Within Marne UFOs
Did Marne's Car Cases Prove Anything?
Two motorists reported light flashes and brief car failures, but later GEIPAN review left the evidence too weak for a firm unknown.
On this page
- What the drivers reported
- Why GEIPAN linked the two cases
- Why the files were downgraded
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
The Broyes and Sommesous vehicle cases are among Marne’s most memorable UFO reports because they sound, at first, like the classic “car stopped by a mysterious light” story. Two drivers, ten days apart, reported sudden light effects and brief vehicle failure on roads in the south of the department. Yet GEIPAN, the French official body that studies unidentified aerospace phenomena for CNES, eventually downgraded both files to category C: not a confirmed unknown, but a case too weakly documented to analyse reliably.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
That makes the pair important for a Marne UFO history page, not because they prove anything extraordinary, but because they show how a striking witness story can lose evidential strength under review. The core lesson is simple: a case can remain unsettling while still falling short of an official “unexplained after investigation” classification.
What the Drivers Reported
The first report came from Broyes on 10 January 2000, between about 21:00 and 21:05. A motorist driving alone on the D39 near the village water tower said a very intense light suddenly entered the car through the sunroof. According to the GEIPAN summary, the engine and car radio stopped while the ignition remained on. The witness said the light faded, the radio worked again, and the car could be restarted. Gendarmes went to the witness’s home and then to the scene shortly afterwards, finding a clear, starry sky, visible air traffic, winter conditions without frost, no public lighting at the location, and no disturbance on the nearby power line. Military sources reported no flight for that evening.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
The underlying investigation report gives the Broyes account more texture. The witness told gendarmes he was driving at roughly 40–50 km/h and had just handled the radio, which showed 21:02. He described being so dazzled that he covered his eyes and tried to lock the door by touch. In the same statement he denied drinking alcohol that night and said he had not used cannabis that evening, although he had used it previously. The report also records that the original estimate of about one minute was later shortened by reconstruction to 15–30 seconds at most.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frGEIPANMicrosoft WordGEIPANMicrosoft Word
The second report concerned Sommesous on 31 December 1999, between about 19:30 and 20:00. A woman driving on the N4 said she saw a whitish flash, not as overwhelming as the Broyes light. Her dashboard warning lights came on, the engine stopped, the car rolled briefly in neutral, and then the engine restarted by itself. She later had the battery terminals checked by a mechanic, with no abnormality found. Her car radio was not on, no noise was heard, and the road had no public lighting.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frGEIPANMicrosoft WordGEIPANMicrosoft Word
The two reports were not identical. Broyes was more dramatic: the light was described as dazzling, entering the vehicle, and causing a stronger emotional reaction. Sommesous was briefer and less physically defined: a flash, dashboard disturbance, a short engine cut-out, and automatic recovery. That difference matters because it weakens the idea of one clearly repeated phenomenon. The shared pattern is real enough to compare, but not tight enough to prove a common cause.
Why GEIPAN Linked the Two Cases
GEIPAN linked Broyes and Sommesous because they were close in time, close in place, and similar in basic structure. The official review says the two observations were only a few kilometres apart in the broader case summary, while the detailed investigation map places the Broyes and Sommesous locations roughly 32 kilometres apart. The reports were ten days apart, and both involved a driver perceiving a light or flash followed by apparent vehicle disturbance.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
The file also explains why the cases were originally grouped. GEIPAN’s 2018 re-examination says they had first been treated together under the case name “SEZANNE-EPERNAY (51) 10.01.2000”, because the gendarmerie report grouped two observations that appeared close in time and space. The Broyes report triggered immediate gendarmerie action, while the Sommesous witness came forward when gendarmes were making enquiries at an EDF office.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frGEIPANMicrosoft WordGEIPANMicrosoft Word
What Makes the Pair Interesting
The cases stand out in Marne because they involve claimed interaction with vehicles, not just distant lights. Many local UFO reports are short observations of lights, possible aircraft, astronomical objects, or ambiguous night-time phenomena. Broyes and Sommesous are different because both witnesses described not only seeing light but also experiencing a practical mechanical or electrical effect.
That is why the cases can feel stronger than ordinary light sightings. A car engine cutting out, a radio stopping, dashboard lights coming on, and a frightened driver returning home are concrete, memorable details. In UFO history, vehicle interference cases often attract attention because they appear to add a physical effect to a visual observation. But in evidence terms, the question is harder: was the vehicle disturbance independently verified, or is it only part of the witness narrative?
In these two files, the answer is mixed. Sommesous had a later mechanical check of the battery terminals, but it found nothing abnormal. Broyes had prompt gendarmerie contact, scene visits, photographs, and a later SEPRA enquiry, but GEIPAN’s re-examination found that much of the detailed material needed to test the claim was missing from the surviving file.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frGEIPANMicrosoft WordGEIPANMicrosoft Word
That is the tension at the heart of the case family. The stories are unusual enough to deserve attention, but the records are not strong enough to support the leap from “unsettling reported experience” to “well-evidenced unexplained event”.
Why the Files Were Downgraded
Both cases were previously classed as D, meaning unexplained after investigation, but GEIPAN’s later review changed them to C. In GEIPAN’s system, category C does not mean “probably alien”, “probably real”, or even “probably unexplained”. It means the case cannot be analysed properly because the available information is insufficient or unreliable. GEIPAN’s glossary states that category C cases are not of the same order as A, B or D cases, because GEIPAN has been unable to reach a conclusion on them.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
The official method explains why this distinction matters. GEIPAN assesses both strangeness and consistency. “Strangeness” is how far the account sits from known explanations after investigation; “consistency” is the quantity and reliability of the information collected. A strange case needs strong information behind it. If the story is odd but the evidence base is weak, it falls into category C rather than category D.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frmethodologie classification geipanmethodologie classification geipan
For Broyes, GEIPAN gave a relatively high strangeness score of 0.70, but only 0.25 for consistency. For Sommesous, the scores were 0.50 for strangeness and 0.10 for consistency. Those numbers capture the official judgement neatly: Broyes sounded stranger, but neither case had enough reliable supporting information to remain a stronger unresolved file.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
GEIPAN gave several reasons for the downgrade:
- Missing investigation detail: although gendarmes and SEPRA investigated Broyes quickly, GEIPAN later had only a short SEPRA report and lacked audio, video, or detailed written records of the interviews and reconstructions.
- Uneven investigation: Sommesous was not investigated on site in the same way as Broyes; the file contained essentially the witness deposition.
- Possible memory influence: the Sommesous witness had heard about Broyes before giving her own account, which could have encouraged comparison.
- Possible cultural influence: for Broyes, GEIPAN noted similarities with science-fiction scenes involving a vehicle being illuminated by an intense light, while also acknowledging that this could not be demonstrated after so many years.
- Unresolved ordinary hypotheses: for Sommesous, GEIPAN mentioned possible physical explanations such as a meteor, camera flash, or fireworks around New Year’s Eve, but also said the file lacked the information needed to weigh those hypotheses properly.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
The downgrade therefore did not solve the cases. It changed the official meaning of their unresolved status. They moved from “unexplained despite the evidence” to “not reliably analysable because the evidence is too thin”.
Did the Car Failures Prove Anything?
The vehicle disturbances are the most intriguing part of the story, but they are also the weakest part evidentially. In Broyes, the engine and radio stoppage were reported by a single driver during a brief and frightening event. In Sommesous, the engine stopped only briefly and restarted by itself, with no fault later found in the battery terminals. Neither file provides instrument data, independent mechanical diagnostics, repeat testing, electromagnetic measurements, or a second witness inside the vehicle.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frGEIPANMicrosoft WordGEIPANMicrosoft Word
This does not make the witnesses dishonest. GEIPAN’s own report says the Broyes witness appeared affected by the experience, and the original enquiry included contact with people around him. But sincerity and evidential strength are separate questions. A sincere person can misperceive a light, misremember timing, connect two events that happened close together, or describe a transient vehicle fault that later cannot be reproduced.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frGEIPANMicrosoft WordGEIPANMicrosoft Word
Nor does an unexplained mechanical symptom automatically point to an exotic cause. A momentary engine cut-out can occur for mundane reasons, especially in older vehicles, and a bright flash on an unlit road can be startling enough to affect perception of what happened next. The problem in these files is that investigators no longer have enough hard detail to separate a true external effect from coincidence, stress, vehicle behaviour, memory reconstruction, or ordinary light sources.
The strongest cautious reading is therefore this: Broyes and Sommesous are valid as reports of unusual driver experiences, but not as proof of a physical UFO effect on cars.
What the Revisit Changed for Marne’s UFO Record
The reassessment matters because it weakens one of Marne’s most dramatic-looking case clusters. Before review, the pair could be read as a small two-case pattern: two motorists, nearby roads, ten days apart, sudden lights, vehicle disruption. After review, the pattern remains interesting, but its official status becomes much more cautious.
The change also shows how GEIPAN’s public archive can evolve. CNES describes GEIPAN as the body responsible for collecting, analysing and archiving reports, with partners including the gendarmerie, police, the air force, CNRS and Météo-France. CNES also records the institutional history: GEPAN was created in 1977, SEPRA replaced it in 1988, and GEIPAN replaced SEPRA in 2005.[CNES]cnes.frGEIPAN | CNESGEIPAN | CNES
That matters here because Broyes and Sommesous straddle institutional eras. The original work belonged to the SEPRA/gendarmerie period; the later public re-evaluation was a GEIPAN review using a more explicit consistency-and-strangeness framework. The result is a useful before-and-after example: what looked like a notable D case became, under later scrutiny, a C case because the file could not carry the weight placed on it.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frGEIPANMicrosoft WordGEIPANMicrosoft Word
For readers following Marne’s UFO history, this makes the cases more instructive rather than less interesting. They show the difference between an eerie local story and a robust unexplained case. They also help explain why the department’s record contains many reports that are worth preserving, but fewer that can support firm conclusions.
The Most Fair-Minded Verdict
Broyes is the stronger and stranger report: a precise location, rapid gendarmerie involvement, a frightened witness, a dramatic light, and a claimed engine and radio failure. Sommesous is the weaker companion report: less precise location, less dramatic light, no full on-site investigation, and a statement made after the witness had heard about Broyes. Together, they form a notable Marne case family, but not a proven unknown.
The fairest conclusion is that later reporting weakened the original claim. It did not expose a simple hoax or produce a clean explanation. It did, however, show that the files lacked the depth needed to support their earlier D status. GEIPAN’s final judgement is careful but clear: both cases are category C because their strangeness is not matched by reliable, sufficient information.[GEIPAN]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
That is why Broyes and Sommesous still belong in Marne’s UFO history. They are not evidence that cars were disabled by an unknown craft. They are evidence of how a compelling regional UFO story can become, on re-examination, a lesson in uncertainty: memorable, unsettling, but too poorly supported to prove what first made it famous.<section class="further-reading-section" data-page-toc-exclude aria-labelledby="further-reading-title"><div class="fr-section-shell"><div class="fr-section-header"><div class="fr-section-heading"><p class="fr-section-kicker">Amazon book picks</p><h3 class="fr-heading" id="further-reading-title">Further Reading</h3></div><p class="fr-intro">Books and field guides related to Did Marne's Car Cases Prove Anything?. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.</p></div><div class="fr-books-grid"><article class="fr-book-card">Book<div class="fr-book-info"><h4 class="fr-book-title">The UFO Experience</h4><p class="fr-book-author">By Joseph Allen Hynek</p><p class="fr-book-desc">Covers close-observation and vehicle-related UFO reports.</p><div class="fr-book-actions">
See on Amazon</div></div></article><article class="fr-book-card">Book
<div class="fr-book-info"><h4 class="fr-book-title">UFOs</h4><p class="fr-book-author">By Leslie Kean</p><p class="fr-book-desc">Provides context for assessing official UFO case investigations.</p><div class="fr-book-actions">
See on Amazon</div></div></article><article class="fr-book-card">Book
<div class="fr-book-info"><h4 class="fr-book-title">The Demon-Haunted World</h4><p class="fr-book-author">By Carl Sagan, Ann Druyan</p><p class="fr-book-popularity">Rating: 4.5/5 from 43 Google Books ratings</p><p class="fr-book-desc">Fits the page's emphasis on evidence quality and uncertainty.</p><div class="fr-book-actions">
See on Amazon</div></div></article><article class="fr-book-card">Book
<div class="fr-book-info"><h4 class="fr-book-title">The Believing Brain</h4><p class="fr-book-author">By Michael Shermer</p><p class="fr-book-desc">Explains how unusual events are interpreted and remembered.</p><div class="fr-book-actions">
See on Amazon</div></div></article></div><div class="fr-section-footer"><div class="fr-browse-links" aria-label="Browse more on Amazon">Browse more on Amazon:The UFO ExperienceUFOsThe Demon Haunted World</div><p class="fr-disclosure">As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.</p></div></div></section><section class="further-reading-section" data-page-toc-exclude data-ebay-localized-links data-ebay-visual-market="EBAY_GB" aria-labelledby="merchant-block-title"><div class="fr-section-shell"><div class="fr-section-header"><div class="fr-section-heading"><p class="fr-section-kicker">eBay marketplace picks</p><h3 class="fr-heading" id="merchant-block-title">Marketplace Samples</h3></div><p class="fr-intro">Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.</p><div class="fr-ebay-market-toolbar"><div class="fr-ebay-market-picker">UsingUSA<div class="fr-ebay-market-menu" data-ebay-market-menu role="listbox" hidden></div></div></div></div><div class="fr-ebay-market-panel" data-ebay-market-panel="EBAY_GB" data-ebay-market-default="1"><div class="fr-books-grid"><article class="fr-book-card">
<div class="fr-book-info"><p class="fr-book-kicker">Example eBay listing</p><h4 class="fr-book-title">Planets Space Solar System Wall Sticker Mural Decal Print Art Astronomy Stars</h4>SearcheBay.co.uk: astronomy wall art<div class="fr-book-actions">
Browse similar oneBay.co.uk</div></div></article><article class="fr-book-card">
<div class="fr-book-info"><p class="fr-book-kicker">Example eBay listing</p><h4 class="fr-book-title">Solar System Orbit Celestial Space Astronomy Poster Print Framed Canvas Wall Art</h4>SearcheBay.co.uk: astronomy wall art<div class="fr-book-actions">
Browse similar oneBay.co.uk</div></div></article><article class="fr-book-card">
<div class="fr-book-info"><p class="fr-book-kicker">Example eBay listing</p><h4 class="fr-book-title">Solar System Framed Wall Print | Sun & Planets Space Art | Astronomy Decor</h4>SearcheBay.co.uk: astronomy wall art<div class="fr-book-actions">
Browse similar oneBay.co.uk</div></div></article><article class="fr-book-card">
<div class="fr-book-info"><p class="fr-book-kicker">Example eBay listing</p><h4 class="fr-book-title">Phases of the Moon Astronomy Full Moon Lunar Space Poster Huge Wall Art 18X24 In</h4>SearcheBay.co.uk: astronomy wall art<div class="fr-book-actions">
Browse similar oneBay.co.uk</div></div></article></div><div class="fr-section-footer">
Browse more oneBay.co.uk<p class="fr-disclosure">Example items shown for inspiration; availability and pricing can change. Branchoria may earn a commission if you purchase through outbound eBay links.</p></div></div></div></section>
Endnotes
1.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: GEIPANMicrosoft Word
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/Compte%20rendu%20enquete190.pdf
2.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/Carte%20lieux%20observations.pdf
3.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/glossaire
4.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: methodologie classification geipan
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/actualites/methodologie-classification-geipan
5.
Source: cnes.fr
Title: GEIPAN | CNES
Link:https://cnes.fr/projets/geipan
6.
Source: cnes.fr
Title: serie ovnis 5 choses savoir geipan
Link:https://cnes.fr/actualites/serie-ovnis-5-choses-savoir-geipan
7.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/sites/default/files/Questionnaire%20terre-R587.pdf
8.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas?field_agregation_index_value=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=title&page=%2C370&sort=asc
9.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=97&s=09&sort=asc
10.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%255B11%255D=11&field_date_d_observation_value%255Bmax%255D=&field_date_d_observation_value%255Bmin%255D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%255Bmax%255D=&field_latitude_value%255Bmin%255D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%255Bmax%255D=&field_longitude_value%255Bmin%255D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation&page=110&sort=desc
11.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_date_value=2004-04-23&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_date_d_observation_textuel&page=%2C22&sort=desc
12.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://www.geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B0%5D=13&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=21&sort=desc
13.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=116&order=field_date_d_observation&page=108&select-category-export=nothing&sort=desc
14.
Source: geipan.fr
Link:https://geipan.fr/fr/cas/2010-10-50728?field_agregation_index_value=Berck
15.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Why Was This UFO Encounter Buried for Decades? | Close Encounters 105
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jM2LDiA3ct0
16.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/2000-01-01542
17.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/cas/1999-12-50497
18.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/en/node/52759
19.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/en/search/cas?field_date_value=2007-03-01&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_departement_textuel&page=%2C368&sort=asc
20.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas/tab?field_agregation_index_value=&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B13%5D=13&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B14%5D=14&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B15%5D=15&field_classification_des_cas_target_id%5B16%5D=16&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_date_value=&field_departement_target_id=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=1&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=57.70414723434193&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=19.642587534013032&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=49.921875&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=-9.843750000000002&field_phenomene_target_id=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_classification_des_cas&page=24%2C15&select-category-export=nothing&sort=asc&video=on
21.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/fr/recherche/cas?field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=title&page=%2C371&sort=asc
22.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: Compte rendu enquete189
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/Compte%20rendu%20enquete189.pdf
23.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://cnes-geipan.fr/en/recherche/cas/tab?field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_date_d_observation_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_document_existe_ou_pas_value=All&field_is_new_value=All&field_is_revisited_value=All&field_latitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_latitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_longitude_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_type_de_cas_target_id=All&order=field_classification_des_cas&page=55&sort=desc
24.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/15_VALLEE_full.pdf
25.
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Title: Procedure classif PAN
Link:https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/Procedure_classif_PAN.pdf
26.
Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hn2xTieploU
Additional References
27.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Meeting France’s UFO detectives • FRANCE 24 English
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zczcBLukQ6s
28.
Source: youtube.com
Title: France’s Official UFO Investigation Agency (GEIPAN)
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lXi5B0NTwVc
29.
Source: youtube.com
Title: UFO Encounter: The Levelland Incident
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VRL9r5kms7g
30.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/France3Occitanie/posts/comment-fonctionne-le-geipan-le-groupe-d%C3%A9tudes-et-dinformations-sur-les-ph%C3%A9nom%C3%A8n/971177045625594/
31.
Source: nationalgeographic.fr
Link:https://www.nationalgeographic.fr/espace/france-qui-se-cache-derriere-le-geipan-le-bureau-des-ovnis-en-france-etrange-enquetes
32.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Groupe d’études et d’informations sur les phénomènes aérospatiaux non identifiés
Link:https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Groupe_d%27%C3%A9tudes_et_d%27informations_sur_les_ph%C3%A9nom%C3%A8nes_a%C3%A9rospatiaux_non_identifi%C3%A9s
33.
Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZgDkf64XkNE
34.
Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=46vv3THsgQE
35.
Source: gendarmerie.interieur.gouv.fr
Title: des gendarmes face aux phenomenes aerospatiaux non identifies
Link:https://www.gendarmerie.interieur.gouv.fr/gendinfo/terrain/immersion/2018/des-gendarmes-face-aux-phenomenes-aerospatiaux-non-identifies
36.
Source: carteovni.fr
Title: sommesous 51
Link:https://carteovni.fr/commune/sommesous-51
Topic Tree