit.com/r/todayilearned/comments/1qa0lyb/til_that_france_has_a_dedicated_unit_to_finding/

62. Source: ijkecd.com
Link:https://www.ijkecd.com/doi/10.5005/jp-journals-10025-1105

63. Source: researchgate.net
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/figure/The-ABCD-grading-classification-system-The-upper-portion-available-as-a-drop-down-menu_fig5_318764577

64. Source: youtube.com
Title: Extraterrestrial life: proof coming soon?
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hkDXEZPb1B0

<summary>Source snippet</summary><p>VALENSOLE 1965 - Bande annonce officielle…</p>

65. Source: cinergie.be
Title: ovnis le mystere belge de bram conjaerts et maarten bernaerts
Link:https://www.cinergie.be/actualites/ovnis-le-mystere-belge-de-bram-conjaerts-et-maarten-bernaerts

66. Source: ovniarchive.com
Link:https://ovniarchive.com/doc/10338?lang=en

67. Source: ufotransparency.com
Title: intl fr geipan bertre 1989 compte rendu enquete r2
Link:https://ufotransparency.com/files/intl-fr-geipan-bertre-1989-compte-rendu-enquete-r2

68. Source: reddit.com
Title: the ufo abduction of linda cortile in nyc 1989
Link:https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/rkexk4/the_ufo_abduction_of_linda_cortile_in_nyc_1989/?tl=fr

What Really Happened in Tarn's UFO Files?